Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T22:00:49.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Remembering the Rites: Religious Learning Network Model and Transmission of Religious Rituals in the Worship of Nutrices Augustae (Poetovio, Pannonia Superior)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Blanka Misic
Affiliation:
Champlain College, Lennoxville
Abigail Graham
Affiliation:
Institute of Classical Studies, London

Summary

This chapter explores how religious knowledge, including rituals, was learned and transmitted by putting forward a novel, cognitive-based, theoretical framework for analysing ritual practices in the Graeco-Roman world. This framework, termed the Religious Learning Network (RLN) theoretical model, is tested within a case study of archaeological and epigraphic evidence of Nutrices Augustae, a cult of local Pannonian healing mother-goddesses. Applying the Religious Learning Network model provides an insight into the types of rituals that may have taken place within this cult as well as the cognitive and social effects that these rituals may have produced upon the ritual participants. This chapter demonstrates that rituals were learned and transmitted within intimate circles through cult members’ interaction with objects, places, and events; forming a dynamic network of memory associations that helped in the encoding, storage, and retrieval of religious and ritual memories.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Introduction

In recent years, an interest in the interdisciplinary study of religious ritual has emerged among scholars of antiquity. In attempting to explain how religious knowledge, including rituals, is learned and transferred, certain scholars of antiquity have turned to theories from Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR).Footnote 1 Although certain cognitive theories, such as Harvey Whitehouse’s Modes of Religiosity,Footnote 2 have become prominent, most current CSR theoretical models were initially developed and based on modern religious practices and so may not be best suited to examining ancient religions. Unlike scholars of modern religions, scholars of ancient religions cannot conduct participant interviews and surveys and instead must make inferences principally from material evidence and texts, which are often incomplete and/or contradictory. Therefore, reconciling the process of learning and transmission of religious rituals between individuals, social groups, and material culture still proves problematic. In order to address these issues, I propose a new, CSR-based theoretical framework for understanding the process of learning and transfer of religious and ritual knowledge within ancient religions, which I term the Religious Learning Network (RLN) theoretical model.

It is to be noted that the RLN model does not claim to provide a universal explanation for ritual transmissionFootnote 3 – for example, it does not yet account for ritual deviationFootnote 4 or change in ritual practices that can occur over several generations. The RLN model does, however, contribute to bridging the gap between cognitive science research on ritual transmission and memory and historical and archaeological study of ritual communication, performance, and experience.Footnote 5 The aim of the RLN is to provide a testable model for how religious rituals were learned and transmitted in the context of the Graeco-Roman world. In this respect, the RLN aligns with a fundamental CSR aim to produce ‘general models intended to provoke further research by applying them to specific contexts with an understanding of the cultural and historical context within which religious ideas are communicated’.Footnote 6 As a theoretical model of ritual learning and transmission designed to be applied to material and archaeological evidence, the value of RLN rests with the possibilities it offers to be tested further in the context of different ancient cults. The RLN can therefore serve as a model for comparing different religious ritual traditions and practices throughout the Graeco-Roman world. The aim of the present chapter is to outline the RLN theoretical model and apply it within a case study of a Roman provincial mother-goddess cult, the Nutrices Augustae, so that we may better understand the types of rituals that may have been observed, the cognitive and social effects that these rituals may have produced upon the ritual participants, and the methods through which ritual knowledge was transmitted within this cult.

The cult of the Nutrices Augustae was chosen as the focus of this study for two reasons. First, as one of the best-attested cults in southern Pannonia in terms of iconographic and epigraphic evidence, the cult of the Nutrices Augustae can provide us with invaluable insight into Pannonian religious practices. Since the evidence for the worship of the Nutrices Augustae is confined to the Pannonian colony of Poetovio and its vicinity, and since this cult is not attested elsewhere in the Roman Empire, it becomes an even more important case study for understanding local provincial religions and ritual practices. Although previous publications on the Nutrices Augustae have focused on exploring the nature and origins of the cult, no publication to date has specifically explored its ritual practices. The application of the cognitive RLN model to the material evidence of the cult of Nutrices Augustae will offer a novel perspective for interpreting this evidence, thus providing a deeper understanding of this cult and the religious rituals and practices that occurred within it. Second, the cult of the Nutrices Augustae was chosen as the focus of this study because it is one of the rare cults from the Roman Empire that features cross-generational ritual participation, with both parents and children recorded as worshippers of the Nutrices Augustae. Thus, the application of the RLN model to the evidence of the cult of the Nutrices Augustae can serve to further the understanding of both horizontal (between individuals in the same community) and vertical (from one generation to another) transmission of cultural and religious knowledge in the Roman Empire. This chapter aims to answer the following questions: what insights can the RLN theoretical model offer regarding the nature of rituals that took place in the cult of Nutrices Augustae? What cognitive and social effects could these rituals have produced on their participants? And last, how were rituals in the cult of the Nutrices Augustae learned and transmitted from one generation to another (i.e. from parents to children)?

Religious Learning Network Theoretical Model

Central to the understanding and transfer of religious ideas is the individual worshipper’s mind. Despite individual differences in how we learn, understand, and interpret information, all learning and exchange of information requires interaction with external stimuli.Footnote 7 These stimuli can be divided into four categories: people, places, objects, and events. Together, these stimuli form a common ground on which religious knowledge can be built and transferred among worshippers (Figure 1.1).

Figure 1.1 Religious Learning Network theoretical model: Part 1.

Figure created by the author.

First, an individual learns by interacting with people, through observation, imitation, collaboration, and/or verbal and non-verbal communication.Footnote 8 Within a religious context, an individual gains religious knowledge by observing, imitating, and communicating with fellow cult members and religious authority figures, who serve as learning aides in initiating the individual into the religion.Footnote 9 Depending on situational contexts, individuals employ differing variations and combinations of these approaches, consciously or unconsciously throughout their lives, in order to achieve the best learning outcomes.Footnote 10 For example, children frequently engage in overimitation,Footnote 11 copying even unnecessary movements in a sequence of action, which adults are less prone to do since they have a greater understanding of causality of actions.Footnote 12 These learning strategies (observation, imitation, collaboration, and verbal and non-verbal communication) do not only occur in the context of religious and/or ritual learning, but are connected to everyday experiences, existing in a wider ‘constellation of cultural practices’.Footnote 13 Thus, as individuals accumulate knowledge gained through life experiences within a particular cultural environment, they are able to extrapolate and apply this knowledge across different situations within the same (or similar) cultural context.

Second, an individual learns by interacting with a specific place through sensory cues. The architectural layout, the decorative features, and the smells, sounds, and objects specific to a particular place all contribute towards building a memory of and around that place.Footnote 14 Therefore, a multifaceted ‘memory of place’ is created within the individual through the combined sensory experience of a particular location.Footnote 15 The focal place for cultic activities is most often a temple, which through the numinous quality placed upon it by the community of worshippers, as well as through its repeated use (such as continued deposition of offerings), can become not only a place that preserves memory (lieu de mémoire) but also an agent in the transmission of religious knowledge.Footnote 16

Third, an individual learns by interacting with objects through observation and/or physical manipulation (touching/handling). Objects, like places, are not passive entities, but can tacitly communicate information.Footnote 17 Within a religious context, for example, when a worshipper sees an altar, they will quickly learn through observation what size and shape the altar should take, and if they witness another worshipper interacting with it they will be able to imitate the actions. Likewise, through physical manipulation of cult instruments an individual learns how they should be used. When handling a sacrificial knife, for example, an individual quickly discovers that the knife should be gripped by the handle since holding it by the blade is not only impractical but also dangerous, and since it is impossible to cut the sacrificial animal with the handle. Moreover, by retrieving past memories of encounters with similar objects (e.g. kitchen knives, daggers etc.) an individual who has never handled a sacrificial knife, for example, can also extrapolate through memory association how a sacrificial knife should be handled.Footnote 18 The individual may not be able to recall every single time they have used a knife-like object in their life, but through accumulation and association of these past experiences they will have gained the general knowledge of what a knife looks like, how it should be used, what events/situations require the use of a knife and so on.Footnote 19 Therefore, objects can exhibit agency by conveying sensory information about their appearance and their mode of use, but also by ‘triggering’ memories of past experiences that can then elicit particular emotional and behavioural responses.Footnote 20

Last, an individual learns by interacting with events through observation, imitation, and/or participation.Footnote 21 An event, such as a religious ritual, is often participatory in natureFootnote 22 – it brings people, objects, and place(s) together within the same temporal-spatial environment. Ritual events also bind participants together through shared, repeated, and choreographed proceedings.Footnote 23 Therefore, the people, the places, the objects, and the events that an individual interacts with become pillars on which their memories and knowledge are built. So, for example, if we remember a specific ritual (event), we will also remember by association where it took place, who we were with, what objects we used, and what we were doing. These pillars (people, places, objects, and events) dynamically form a network of memory associations, helping in the encoding, storage, and recall of information.Footnote 24 This network of memory associations, in its turn, forms an autobiographical narrative particular to each individual, which can facilitate the processing and remembering of complex phenomena, such as religious rituals.Footnote 25 As individuals reflect on the events, people, objects, and places that form their life experience, and thus construct their autobiographical narrative, they can derive a sense of meaning that will shape their identities. Emotionally intense experiences in particular, such as vivid religious rituals, may prompt an individual to create meaning from their individual religious experience.Footnote 26 As episodic events that build upon autobiographical knowledge,Footnote 27 rituals are personal (and often highly emotional) lived experiences, whose repeated performance becomes embodied and embedded in various (albeit connected) ways. The autobiographical narrative, thus, is the culmination of the individual’s lived experiences – the places, objects, people, and events that the individual experiences form a network of memory associations.Footnote 28

This network may become re-enforced through repeated and/or similar experiences that build upon existing memories and experiences,Footnote 29 reshaping an individual’s autobiographical narrative. In this respect, memories are malleable and can become reconsolidated and reformed upon retrieval.Footnote 30 While an individual may forget certain details of an event, or even misremember, the factual accuracy of the event memory is not necessarily important – the individual’s perception of its validity and its importance is. Autobiographical memories, therefore, are selective.Footnote 31 Research suggests that memories that are closely connected to self-identity are perceived as more important and thus more memorable.Footnote 32 Autobiographical memories are also situational: they are embedded within particular contexts and memory network associations. What an individual remembers and how an individual remembers is influenced by various contextual factors and cues during memory formation as well as during subsequent memory retrieval.Footnote 33 For example, recalling an event in conversation with others can restructure an individual’s original memory of the event depending on which details are emphasized in conversation during recall, who is recounting the event, and so on.Footnote 34 The retrieval and reactivation of a memory allows that memory to be modified, incorporating subsequent new and related memories that can be grouped by association.Footnote 35 Therefore, although a memory from an individual’s autobiographical narrative can change and become reformed upon retrieval, the dynamic recall and reconsolidation process, by being built on existing memories and experiences, connects memories within an associative memory network, which can become re-enforced through repetition.

