Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T16:28:42.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2021

Michael A. Zilis
Michael A. Zilis
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Rights Paradox
How Group Attitudes Shape US Supreme Court Legitimacy
 , pp. 161 - 172
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Jody L., and Daugherity, Brian J.. 2006. “Recovering a ‘Lost’ Story Using Oral History: The United States Supreme Court’s Historic Green v. New Kent County Virginia Decision.” Oral History Review 33(2): 25–44.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2012. “Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Kolodny, Robin. 2009. “Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 755–770.Google Scholar
Armaly, Miles T. 2018. “Extra-Judicial Actor Induced Change in Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Political Research Quarterly 71(3): 600–613.Google Scholar
Aronson, Eliot, Ellsworth, Phoebe C., Carlsmith, J. Merrill, and Gonzales, M. H.. 1990. Methods of Research in Social Psychology, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Badas, Alex. 2019. “The Applied Legitimacy Index: A New Approach to Measuring Judicial Legitimacy.” Social Science Quarterly 100(5): 1848–1861.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2008. “Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 102(3): 369–384.Google Scholar
Banks, Antoine J., and Hicks, Heather M.. 2015. “Fear and Implicit Racism: Whites’ Support for Voter ID Laws.” Political Psychology 37(5): 641–658.Google Scholar
Banks, Antoine J., and Valentino, Nicholas. 2012. “Emotional Substrates of White Racial Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 56(2): 286–297.Google Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L. 2009. “The Constraining Capacity of Legal Doctrine on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 103(3): 474–495.Google Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Johnston, Christopher D.. 2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 184–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Johnston, Christopher D.. 2020. Curbing the Court: Why the Public Constrains Judicial Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and O’Geen, Andrew J.. 2015. “The Nature of Legal Change on the U.S. Supreme Court: Jurisprudential Regimes Theory and Its Alternatives.” American Journal of Political Science 59(4): 880–895.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2017. Ideology in the Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin, and Vohs, Kathleen D.. 2001. “Bad Is Stronger than Good.” Review of General Psychology 5(4): 323–370.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20(3): 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Ryan C., Owens, Ryan J., Wedeking, Justin, and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2016a. “The Influence of Public Sentiment on Supreme Court Opinion Clarity.” Law and Society Review 50(3): 703–732.Google Scholar
Black, Ryan C., Owens, Ryan J., Wedeking, Justin, and Wohlfarth, Patrick. 2016b. U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and Their Audiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Ryan C., Owens, Ryan J., Wedeking, Justin, and Wohlfarth, Patrick. 2020. The Conscientious Justice: How Supreme Court Justices’ Personalities Influence the Law, the High Court, and the Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Lacari, Frederick C.. 1989. “Education and Political Tolerance: Testing the Effects of Cognitive Sophistication and Target Group Affect.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53(3): 285–308.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas A., and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 959–978.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Sniderman, Paul M.. 1985. “Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning.” American Political Science Review 79(4): 1061–1078.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William R., and Golder, Matt. 2005. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, Bert. 2004. “Brown v. Board of Education and Attacks on the Courts: Fifty Years Ago, Fifty Years Later.” Brennan Center for Justice, www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/Brown%20v.%20Board%20of%20Education%20Attacks%20on%20the%20Courts%2C%2050%20Years%20Ago%2C%2050%20Years%20Later.pdf.Google Scholar
Buhrmester, Michael, Kwang, Tracy, and Gosling, Samuel D.. 2011. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-quality, Data?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1): 3–5.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L.. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 635–664.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., Friedman, Barry, Martin, Andrew D., and Vanberg, Georg. 2012. “Who Controls the Content of Supreme Court Opinions?” American Journal of Political Science 56(2): 400–412.Google Scholar
Casillas, Christopher J., Enns, Peter K., and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 74–88.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.Google Scholar
Christenson, Dino P., and Glick, David M.. 2015. “Chief Justice Roberts’s Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2): 403–418.Google Scholar
