Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:35:34.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Human sex ratios: adaptations and mechanisms, problems and prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

John Lazarus
Affiliation:
Evolution and Behaviour Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Ian C. W. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

Summary

This chapter considers the factors influencing population birth sex ratios and variations of the sex ratio within populations, together with adaptive interpretations of these effects and the mechanisms underlying them. Adaptations and mechanisms for birth sex ratios are poorly understood, whereas variation in the sexual biasing of postnatal investment is more clearly adaptive. Social and demographic factors influencing birth sex ratios and postnatal investment include: parental status (the Trivers-Willard effect), father's age, birth order and local resource enhancement and competition. Complex effects are expected since many causal factors may interact at different times during offspring dependency. Possible mechanisms for control of the birth sex ratio include: the proportion of X and Y sperm in ejaculates; the relative success of X and Y sperm in fertilization, as determined by hormonal changes over the menstrual cycle interacting with the time of insemination and coital frequency; and embryonic mortality. Prospects for new work emerge from the following analyses: mechanisms for the Trivers-Willard effect (X and Y sperm proportions in ejaculates, coital frequency, embryonic mortality, family size and paternal age; predicting adaptation from proposed mechanisms and ancestral states; relationships between status, reproductive success and its variance; measuring status more realistically; and marginal return as the correct measure for predicting investment.

Introduction

The peculiar fascination with the human sex ratio at birth has a number of sources.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sex Ratios
Concepts and Research Methods
, pp. 287 - 312
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernethy, V & Yip, R (1990) Parent characteristics and sex differential infant mortality: the case in Tennessee. Human Biology, 62, 279–290Google ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J L & Crawford, C B (1993) Trivers-Willard rules for sex allocation: when do they maximise expected grandchildren in humans?Human Nature, 4, 137–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bereczkei, T & T, Dunbar R I (1997) Female-biased reproductive strategies in a Hungarian Gypsy population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 264, 17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, M E (1995) Genetic control of the secondary sex ratio. Human Reproduction, 10, 2531–2533CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bibbins, P E Jr, Lipshultz, L I, Ward, J B Jr & Legator, M S (1988) Fluorescent body distribution in spermatozoa in the male with exclusively female offspring. Fertility and Sterility, 49, 670–675CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boone, J L III (1986) Parental investment and elite family structure in preindustrial states: a case study of late medieval-early modern Portuguese genealogies. American Anthropologist, 88, 859–878Google Scholar
Borgerhoff, Mulder M (1994) On polygyny and sex ratio at birth: an evaluation of Whiting's study. Current Anthropology, 35, 625–627Google Scholar
Borgerhoff, Mulder M (1998a) Brothers and sisters: how sibling interactions affect optimal parental allocations. Human Nature, 9, 119–162Google Scholar
Borgerhoff, Mulder M (1998b) The demographic transition: are we close to an evolutionary explanation?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown D E (1991) Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill
Brown, G R (2001) Sex-biased investment in nonhuman primates: can Trivers & Willard's theory be tested?Animal Behaviour, 61, 683–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss D (1992) Mate preference mechanisms: consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In: J H Barkow, L Cosmides & J Tooby (eds) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, pp 250–266. New York: Oxford University Press
Buss D M (1999) Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
Chahnazarian, A (1988) Determinants of the sex ratio at birth: review of recent literature. Social Biology, 35, 214–235Google ScholarPubMed
Charnov, E L (1979a) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 76, 2480–2484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov, E L (1979b) The genetical evolution of patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness. American Naturalist, 113, 465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock T H (1991) The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Clutton-Brock T H & Albon S D (1982) Parental investment in male and female offspring in mammals. In: King's College Sociobiology Group, Cambridge (eds) Current Problems in Sociobiology, pp 223–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Constandse-Westermann TS & Newell RR (1989) Social and biological aspects of the Western European Mesolithic population structure: a comparison with the demography of North American Indians. In: C Bonsall (ed) The Mesolithic in Europe, pp 106–115. Edinburgh: John Donald
Creasy, M R (1977) The primary sex ratio of man. Annals of Human Biology, 4, 390–392Google Scholar