Within the RLN theoretical model, there are two exerting forces that play a role in the process of learning and remembering religious experiences. The first is repetition. A key characteristic of rituals is that they are repetitive, redundant, and occur in a specific sequence (rituals are often rigid, scripted, and synchronized).Footnote 36 Ritual actions are repetitive in order to ‘attract and hold attention’.Footnote 37 Repetitive, redundant sequences of action stand out from everyday efficiency-oriented actions and are therefore attention-grabbing. Increased attention during ritual proceedings combined with repetition of movements would have led to a better learning and remembering of ritual events. Additionally, the motivation to ensure a successful ritual and a positive ritual outcome would have also led to ‘mimicking previous successful practices’.Footnote 38 Roman rituals, in particular, were known for their ‘high levels of routinization and procedural rigor’.Footnote 39 Unless completed correctly, rituals had to be repeated until the desired effect was achieved.Footnote 40 Considering such a high emphasis on correct performance, it is likely that individuals intentionally attempted to repeat and/or overimitate ritual actions that had produced a positive outcome in the past, leading to high-fidelity learning and transmission of ritual.Footnote 41 Ritual proceedings may also have been rehearsed in one’s mind prior to the performance of a ritual in order to ensure correct performance and success of ritual.Footnote 42 Last, participating in the same ritual several times over the course of one’s life would have likewise served to re-enforce memories of ritual proceedings. Thus, physical repetition of ritual actions and/or rehearsal of ritual in one’s mind would have facilitated the learning and remembering of ritual proceedings. Ultimately, the repetition of ritual and its associations (people, places, objects, and events) would have reinforced the bonds between them and subsequently the whole memory network (Figure 1.2).Footnote 43

Figure 1.2 Religious Learning Network theoretical model: Part 2.

Figure created by the author.

Another exerting force on learning and remembering ritual experiences is emotional investment.Footnote 44 The greater the emotional value placed on the divinity, the fellow worshippers, the temple, the rituals, and the ritual objects on the part of the worshipper, the more he or she will pay attention and be willing to learn, as well as remember longer.Footnote 45 In their turn, the four external stimuli (people, places, objects, and events) can also evoke emotional and motivational responses that drive behaviour. Research on autobiographical memories indicates that memories that include emotional content appear to be more memorable, and that even when individuals make an effort to suppress highly emotional memories (e.g. memories of traumatic events) those memories nevertheless persist.Footnote 46 The Religious Learning Network (RLN) theoretical model, therefore, facilitates narrative processing – the remembrance of ritual in narrative format – through a network of associations of ritual components (people, places, objects, and events) in combination with emotionality and repetition.

Nutrices Augustae

The Nutrices Augustae, female goddesses associated with the safekeeping of children, are almost exclusively recorded in the Roman colony of Poetovio (Ulpia Traiana Poetovionensis), corresponding to modern-day Ptuj, Slovenia.Footnote 47 The territory of Poetovio came to be occupied by the Roman army as of approximately 12 BCE, gaining colonial status under the emperor Trajan, and becoming the administrative centre of the province of Pannonia Superior. The neighbourhoods of Spodnja Hajdina (Vicus Fortunae) and Zgornji Breg seem to have been settled first, with Panorama, Vičava, and Rabelčja vas formed subsequently, once the settlement grew. The cosmopolitan settlers of Poetovio brought their gods with them from all corners of the Empire, who amalgamated with each other and with other pre-existing Celtic, Illyrian, and Pannonian divinities. Of these, the most popular at Poetovio were Jupiter, Mithras, and the Nutrices Augustae.Footnote 48

The Nutrices AugustaeFootnote 49 are goddesses of possibly Celtic origin, and their cult may be connected with other Celtic healing and mother goddesses.Footnote 50 In terms of material evidence, they are attested primarily by inscribed and uninscribed reliefs, dating from the mid-second to the mid-third centuries CE.Footnote 51 Even though several studies have been conducted on the cult of the Nutrices,Footnote 52 no study to date has specifically addressed the nature of rituals nor the effects of rituals that may have taken place within this cult. Therefore, I argue that if we take an event (in this case worship of the Nutrices) and apply it within the Religious Learning Network (RLN) model by examining the organisation of religious place(s) (in this case Nutrices sanctuary), the votive objects (in this case reliefs), and the people connected with the cult of the Nutrices (in this case inscriptions recording worshippers), we will be able to demystify what types of rituals occurred, what effects these rituals produced on the participants, as well as how ritual proceedings were learned and transmitted among worshippers.

Although the Nutrices are always invoked in plural form, on reliefs they are most often depicted as a lone sitting goddess holding an infant (sometimes swaddled, sometimes not) to her exposed left breast in the act of nursing.Footnote 53 The Nutrix is usually portrayed seated on the right side of the relief, an altar in front of her. An approaching mother-figure, positioned usually in the centre of the relief, holds out an infant towards the Nutrix. Behind the mother-figure stands an accompanying woman holding a tray or a basket of offerings on her head (Figure 1.3).Footnote 54

Figure 1.3 Nutrices Augustae relief (PMPO, RL 978), held in Pokrajinski muzej Ptuj Ormož.

photo by Boris Farič (reproduced with permission from the museum)Footnote 57

It is to be noted, however, that the iconography on the Nutrices reliefs is not homogenous, and that there are some iconographic variations of this scene. For example, AE 1986, 564 depicts two Nutrices, one on each side of the relief, with the mother-figure holding the hand of a little girl in the middle. AIJ 325 features a seated Nutrix in the centre of the relief, flanked by two female worshippers. AIJ 326 features a lone female worshipper making an offering on the altar in front of the Nutrix, while AIJ 330 depicts a lone seated Nutrix. Finally, AIJ 327 depicts a young boy extending an offering to the Nutrix while an accompanying female figure, standing behind the boy, holds a tray of offerings on her head (Figure 1.4).Footnote 55

Figure 1.4 Nutrices Augustae relief (PMPO, RL 82), held in Pokrajinski muzej Ptuj Ormož.

photo by Boris Farič (reproduced with permission from the museum)Footnote 59

We must be careful not to interpret these relief scenes as realistic representations of ritual.Footnote 56 Roman iconographic scenes of sacrificial rituals are known to combine different ritual elements and depict them as if happening simultaneously, or even present a particular ‘snapshot’ of more extensive ritual proceedings.Footnote 58 However, it is possible that the iconographic variations observed on Nutrices reliefs may reflect the diversity of ritual experiences. Within the cognitive sciences an individual’s mind and their autobiographical memories are understood to be situated and extended into the environment which surrounds the individual. Since autobiographical memory is selective and finite (i.e. individuals can retain only so much information and are not able to encode and recall every detail of what they perceive), an individual’s environment therefore serves to extend and ‘scaffold’ their memories and cognitive processes.Footnote 60 This environment (e.g. places, objects, people, and events) can be imbued with mnemonic cues which can ‘trigger’ within the individual memories of past experiences. For example, students use course notes to remember past lectures and mixologists keep track of drinks ordered by making use of different cocktail glasses.Footnote 61 However, the environment which surrounds an individual is not a mere passive holder of offloaded memories; through active engagement and re-engagement with their changing environment an individual’s cognitive processing and their memories can be reshaped. In this respect, the individual and their surrounding environment interact in a dynamic process of ‘externalizing and reperceiving’.Footnote 62

These cognitive approaches can be applied to the iconographic variations on Nutrices reliefs in order to provide an insight on the diversity of religious experiences. The representations of ritual on the Nutrices reliefs should not be taken at face value as veritable ‘snapshot’ images of ritual proceedings, but instead the reliefs may be understood as objects which extend the memory of an individual’s ritual experience into an environment. As each individual worshipper forms an autobiographic memory of their ritual experience, the setting up of an ex voto relief would have served as a material and external manifestation of the individual’s ritual experience and ritual memory. Each individual, therefore, may have selected and dedicated a relief that represented an aspect of their ritual experience that they deemed most important, and which closely aligned with their self-identity. This does not mean that the relief would have necessarily depicted accurate sequences of ritual proceedings, rather that it illustrated what the dedicator perceived as most pertinent to their own ritual experience. Since individual ritual experiences and autobiographical memories differed from worshipper to worshipper, these corresponding Nutrices reliefs would have translated into a variety of iconographic depictions, reflecting a variety of individual ritual experiences.

Dedicated reliefs, which formed part of the permanent decoration of the temple, may have also served to trigger and reshape the memory of past ritual experiences for individual worshippers visiting the temple.Footnote 63 A worshipper would have engaged not only with their own ex voto, but also with the dedications of other worshippers which were placed in the temple, serving simultaneously as reminders of others’ fulfilled vows and of their own completed ritual proceedings. Different relief images may have engaged individual worshippers on different levels: for some a certain relief image may have triggered emotional aspects of their own ritual experience, for others a relief image may have triggered forgotten details of their own ritual memory. An individual’s engagement with different reliefs would have therefore produced a dynamic recall and reconsolidation process of their own ritual experience, triggering some aspects of the original memory while also adding layers of new meaning and new memory associations.

