Skip to main content
Semantics for Counting and Measuring
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Schvarcz, Brigitta R. 2017. Approaches to Hungarian. Vol. 15, Issue. , p. 157.

    Schvarcz, Brigitta R. and Rothstein, Susan D. 2017. Approaches to Hungarian. Vol. 15, Issue. , p. 183.

    Pires de Oliveira, Roberta and Martins, Jair 2017. Preliminary remarks on the nominal phrase in Cape Verdean: The semantics of bare nouns cross-linguistically. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 100.

    Mihatsch, Wiltrud 2016. Collectives, object mass nouns and individual count nouns. Lingvisticae Investigationes , Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 289.

  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Semantics for Counting and Measuring
    • Online ISBN: 9780511734830
    • Book DOI:
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The use of numerals in counting differs quite dramatically across languages. Some languages grammaticalise a contrast between count nouns (three cats; three books) vs 'non-count' or mass nouns (milk, mud), marking this distinction in different ways. Others use a system of numeral classifiers, while yet others use a combination of both. This book draws attention to the contrast between counting and measuring, and shows that it is central to our understanding of how we use numerical expressions, classifiers and count nouns in different languages. It reviews some of the more recent major linguistic results in the semantics of numericals, counting and measuring and theories of the mass/count distinction, and presents the author's new research on the topic. The book draws heavily on crosslinguistic research, and presents in-depth case studies of the mass/count distinction and counting and measuring in a number of typologically unrelated languages. It also includes chapters on classifiers, constructions and on adjectival uses of measure phrases.


‘At the interface between cognition, language, and ontology, traditional views on mass vs count are seriously challenged by languages such as Hungarian, Brazilian Portuguese and Yudja. Rothstein brilliantly deals with these difficult issues by distinguishing counting and measuring as two types of semantic operation. A work of great breath that opens new research avenues.'

Roberta Pires de Oliveira - National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil and Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Acquaviva, P. 2008. Lexical Plurals: A Morphosemantic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra, 2003. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Akmajian, Adrian, and Lehrer, Adrienne, 1976. NP-like quantifiers and the problem of determining the head of an NP. Linguistic Analysis 2, 4, 395413.
Alexiadou, Artemis, 2011. Plural mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of number. In Washburn, Mary Byram, McKinney-Bock, Katherine, Varis, Erika, Sawyer, Ann and Tomaszewicz, Barbara (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 3341. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Allan, Keith, 1977. Classifiers. Language 53, 2, 285311.
Allan, Keith, 1980. Nouns and countability. Language 56, 3, 541–67.
Allan, Keith, 2006. A ‘just that’ lexical meaning for most. In von Heusinger, K. and Turner, K. (eds.), Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, pp. 4991. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bach, Emmon, 1989. Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics. Albany: SUNY Press.
Bale, Alan C., and Barner, David, 2009. The interpretation of functional heads: using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 26, 3, 217–52.
Bale, Alan, and Coon, Jessica, 2014. Classifiers are for numerals, not for nouns: consequences for the mass/count distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 45, 4, 695707.
Bale, Alan, and Khanjian, Hrayr, 2008. Classifiers and number marking. In Friedman, T. and Ito, S. (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory XVIII, pp. 7488. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Barner, David, and Snedeker, Jesse, 2005. Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition 97, 1, 4166.
Barnes, Julian, 2003. The Pedant in the Kitchen. Revised edn published 2012. London: Atlantic Books.
Barwise, Jon, and Cooper, Robin, 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 2, 159219.
Beviláqua, Kayron, Pires de Oliveira, Roberta and Lima, Suzi, 2016. Bare Nouns in Brazilian Portuguese: an experimental study an grinding. In Rothstein, S. and Šķilters, J. (eds.), The Baltic International yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Volume XI: Number: Cognitive, Semantic and Crossliguistic Approaches, Kansas: New Prairie Press. [Online publication]
Bisang, Walter, 2012. Numeral classifiers with plural marking, a challenge to Greenberg. In Xu, D. (ed.), Plurality and Classifiers across Languages in China, pp. 2342. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Borer, Hagit, 1989. On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In Booij, G. and Van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1989, pp. 4564. Dordrecht: Foris.