Cronk, L (1989) Low socioeconomic status and female-biased parental investment: the Mukogodo example. American Anthropologist, 91, 414–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronk, L (1990) Comment on: Sieff DF, explaining biased sex ratios in human populations: a critique of recent studies. Current Anthropology, 31, 35–36Google Scholar
Cronk, L (1991) Preferential parental investment in daughters over sons. Human Nature, 2, 387–417CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronk L (2000) Female-biased parental investment and growth performance among the Mukogodo. In: L Cronk, N Chagnon & W Irons (eds) Human Behavior and Adaptation: An Anthropological Perspective. pp 203–221. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
Cronk L, Chagnon N & Irons W (eds) (2000) Human Behavior and Adaptation: An Anthropological Perspective. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
Cummins DD (1998) Social norms and other minds: the evolutionary roots of higher cognition. In: D D Cummins & C Allen (eds) The Evolution of Mind, pp 30–50. New York: Oxford University Press
Daly, M & Wilson, M (1999) Human evolutionary psychology and animal behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 57, 509–519CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly M & Wilson M (2000) Reply to Smith et al. Animal Behaviour, 60, F27–F29: http://www.academicpress.com/anbehav/forum and http://www.idealibrary.com
Davis JN & Todd PM (1999) Parental investment by simple decision rules. In: G Gigerenzer, P M Todd & The ABC Group (eds) Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart, pp 309–324. New York: Oxford University Press
Dickemann M (1979) Female infanticide, reproductive strategies, and social stratification: a preliminary model. In: N A Chagnon & W Irons (eds) Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior, pp 321–367. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press
Dmowski, W P, Gaynor, L, Rao, R, Lawrence, M & Scommegna, A (1979) Use of albumin gradients for X and Y sperm separation and clinical experience with male sex preselection. Fertility and Sterility, 31, 52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterlin R A (1980) Birth and Fortune. London: Grant McIntyre
Ellis BJ (1992) The evolution of sexual attraction: evaluative mechanisms in women. In: J H Barkow, L Cosmides & J Tooby (eds) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, pp 267–288. New York: Oxford University Press
Festa-Bianchet, M (1996) Offspring sex ratio studies of mammals: does publication depend on the quality of the research or the direction of the results?Écoscience, 3, 42–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher R A (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Fisher R A (1958) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd edn. New York: Dover Publications
Foley, R (1996) The adaptive legacy of human evolution: a search for the environment of evolutionary adaptedness. Evolutionary Anthropology, 4, 194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank R H (1985) Choosing the Right Pond. Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. New York: Oxford University Press
Frank, S A (1987) Individual and population sex allocation patterns. Theoretical Population Biology, 31, 47–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, S A (1990) Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21, 13–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, D S & Thornton, A (1982) Income and fertility: the elusive relationship. Demography, 19, 65–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freese, J & Powell, B (1999) Sociobiology, status and parental investment in sons and daughters: testing the Trivers-Willard hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1704–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S W & Simpson, J A (1990) Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaulin, S J C & Robbins, C J (1991) Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary North American society. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 85, 61–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graffelman, J & Hoekstra, R F (2000) A statistical analysis of the effect of warfare on the human secondary sex ratio. Human Biology, 72, 433–445Google ScholarPubMed
Grant, V J (1990) Maternal personality and sex of infant. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 63, 261–266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, V J (1992) The measurement of dominance in pregnant women by use of the simple adjective test. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, V J (1994) Maternal dominance and the conception of sons. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 67, 343–351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant V J (1998) Maternal Personality, Evolution and the Sex Ratio. Do Mothers Control the Sex of the Infant? London: Routledge
Hilsenrath, R E, Buster, J E, Swarup, M, Carson, S A & Bischoff, F Z (1997) Effect of sexual abstinence on the proportion of X-bearing sperm as assessed by multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization. Fertility and Sterility, 68, 510–513CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hrdy SB (1987) Sex-biased parental investment among primates and other mammals: a critical evaluation of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis. In: R J Gelles & J B Lancaster (eds) Child Abuse and Neglect: Biosocial Dimensions, pp 97–147. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
