Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:32:57.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Ruling the World

Organizational Ecology and Bias in Global Governance

from Part I - Theorizing Rule

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2023

Christopher Daase
Affiliation:
Peace Research Institute Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt
Nicole Deitelhoff
Affiliation:
Peace Research Institute Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt
Antonia Witt
Affiliation:
Peace Research Institute Frankfurt
Get access

Summary

The ecology of governance organizations (GOs) matters for what is or is not ruled. The array of actors who comprise the current system of global governance, and especially private governance organizations (PGOs), has grown dramatically in recent decades. Drawing on organizational ecology, I posit that the rise of PGOs is both required and facilitated by disagreements between states that block the creation of what might be otherwise effective intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). In a form of “double-negative regulation,” states block IGOs which in turn leave open niches that are then filled by PGOs, which then both complement and sometimes substitute for state law. The organizational ecology approach outlined here extends and refocuses inquiry in systematic ways that give us a fuller understanding of how and why PGOs have emerged as one of the most striking features of the contemporary world order. The key innovations in this paper are to a) shift the level of analysis from single agents or populations of agents to the entire field of GOs, including states, IGOs, and PGOs and b) draw on principles of ecology to understand the composition and dynamics of systems of governance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan, and Zangl, Bernhard (eds.). 2015. International Organizations as Orchestrators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., Green, Jessica F., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2016. “Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance.” International Organization 70(2): 247277.Google Scholar
Andonova, Liliana B., Hale, Thomas N., and Roger, Charles B.. 2017. “National Policy and Transnational Governance of Climate Change: Substitutes or Complements?International Studies Quarterly 61(2): 253268.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K. (eds.). 2010. Who Governs the Globe? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartley, Tim. 2003. “Certifying Forests and Factories: States, Social Movements, and the Rise of Private Regulation in the Apparel and Forest Products Fields.” Politics and Society 31(3): 433464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, Tim. 2007. “How Foundations Shape Social Movements: The Construction of an Organizational Field and the Rise of Forest Certification.” Social Problems 54(3): 229255.Google Scholar
Bartley, Tim. 2014. “Transnational Governance and the Re-Centered State: Sustainability or Legality?Regulation and Governance 8(1): 93109.Google Scholar
Bartley, Tim. 2018. Rules without Rights: Land, Labor, and Private Authority in the Global Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, John H., Goldstein, Judith L., Josling, Timothy E., and Steinberg, Richard H.. 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bradford, Anu. 2020. The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büthe, Tim and Mattli, Walter. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Sean B. 2016. The Serengeti Rules: The Quest to Discover How Life Works and Why It Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin. 2002. “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 15(4): 503529.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin, and Stone, Michael W.. 2012. “Can Legality Verification Rescue Global Forest Governance? Analyzing the Potential of Public and Private Policy Intersection to Ameliorate Forest Challenges in Southeast Asia.” Forest Policy and Economics 18(3): 1322.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin, Auld, Greame, and Newsom, Deanna. 2004. Governing through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Peter, and Lister, Jane. 2013. Eco-Business: A Big-Brand Takeover of Sustainability. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of Qwerty.” American Economic Review 75(2): 332337.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147160.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, Klaus, and Pattberg, Philipp. 2009. “World Politics and Organizational Fields: The Case of Transnational Sustainability Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 707744.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Stein S., and Sending, Ole J.. 2013. “There Is No Global Public: The Idea of the Public and the Legitimation of Governance.” International Theory 5(2): 213237.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and McAdam, Doug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FSC. 2018. Annual Report 2018, https://annual-reports.fsc.org/en#downloads (last access July 25, 2022).Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter A., Lake, David A., and Stein, Janice G.. 2012. The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue Is Not Enough. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Jessica F. 2013. “Order out of Chaos: Public and Private Rules for Managing Carbon.” Global Environmental Politics 13(2): 115.Google Scholar
Green, Jessica F. 2014. Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, Lars H. 2005. “Sustainable Forestry in Sweden: The Effect of Competition Among Private Certification Schemes.” The Journal of Environment and Development 14(3): 338355.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, Lars H. 2014. “Dynamic Governance Interactions: Evolutionary Effects of State Responses to Non-State Certification Programs.” Regulation and Governance 8(1): 7492.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2020. Let Them Eat Tweets: How The Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney B., and Biersteker, Thomas J.. 2002. “The Emergence of Private Authority in the International System.” In: Hall, Rodney B. and Biersteker, Thomas J. (eds.), The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 322.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. 1961. The Federalist Papers (1787–88). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hannan, Michael T., and Freeman, John. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