Christenson, Dino P., and Glick, David M.. 2019. “Reassessing the Supreme Court: How Decisions and Negativity Bias Affect Legitimacy.” Political Research Quarterly 72(3): 637–652.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2009. “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 971–989.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2011. The Limits of Judicial Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, John A. and McGuire, Kevin T.. 1996. “Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Flag.” Political Research Quarterly 49(4): 771–781.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S., Lax, Jeffrey R., and Rice, Douglas. 2015. “Measuring the Political Salience of Supreme Court Cases.” Journal of Law and Courts 3(1): 37–65.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S., Staton, Jeffrey K., Wang, Yu, and Agichtein, Eugene. 2018. “Using Twitter to Study Public Discourse in the Wake of Judicial Decisions: Public Reactions to the Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Cases.” Journal of Law & Courts 6(1): 93–126.Google Scholar
Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(5): 808–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, Todd A., and Cooper, Christopher A.. 2012. “Case Salience and Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decisions: Towards a New Measure.” Political Research Quarterly 65(2): 396–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Todd A., and Cooper, Christopher A.. 2015. “Making the Cases ‘Real’: Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Supreme Court Cases, 1953–2004.” Political Communication 32(1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1988. “The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking.” British Journal of Political Science 18(1): 51–76.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley. 1984. “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications.” American Journal of Political Science 25(4): 617–645.Google Scholar
Continetti, Matthew. 2019. “Kavanaugh and the Crisis of Legitimacy.” National Review. September 21, 2019, www.nationalreview.com/2019/09/brett-kavanaugh-accusations-democratic-strategy/.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, Apter, David (ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1970. “Attitudes and Non-attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, Tufte, E. R. (ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 168–189.Google Scholar
Crawford, Jerome T., and Pilanski, Janet M.. 2012. “Political Intolerance, Right and Left.” Political Psychology 35(6): 841–851.Google Scholar
Cruz, Ted. 2015. “Constitutional Remedies to a Lawless Supreme Court.” National Review. June 26, 2015, www.nationalreview.com/article/420409/constitutional-remedies-lawless-supreme-court-ted-cruz.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279–295.Google Scholar
Davis, Richard. 2014. “The Symbiotic Relationship between the U.S. Supreme Court and the Press.” In Covering the United States Supreme Court in the Digital Age, Davis, Richard (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4–22.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. 2011. “Experiments: An Introduction to Core Concepts.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drudge Report. 2013. “Gay Day at the High Court: DOMA Unconstitutional.” Drudge Report. June 26, 2013, www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2013/06/26/20130626_171231.htm.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 435–457.Google Scholar
Edwards, Harry T. 1991. “The Judicial Function and the Elusive Goal of Principled Decisionmaking.” Wisconsin Law Review 5: 837–866.Google Scholar
Eggen, Dan. 2010. “Large Majority Opposes Supreme Court’s Decision on Campaign Financing.” Washington Post, www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/17/AR2010021701151.html/02/17/AR2010021701151.html.Google Scholar
Engel, Stephen. 2011. American Politicians Confront the Court: Opposition Politics and Changing Responses to Judicial Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Ho, Daniel E., King, Gary, and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 2005. “The Supreme Court during Crisis.” NYU Law Review 80: 1–116.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1996. “The Norm of Stare Decisis.” American Journal of Political Science 40(4): 1018–1035.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1997. The Choices Justices Make. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 2000. “Toward a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, a Look Ahead.” Political Research Quarterly 53(3): 625–651.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 2013. “Reconsidering Judicial Preferences.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 11–31.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Parker, Christopher M., and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 2018. “Do Justices Defend Speech They Hate? In-Group Bias, Opportunism, and the First Amendment.” Journal of Law and Courts 6(2): 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 66–83.Google Scholar
Farganis, Dion. 2009. “Court Curbing in the Modern Era: Should Supreme Court Justices Really Worry about Attacks from Congress?” SSRN. July 12, 2009, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1430723.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Stenner, Karen. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 18(4): 741–770.Google Scholar