Borer, Hagit, 1999. Deconstructing the construct. In Johnson, K. and Roberts, I. (eds.), Beyond Principles and Parameters, pp. 4390. Berlin: Springer (Kluwer).
Borer, Hagit, 2005. Stucturing Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, Hagit, 2009. Compounds: the view from Hebrew. In Lieber, R. and Stekauer, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, pp. 491511. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borges, Jorge Luis, 1999. Collected Fictions, translated by Hurley, Andrew. New York: Penguin Books.
Borschev, Vladimir, and Partee, Barbara H., 2004. Genitives, types, and sorts: the Russian genitive of measure. In Kim, Ji-yung, Lander, Yury A. and Partee, Barbara H. (eds.), Possessives and Beyond: Semantics and Syntax, UMOP 29, pp. 2943. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Borschev, Vladimir, Paducheva, Elena V., Partee, Barbara H., Testelets, Yakov G. and Yanovich, Igor, 2006. Sentential and constituent negation in Russian BE-sentences revisited. In Lavine, James E., Franks, Steven L., Tasseva-Kurktchieva, Mila and Filip, Hana (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Princeton Meeting 2005, pp. 5065. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Borschev, Vladimir, Paducheva, Elena V., Partee, Barbara H., Testelets, Yakov G. and Yanovich, Igor, 2008. Russian genitives, non-referentiality, and the property-type hypothesis. In Antonenko, A., Bailyn, J. F. and Bethin, C. (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Stony Brook Meeting 2007, pp. 4867. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Bunt, Harry, 1985. Mass Terms and Model-theoretic Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, Susan, and Xu, Fei, 2001. Infant’s knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking. Cognition 80, 179213.
Carlson, Gregory N., 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Casati, Roberto, and Varzi, Achille C., 1999. Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chao, Yuen-Ren, 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., 2012. Counting and classifiers. In Massam, D. (ed.), Count and Mass across Languages, pp. 199219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Sybesma, Rint, 1998. Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28, 3, 385412.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Sybesma, Rint, 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 4, 509–42.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Sybesma, Rint, 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In Cinque, G. and Kayne, R. S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, pp. 259–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., and Sybesma, Rint, 2012. Classifiers and DP. Linguistic Inquiry 43, 4, 634–50.
Cheng, Lisa L.-S., Doetjes, Jenny S. and Sybesma, Rint, 2008. How universal is the universal grinder? In van Koppen, M. and Botma, B. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2008, pp. 5062. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chierchia, Gennaro, 1984. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chierchia, Gennaro, 1985. Formal semantics and the grammar of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 417–43.
Chierchia, Gennaro, 1998a. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 53103. Berlin: Springer (Kluwer).
Chierchia, Gennaro, 1998b. Reference to kinds. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339405.
Chierchia, Gennaro, 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In Belletti, A. (ed.), Structures and Beyond, the Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3, pp. 39103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chierchia, Gennaro, 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174, 99149.
Chierchia, Gennaro, and Turner, Raymond, 1988. Semantics and property theory, Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 3, 261302.
Chomsky, Noam, 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Cohen, Ariel, and Krifka, Manfred, 2010. Superlative quantifiers as modifiers of meta-speech acts. In Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Volume VI.
Comrie, Bernard, 2011. Numeral bases. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, ch. 131, Accessed on 21 August 2013.
Corbett, Greville, 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William, 1994. Semantic universals in classifier systems. Word 45, 145–71.
Csirmaz, Anikó, and Dékány, Éva, 2014. Hungarian is a classifier language. In Raffaele, S. and Masini, F. (eds.), Word Classes: Nature, Typology and Representations, pp. 141–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Danon, Gabi, 2008. Definiteness spreading in the Hebrew construct state. Lingua 118, 7, 872906.
Danon, Gabi, 2012. Two structures for numeral–noun constructions. Lingua 122, 12, 12821307.