Place

Archaeological remains record only one Nutrices sanctuary located at Spodnja Hajdina, with two other sanctuaries presumed to be located at Zgornji Breg and Panorama.Footnote 64 The Spodnja Hajdina temple is small, measuring 11.30 × 8 metres, and of a rectangular, almost trapezoidal shape. In total twenty-three reliefs were found in or adjacent to the temple.Footnote 65 The temple is positioned within a religious complex, close to the first and the second Mithraeum (i.e. temple to Mithras), with some Nutrices dedications discovered inside the second Mithraeum.Footnote 66 The second Nutrices sanctuary, presumed to have existed at Zgornji Breg, would have been located adjacent to the third Mithraeum. Only three reliefs were discovered here.Footnote 67 The third sanctuary is presumed to have existed at Panorama on the basis of seven reliefs discovered in secondary use. Based on these finds, it is possible that these temples were smaller than the one at Spodnja Hajdina, with worshippers forming likely intimate, close-knit bonds.Footnote 68 The inscribed reliefs from these sanctuaries record a mix of slave and citizen dedicators.Footnote 69 Therefore, we have at least three sanctuaries to the Nutrices located within Poetovio, all in use simultaneously. It would appear then that each congregation created its own local, neighbourhood temple. This organisation may have promoted distinct neighbourhood identities, while at the same time fostering solidarity among the different inhabitants of Poetovio.

As the RLN model stipulates, the architectural features of a sanctuary can give us an indication of what types of religious rituals may have taken place there. On the basis of preserved archaeological remains of the Spodnja Hajdina temple we can draw certain conclusions. First, the small size of the temple limited the number of worshippers that could assist and/or participate in the rituals. Accounting for the measurements of the temple, only a few worshippers (perhaps one or two extended families) may have been able to fit inside the temple at a time. Such a confining space would have restricted movement, meaning that rituals likely did not involve large gatherings nor elaborate pageantry. The rituals which took place then, were likely an intimate affair, fostering close interactions among worshippers, and promoting the formation of local group identities.

Additionally, the small number of dedications preserved, only twenty-three in over a century of use, further support the claim that the cult of the Nutrices may have been exclusive.Footnote 70 Legible inscribed dedications from the Spodnja Hajdina sanctuary indicate that at least some worshippers were slaves employed in the imperial administrative and customs service.Footnote 71 It is therefore possible that the cult would have been purposefully kept small, administered possibly through social and/or professional networks. The Poetovian Mithraic congregations appear to have been similarly organised: formed largely around social and professional networks (recorded worshippers include slaves/freedmen in the imperial administrative and customs service, and soldiers), with up to five temples spread throughout the different neighbourhoods of the city.Footnote 72 Considering the geographical proximity of the Spodnja Hajdina temple to the first and the second Mithraeum, and the fact that slaves and freedmen working for the imperial administrative and customs services are found as worshippers of both Mithras and the Nutrices, one could speculate that the Spodnja Hajdina sanctuary was initially built and frequented by these men and their families, whose offices and perhaps living quarters may have been located nearby.Footnote 73 The cult of the Nutrices, thus, may have mirrored the intimate, tightly-knit ties of the Mithraic cell (congregation), while catering to those whom Mithras could not help – the non-initiate wives and children.Footnote 74

Secondly, the small size of the Spodnja Hajdina Nutrices temple would have framed the sensory experience of the worshippers, creating a more favourable environment for the learning and transmission of religious knowledge. In essence, since the temple was small, the worshippers likely stood close to each other, perhaps even touching; and the view, sound, and smell of the ritual proceedings may have been relatively unhindered. The physical closeness between worshippers, as well as the intimate atmosphere, would have contributed to creating not only close-knit bonds between the ritual participants; but since they were able to hear, see, and experience all the ritual proceedings from close-up, their likelihood of learning and remembering the ritual proceedings would have been increased. These claims align well with the RLN model, which stipulates that individuals interact and learn from a specific environment through visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory, and tactile cues. Therefore, the architectural layout, the decorative features, and the smells, sounds, and objects that the worshipper came in contact with during ritual would have all contributed towards creating a network of memory associations, effectively encoding the memory of the ritual as an autobiographical narrative.Footnote 75

Objects

In addition to the architectural features of a sanctuary, decorative and votive objects also played an important role in the learning and transmission of religious knowledge. The act of setting up an inscribed altar or relief forms one part of ritual performance in itself, and these objects indicate that significant effort, time, and financial resources were put into their planning, manufacture, and consecration in the temple.Footnote 76 In particular objects in stone, such as reliefs, statues, and altars, would have formed a key and permanent aspect of the decoration of the sanctuary, becoming an integral part of the ‘persistent place’ of the temple.Footnote 77

Although, as discussed above, we must be careful not to interpret the reliefs dedicated to the Nutrices as completely realistic representations of ritual proceedings, nevertheless, they may offer us some clues as to what type of rituals may have been performed. A standard motif on the Nutrices reliefs is the depiction of female worshipper(s) bringing offerings of foodstuffs, often interpreted as fruit, bread, or cakes to the seated goddess (see Figure 1.3 and Figure 1.4).Footnote 78 Šašel-Kos notes that in the case of the nursing Kourotrophoi goddesses ‘cakes made of first-fruit were offered to them, since these goddesses were essentially deities of fertility’.Footnote 79 Due to their connection to nursing and safeguarding of children, it is possible that the Nutrices also received similar offerings. Some reliefs also depict offerings of liquids, as an urceus (jug for liquid libations)Footnote 80 and a patera (dish used in sacrificial rituals)Footnote 81 can be seen in use.Footnote 82 It is possible that water played an important role in Nutrices rituals due to its purifying and healing properties.Footnote 83 A female worshipper on AIJ 325 carries a towel, indicating the act of ritual hand-washing.Footnote 84 Additionally, water elements are indicated on a relief depicting a Nutrix sitting next to a woman, presumably a Nymph, who carries a sea shell;Footnote 85 as well as by the fact that the Spodnja Hajdina sanctuary was located in close proximity to a spring. Therefore, water may have been used for purification prior to the start of the ritual(s), as well as an offering for health during ritual(s).

In addition to offerings of food and liquids, it is also possible that incense may have formed part of the Nutrices ritual. The burning of incense was a frequent offering to the divinities in Roman religious practice.Footnote 86 Gurlitt interprets a cylindrical canister carried by an attendant on AIJ 334Footnote 87 as a portable incense altar;Footnote 88 while another relief appears to show a female worshipper carrying a box of incense and making an offering over an altar.Footnote 89 Incense may have been burned as an additional form of purification, and/or to call down the attention of the divinity.Footnote 90 The cylindrical canister may be alternatively understood as a lantern,Footnote 91 in which case it may indicate that rituals took place inside the temple and/or in low light (early morning/evening). Representations on reliefs give no indication that music accompanied the rituals described above, or that public processions or animal sacrifices were part of rituals performed; however, as discussed above, the relief images may only depict select aspects of more extensive ritual proceedings.

If we interpret this evidence within the RLN model we can see that the objects used would have played an important role in the encoding and transmission of religious knowledge. The worshippers’ senses would have been engaged through the manipulation of the objectsFootnote 92 – the texture of incense upon touch, its pungent smell when burned, the sight of flickering lantern light, the sound of pouring liquid, combined with the sacredness of the temple and the emotional connection to the goddess(es) and fellow worshippers, all worked to create a network of associations in the memory of the worshipper. This would have resulted in a distinctive sensorial experience for each worshipper,Footnote 93 becoming part of their autobiographical narrative. Additionally, since these same cult objects (e.g. urceus, patera etc.) were also used in rituals for other divinities, interaction with them would have evoked memories of previously performed rituals.Footnote 94 Furthermore, because religious rituals in the Roman world were sequenced and repetitive events, observed and/or performed since childhood, they would have become therefore deeply embodied.Footnote 95

People

In addition to iconography, many reliefs also display inscriptions which indicate that the Nutrices were invoked for healing and/or well-being purposes of a child (the formula pro salute appears on dedications from all three sanctuaries).Footnote 96 It is also possible that the Nutrices were invoked and celebrated during important childhood and/or family transitions (e.g. birth of a child, celebration of a childhood rite of passage, survival of a significant childhood illness etc.).Footnote 97 In pre-modern societies there were significant health risks associated with childbirth and early childhood to an extent that in many cultures ‘the perinatal period is heavily ritualized’.Footnote 98 Nutrices rituals, therefore, may have been special occasion rituals, marking significant events in a child’s life. This may be supported by the small number of dedicated reliefs, although we cannot discount other types of dedications and offerings which have not survived.Footnote 99 If these were special occasion rituals celebrating important life events, then they were likely highly memorable and emotionally arousing rituals tied closely to the identity of the child and their family unit. Whether the Nutrices rituals were the result of positive events (e.g. thanking the goddesses for the birth of a child or celebrating a child’s rite of passage) or negative events (e.g. entreating the goddesses to help a sick child), the emotionality surrounding the event and the shared ritual performance among the members of the family unit would have undoubtedly strengthened the bonds between the ritual participants.Footnote 100

Even if the Nutrices rituals were special occasion rituals and therefore infrequently performed, this does not necessarily signify that they would not have been repeated. A family with multiple children, for example, may have invoked the Nutrices not only during different stages of a child’s life, but would have likely repeated ritual proceedings for each child.Footnote 101 Although we cannot discount the possibility that there may have been different types of Nutrices rituals to mark key events in a child’s life, and we must acknowledge that ritual experiences differed from one ritual to another and from one individual to another; since rituals were shared among the family repeated (even if different) rituals for the Nutrices would have come to form a network of memory associations within the autobiographic memories of participating family members as well as a shared database of religious knowledge. For example, a parent who had already performed a specific Nutrices ritual for one child would have been able to recall the ritual proceeding when the time came to repeat this ritual for subsequent children. These ritual experiences may have been different, but within the parent’s autobiographical narrative they would have formed distinct yet connected memories of the ritual events.Footnote 102 According to the RLN model, therefore, the repetition of ritual and the emotional investment in the ritual and fellow ritual participants helped to embed the memory of ritual proceedings as part of a network of memory associations within an individual’s autobiographical narrative.