Hrdy, S B (1990) Sex bias in nature and in history: a late 1980s reexamination of the ‘Biological Origins’ argument. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 33, 25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, S B & Judge, D S (1993) Darwin and the puzzle of primogeniture: an essay on biases in parental investment after death. Human Nature, 4, 1–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irving, J, Bittles, A, Peverall, J, Murch, A & Matson, P (1999) The ratio of X- and Y-bearing sperm in ejaculates of men with three or more children of the same sex. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 16, 492–494CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobsen, R, M⌀ller, H & Mouritsen, A (1999) Natural variation in the human sex ratio. Human Reproduction, 14, 3120–3125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1971) Cycle day of insemination, coital rate, and sex ratio. The Lancet, , 112–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W H (1974) Marital coital rates, spouses' ages, family size and social class. Journal of Sex Research, 10, 205–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1980) Gonadotrophin and the human secondary sex ratio. British Medical Journal, 281, 711–712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1981) The honeymoon effect on marital coitus. Journal of Sex Research, 17, 114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W H (1983) Decline in coital rates with spouses' ages and duration of marriage. Journal of Biosocial Science, 15, 83–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1984) The sex ratios of black births. Annals of Human Biology, 11, 39–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1985) The sex ratios of oriental births. Annals of Human Biology, 12, 485–487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1986) Hormonal control of sex ratio. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 118, 427–441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1987a) The human sex ratio. Part 1: a review of the literature. Human Biology, 59, 721–752Google Scholar
James, W H (1987b) The human sex ratio. Part 2: a hypothesis and a program of research. Human Biology, 59, 873–900Google Scholar
James, W H (1987c) Hormone levels of parents and sex ratios of offspring. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 129, 139–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W H (1990) The hypothesized hormonal control of human sex ratio at birth – an update. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 143, 555–564CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1992) The hypothesized hormonal control of mammalian sex ratio at birth – a second update. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 155, 121–128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1993) Continuing confusion. Nature, 365, 8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1994) Comment on: changing sex ratios: the history of Havasupai fertility and its implications for human sex ratio variation. Current Anthropology, 35, 268–270Google Scholar
James, W H (1995) What stabilizes the sex ratio?Annals of Human Genetics, 59, 243–249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1996) Evidence that mammalian sex ratios at birth are partially controlled by parental hormone levels at the time of conception. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 180, 271–286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (1997a) Coital rates and sex ratios. Human Reproduction, 12, 2083–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W H (1997b) Sex ratio, coital rates, hormones and time of fertilization within the cycle. Annals of Human Biology, 24, 403–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W H (1999) The status of the hypothesis that the human sex ratio at birth is associated with the cycle day of conception. Human Reproduction, 14, 2177–2178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H (2000) Secular movements in sex ratios of adults and of births in populations during the past half-century. Human Reproduction, 15, 1178–1183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W H & Rostron, J (1985) Parental age, parity and sex ratio in births in England and Wales, 1968–77. Journal of Biosocial Science, 17, 47–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshi, N V (2000) Conditions for the Trivers-Willard hypothesis to be valid: a minimal populationgenetic model. Journal of Genetics, 79, 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan HS & Lancaster JB (2000) The evolutionary economics and psychology of the demographic transition to low fertility. In: L Cronk, N Chagnon & W Irons (eds) Human Behavior and Adaptation: An Anthropological Perspective, pp 283–322. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
Kaplan HS, Lancaster JB, Bock JA & Johnson SE (1995) Fertility and fitness among Albuquerque men: a competitive labour market theory. In: R I M Dunbar (ed) Human Reproductive Decisions: Biological and Social Perspectives, pp 96–136. Basingstoke: St. Martin's Press
Katz, D F (1991) Human cervical mucus: research update. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165, 1984–1986CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly R L (1995) The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press
Kemper T D (1990) Social Structure and Testosterone: Explorations of the Socio-bio-social Chain. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press