Dantzig, Tobias, 1954. Number, the Language of Science: A Critical Survey Written for the Cultured Non-mathematician, 4th edn. Doubleday. Reprinted in 2007. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
David, Elizabeth, 1999. French Provincial Cooking. London: Penguin.
Dehaene, Stanislas, 2010. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dékány, Éva, 2011. A Profile of the Hungarian DP. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Linguistics, University of Tromsø.
Dočekal, Mojmír, and Ziková, Markéta, 2013. Semantic opacity of collective nouns and transparency of group numerals. Paper presented at Formal Description of Slavic Languages 10. Leipzig, December.
Doetjes, Jenny S., 1997. Quantifiers and Selection: On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Leiden University.
Doetjes, Jenny S., 2012. Count/mass distinctions across languages. In Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K. and Portner, P. (eds.), Semantics: an International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Part III, pp. 2559–80. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Doron, Edit, 2003. Bare singular reference to kinds. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 13, 7390.
Doron, Edit, and Meir, Irit, 2013a. Construct state: modern Hebrew. In Khan, G. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, pp. 581–9. Leiden: Brill.
Doron, Edit, and Meir, Irit, 2013b. Amount definites. In Bessayde, C. and Pires de Oliveira, R. (eds.), Weak Definites across Languages – Theoretical and Experimental Investigations, Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 42, pp.139–65. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
Doron, Edit, and Müller, Ana, 2013. The cognitive basis of the mass–count distinction: evidence from bare nouns. In Hofherr, P. Cabredo and Zribi-Hertz, A. (eds.), Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference, pp. 73101. Leiden: Brill.
Epstein-Naveh, Noa, 2015. Pluralization and mass nouns – can they go together in modern Hebrew? Unpublished MA thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan.
Erbaugh, Mary S., 2002. Classifiers are for specification: complementary functions for sortal and general classifiers in Cantonese and Mandarin. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale 31, 1, 3369.
Farkas, Donka, and de Swart, Henriette, 2003. The Semantics of Incorporation, Stanford Monographs in Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Feigenson, Lisa, Dehaene, Stanislas and Spelke, Elisabeth, 2004. Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 7, 307–14.
Franks, Steven, 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frege, Gottlob, 1884. Grundlagen der Arithmetik / The Foundations of Arithmetic. Translated from the German by Austin, J. L.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Frege, Gottlob, 1892. Über Begriff und Gegenstand. Vierteljahresschrift für Wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16, 192205. Translated as ‘On concept and object’. In Geach, P. and Black, M. (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, pp. 4255. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gadzar, Gerald, 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
Gafni, Chen, and Rothstein, Susan, 2014. Who has more N? Context and variety are both relevant. Paper presented at the First Conference on Cognition Research of the Israeli Society for Cognitive Psychology. Akko, 10–12 February.
Gawron, Jean Marc, 2002. Two kinds of quantizers in DP. Handout of talk at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 3–6 January.
Geenhoven, Veerle, 1998. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Ghaniabadi, Saeed, 2012. Plural marking beyond count nouns. In Massam, D. (ed.), Count and Mass across Language, pp. 112–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gil, David, 2013. Numeral classifiers. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology., Accessed on 31 March 2015.
Gillon, Brendan, 1992. Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 6, 597640.
Greenberg, Joseph, 1974. Language Typology: A Historical and Analytic Overview. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Grestenberger, Laura, 2015. Number marking in German measure phrases and the structure of pseudo-partitives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18, 2, 93138.
Grimm, Scott, 2014. Individuating the abstract. In Etxeberria, U., Fălăuş, A., Irurtzun, A. and Leferman, B. (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18, pp. 182200. Vitoria, Spain: University of the Basque Country.
Grimm, Scott, 2015. Abstract nouns and countability. Paper presented at the 11th International Symposium of Cognition, Logic and Communication: ‘Number: Cognitive, Semantic and Crosslinguistic Approaches’. University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, December.
Grimm, Scott, and Levin, Beth 2012. Who has more furniture? An exploration of the bases for comparison’. Paper presented at Mass/Count in Linguistics, Philosophy and Cognitive Science Conference. École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France, 20–21 December. Slides downloadable at:
Grosu, Alexander, and Landman, Fred, 1998. Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6, 2, 125–70.