According to the legible and/or complete Nutrices relief inscriptions, a significant number of reliefs were set up by both parents on behalf of their child, with perhaps a smaller number of dedications erected by the father or the mother alone.Footnote 103 Although there is no specific mention of children’s ages in the inscriptions, the reliefs depict infants, that is, children under the age of three years old. This early stage of childhood was particularly precarious in the Graeco-Roman world since infants were perceived as feeble, dependent on breastfeeding, and susceptible to various illnesses, thus needing the care of a Nutrix.Footnote 104 It is therefore possible that at least some of the children mentioned on the reliefs would have been afflicted or in danger of some illness or calamity which worried their parents sufficiently in order to solicit the help of the Nutrices.Footnote 105 If this was the case, then the high level of emotional attachment to their children, combined with the high-stress and high-emotionality experienced due to the misfortune of a loved one, would have worked to imprint the ritual proceedings into the memories of the ritual participants.Footnote 106 In other words, since the well-being of their child depended on performing the ritual correctly, the parents would have devoted much attention and effort to memorizing and performing the ritual sequences needed to invoke the Nutrices.

Additionally, it is likely that the parents may have remembered the rituals for a long time, even after the significant event for which the ritual was performed had passed. Recent research on autobiographical memories indicates that ‘memories of turning points in people’s lives … continue to attract attention and evoke feelings … and may guide behavior’.Footnote 107 Therefore, the memory of specific rituals may not only persist due to the emotional importance placed on them; but the parents may continue to repeat Nutrices rituals in order to ensure that their child stays healthy and/or to prevent some future calamity to their child.Footnote 108 In this way, because an illness of a child, for example, is a highly emotional and painful moment of a parent’s life, it becomes an important defining memory, closely tied to their identity as a parent. These self-defining memories elicit not only high emotions, but due to their importance, can also be repeatedly recalled and further linked to related memories,Footnote 109 becoming stronger and more embedded. This is reflected in the RLN model, which posits that emotional investment in a ritual and its repetition work together to embed the ritual memory, which is further reinforced through the network of memory associations.

Another aspect to be observed on the reliefs of the Nutrices cult is the image of the ‘presentation’ of the child. Female worshippers are depicted presenting the child to the Nutrix, holding the child outwards as if the goddess is about to receive it into her own hands and bless it (Figure 1.3).Footnote 110 Thus, the child is blessed and/or healed by the divine (and symbolic) touch and/or presence of the goddess(es) (Figure 1.4). Even if the performed ritual lacked a medical effect, psychologically, the ‘placebo effect’ produced by the ritual would have generated a positive emotional state in the worshipper, providing reassurance, hope, and psychological relief.Footnote 111 In turn, these positive feelings experienced as a result of the performed ritual would have motivated the worshipper to repeat the ritual, effectively re-enforcing ritual behaviourFootnote 112 and embedding the memory of ritual proceedings in the mind of the worshipper. This fits well within the RLN model – emotional attachment to their child and its well-being would have motivated the parents to keep frequenting the temple and to keep participating in rituals. In turn, repeated exposure to the temple, the votive objects, the rituals, and the fellow worshippers would have, through repetition and association, encoded religious knowledge, such as ritual proceedings, in the memory of the individual worshipper.

A further key feature to be observed in the votive evidence of the Nutrices cult is the social nature of ritual. Relief inscriptions record not only the child but also the parent(s) as well as occasionally siblings (Figure 1.3). The reliefs also often depict not only the mother and the child, but very often one and sometimes two additional female figures, who assist in the ritual by carrying the offerings (Figure 1.3). It may be possible to interpret these figures as servants,Footnote 113 fellow worshippers, family members,Footnote 114 and perhaps even as cult attendants, who support the worshipper in the performance of ritual proceedings. It is also possible that, beyond the immediate family members, extended family members, friends, and neighbours also took part in ritual proceedings for the Nutrices, showing up to support each others’ families during significant events in their children’s lives (e.g. celebration of a childhood rite of passage, illness of a child etc.). Cognitive research indicates that group rituals foster both emotional and social bonds between ritual participants – since the individuals who sought the help of the Nutrices all experienced deep concern for the well-being of their children, group rituals would have bonded them through shared feelings and shared performed ritual experience, providing effectively a support group.Footnote 115 In this way, group rituals would have created social cohesion, stability, and routine during uncertain times and/or transitional life events in addition to fostering the creation of local group identities and community ties.Footnote 116

The notion that rituals may have been scripted/choreographed, with everybody knowing their assigned place and actions (e.g. the mother presenting the child, the attendant carrying offerings etc.), would have further reinforced each person’s sense of group belonging, as everybody participated in the same event and had an important role to play in the successful completion of the ritual.Footnote 117 Additionally, if extended family members, friends, and neighbours participated in each others’ ritual proceedings then individuals may have taken part and/or witnessed repeated instances of Nutrices rituals. As Jörg Rüpke points out: ‘Typically, ritual actions did not remain a one-off thing. Patterns of repetition were important for the formation of real or imagined worshipping communities, establishing horizontal relationships of different degrees of intensity.’Footnote 118 Therefore, as the Religious Learning Network theory posits, emotional investment in the well-being of the child, the family unit, and the fellow community of worshippers would have combined with repetition of ritual in order to facilitate the learning and remembering of ritual proceedings.

Finally, we must not forget that since children also observed and participated in the ritual proceedings, religious and ritual knowledge would have been transmitted to the next generation.Footnote 119 Cognitive research indicates that children as young as one year old are capable of learning ritual actions through observation and imitation of adults.Footnote 120 Yet, children are selective learners. They are particularly attentive to various didactic signals (e.g. eye contact, verbal communication paired with actions etc.) from trustworthy in-group members such as parents and relatives, since they seek to affiliate and display a sense of belonging towards the members of their group.Footnote 121 In addition to this motivation for affiliation and conformity, children’s general predisposition for overimitation of adults (i.e. the replication of even redundant gestures in a sequence of action) also results in higher fidelity learning and transmission of knowledge and behaviours between adults and children.Footnote 122 Research from the cognitive sciences, therefore, indicates that children show an innate receptivity towards ritualized activities, since one key aspect of rituals is that they feature redundant actions in a sequenced performance.Footnote 123

Moreover, since rituals are causally opaque (i.e. there is no clear link as to how the ritual actions performed bring about the desired ritual goal), individuals are even more motivated to imitate ritual actions faithfully due to this uncertainty.Footnote 124 This may be particularly true with respect to children, since they are relatively inexperienced ritual participants. Thus, ‘the costs of not imitating with high fidelity in an uncertain situation outweigh the benefits of the reduced effort entailed in imitating with low fidelity’.Footnote 125 Overall, children faithfully copy (i.e. overimitate) the ritual actions of trusted adults because they want to conform and be accepted by their social group.Footnote 126 This high-fidelity imitation ultimately results in high-fidelity learning, even if the learning of the technical elements of the ritual was not the original nor ultimate goal of the child. Overimitation therefore facilitates learning through high-fidelity repetition of even redundant sequences of action, as well as through motivation for emotional and social bonding/affiliation with members of the in-group. This concords with the RLN model, which states that emotional investment and repetition work together to facilitate the learning of ritual elements.

Children are not just observers and imitators, but also actively participate in their learning process through experimentation – they ‘take their apprenticeship into their own hands’.Footnote 127 In the Graeco-Roman world, once a child reached the age of two or three years old they were introduced into religious life and began to participate in religious rituals.Footnote 128 This is corroborated by depictions on Nutrices reliefs – AE 1986, 564 and AIJ 329 both depict a little girl holding a woman’s hand, observing as the woman gives an offering to the Nutrices. Additionally, Figure 1.4 (AIJ 327) depicts a little boy actively participating in the ritual and ‘learning by observing and pitching in’Footnote 129 – he extends an offering to the Nutrix, with an adult female figure standing behind him, likely supervising and guiding him. By observing, participating, and imitating the ritual actions of trusted adults, and the intent seriousness which the adults accord to them, the child is able to infer their importance and sacredness,Footnote 130 as well as to acquire knowledge of ritual activities and norms.Footnote 131

Since the cult of the Nutrices was centred around the family, the inclusion and participation of the child in the ritual proceedings, as a recognized family and community member, would have been even more important. By participating in the ritual proceedings for the Nutrices, the child actively contributed to the well-being and success of their family unit. These different methods of learning and cross-generational knowledge transmission – observation, imitation/overimitation, participation/experimentation and collaboration – have been shown to be present in children across cultural groups,Footnote 132 and therefore very likely also facilitated the transmission of religious knowledge between adults and children in the cult of the Nutrices, and more widely within the Graeco-Roman world.

We also must not forget that learning, remembering, and transmission of knowledge occurs within a social context. Although children learn through observation, imitation, and participation, environmental, cultural, and social influences also play a role in the preservation and transmission of knowledge.Footnote 133 As has been pointed out in the RLN model, an individual’s memories are not only situated and extended within their environment, but memories are also shared, constructed, and reconstructed among individuals and within social groups.Footnote 134 This becomes particularly important if we consider the cross-generational process of learning and remembering. As young and relatively inexperienced participants in ritual events, children would have needed the guidance and encouragement of trusted adults during their performance of ritual duties. As the Nutrices reliefs appear to display, both children and adults thus collaboratively participated in the ritual proceedings, forming, in the process, distinct yet shared autobiographical memories of the ritual event. These memories of a shared ritual event would have served not only to bond the participants socially and emotionallyFootnote 135 but would have also influenced the ways in which the participants remembered the event.