Flemming, Roy B., Bohte, John, and Dan Wood, B.. 1997. “One Voice among Many: The Supreme Court’s Influence on Attentiveness to Issues in the United States, 1947–92.” American Journal of Political Science 41(4): 1224–1250.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Kosaki, Liane C.. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83(3): 751–771.Google Scholar
Gawthorpe, Andrew. 2018. “The Cost of Kavanaugh’s Victory? The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court.” The Guardian. October 7, 2018, www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/07/brett-kavanaugh-victory-high-price-us-supreme-court-republicans.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, and Shapiro, Jesse M.. 2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica 78(1): 35–71.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law & Society Review 23(3): 469–496.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1992. “Alternative Measures of Political Tolerance: Must Tolerance Be ‘Least-Liked’?” American Journal of Political Science 36(2): 560–577.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2015. “Legitimacy Is for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” In Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority: The Role of Institutional Trust, Borstein, Brian H. and Tomkins, Alan J. (eds.). New York: Springer, 81–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 1992. “Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support.” Journal of Politics 54(4): 1120–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 2009. “Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court.” Journal of Politics 71(2): 429–441.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta. 2003a. “Measuring Attitudes towards the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 354–367.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta. 2003b. “The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?” British Journal of Political Science 33(4): 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Lodge, Milton, and Woodson, Benjamin. 2014. “Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” Law & Society Review 48(4): 837–866.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2014. “The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms, and Recent Challenges Thereto.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 201–219.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2015. “Is the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2017. “Reconsidering Positivity Theory: What Roles Do Politicization, Ideological Disagreement, and Legal Realism Play in Shaping U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14(3): 592–617.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2018. Black and Blue: African Americans and Legal Legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Pereira, Miguel M., and Ziegler, Jeffrey. 2017. “Updating Supreme Court Legitimacy: Testing the ‘Rule, Learn, Update’ Model of Political Communication.” American Politics Research 45(6): 980–1002.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., and Evans, Arthur S.. 1985. “External Threat, Perceived Threat, and Group Identity.” Social Science Quarterly 66(1): 50–66.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., Blackstone, Bethany, and Vining, Richard L.. 2008. “The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 70(2): 293–306.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and Milyo, J.. 2005. “A Measure of Media Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4): 1191–1237.Google Scholar
Hainmuller, Jens, Hopkins, Daniel J., and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2011. The Nature of Supreme Court Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2014. “The Semiconstrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 352–366.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K. 2016. “Judicial Review as a Limit on Government Domination: Reframing, Resolving, and Replacing the (Counter) Majoritarian Difficulty.” Perspectives on Politics 14(2): 391–409.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. 1788. “Federalist No. 78.” Library of Congress. https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-text.Google Scholar
Hannah-Jones, Nikole. 2019. “It Was Never About Busing.” New York Times. July 12, 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/07/12/opinion/sunday/it-was-never-about-busing.html.Google Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., Intawan, Chinita, and Nicholson, Stephen P.. 2018. “Snap Judgment: Implicit Perceptions of a (Political) Court.” Political Behavior 40(1): 127–147.Google Scholar
Harvey, Anna. 2013. A Mere Machine: The Supreme Court, Congress, and American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Anna, and Friedman, Barry. 2009. “Ducking Trouble: Congressionally Induced Selection Bias in the Supreme Court’s Agenda.” Journal of Politics 71(2): 574–592.Google Scholar
Haven, Stefanie. 2013. “DOMA, Prop 8 Rulings Draw Favor from the Left, Fury from the Right.” CBS News. June 26, 2013, www.cbsnews.com/news/doma-prop-8-rulings-draw-favor-from-the-left-fury-from-the-right/.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7(2): 133–165.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Smith, Joseph L.. 2007. “Issue Preferences and Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71(1): 40–66.Google Scholar