Hammarström, Harald, 2010. Rarities in numeral systems. In Wohlgemuth, J. and Cysouw, M. (eds.), Rethinking Universals: How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theory, pp. 1160. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hanke, Thomas, 2010. Additional rarities in the typology of numerals. In Wohlgemuth, J. and Cysouw, M. (eds.), Rethinking Universals: How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theory, pp. 6189. Berlin: de Gruyter.
He, Chuansheng, and Jiang, Yan, 2011. Type shifting, Chinese hen+N structure, and implications for semantic parameters. Lingua 121, 5, 698986.
Heim, Irene, 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite NPs. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Heim, Irene, 1987. Where does the definiteness restriction apply? Evidence from the definiteness of variables. In ter Meulen, A. and Reuland, E. (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, pp. 2142. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Higginbotham, James, 1987. Indefiniteness and predication. In ter Meulen, A. and Reuland, E. (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, pp. 4370. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hofweber, Thomas, 2005. Number determiners, numbers, and arithmetic. The Philosophical Review 114, 2, 179225.
Horn, Laurence R., 1972. The Semantics of Logical Operators in English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Horn, Laurence R., 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hsieh, Miao-Ling, 2008. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in Chinese. Taipei: Crane Publishers.
Huang, Yi Ting, Spelke, Elisabeth and Snedeker, Jesse, 2013. What exactly do numbers mean? Language Learning and Development 9, 2, 105–29.
Huntley-Fenner, Gavin, Carey, Susan and Solimando, Andrea, 2002. Objects are individuals but stuff doesn’t count: perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants’ representations of small groups of discrete entities. Cognition 85, 203–21.
Hurford, James R., 1987. Language and Number: The Emergence of a Cognitive System. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hyde, Daniel C., 2011. Two systems of non-symbolic numerical cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5.
Hyde, Daniel C., and Spelke, Elisabeth, 2011. Neural signatures of number processing in human infants: evidence for two core systems underlying numerical cognition. Developmental Science 14, 2, 360–71.
Ionin, Tania, and Matushansky, Ora, 2006. The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 23, 315–60.
Jackendoff, Ray, 1977. X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray, 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41, 1, 945.
Jiang, Li, 2008. Monotonicity and measure phrases in Chinese. Paper presented at the 11th International Symposium of Chinese Language and Linguistics. Taiwan, 23–25 May.
Kadmon, Nirit, 1987. On Unique and Non-unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Kadmon, Nirit, 1990. Uniqueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 3, 273324.
Kamp, Hans, 1975. Two theories about adjectives. In Keenan, E. (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 123–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kamp, Hans, 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Groenendijk, J., Janssen, Th. and Stokhof, M. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Volume I, pp. 277322. Amsterdam: Mathematic Centre. Reprinted in Portner, P. and Partee, B. H. (eds.), 2002. Formal Semantics, pp. 189222. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. And reprinted in von Heusinger, K. and ter Meulen, A. (eds.), 2013. The Dynamics of Meaning and Interpretation: Selected Papers of Hans Kamp, pp. 329–69. Leiden: Brill.
Kamp, Hans, and Reyle, Uwe, 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Berlin: Springer (Kluwer).
Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W. and Volkmann, J., 1949. The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology 62, 4, 498525.
Keenan, Ed, and Stavi, Jonathan, 1986. A semantic characterization of natural language determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 3, 253326.
Keenan, Edward L., and Faltz, Leonard M., 2012. Boolean Semantics for Natural Language. Berlin: Springer.
Kennedy, Christopher, and McNally, Louise, 1999. From event structure to scale structure: degree modification in deverbal adjectives. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9, 163–80.
Khrizman, Keren, 2015. Russian as a (non)-classifier language. Paper presented at the 11th International Symposium of Cognition, Logic and Communication: ‘Number: Cognitive, Semantic and Crosslinguistic Approaches’. University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia, December.
Khrizman, Keren, 2016. Numerous Issues in the Semantics of Russian Numeral Constructions. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan.