As time passed and children grew up the memory of a specific early childhood event, such as a religious ritual, may have faded, even if that event may have constituted a defining moment of their life (e.g. childhood rite of passage, recovery from a significant illness etc.). However, the trusted adults and family members who participated in the original event alongside the child would have been able to collectively help the child to ‘reconstruct’ the memory of the event. By collaborating and exchanging details from their own autobiographical memories, the participants would have been able to fill the gaps in each others’ memories of the event.Footnote 136 This social, transactiveFootnote 137 process of remembering enables the preservation and cross-generational transmission not merely of specific event details, but more importantly, of shared group values. In this respect, religious knowledge, including religious rituals, and the cultural and social values which they embodied, would have been transferred from parents to children, who, in their turn, would have carried on the worship and the memory of the Nutrices.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Nutrices were worshipped as healing and protective goddesses whose cult was focused on the family, and especially the well-being of children. Due to this fact, rituals performed within the cult created and fostered close-knit ties among the community of worshippers and supported the creation of local identities. As the Religious Learning Network (RLN) model has shown, religious rituals were learned and transferred within intimate circles, between family members and the local community of worshippers, from individual to individual, as well as through interaction with objects, places, and events. In this way, emotional bonds combined with repetitive exposure to external stimuli to form a dynamic network of memory associations, which created a narrative within the life-experience of the individual, making it easier to store and retrieve memories of religious rituals.

Footnotes

* The author would like to express gratitude to participants at TRAC 2018, IACSR 2018, TAG 2018, and TRAC 2019 who provided valuable comments for the development of the RLN model. The author would also like to thank Lee-Ann McKay, Josipa Lulić, Jacob Mackey, Stephen Adams, Emma-Jayne Graham, and Abigail Graham, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions on previous versions of this chapter. All errors remain the author’s own.

3 As Robert N. Reference McCauleyMcCauley (2020: 119) states: ‘CSR’s explanations are like any other scientific explanations … They are theoretical, ergo, they are selective and not all-encompassing. Instead, the best theoretical explanations of science provoke new and deeper questions.’

4 For a discussion of ritual deviation see Abigail Graham’s Chapter 4 in this volume.

5 Many scholars, such as Reference SosisSosis (2020: 6), Reference Legare and NielsenLegare and Nielsen (2020: 5), and Reference Eidinow, Geertz, Deeley, North, Eidinow, Geertz and NorthEidinow et al. (2022: 8), have expressed a need for more interdisciplinary and integrative research between the Cognitive Sciences and the Humanities in order to advance the study and understanding of religious systems and rituals.

6 Reference WhiteWhite 2021: 322 (quote), see also 204.

7 Reference Montague, Eagleman, McClure, Berns and NadelMontague et al. 2002: 908. Reference Harris, Sutton, Barnier and Della SalaHarris et al. (2010: 271) state: ‘human cognitive processing is “hybrid”: including not only the individual brain and body, but also the environment … an individual’s neural system does not act in causal isolation from its environmental and social context’. According to Reference SosisSosis (2020: 2): ‘Like all communities, religious groups are influenced by external factors including the social, political, economic, ecological and socio-religious environment in which the group is situated.’

9 Reference Mackey, Vuolanto and LaesMackey 2017. In psychology and cognitive sciences this approach is referred to as social learning. Reference Lyons, Young and KeilLyons et al. (2007: 19751) state: ‘a remarkable proportion of our abilities are learned by imitating those around us. Imitation is a critical part of what makes us cognitively human’.

12 Reference Nielsen, Kapitány and ElkinsNielsen et al. 2015: 191. Reference Legare and NielsenLegare and Nielsen (2015: 688) state that: ‘For instrumental learning, with an increase in experience, high fidelity imitation decreases and innovation increases.’

13 In her explanation of the LOPI (Learning by Observing and Pitching In) model, Barbara Reference RogoffRogoff (2014: 77) accounts for cultural practices such as imitation, observation, and collaboration, stating that they ‘are connected with many other aspects of children’s and families’ lives as aspects of coherent constellations of cultural practices … The idea of constellations contrasts with treating cultural practices such as schooling, parental occupations, or urban living as variables that operate independently’. See also Reference RossanoRogoff, Nadjafi and Mejía-Arauz 2014.

Reference SosisSosis (2020: 3) states that ‘cultural evolutionists emphasize the importance of context, that is, the social environment, in explaining the transmission of particular religious beliefs’.

14 According to Reference Day and DayDay (2013: 2) ‘the senses are the mediums through which humans experience their world’. Reference ConnertonConnerton (1989: 74) argues that the senses form a key aspect of the ‘mnemonics of the body’. Reference Hamilakis and DayHamilakis (2013: 411) states that ‘sensorial experience is activated at the moment of a trans-corporeal encounter; this is an encounter … between human bodies and objects, things, and environments’.

15 Mackey, personal correspondence, 29 April 2019.

16 Reference Van der PloegVan der Ploeg (2016: 189) states: ‘Sacred space … plays a vital role in the articulation and transmission of socio-cultural practices. It is, furthermore, the physical embodiment of the memory of a community and, as such, it reflects and expresses social behaviours, meanings and beliefs.’ See also Reference Sutton, Sullivan and Floyd-WilsonSutton 2020. For a further theoretical discussion of space/place from a geographical perspective see Steven Muir’s Chapter 5 in this volume.

17 Reference Geertz and CarnevaleGeertz (2017: 50) states: ‘Places and material objects have a life of their own which influences our emotional and cognitive lives.’ See also: Reference Day and DayDay 2013: 8, 14, and Reference Sutton, Sullivan and Floyd-WilsonSutton 2020.

18 This is not dissimilar to Lawrence Barsalou’s grounded cognition and situated conceptualisation approach, as outlined in Reference Eidinow, Eidinow, Geertz and NorthEidinow 2022: 76–9 and Reference Van Cappellen, Edwards, Geertz, Ambasciano, Eidinow, Martin, Laigaard Nielbo, Roubekas, van Mulukom and XygalatasVan Cappellen and Edwards 2022: 117. Neuroscience research on memory retrieval (Reference SaraSara 2000: 73) indicates that ‘remembering … involves the apprehension and comprehension of contemporary stimuli in the light of past experience … retrieval is usually brought about as a result of integration of incoming environmental information with the “memory network” driven by that information’. The concept of ‘memory network’ within the present RLN theoretical model is built on the cognitive/neuroscience understanding of memory as a network of associations (see Reference Tulving and ThomsonTulving and Thomson 1973: 352, 358).

19 According to Reference Eidinow, Eidinow, Geertz and NorthEidinow et al. (2022: 3) ‘Cognition proceeds on the basis of maps that are configured by prior experience, brain and body processes, and cultural and social models of behaviour that are continually updated throughout life.’ Reference Laidlaw, Whitehouse and LaidlawLaidlaw (2004: 4) uses a similar example of an individual getting a haircut in order to explain how the episodic (autobiographical) memories and semantic (general knowledge about the world) memories are connected.

20 Reference MoserMoser 2019: 110–12, 119–22, 124.

21 Reference Högberg, Gärdenfors and LarssonHögberg et al. (2015: 848) state that: ‘It is the relation between observations and the experience of execution that results in social learning.’

25 Reference Martin, Eidinow, Geertz and NorthMartin (2022: 230) notes that humans have a tendency ‘for representing experiences through narrative’.

26 Harvey Whitehouse calls this phenomenon ‘spontaneous exegetical reflection’. See Reference WhitehouseWhitehouse 2004, Reference van Mulukomvan Mulukom 2017: 192, Reference MoserMoser 2019: 123, and Reference WhiteWhite 2021: 272.

27 Episodic memory relates to one’s autobiographical memory. According to Reference Van Cappellen, Edwards, Geertz, Ambasciano, Eidinow, Martin, Laigaard Nielbo, Roubekas, van Mulukom and XygalatasTulving and Thomson (1973: 354): ‘Briefly, episodic memory is concerned with storage and retrieval of temporally dated, spatially located, and personally experienced events or episodes, and temporal-spatial relations among such events.’ See also Reference van Mulukomvan Mulukom 2017: 192.

29 Reference SaraSara (2000: 73) states: ‘retrieval will lead to the formation of new memories made on the background of a retrieved prior experience. Therefore, it is inconceivable that new memory can be acquired independently of retrieval of past experience’. On re-enforcement of memory associations through repetition see Reference Tulving and ThomsonTulving and Thomson 1973: 356–7.

31 Reference Harris, Sutton, Barnier and Della SalaHarris et al. (2010: 266) state ‘just as individual autobiographical memory is selective and goal directed, social memory is also likely to be selective, depending on the norms and values of the group that might prioritize certain items for retrieval and others for forgetting’.

34 Reference Harris, Sutton, Barnier and Della SalaHarris et al. 2010: 266–8. Reference Hupbach, Gomez, Hardt and NadelHupbach et al. (2007: 48) warn that the introduction of misleading facts can likewise modify a memory. Reference Harris, Sutton, Barnier and Della SalaHarris et al. (2010: 266) state that when it comes to autobiographical memory ‘It originates with an individual’s experience of an event but is maintained, shaped, and elaborated through interaction with others … as well as through individual identity goals.’

35 Reference Hupbach, Gomez, Hardt and NadelHupbach et al. (2007: 51) state: ‘stored memories remain open to change as a function of related experience … the “multiple trace theory” (MTT) … takes as given that reactivating a previously “stored” memory leads to the creation of a new version of that memory’.

40 Plin. HN. 28.3 and Livy, The History of Rome, 41.14.7. See also Reference RüpkeRüpke 2020: 26, 37.

41 Reference Hobson, Schroeder, Risen, Xygalatas and InzlichtHobson et al. (2017: 14–15) state that ‘As long as a shared ritual remains a fixed set of sequences, done in the exact same way as in previous instances … then the properties of the ritual experience that are encoded (and later retrieved) will remain relatively unchanged.’

42 Mental rehearsal before a performance is a common practice among athletes, known in sport psychology as cognitive specific imagery (see Paivio’s Analytic Model of Imagery in Reference Hall, Mack, Paivio and HausenblasHall et al. 1998).