Hitt, Matthew P., and Searles, Kathleen. 2018. “Media Coverage and Public Approval of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Communication 35(4): 566–586.Google Scholar
Ho, Daniel, and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2008. “Measuring Explicit Political Positions of Media.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3(4): 353–377.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.” Political Psychology 22(1): 127–156.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Vincent L., and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2004. “The Centrality of Race in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 383–408.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Guarav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405–431.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3): 690–707.Google Scholar
Jardina, Ashley E. 2014. Demise of Dominance: Group Threat and the New Relevance of White Identity for American Politics. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Jardina, Ashley E. 2019. White Identity Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Christopher D., and Bartels, Brandon L.. 2010. “Sensationalism and Sobriety: Differential Media Exposure and Attitudes toward American Courts.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(2): 260–285.Google Scholar
Johnston, Christopher D., Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Bartels, Brandon L.. 2014. “Ideology, the Affordable Care Act Ruling, and Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78(4): 963–973.Google Scholar
Judd, John W. 1905. “The XIV Amendment – Its History and Evolution – Part One.” American Lawyer 13: 338–342.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2006. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R. and Kalmoe, Nathan P.. 2017. Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 341–355.Google Scholar
Lafond, Nicole. 2018. “Trump Grumbles that Gorsuch Is Too Liberal after Immigration Case Vote.” Talking Points Memo. April 20, https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-grumbles-gorsuch-too-liberal.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1985. “Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 29(1): 119–138.Google Scholar
Library of Congress. No date. Congress Globe. 39th Congress, 1st Session, Part Four, 2881–3840, https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=073/llcg073.db&recNum=2.Google Scholar
Linos, Katerina, and Twist, K. 2016. “The Supreme Court, the Media, and Public Opinion: Comparing Experimental and Observational Methods.” Journal of Legal Studies 45(2): 223–254.Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam. 2013. “Corporations Find a Friend in the Supreme Court.” New York Times, May 4, 2013, www.nytimes.com/2013/05/05/business/pro-business-decisions-are-defining-this-supreme-court.html?mcubz=2.Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam. 2014. “For Justices, Free Speech Often Means ‘Speech I Agree With.’” New York Times, May 5, 2014, www.nytimes.com/2014/05/06/us/politics/in-justices-votes-free-speech-often-means-speech-i-agree-with.html?mcubz=2.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88(1): 63–76.Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1788. “Federalist No. 10.” Library of Congress, https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-text.Google Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, Spriggs, James F., and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Sullivan, John L., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Wood, Sandra L.. 1995. With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mark, Alyx, and Zilis, Michael A.. 2019. “The Conditional Effectiveness of Legislative Threats: How Court Curbing Alters the Behavior of (Some) Supreme Court Justices.” Political Research Quarterly 72(3): 570–583.Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis 10(2): 134–153.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Respectfully Disagree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 128–145.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Richard K. 2005. “James Madison’s Political Theory: Hostage to Democratic Fortune.” Review of Politics 67(1): 49–67.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 270–283.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 895–918.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T. 2009. “Public Schools, Religious Establishments, and the US Supreme Court: An Examination of Policy Compliance.” American Politics Research 37(1): 50–74.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin T., and Stimson, James A.. 2004. “The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited: New Evidence on Supreme Court Responsiveness to Public Preferences.” Journal of Politics 66(4): 1018–1035.Google Scholar