Khrizman, Keren, and Rothstein, Susan, 2015. Russian approximative inversion as a measure construction. In Zybatow, G., Biskup, P., Guhl, M., Hurtig, C., Mueller-Reichau, O. and Yastrebova, M. (eds.), Slavic Grammar from a Formal Perspective. The 10th Anniversary FDSL Conference, Leipzig 2013, Linguistik International 35, pp. 259–72. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.
Khrizman, Keren, Landman, Fred, Lima, Suzi, Rothstein, Susan and Schvarcz, Brigitta R., 2015. Portion readings are count readings, not measure readings. Proceedings of the 20th Amsterdam Colloquium.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, 2001. ‘A piece of the cake’ and ‘a cup of tea’: partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions in the Circum-Baltic languages. In Dahl, Ö. and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (eds.), Circum-Baltic Languages, Volume II: Grammar and Typology, pp. 523–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, 2009. ‘A lot of grammar with a good portion of lexicon’: towards a typology of partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions. In Helmbrecht, J., Nishina, Y., Shin, Y., Skopeteas, S. and Verhoeven, E. (eds.), Form and Function in Language Research: Papers in Honour of Christian Lehmann, pp. 329–46. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Krifka, Manfred, 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J. and von Emde Boas, P. (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expression, pp. 75115. Dordrecht: Foris.
Krifka, Manfred, 1990. Four thousand ships passed through the lock: object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 5, 487520.
Krifka, Manfred, 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Sag, I. A. and Szabolcsi, A. (ed.), Lexical Matters, pp. 2952. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Krifka, Manfred, 1995. Common nouns: a contrastive analysis of English and Chinese. In Carlson, G. N. and Pelletier, F. J. (eds.), The Generic Book, pp. 398411. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krifka, Manfred, 2009. Approximate interpretations of number words: a case for strategic communication. In Hinrichs, E. and Nerbonne, J. (eds.), Theory and Evidence in Semantics, pp 109–32. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kulkarni, Ritwik, Rothstein, Susan and Treves, Alessandro, 2013. A statistical investigation into the crosslinguistic distribution of mass and count nouns: morphosyntactic and semantic perspectives. Biolinguistics 7, 132–68.
Kulkarni, Ritwik, Treves, Alessandro and Rothstein, Susan, in press. Can mass-count syntax be derived from semantics? In Moltmann, F. (ed.), Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Landman, Fred, 1991. Structures for Semantics. Berlin: Springer (Kluwer).
Landman, Fred, 1995. Plurality. In Lappin, S. (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Semantics, 1st edn, pp. 425–57. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Landman, Fred, 2000. Events and Plurality. Berlin: Springer (Kluwer).
Landman, Fred, 2003. Predicate–argument mismatches and the adjectival theory of indefinites. In Coene, M. and d’Hulst, Y. (eds.), From NP to DP: Volume 1, pp. 211–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Landman, Fred, 2004. Indefinites and the Type of Sets. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Landman, Fred, 2011a. Count nouns, mass nouns, neat nouns, mess nouns. In The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Volume VI.
Landman, Fred, 2011b. Boolean pragmatics. In van der Does, J. and Novaes, C. Dutlih (eds.), ‘This is not a Festschrift’: A Festpage for Martin Stokhof.
Landman, Fred, 2015. Lectures on Iceberg Semantics for Mass and Count Nouns. Unpublished manuscript, Tel Aviv University and Tübingen University.
Landman, Fred, 2016. Iceberg semantics for count nouns and mass nouns: the evidence from portions. In Rothstein, S. and Šķilters, J. (eds.), The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Volume XI: Number: Cognitive, Semantic and Crosslinguistic Approaches. Kansas: New Prairie Press. (Online publication.)
Landman, Fred, and Rothstein, Susan, 2010. Incremental homogeneity in the semantics of aspectual for-phrases. In Hovav, M. R., Doron, E. and Sichel, I. (eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure, pp. 229–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lasersohn, Peter, 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75, 3, 522–51.
Lehrer, Adrienne, 1986. English classifier constructions. Lingua 68, 2, 109–48.