43 Reference Eagleman, Montague and NadelEagleman and Montague 2002: 807, Reference Tulving and ThomsonTulving and Thomson 1973: 356–7 and Reference XygalatasXygalatas 2022: 115. Reference Hobson, Schroeder, Risen, Xygalatas and InzlichtHobson et al. (2017: 15) state that ‘cultural learning is maintained through ritual because meaning is transferred back onto the norms through frequent performance. Each time a ritual is performed or observed, a mental narrative is recreated, which acts as a reminder of what a group values most (and the meaning behind the purpose of the ritual) … With greater sense of collective purpose, a person will be motivated to continue to share and transmit the group’s ritual practices.’

44 Reference van Mulukomvan Mulukom (2017: 195) states that ‘Emotional events are more likely to be remembered than neutral events.’ Reference McCauleyMcCauley (2020: 110) stresses ‘the important role that emotion plays not only in the explanation of human behavior but also in a host of cognitive operations’.

45 Emotional investment often goes hand-in-hand with positive emotions (e.g. the more we like someone the more we are willing to do for them). Reference van Mulukomvan Mulukom (2017: 195) states ‘Positive memories have been shown to fade more slowly than negative memories’. See also Reference Hamilakis and DayHamilakis 2013: 416.

46 Reference Harris, Sutton, Barnier and Della SalaHarris et al. 2010: 261, 264. Reference Martin, Eidinow, Geertz and NorthMartin (2022: 221) states that ‘Responses to superstimuli are often emotion-laden, which enhances memorability.’

49 Hereafter referred to as Nutrices for the sake of brevity.

50 Reference Šašel-Kos, Lehner and SchrettleŠašel-Kos 2016: 167–9 provides a short survey of Nutrices and Nutrices-like goddesses throughout the Empire. According to Reference Carroll, Carroll and GrahamCarroll (2014: 159), mother-goddesses are especially popular in Britain and Gaul but are also found in other western provinces of the Roman Empire. They are usually depicted as three seated goddesses holding objects associated with infant care.

51 For a detailed survey of over forty recorded dedications see Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos 1999. Reference Šašel-Kos, Lehner and SchrettleŠašel-Kos (2016: 171) notes, however, that we should not discount the possibility ‘that Nutrices were worshipped elsewhere in Noricum and Celtic Pannonia, but in a different way; their worshippers did not erect costly reliefs to the goddesses’.

54 Reference Carroll, Carroll and GrahamCarroll (2014: 159) describes the Nutrices reliefs: ‘On these reliefs, one of the Nutrices Augustae (‘noble nurses’) is depicted receiving mortal mothers who have brought their babies into the sanctuary to be breast-fed with divine milk.’

55 For a more detailed discussion of these variations see Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos 1999: 180–4.

56 It must be noted that on numerous reliefs the gender of the child depicted often matches the name in the accompanying inscription. For example, AE 1986, 564 depicts the mother-figure holding the hand of a small girl who in the inscription below is named as Maximilla. The same is true for AIJ 329, where the girl, Successia, is also named in the accompanying inscription. Likewise, male children presented to the Nutrix on AE 1986, 565, AIJ 327 and AE 1986, 569 match the male names in the inscriptions. Although we must be careful not to generalize, since some reliefs are damaged and/or uninscribed, this attention to gender in representation, in addition to iconographic variations of relief scenes, seems to suggest that artists did not simply carve a scene from a standardized sketch but that reliefs may have been customized.

57 According to EDCS-07600367, AE 1986, 565, the Figure 1.3 inscription reads: Nutricibus Augustis / d{e}is Aurelius Servandus et / Ulpia Secundina pro Secumdino(!) et Servato fili(i)s votum v(oto) s(olverunt) l(ibentes) m(erito). See also Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos 1999: 173, no. 33 for an alternative reading of the inscription.

58 Reference MoserMoser 2019: 147. My gratitude to Emma-Jayne Graham for her insight on this point.

59 According to EDCS-30200477, AIJ 327, the Figure 1.4 inscription reads: Nutr[i]cibus pro sa(lu)te / Iucund[a]e dominae et Her/[a]cliti fili(i) Ph[ilo(?)] pater v(otum) s(olvit) l(ibens) m(erito). See also Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos 1999: 158–9, no. 5.

63 Reference RüpkeRüpke (2020: 31) states that ‘Within a communicative framework, material object might also serve as triggers of attention and meta-communicative markers, producing special attention with a wide range of tools and acoustic, visual, olfactory or emotional markers.’

66 AIJ 327 = CIL III 15184.25 and CIL III 15184.26. According to Reference Šašel-Kos, Lehner and SchrettleŠašel-Kos (2016: 172–3), certain Nutrices reliefs may have been moved to the second Mithraeum in the fourth century CE for safekeeping, as she suspects the cult may have continued to be practiced in secret after Christianity becomes the official religion of the Empire. See also: Reference Belak and LamutBelak 1993: 236.

68 According to Reference Van der PloegVan der Ploeg (2016: 189): ‘Spiritual cohesion was maintained and reinforced via religious space and architecture.’

69 As concerns the Spodnja Hajdina sanctuary, most inscribed dedications are damaged and fragmentary, with only two offering enough information in order to establish social/professional affiliations of worshippers. Both of the dedicators are slaves in the imperial administrative service. One (AIJ 335 = CIL III 14062) identifies himself as Aeliodorus contrascriptor servus Augusti nostri, indicating that he was affiliated to the customs service; while the other (CIL III 14052) identifies himself as Theophilus Augusti servus, a slave possibly attached either to the customs service or the tabularium in Poetovio. Names on other legible dedications from Spodnja Hajdina record both slaves and citizens – Heraclitus (AIJ 327 = CIL III 15184.25), Achelous (CIL III 14059), Aurelius Viator (AIJ 332 = CIL III 14053), and Benignes Vitalis (AIJ 334 = CIL III 14056).

The three preserved dedications from the Zgornji Breg sanctuary, however, offer no information about social/professional affiliations although the names of the dedicators may indicate that they are descended from Celtic and/or autochthonous inhabitants – Aurelius Siro (AIJ 325), Valerius Secundianus (AIJ 330), and Successius Maximianus and Malia Verina (AIJ 329).

As concerns the Panorama sanctuary, some recorded dedicators possibly display servile status – Fortunatus (AIJ 326 = CIL III 4047) and Vitalis and Vintumila (AE 1986, 564). Others display their citizen status – Aurelia Exxuperata (AIJ 324), Aurelius Servandus and Ulpia Secundina (AE 1986, 565), and Aelia Vera (AE 1986, 567). Few of the dedicators also hold official positions in Poetovio – Titus Cassius Verinus decurio coloniae Poetovionensium (AE 1986, 568), Aelius Secundinus decurio (AIJ 328 = CIL III 4052/3), and Lucius Fuscinius Exsuperatus Augustalis coloniae Poetovionensium (AE 1986, 569).

71 AIJ 335 = CIL III 14062, CIL III 14052.

74 A study is forthcoming by the present author which will test the RLN model within the Pannonian evidence of the cult of Mithras as part of her HORIZON EU MSCA project CAMRIP (Cognitive Aspects of Mithraic Rituals in Pannonia). For a further analysis of the cult of Mithras see Vicky Jewell’s Chapter 3 in this volume.

75 For a further analysis of sensory stimuli in relation to ritual space/place see Chapter 4 by Steven Muir and Chapter 5 by Abigail Graham in this volume. My gratitude to an anonymous reviewer who remarked that emotional arousal can be likewise stimulated by monumental architecture.

76 In her discussion of infant funerary monuments Carroll states (2014: 161): ‘the act of seeking out and paying not inconsiderable sums of money for a memorial in stone testifies to the special nature of these objects’. This point is equally valid for votive monuments such as the Nutrices reliefs.

78 As depicted on AIJ 327, AIJ 332, AIJ 333, and AIJ 334.

80 As depicted on AIJ 325, and AIJ 326 = CIL III 4047.

81 As depicted on AIJ 325, AE 1986, 564, and AIJ 326 = CIL III 4047.

82 For a further discussion of cult instruments in Roman rituals see Emma-Jayne Graham’s Chapter 2 in this volume.

85 AIJ 328 = CIL III 4052/3, and Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos 1999: 184.

87 Possibly also on AIJ 332 and on Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos 1999: 176–7, no. 38.

89 AE 1986, 567.

91 Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos 1999: 156 and 176, no. 38.

92 For a further analysis of haptic ritual experiences see Emma-Jayne Graham’s Chapter 2 and Vicky Jewell’s Chapter 3 in this volume.

93 According to Reference Van der PloegVan der Ploeg (2016: 188–9) ‘Each individual would have had a different experience of the event, depending on their sensory input, as each of the senses had a varied range and sphere of influence.’

94 Reference RüpkeRüpke (2020: 33) states that ‘relations were established and habitualized not only to specific places and material objects, but also to acoustic phenomena and ways of speaking, thereby creating webs of associations between situations involving similar objects or sounds’.

95 Reference Högberg, Gärdenfors and LarssonHögberg et al. 2015: 848 (referring to Riede’s study of stone tool use in the Palaeolithic).

96 Spodnja Hajdina sanctuary: CIL III 14052, CIL III 14055, CIL III 14057, CIL III 14061, AIJ 327, and possibly CIL III 14059 and AIJ 334 = CIL III 14056.

Zgornji Breg sanctuary: AIJ 329 and AIJ 325.

Panorama sanctuary: AE 1986, 568, AIJ 328, AE 1986, 569, CIL III 4047 = AIJ 326, and possibly AE 1986, 567 and AIJ 324.

97 On personal transition rituals see Reference RossanoRossano 2020: 6–7. It is possible that some of the Nutrices reliefs may have been set up to mark a successful rite of passage from infancy (ending at around three years old) into further childhood, thus thanking the Nutrices for the protection of the child during these precarious early years. For a further discussion of rites of passage with respect to infant votives see Reference Derks, Carroll and GrahamDerks 2014 and Reference Graham, Carroll and GrahamGraham 2014.