Kenrick, D T & Keefe, R C (1992) Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackow, S (1995a) The developmental asynchrony hypothesis of sex ratio manipulation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 176, 273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackow, S (1995b) Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biological Reviews, 70, 225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K N, Kumm, J & Feldman, M W (1995) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory: a test case. Current Anthropology, 36, 131–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, J & Inglis, I R (1986) Shared and unshared parental investment, parent-offspring conflict and brood size. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1791–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leimar, O (1996) Life-history analysis of the Trivers and Willard sex-ratio problem. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low BS (2000) Sex, wealth and fertility: old rules, new environments. In: L Cronk, N Chagnon & W Irons (eds) Human Behavior and Adaptation: An Anthropological Perspective, pp 323–344. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
Lummaa, V, Merilä, J & Kause, A (1998) Adaptive sex ratio variation in pre-industrial human (Homo sapiens) populations?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 265, 563–568CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mace, R (1996) Biased parental investment and reproductive success in Gabbra pastoralists. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38, 75–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mace R (2000) An adaptive model of human reproductive rate where wealth is inherited: why people have small families. In: L Cronk, N Chagnon & W Irons (eds) Human Behavior and Adaptation: An Anthropological Perspective, pp 261–281. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
Mackey, W C (1993) Relationships between the human sex ratio and the woman's microenvironment: four tests. Human Nature, 4, 175–198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, J T, Anderton, R & Washington, S M (1996) Women's waists and the sex ratio of their progeny: evolutionary aspects of the ideal female body shape. Journal of Human Evolution, 31, 41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, J T, Trivers, R L, Singh, D & Thornhill, R (1999) The mystery of female beauty. Nature, 399, 214–215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, J F (1994) Changing sex ratios: the history of Havasupai fertility and its implications for human sex ratio variation. Current Anthropology, 35, 255–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J F (1995) Hormonal and behavioral determinants of the secondary sex ratio. Social Biology, 42, 226–238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, J F (1997a) Length of the follicular phase, time of insemination, coital rate and the sex of offspring. Human Reproduction, 12, 611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J F (1997b) Coital rates and sex ratios. Human Reproduction, 12, 2084–2085Google Scholar
Maynard, Smith J (1980) A new theory of sexual investment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 7, 247–251Google Scholar
Maynard, Smith J (1983) The economics of sex (review of E Charnov's The Theory of Sex Allocation). Evolution, 37, 872–873Google Scholar
Mealey, L (1985) The relationship between cultural success and biological success: a case study of the Mormon religious hierarchy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D H II & Gledhill, B L (1988) How large should my study be so that I can detect an altered sex ratio?Fertility and Sterility, 50, 21–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller R O (1996) Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling. An Introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer-Verlag
Myers, J H (1978) Sex ratio adjustment under food stress: maximization of quality or numbers of offspring?American Naturalist, 112, 381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordborg, M (1992) Female infanticide and human sex ratio evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 158, 195–198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oksanen, L (1981) All-female litters as a reproductive strategy: defense and generalization of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis. American Naturalist, 117, 109–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérusse, D (1993) Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, M (1997) Sex and the birth rate: human biology, demographic change, and access to fertilityregulation methods. Population and Development Review, 23, 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts M & Selman P (1979) Society and Fertility. Plymouth: Macdonald and Evans
Rao, K V & Demaris, A (1995) Coital frequency among married and cohabiting couples in the United States. Journal of Biosocial Science, 27, 135–150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renkonen, K O (1970) Heterogeneity among first post-nuptial deliveries. Annals of Human Genetics, 33, 319–321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, A M (1978) The origins of fluctuations in the human secondary sex ratio. Journal of Biosocial Science, 10, 169–182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenheim, J A, Nonacs, P & Mangel, M (1996) Sex ratios and multifaceted parental investment. American Naturalist, 148, 501–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal R (1991) Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Ruder, A (1986) Paternal factors affect the human secondary sex ratio. Human Biology, 58, 357–366Google ScholarPubMed