Miller, Erin. 2010. “Has the Supreme Court Been Mainly a Friend or Foe to African Americans?” SCOTUSblog. February 1, 2010, www.scotusblog.com/2010/02/has-the-supreme-court-been-mainly-a-friend-or-a-foe-to-african-americans/.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87(1): 87–101.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J., and Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama. 1997. “The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 59(4): 1114–1142.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1969. “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: A Preliminary Mapping of Some Prerequisites of Court Legitimation of Regime Changes.” In Frontiers in Judicial Research, Grossman, J. B. and Tanenhaus, J. (eds.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
National Review. 2016. “In Fisher, Another Blow to Equal Opportunity.” National Review. June 23, 2016, www.nationalreview.com/article/437047/fisher-v-ut-supreme-court-gets-it-wrong.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael J., and Gibson, James L.. 2019. “How Does Hyper-Politicized Rhetoric Affect the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy?” Journal of Politics 81(4): 1512–1516.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael J., and Gibson, James L.. 2020. “Measuring Subjective Ideological Disagreement with the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts 8(1): 75–94.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., and Kinder, Donald R.. 1996. “Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58(4): 1055–1078.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael J., and Tucker, Patrick. In Press. “The Stability of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy.” Journal of Politics, https://doi.org/10.1086/710143.Google Scholar
Nichols, Curt, Bridge, Dave, and Carrington, Adam M.. 2014. “Court Curbing via Attempt to Amend the Constitution: An Update of Congressional Attacks on the Supreme Court from 1955–1984.” Justice System Journal 35(4): 331–343.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, Jerome, and Dukes, James O.. 1992. “Media Coverage of the Supreme Court’s Caseload.” Journalism Quarterly 69(1): 195–203.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael. 2018. “Commander v. Chief.” The Atlantic. April, www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/20182018/04/commander-v-chief/554045/.Google Scholar
Ohlheiser, Abby. 2015. “Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis on Gay Marriage Licenses: ‘It Is a Heaven or Hell Decision.’” Washington Post. September 1, 2015, www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/09/01/kentucky-clerk-kim-davis-on-gay-marriage-licenses-it-is-a-heaven-or-hell-decision/?utm_term=.1e4df8163fe4.Google Scholar
Owens, Ryan J., Wedeking, Justin, and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2013. “How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review.” Journal of Law and Courts 1(1): 35–59.Google Scholar
Peffley, Mark, Hutchison, Marc L., and Shamir, Michal. 2015. “The Impact of Persistent Terrorism on Political Tolerance: Israel, 1980–2011.” American Political Science Review 109(4): 812–832.Google Scholar
Perlman, Matthew, Hutchinson, Bill, and Warren, James. 2013. “Edith Windsor, Center of Supreme Court’s DOMA Ruling, Wins ‘Everything We Asked and Hoped For.’” New York Daily News. June 26, 2013, www.nydailynews.com/new-york/edith-windsor-wins-hoped-article-1.1383602.Google Scholar
Perlstein, Rick. 2012. “Lee Atwater’s Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy.” The Nation, www.thenation.com/article/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy/.Google Scholar
“Playing Favourites.” 2014. The Economist. May 13, 2014. No author, www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/05/judicial-bias.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reilly, Ryan J., and Siddiqui, Sabrina. 2013. “Supreme Court DOMA Decision Rules Federal Same-Sex Marriage Ban Unconstitutional.” Huffington Post. June 26, 2013, www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/26/supreme-court-doma-decision_n_3454811.html.Google Scholar
Richards, Mark J., and Kritzer, Herbert M.. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96(2): 305–320.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ross, William G. 2002. “Attacks on the Warren Court by State Officials: A Cast Study of Why Court-Curbing Movements Fail.” Buffalo Law Review 50: 483–612.Google Scholar
Sandalow, Terrance. 1977. “Judicial Protection of Minorities.” Michigan Law Review 75: 1162–1195.Google Scholar
Sarratt, Reed. 1966. The Ordeal of Desegregation. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1973. “Segregation Academies and State Action.” Yale Law Journal 82(7): 1436–1461.Google Scholar
Sen, Maya. 2017. “How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 70(2): 374–393.Google Scholar
Sherman, Mark. 2017. “How Supreme Court Justices Could Avoid Issuing a Verdict on Trump’s Travel Ban.” PBS. September 19, 2017, www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-justices-avoid-issuing-verdict-trumps-travel-ban.Google Scholar
Silverleib, Alan. 2010. “Gloves Come Off After Obama Rips Supreme Court Ruling.” CNN. January 28, 2010, www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/28/alito.obama.sotu/index.html?hpt=Sbin.Google Scholar
Slattery, Gram. 2014. “Public Confidence in Supreme Court at Historic Low, Poll Suggests.” Christian Science Monitor. June 30, 2014, www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0630/Public-confidence-in-Supreme-Court-at-historic-low-poll-suggests.Google Scholar