Levinson, Steven C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Steven C., 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Li, XuPing, 2011. On the Semantics of Classifiers in Chinese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan.
Li, XuPing, 2013. Numeral Classifiers in Chinese: the Syntax–Semantics Interface. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Li, XuPing, and Bisang, Walter, 2012. Classifiers in Sinitic languages: from individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua 122, 4, 335–55.
Li, XuPing, and Rothstein, Susan, 2012. Measure readings of Mandarin classifier phrases and the particle de. Language and Linguistics 13, 4, 693741.
Lima, Suzi, 2010. About the count–mass distinction in Yudja: a description. In Rogers, Beth and Szakay, Anita (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas, pp. 157–64. Vancouver: UBCWPL.
Lima, Suzi, 2012. Numerals and the universal packager in Yudja (Tupi). In Bogal-Allbritten, E. (ed.), Proceedings of Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas 6. Amherst: GLSA Publications.
Lima, Suzi, 2014. The Grammar of Individuation and Counting. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lima, Suzi, Li, Peggy and Snedeker, Jesse, 2014. Acquiring the denotation of object-denoting nouns in a language without partitives. Poster presented at Boston University Conference on Language Development 39. 7–9 November.
Link, Godehard, 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. In Bauerle, R., Schwartze, C. and von Stechow, A. (eds.), Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, pp. 302–23. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Link, Godehard, 1984. Hydras: on the logic of relative clause constructions with multiple heads. In Landman, F. and Veltman, F. (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, pp. 245–57. Dordrecht: Foris.
Lipton, James, 1993. An Exaltation of Larks: The Ultimate Edition. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
, Shu-Xiang (吕叔湘), 1980/1999. Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci. [Eight Hundred Characters in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press. (In Chinese.)
Lyons, John, 1977. Semantics, Volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mathieu, Eric, 2012. On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. In Massam, Diane (ed.), Count and Mass across Languages, pp. 172–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mel’čuk, I., 1985. Poverxnostnyj Sintaksis Russkix čislovyx Vyraženij, Wiener Slawistischer Almanach Sonderband 16. Vienna: Institut fur Slavistic der Universitat Wien.
Mithun, Marianne, 1988. Lexical categories and the evolution of number marking. In Hammond, M. and Noonan, M. (eds.), Theoretical Morphology, pp. 211–34. New York: Academic Press.
Mittwoch, Anita, 1988. Aspects of English aspect: on the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 2, 203–54.
Moshavi, Adina, and Rothstein, Susan, in press. Indefinite numerical construct phrases in Biblical Hebrew. Journal of Semitic Studies.
Müller, Anna, Storto, Luciana and Thiago, Coutinho, 2006. Number and the mass/count distinction in Karitiana. In Fujimori, A. and Silva, M. A. Reis (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas, pp. 122–35. Vancouver: UBC Working Papers in Linguistics.
Partee, Barbara H., 2008. Negation, intensionality, and aspect: interaction with NP semantics. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect, pp. 291317. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Partee, Barbara H., and Borschev, Vladimir, 2012. Sortal, relational, and functional interpretations of nouns and Russian container constructions. Journal of Semantics 29, 4, 445–86.
Paul, Waltraud, in press. The insubordinate subordinator ‘de’ in Mandarin Chinese. To appear in Tang, S.-W. (ed.), The Attributive Particle in Chinese, Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics Series. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Peano, Giuseppe, 1889. Arithmetices principia: nova methodo. Turin: Fratres Bocca. Translated as The principles of arithmetic, presented by a new method. In van Heijenoort, J. (ed.), 1967. From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, pp. 8397. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, 1975. Non-singular reference: some preliminaries. Philosophia 5, 4, 451–65.
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, (ed.) 1979. Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems. Berlin: Springer (Reidel).
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, 2012. Lexical Nouns are both +MASS and +COUNT but they are neither +MASS nor +COUNT. In Massam, D. (ed.), Count and Mass across Languages, pp. 926. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peyraube, Alain, 1999. On the modal auxiliaries of possibility in Classical Chinese. In Wang, H. Samuel, Tsao, Feng-fu and Lien, Chin-fa (eds.), Selected Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, pp. 2752. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta, and Rothstein, Susan, 2011. Bare singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 121, 2153–75.