Schwinger, E, Ites, J & Korte, B (1976) Studies on frequency of Y chromatin in human sperm. Human Genetics, 34, 265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieff, D F (1990) Explaining biased sex ratios in human populations: a critique of recent studies. Current Anthropology, 31, 25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, J B (1984) Local resource competition and the evolution of male-biased sex ratios. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 108, 203–213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, D & Zambarano, R J (1997) Offspring sex ratio in women with android body fat distribution. Human Biology, 69, 545–556Google ScholarPubMed
Smith EA (2000) Three styles in the evolutionary analysis of human behavior. In: L Cronk, N Chagnon & W Irons (eds) Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, pp 27–46. New York: Aldine de Gruyter
Smith EA, Borgerhoff Mulder M & Hill K (2000) Evolutionary analyses of human behaviour: a commentary on Daly & Wilson. Animal Behaviour, 60, F21–F26: http://www.academicpress.com/anbehav/forum and http://www.idealibrary.com
Smith HJ, Spears R & Hamstra IJ (1999) Social identity and the context of relative deprivation. In: N Ellemers, R Spears & B Doosje (eds) Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content, pp 205–265. Oxford: Blackwells
Smith, M S, Kish, B J & Crawford, C B (1987) Inheritance of wealth as human kin investment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinson, S (1985) Sex differences in environmental sensitivity during growth and development. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 28, 123–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, D (1989) A critique of Darwinian anthropology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teitelbaum, M S (1970) Factors affecting the sex ratio in large populations. Journal of Biosocial Science, Supplement, 2, 61–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teitelbaum MS (1972) Factors associated with the sex ratio in human populations. In: G A Harrison & A J Boyce (eds) The Structure of Human Populations, pp 90–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Teitelbaum, M S & Mantel, N (1971) Socio-economic factors and the sex ratio at birth. Journal of Biosocial Science, 3, 23–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd PM & GF Miller (1999) From pride and prejudice to persuasion: satisficing in mate search. In: G Gigerenzer, P M Todd & The ABC Group (eds) Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, pp 287–308. New York: Oxford University Press
Trivers, R L (1974) Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers R (1985) Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings
Trivers, R L & Willard, D E (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 90–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turke, P W (1990) Which humans behave adaptively, and why does it matter?Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 305–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udry, J R, Deven, F R & Coleman, S J (1982) A crossnational comparison of the relative influence of male and female age on the frequency of marital intercourse. Journal of Biosocial Science, 14, 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Schaik C P & Hrdy, S B (1991) Intensity of local resource competition shapes the relationship between maternal rank and sex ratios at birth in cercopithecine primates. American Naturalist, 138, 1555–1562Google Scholar
Vining, D R Jr (1986) Social versus reproductive success: the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 167–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visaria, P M (1967) Sex ratio at birth in territories with a relatively complete registration. Eugenics Quarterly, 14, 132–142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voland, E, Siegelkow, E & Engel, C (1991) Cost/benefit oriented parental investment by high status families. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voland, E, Dunbar, R I M, Engel, C & Stephan, P (1997) Population increase and sex-biased parental investment in humans: evidence from 18th- and 19th-century Germany. Current Anthropology, 38, 129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, I (1983) Sex differences in human mortality: the role of genetic factors. Social Science and Medicine, 17, 321–333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberg, M S, Lottes, I L & Gordon, L E (1997) Social class background, sexual attitudes, and sexual behavior in a heterosexual undergraduate sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 625–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellings K, Field J, Johnson A & Wadsworth J (1994) Sexual Behaviour in Britain: The National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. London: Penguin
Wells, J C K (2000) Natural selection and sex differences in morbidity and mortality in early life. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 202, 65–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werren, J H & Charnov, E L (1978) Facultative sex ratios and population dynamics. Nature, 272, 349–350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiting, J W M (1993) The effect of polygyny on sex ratio at birth. American Anthropologist, 95, 435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (1984) A prospective multicentre study of the ovulation method of natural family planning. IV. The outcome of pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility, 41, 593–598CrossRef
Williams, G C (1979) The question of adaptive sex ratio in outcrossed vertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, series B, 205, 567–580CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M & Daly, M (1997) Life expectancy, economic inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in Chicago neighbourhoods. British Medical Journal, 314, 1271–1274CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×