Slotnick, Eliot E. 1991. “Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decision Making: Problems and Prospects.” Judicature 75(3): 128–130.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 2013. “The American Panel Survey.” Weidenbaum Center at Washington University. Available at: taps.wustl.edu.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Phillip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Solberg, Rorie Spill, and Waltenburg, Eric N.. 2014. The Media, the Court, and the Misrepresentation: The New Myth of the Court. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N. 2014. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spaeth, Harold J., Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew D., Segal, Jeffrey A., Ruger, Theodore J., and Benesh, Sara C.. 2017. Supreme Court Database, version 2017, release 1, http://supremecourtdatabase.org.Google Scholar
Stancil, Will. 2018. “The Radical Supreme Court Decision that America Forgot.” The Atlantic. May 29, 2018, www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/05/the-radical-supreme-court-decision-that-america-forgot/561410/.Google Scholar
Stimson, James. 2018. Public Opinion in American: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stohr, Greg. 2015. “Americans Want Supreme Court to Turn Off Political Spending Spigot.” Bloomberg Politics, www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-09-28/bloomberg-poll-americans-want-supreme-court-to-turn-off-political-spending-spigot2015-09-28/bloomberg-poll-americans-want-supreme-court-to-turn-off-political-spending-spigot.Google Scholar
Strickler, Vincent James. 2014. “The Supreme Court and New Media Technologies.” In Covering the United States Supreme Court in the Digital Age, Davis, Richard (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–88.Google Scholar
Strother, Logan. 2017. “How Expected Political and Legal Impact Drive Media Coverage of Supreme Court Cases.” Political Communication 34(4): 571–589.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E.. 1993. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., and Transue, John E.. 1999. “The Psychological Underpinnings of Democracy: A Selective Review of Research on Political Tolerance, Interpersonal Trust, and Social Capital.” Annual Review of Psychology 50(1): 625–650.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2004. “Did Brown Matter?” New Yorker, www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/05/03/did-brown-matter.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In Organizational Identity: A Reader, Austin, William G. and Worchel, Stephen (eds.). Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 33–47.Google Scholar
Totenberg, Nina. 2010. “Roberts Slams ‘Pep Rally’ Scene at State of the Union.” National Public Radio, www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124537470.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, and Lezin, Katya. 1991. “What Really Happened in Brown v. Board of Education.” Columbia Law Review 91(8): 1867–1930.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ura, Joseph Daniel. 2014. “The Placement of Conflict: The Supreme Court and Issue Attention in the National Media.” In Covering the United States Supreme Court in the Digital Age, Davis, Richard (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–172.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Brader, Ted, and Jardina, Ashley E.. 2013. “Immigrant Opposition Among U.S. Whites: General Ethnocentrism or Media Priming of Attitudes about Latinos?” Political Psychology 34(2): 149–166.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., and White, Ismail K.. 2002. “Cues that Matter: How Political Ads Prime Racial Attitudes during Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 75–90.Google Scholar
Wedeking, Justin, and Zilis, Michael A.. 2018. “Disagreeable Rhetoric and the Prospect of Public Opposition: Opinion Moderation on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 71(2): 380–394.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zilis, Michael A. 2015. The Limits of Legitimacy: Dissenting Opinions, Media Coverage, and Public Responses to Supreme Court Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Zilis, Michael A. 2018. “Minority Groups and Judicial Legitimacy: Group Affect and the Incentives for Judicial Responsiveness.” Political Research Quarterly 71(2): 270–283.Google Scholar
Zilis, Michael A. In Press. “How Identity Politics Polarizes Rule of Law Opinions.” Political Behavior, doi: 10.1007/s11109-020-09616-3.Google Scholar
Zilis, Michael A., Wedeking, Justin, and Denison, Alexander. 2017. “Hitting the ‘Bullseye’ in Supreme Court Coverage: News Quality in the Court’s 2014 Term.” Elon Law Review 9(2): 489–523.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Michael A. Zilis, University of Kentucky
  • Book: The Rights Paradox
  • Online publication: 22 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108937764.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Michael A. Zilis, University of Kentucky
  • Book: The Rights Paradox
  • Online publication: 22 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108937764.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Michael A. Zilis, University of Kentucky
  • Book: The Rights Paradox
  • Online publication: 22 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108937764.010
Available formats
×