99 Reference RüpkeRüpke (2020: 30) states that ‘Small gifts, many of them perishable, must have been the standard sacrificial objects of poor people, that formed the vast majority of ancient populations, even in non-routine situations.’

101 My gratitude to Emma-Jayne Graham for drawing my attention to this.

102 Reference RüpkeRüpke (2020: 31) states: ‘The material and social relations established in religious communication have effects beyond the actual performance. Memories of such usages and constellations keep such relationships alive, repetition might renew them.’

103 Dedications where an explicit familial connection is stated: AIJ 327, AIJ 329, AE 1986, 564, AE 1986, 565, AE 1986, 567, AE 1986, 568 and AE 1986, 569.

Dedications set up by the father: AIJ 325 and perhaps AIJ 326 = CIL III 4047, and AIJ 330.

Dedications set up by the mother: AE 1986, 567.

Dedications set up jointly by both parents: AIJ 324, AIJ 329, AE 1986, 564, AE 1986, 565, AE 1986, 568, and AE 1986, 569.

105 Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos 1999: 186, 191. While none of the inscriptions state a specific medical condition or ailment, recent research on children’s health in the Graeco-Roman world (Reference Dasen and RawsonDasen 2011, Reference Carroll, Carroll and GrahamCarroll 2014: 160, and Reference Bourbou and DasenBourbou and Dasen 2018, among others) indicates that some of the notable medical problems encountered in infancy are diarrhea, epilepsy, teething troubles, malnutrition, infections, fever, scurvy, and rickets, among others.

106 Reference van Mulukomvan Mulukom (2017: 199) states: ‘When individuals experience a significant and highly emotional event, this event creates a lasting episodic memory in their minds.’

108 This can be related to threat-detection psychology as explained in Reference Boyer and LiénardBoyer and Liénard 2020: 3–5.

110 AE 1986, 565, AE 1986, 566, and AE 1986, 569, among others.

111 Reference Hobson, Schroeder, Risen, Xygalatas and InzlichtHobson et al. 2017: 6–7, 9. According to Reference Legare and NielsenLegare and Nielsen (2020: 2) a ritual can have ‘the beneficial psychological effects of reducing parental anxiety and increasing feelings of control over the health and safety of their infant’. Moreover, according to Reference Legare and NielsenLegare and Nielsen (2020: 4): ‘Rituals also allow individuals to exert agency through action, giving the illusion of increased control that could also be related to emotional regulation and anxiety reduction … and may improve perceived health.’ For research on how rituals can reduce anxiety see Reference Lang, Krátký and XygalatasLang et al. 2020. On the numerous physiological, psychological, and social benefits of rituals and the placebo effect see Reference XygalatasXygalatas 2022: 227–30, 242.

114 See the two uninscribed reliefs published in Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos 1999: 176, no. 37, fig. 23; and 176–7, no. 38, fig. 24. Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos (1999: 182) states: ‘the cult of the Nutrices was a family cult, performed, however, not only at home, but also in a public place, in small sanctuaries or shrines, in a circle of several families’.

115 Reference Hobson, Schroeder, Risen, Xygalatas and InzlichtHobson et al. 2017: 4–5, 11–12. Reference RossanoRossano (2020: 4) states that ‘The human brain has evolved to treat uncertainty and lack of control as safety and survival threats … Strong social support systems provide security from these threats … Thus, ritual may well be an evolved strategy for increasing “social security” against the threat of future uncertainty and lack of control … rituals address these threats by cultivating … social support.’

116 Reference Šašel-KosŠašel-Kos (1999: 191–2) states: ‘Their cult must have been important for families, especially mothers, nurses and children, who thus had the opportunity of coming together during times of festivity. They could share their experiences on such occasions, coping with cognate difficulties concerning children, regardless of their social status. Thus the cult of the Nutrices … may have had a positive and unifying social impact within the community.’ On how participation in group rituals can lead to social bonding see Reference 55DunbarDunbar 2021.

117 Reference Hobson, Schroeder, Risen, Xygalatas and InzlichtHobson et al. (2017: 11) state that ‘the function of a shared group ritual is to allow an individual to participate fully in the social world by affiliating with fellow group members, reaffirming one’s position in the group, and sharing in important social conventions and cultural knowledge’.

For a perspective on the unpredictability of rituals and how they can turn unsuccessful see Abigail Graham’s Chapter 4 in this volume.

119 Reference Hobson, Schroeder, Risen, Xygalatas and InzlichtHobson et al. (2017: 11) state: ‘observing a group ritual helps a person learn and share cultural knowledge related to the social norms most important to the group’.

120 Reference Mackey, Vuolanto and LaesMackey 2017, Reference Hobson, Schroeder, Risen, Xygalatas and InzlichtHobson et al. 2017: 14, and Reference Wen, Willard, Caughy and LegareWen et al. 2020: 1–2. Reference Legare and HarrisLegare and Harris (2016: 637) indicate that children as young as eight months old can associate certain actions to appropriate cultural artefacts through observation.

123 Reference Legare and HarrisLegare and Harris 2016: 636, and Reference Nielsen, Kapitány and ElkinsNielsen et al. 2015: 192, 197. Reference XygalatasXygalatas (2022: 39) points out: ‘From around the age of two, children typically develop a variety of rules and routines that they follow compulsively. They are obsessed with repetition, acting out the same things over and over again.’

124 Reference Legare and NielsenLegare and Nielsen (2015: 690) state: ‘causal opacity of rituals make them ideally suited to high fidelity cultural transmission’. On causal opacity of rituals see Reference XygalatasXygalatas 2022: 6–7 and 88–94.

126 Reference Legare and NielsenLegare and Nielsen 2015: 690–1. Reference Panagiotidou and BeckNielsen et al. (2015: 196) state that we ‘reinforce behavior we think makes us part of our perceived in-group’.

128 Reference Dasen and RawsonDasen 2011: 292, 312. Reference Graham, Carroll and GrahamGraham (2014: 43) states: ‘By seeking the support of the divine world, and the subsequent expression of gratitude with a suitable ex-voto, the child was not only set on a path of socialisation but was also made a member of the religious community which would continue to be involved with other major developments of its life.’

129 The model of Learning by Observing and Pitching In (LOPI) was developed by Barbara Rogoff to account for cross-cultural children’s learning. The model places an emphasis on learning through observation, collaboration, and active participation by children (under adult guidance) who contribute to community activities. See Reference RogoffRogoff 2014 and Reference Rogoff, Najafi and Mejía-ArauzRogoff, Nadjafi and Mejía-Arauz 2014.

131 Reference Wen, Willard, Caughy and LegareWen et al. (2020: 5) state that one key purpose of rituals is ‘to transmit group norms to new group members’ (in this case children).

133 Reference van Mulukomvan Mulukom 2017: 200. Reference Herrmann, Legare, Harris and WhitehouseHerrmann et al. (2013: 541) state that: ‘Attention to social cues and contextual information is a key component of the development and transmission of cultural knowledge.’

137 The theory of transactive memory is put forward by Wegner (see Reference Wegner, Giuliano, Hertel and IckesWegner et al. 1985 and Reference Wegner, Mullen and GoethalsWegner 1986). Reference Harris, Sutton, Barnier and Della SalaHarris et al. (2010: 275) state that ‘Transactive memory theory focuses on the way in which socially shared remembering supports memory, and by extension protects against forgetting.’