IFRS Foundation. 2019. Annual Report 2018, www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/about-us/funding/2018/annual-report-2018.pdf (last access July 25, 2022).Google Scholar
Jung, Danielle, and Lake, David A.. 2011. “Markets, Hierarchies, and Networks: An Agent-Based Organizational Ecology.” American Journal of Political Science 55(4): 972990.Google Scholar
Johnson, Tara. 2014. Organizational Progeny: Why Governments Are Losing Control over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinderman, Daniel. 2015. “Explaining the Rise of National Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Global Frameworks, World Culture, and Corporate Interests.” In: Tsutsui, Kiyoteru and Lim, Alwyn (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107146.Google Scholar
Kinderman, Daniel. 2019. “The Challenges of Upward Regulatory Harmonization: The Case of Sustainability Reporting in the European Union.” Regulation and Governance 14(4): 674697.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Lim, Alwyn, and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2015. “The Social Regulation of the Economy in the Global Context.” In: Tsutsui, Kiyoteru and Lim, Alwyn (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Locke, Richard M. 2013. The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loconto, Allison, and Fouilleux, Eve. 2014. “Politics of Private Regulation: ISEAL and the Shaping of Transnational Sustainability Governance.” Regulation and Governance 8(2): 166185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Axel, and Cuypers, Dieter. 2010. “Forest Certification as a Global Environmental Governance Tool: What Is the Macro-Effectiveness of the Forest Stewardship Council?Regulation and Governance 4(4): 408434.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul R., North, Douglass C., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1990. “The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs.” Economics and Politics 2(1): 123.Google Scholar
Nooruddin, Irfan, and Sokhey, Sarah W.. 2012. “Credible Certification of Child Labor Free Production.” In: Gourevitch, Peter A., Lake, David A., and Stein, Janice G. (eds.), The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue Is Not Enough. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6285.Google Scholar
Olegario, Rowena. 2003. “Credit Reporting Agencies: A Historical Perspective.” In: Miller, Magaret J. (ed.), Credit Reporting Systems and the International Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 115159.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2001. “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth.” International Organization 55(2): 251287.Google Scholar
Overdevest, Christine. 2010. “Comparing Forest Certification Schemes: The Case of Ratcheting Standards in the Forest Sector.” Socio-Economic Review 8(1): 4776.Google Scholar
Overdevest, Christine, and Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2014. “Assembling an Experimental Regime: Transnational Governance Interactions in the Forest Sector.” Regulation and Governance 8(1): 2248.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roger, Charles, and Dauvergne, Peter. 2016. “The Rise of Transnational Governance as a Field of Study.” International Studies Review 18(3): 415437.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 2002. “Governance in a New Global Order.” In: Held, David and McGrew, Anthony (eds.), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Malden: Polity Press, pp. 7086.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard, and Davis, Gerald F.. 2007. Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural, and Open System Perspectives. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stroup, Sarah S. and Wong, Wendy H.. 2017. The Authority Trap. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Alan. 2001. American Colonies: The Settling of North America. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Van der Ven, Hamish, Bernstein, Steven, and Hoffmann, Matthw. 2017. “Valuing the Contributions of Nonstate and Subnational Actors to Climate Governance.” Global Environmental Politics 17(1): 120.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wilks, Stephen. 2013. The Political Power of the Business Corporation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Wong, Wendy H. 2012. Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1994. International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Ruling the World
  • Edited by Christopher Daase, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Nicole Deitelhoff, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Antonia Witt, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt
  • Book: Rule in International Politics
  • Online publication: 15 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009307703.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Ruling the World
  • Edited by Christopher Daase, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Nicole Deitelhoff, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Antonia Witt, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt
  • Book: Rule in International Politics
  • Online publication: 15 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009307703.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Ruling the World
  • Edited by Christopher Daase, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Nicole Deitelhoff, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt and Goethe University Frankfurt, Antonia Witt, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt
  • Book: Rule in International Politics
  • Online publication: 15 June 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009307703.005
Available formats
×