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta, and Rothstein, Susan, 2013. Bare singular objects in Brazilian Portuguese: perfectivity, telicity and kinds. In Kabatek, J. and Wall, A. (eds.), New Perspectives on Bare Noun Phrases in Romance and Beyond, Studies in Language Companion Series 141, pp. 89222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ritter, Elizabeth, 1988. A head movement approach to construct state phrases. Linguistics 26, 909–29.
Ritter, Elizabeth, 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Perspectives on Phrase Structure, Syntax and Semantics 25, pp. 3762. New York: Academic Press.
Rothstein, Susan, 1999. Fine-grained structure in the eventuality domain: the semantics of predicative adjective phrases and be. Natural Language Semantics 7, 4, 347420.
Rothstein, Susan, 2000. Domain selection in relative clauses. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Syntax and Semantics of Relative Clauses. Tel Aviv University. June.
Rothstein, Susan, 2001. Predicates and their Subjects. Berlin: Springer (Kluwer).
Rothstein, Susan, 2004. Structuring Events: a Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rothstein, Susan, 2009. Individuating and measure readings of classifier constructions: evidence from Modern Hebrew. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1, 106–45.
Rothstein, Susan, 2010. Counting, measuring and the mass count distinction. Journal of Semantics 27, 3, 343–97.
Rothstein, Susan, 2011. Counting, measuring and the semantics of classifiers. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Volume VI.
Rothstein, Susan, 2012. Numericals: counting, measuring and classifying. In Aguilar-Guevara, A., Chernilovskaya, A. and Nouwen, R. (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16, pp. 527–43. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Rothstein, Susan, 2013a. A Fregean semantics for number words. In Aloni, Maria, Franke, Michael and Roelofsen, Floris (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 179–86.
Rothstein, Susan, 2013b. Counting, measuring and the mass/count distinction. Paper presented at the Düsseldorf Workshop on Countability, September.
Rothstein, Susan, 2013c Acrosslinguistic perspective on bare nominals: Modern Hebrew and Brazilian Portuguese. In Kabatek, J. and Wall, A. (eds.), New Perspective on Base Noun Phrases in Romance and Beyond, Studies in Language Companion series 141.
Rothstein, Susan, 2016a. Counting and Measuring: a theoretical and crosslinguistic account. In Rothstein, S. and Šķilters, J. (eds.), The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Volume XI: Number: Cognitive, Semantic and Crosslinguistic Approaches. Kansas: New Prairie Press. [Online publication]
Rothstein, Susan, 2016b. Counting, measuring and approximation. Paper presented at the Second Düsseldorf Workshop on Countability. June.
Rothstein, Susan, and Pires de Oliveira, Roberta, in press. Comparatives in Brazilian Portuguese: counting and measuring. In Moltmann, F. (ed.), Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rothstein, Susan, and Treves, Alessandro, 2010. Computational constraints on compositional interpretation: refocusing the debate on language universals. Lingua 120, 12, 2717–22.
Rotstein, Carmen, and Winter, Yoad, 2004. Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12, 3, 259–88.
Schmitt, Cristina, and Munn, Alan, 1999. Against the nominal mapping parameter: bare nouns in Brazilian Portuguese. In Mako, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 29: University of Delaware, pp. 339–54. Delaware: University of Delaware.
Schmitt, Cristina, and Munn, Alan, 2002. Bare nouns and the morphosyntax of number. In Tamanji, P., Hirotani, M. and Hall, N. (eds.), Current Issues in Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Ann Arbor, 8–11 April 1999, pp. 225–39. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Schvarcz, Brigitta R., 2014. The Hungarians Who Say -nyi: Issues in Counting and Measuring in Hungarian. Unpublished MA thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan.
