Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:54:39.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Idealised Watchdog Estate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Get access

Summary

‘A man without a newspaper is half-clad, and imperfectly furnished for the battle of life. From being persecuted and then contemptuously tolerated, it has become the rival of organised governments. Will it become their superior?’

W. T. Stead, 1886

‘People were reluctant to confer on newspaper its fully idealised role. The newspaper could act as watchdog of government, but the government also was asked to be a watchdog of the press.’

Denis McQuail, 1976

By claiming a public and essentially democratic purpose, which shapes its other imperatives, the news media has been able to define itself as an institution with a public political, social and cultural role. As a ‘business affected by public purpose’ (Hutchins, 1947: 90), the media has asserted influence across a wide range of endeavours. Indeed it has been argued that the media is central to ‘determining the level of the civilisation in which it operates. Freedom of the press … means freedom to turn that level up or down’ (Hocking, 1947: 45). The contemporary news media has spun the dial in both directions at different times.

The claim to this central, independent status is based largely on the liberal arguments of the Enlightenment, which led to the successful creation of the notion of the press as the Fourth Estate in nineteenth-century Britain, and as an institution of such importance to the democratic process that it must not be limited in the United States. It emerged formally in other countries as well – the Fourth Power in France and Spain, the Third Estate in Sweden with constitutional guarantees of press freedom since 1766, and even, for a time, as the Seventh Power in the former Yugoslavia.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reviving the Fourth Estate
Democracy, Accountability and the Media
, pp. 47 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×