References

Beck, R. 2004. ‘Four men, two sticks, and a whip: image and doctrine in a Mithraic ritual’, in Whitehouse, H. and Martin, L. H., eds. Theorizing Religions Past: Archaeology, History, and Cognition, 87103. Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
Belak, M. 1993. ‘Med Nutricami in Mitro’, in Lamut, B., ed. Ptujski Arheološki Zbornik Ob 100- letnici muzeja in Muzejskega društva, 233–9. Ptuj.Google Scholar
Bourbou, C. and Dasen, V. 2018. ‘Enfance en péril: les maladies infantiles à l’époque romaine’, Archéologia 564: 5865.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. and Liénard, P. 2020. ‘Ingredients of “rituals” and their cognitive underpinnings’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0439Google Scholar
Carroll, M. 2014. ‘Mother and infant in Roman funerary commemoration’, in Carroll, M. and Graham, E. J., eds. Infant Health and Death in Roman Italy and Beyond. Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series Number 96, 159–78. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Clegg, J. M. and Legare, C. H. 2016. ‘A cross-cultural comparison of children’s imitative flexibility’, Developmental Psychology 52(9): 1435–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clegg, J. M., Wen, N. J., DeBaylo, P. H., Alcott, A., Keltner, E. C. and Legare, C. H. 2021. ‘Teaching through collaboration: flexibility and diversity in caregiver-child interactions across cultures’, Child Development 92(1): e56e75.Google Scholar
Connerton, P. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasen, V. 2011. ‘Childbirth and infancy in Greek and Roman antiquity’, in Rawson, B., ed. A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds, 291314. Oxford.Google Scholar
Day, J. 2013. ‘Introduction: making senses of the past’, in Day, J., ed. Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology, 131. Carbondale.Google Scholar
Derks, T. 2014. ‘Seeking divine protection against untimely death: infant votives from Roman Gaul and Germany’, in Carroll, M. and Graham, E. J., eds. Infant Health and Death in Roman Italy and Beyond. Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series Number 96, 4768. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Diez, E. 1993. ‘Magna Mater oder Nutrix?’, in Lamut, B., ed. Ptujski Arheološki Zbornik Ob 100-letnici muzeja in Muzejskega društva, 251–62. Ptuj.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. 2021. ‘Religiosity and religious attendance as factors in wellbeing and social engagement’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 11(1): 1726. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2020.1712618Google Scholar
Eagleman, D. and Montague, R. 2002. ‘Learning and memory, models of’, in Nadel, L., ed. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 806–12. London. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470018860.s00368Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2022. ‘Ancient Greek smellscapes and divine fragrances: anthropomorphizing the gods in Ancient Greek culture’, in Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W. and North, J., eds. Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience, 6995. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W., Deeley, Q. and North, J. 2022. ‘Introduction’, in Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W. and North, J., eds. Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience, 116. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, A. W. 2017. ‘Religious bodies, minds and places: a cognitive science of religion perspective’, in Carnevale, L., ed. Spazi e luoghi sacri espressioni ed esperienze di vissuto religioso, 3552. Bari Santo Spirito.Google Scholar
Graham, E. J. 2014. ‘Infant votives and swaddling in Hellenistic Italy’, in Carroll, M. and Graham, E. J., eds. Infant Health and Death in Roman Italy and Beyond. Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series Number 96, 2346. Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Gurlitt, W. 1896. ‘Pettauer antiken. I. Die Nutrices Augustae’, Archäolog.-epigraph. Mittheilungen aus Oesterreich-Ungarn 19(1): 125.Google Scholar
Hall, C. R., Mack, D., Paivio, A. and Hausenblas, H. A. 1998. ‘Imagery use by athletes: development of the sport imagery questionnaire’, International Journal of Sport Psychology 29: 7389.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. 2013. ‘Afterword: eleven theses on the archaeology of the senses’, in Day, J., ed. Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology, 409–19. Carbondale.Google Scholar
Harris, C. B., Sutton, J. and Barnier, A. J. 2010. ‘Autobiographical forgetting, social forgetting, and situated forgetting: forgetting in context’, in Della Sala, S., ed. Forgetting, 253–84. Hove.Google Scholar
Herrmann, P. A., Legare, C. H., Harris, P. L. and Whitehouse, H. 2013. ‘Stick to the script: the effect of witnessing multiple actors on children’s imitation’, Cognition 129: 536–43.Google Scholar
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D. and Inzlicht, M. 2017. ‘The psychology of rituals: an integrative review and process-based framework’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 00(0): 125.Google Scholar
Högberg, A., Gärdenfors, P. and Larsson, L. 2015. ‘Knowing, learning and teaching: how Homo became Docens’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 25(4): 847–58.Google Scholar
Huet, V. 2008. ‘L’encens sur les reliefs sacrificiels romains’, in Bodiou, L., Frère, D. and Mehl, V., eds. Parfums et Odeurs dans l’Antiquité, 105–16. Rennes.Google Scholar
Hull, K. 2014. ‘Ritual as performance in small-scale societies’, World Archaeology 46(2): 164–77.Google Scholar
Hupbach, A., Gomez, R., Hardt, O. and Nadel, L. 2007. ‘Reconsolidation of episodic memories: a subtle reminder triggers integration of new information’, Learning & Memory 14: 4753.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, J. 2004. ‘Introduction’, in Whitehouse, H. and Laidlaw, J., eds. Ritual and Memory: Toward a Comparative Anthropology of Religion, 19. Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
Lang, M., Krátký, J., Shaver, J. H., Jerotijević, D. and Xygalatas, D. 2015. ‘Effects of anxiety on spontaneous ritualized behavior’, Current Biology 25: 1892–7.Google Scholar
Lang, M., Krátký, J. and Xygalatas, D. 2020. ‘The role of ritual behaviour in anxiety reduction: an investigation of Marathi religious practices in Mauritius’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0431Google Scholar
Legare, C. H. and Harris, P. L. 2016. ‘The ontogeny of cultural learning’, Child Development 87(3): 633–42.Google Scholar
Legare, C. H. and Nielsen, M. 2015. ‘Imitation and innovation: the dual engines of cultural learning’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(11): 688–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.005Google Scholar
Legare, C. H. and Nielsen, M. 2020. ‘Ritual explained: interdisciplinary answers to Tinbergen’s four questions’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G. and Keil, F. C. 2007. ‘The hidden structure of overimitation’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 104(50): 19751–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Mackey, J. 2017. ‘Roman children as religious agents: the cognitive foundations of cult’, in Vuolanto, V. and Laes, C., eds. Children and Everyday Life in the Roman and Late Antique World, 179–97. London.Google Scholar
Martin, L. H. 2022. ‘Identifying symptoms of religious experience from ancient material culture: the example of cults of the Roman Mithras’, in Eidinow, E., Geertz, A. W. and North, J., eds. Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience, 218–42. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. N. 2020. ‘Recent trends in the cognitive science of religion: neuroscience, religious experience, and the confluence of cognitive and evolutionary research’, Zygon 55(1): 97124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misic, B. 2015. ‘Cognitive theory and religious integration: the case of the Poetovian Mithraea’, in Brindle, T., Allen, M., Durham, E. and Smith, A., eds. TRAC 2014. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Reading 2014, 3140. Oxford. http://doi.org/10.16995/TRAC2014_31_40Google Scholar
Misic, B. 2022. ‘Worship of the Nymphs at Aquae Iasae (Roman Pannonia Superior): cognition, ritual and sacred space’, in Henig, M. and Lundock, J., eds. Water in the Roman World: Engineering, Trade, Religion and Daily Life, 157–74. Oxford.Google Scholar
Montague, R., Eagleman, D., McClure, S. and Berns, G. 2002. ‘Reinforcement learning: a biological perspective’, in Nadel, L., ed. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 908–13. London. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470018860.s00373Google Scholar
Moser, C. 2019. The Altars of Republican Rome and Latium. Sacrifice and the Materiality of Roman Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M., Kapitány, R. and Elkins, R. 2015. ‘The perpetuation of ritualistic actions as revealed by young children’s transmission of normative behavior’,Evolution and Human Behavior 36(3): 191–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.11.002Google Scholar
Panagiotidou, O. and Beck, R. 2017. The Roman Mithras Cult: A Cognitive Approach. London.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. 2014. ‘Learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors: an orientation’, Human Development 57: 6981.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B., Najafi, B. and Mejía-Arauz, R. 2014. ‘Constellations of cultural practices across generations: indigenous American heritage and learning by observing and pitching in’, Human Development 57: 8295.Google Scholar
Rossano, M. J. 2020. ‘Ritual as resource management’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0429Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2020. ‘Establishing self-world relations in socio-religious practices: looking at Roman religious communication’, ARYS 18: 1950.Google Scholar
Sara, S. J. 2000. ‘Retrieval and reconsolidation: toward a neurobiology of remembering’, Learning & Memory 7: 7384.Google Scholar
Siebert, A. V. 2015. ‘Instruments and vessels’, in Raja, R. and Rüpke, J., eds. A Companion to the Archaeology of Religion in the Ancient World, 388–96. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sosis, R. 2020. ‘The last Talmudic demon? The role of ritual in cultural transmission’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, J. 2020. ‘Place and Memory: History, Cognition, Phenomenology’, in Sullivan, G. A. and Floyd-Wilson, M., eds. Geographies of Embodiment in Early Modern England, 113–33. Oxford.Google Scholar
Šašel-Kos, M. 1999. Pre-Roman Divinities of the Eastern Alps and Adriatic. Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Šašel-Kos, M. 2016. ‘Nutrices: the most popular goddesses at Poetovio’, in Lehner, M. and Schrettle, B., eds. Zentralort und Tempelberg: Siedlungs- und Kultentwicklung am Frauenberg bei Leibnitz im Vergleich, 167–74. Wien.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. and Thomson, D. 1973. ‘Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory’, Psychological Review 80(5): 352–73.Google Scholar
Van Cappellen, P. and Edwards, M. E. 2022. ‘The embodiment of worship: relations among postural, psychological, and physiological aspects of religious practice’, in Geertz, A. W., Ambasciano, L., Eidinow, E., Martin, L. H., Laigaard Nielbo, K., Roubekas, N. P., van Mulukom, V. and Xygalatas, D., eds. Studying the Religious Mind: Methodology in the Cognitive Science of Religion, 115–38. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, G. 2016. ‘Reconstructing the sensory experience of Caracalla’s supplication at the Pergamene Asclepieion’, Exchanges: The Warwick Research Journal 3(2): 185–98.Google Scholar
van Mulukom, V. 2017. ‘Remembering religious rituals: autobiographical memories of high-arousal religious rituals considered from a narrative processing perspective’, Religion, Brain & Behavior 7(3): 191205. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1232304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weddle, C. 2013. ‘The sensory experience of blood sacrifice in the Roman imperial cult’, in Day, J., ed. Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology, 137–59. Carbondale.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. 1986. ‘Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind’, in Mullen, B. and Goethals, G. R., eds. Theories of Group Behaviour, 185208. New York.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T. and Hertel, P. T. 1985. ‘Cognitive interdependence in close relationships’, in Ickes, W., ed. Compatible and Incompatible Relationships, 253–76. New York.Google Scholar
Wen, N. J., Willard, A. K., Caughy, M. and Legare, C. H. 2020. ‘Watch me, watch you: ritual participation increases in-group displays and out-group monitoring in children’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 375(1805): 20190437. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, C. 2021. An Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Religion. Connecting Evolution, Brain, Cognition, and Culture. New York.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. 2004. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H. and Laidlaw, J. 2004. Ritual and Memory: Towards a Comparative Anthropology of Religion. Walnut Creek.Google Scholar
Wigand, K. 1915. ‘Die Nutrices Augustae von Poetovio’, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes 18: 188218.Google Scholar
Xygalatas, D. 2022. Ritual. How Seemingly Senseless Acts Make Life Worth Living. New York.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1.1 Religious Learning Network theoretical model: Part 1.

Figure created by the author.
Figure 1

Figure 1.2 Religious Learning Network theoretical model: Part 2.

Figure created by the author.
Figure 2

Figure 1.3 Nutrices Augustae relief (PMPO, RL 978), held in Pokrajinski muzej Ptuj Ormož.

photo by Boris Farič (reproduced with permission from the museum)57
Figure 3

Figure 1.4 Nutrices Augustae relief (PMPO, RL 82), held in Pokrajinski muzej Ptuj Ormož.

photo by Boris Farič (reproduced with permission from the museum)59

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×