Schvarcz, Brigitta R., in press. Classifier constructions in Hungarian and the semantics of the suffix -nyi. To appear in Liptak, A. and van der Hulst, H. (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schvarcz, Brigitta R., and Rothstein, Susan, in press. Hungarian classifier constructions and the mass/count distinction. To appear in Liptak, A. and van der Hulst, H. (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schwarzschild, Roger, 2006. The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 9, 1, 67110.
Schwarzschild, Roger, 2011. Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In Lima, S., Mullin, K. and Smith, B. (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, pp. 661–78. Amherst: GLSA.
Selkirk, Elisabeth O., 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Culicover, P. W., Wasow, T. and Akmajian, A. (eds.), Formal Syntax, pp. 285316. New York: Academic Press.
Sharvy, Richard, 1978. Maybe English has no count nouns: notes on Chinese semantics. An essay in metaphysics and linguistics. Studies in Language 2, 3, 345–65.
Siloni, Tal, 2001. Construct States at the PF interface. In Pica, Pierre (ed.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1, pp. 229–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Soja, Nancy N., Carey, Susan and Spelke, Elisabeth, 1991. Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meaning: object terms and substance terms. Cognition 38, 2, 179211.
Srinivasan, Mahesh, Chestnut, Eleanor, Li, Peggy and Barner, David, 2013. Sortal concepts and pragmatic inference in children’s early quantification of objects. Cognitive Psychology 66, 3, 302–26.
Sybesma, Rint, 2007. Běifāng fāngyán hé Yuèyǔ zhōng míngcí de kěshǔbiāojì [Markers of countability on the noun in Mandarin and Cantonese]. Yŭyánxué lùncōng 35, 234–45.
Tai, James H.-Y., and Lianqing, Wang, 1990. A semantic study of the classifier tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 25, 3556.
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane, 1990. Chinese Phrase Structure and the Extended X-bar theory. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca.
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane, 2005. Nouns or classifiers: a non-movement analysis of classifiers in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 6, 3, 431–72.
Tsoulas, George, 2006. Plurality of mass nouns and the grammar of number. Handout from talk presented at Generative Linguistics in the Old World 2006. Barcelona, 6–8 April.
Varzi, Achille C., 2007. Spatial reasoning and ontology: parts, wholes, and locations. In Aiello, M., Pratt-Hartmann, I., and van Benthem, J. F. A. K. (eds.), Handbook of Spatial Logics, pp. 9451038. Berlin: Springer (Kluwer).
Wągiel, Marcin, 2015. Sums and groups: semantic analysis of Polish numerals. In Zybatow, Gerhild, Biskup, Petr, Guhl, Marcel, Hurtig, Claudia, Mueller-Reichau, Olav and Yastrebova, Maria (eds.), Slavic Grammar from a Formal Perspective: The 10th Anniversary FDSL Conference, Leipzig 2013, pp. 495514. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Watters, John Roberts, 1981. A phonology and morphology of Ejagham – with notes on dialectal variation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Wiese, Heike, 2003. Numbers, Language and the Human Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilhelm, Andrea, 2008. Bare nouns and number in Dëne Sųłiné. Natural Language Semantics 16, 3968.
Wilkinson, Karina, 1995. The semantics of the common noun kind. In Carlson, G. N. and Pelletier, F. J. (eds.), The Generic Book, pp. 383–97. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wiltschko, Martina, 2008. The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26, 3, 639–94.
Yadroff, Michael, and Billings, Loren, 1998. The syntax of approximative inversion in Russian (and the general architecture of nominal expressions). In Bošković, Željko, Franks, Steven and Snyder, William (eds.), Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 6: The Connecticut Meeting 1997, pp. 319–38. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Yang, Rong, 2001. Common Nouns, Classifiers, and Quantification in Chinese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University, New Jersey.
Yip, Chak-Lam, 2008. Complicating the oversimplification: Chinese numeral classifiers and true measures. In Chan, M. K. M. and Kang, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, pp. 285–95. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Zaroukian, Erin, 2011. Divergent approximators. In Reich, I., Horch, E. and Pauly, D. (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15, pp. 677–90. Saarbrücken: Universaar – Saarland University Press.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 31
Total number of PDF views: 1686 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 2608 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th April 2017 - 19th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.