Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:11:12.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Sexual segregation: a necessary consideration in wildlife conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2009

Esther S. Rubin
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of San Diego, Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species
Vernon C. Bleich
Affiliation:
California Department of Fish and Game
Kathreen Ruckstuhl
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Peter Neuhaus
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

OVERVIEW

The importance of animal behaviour to the development of conservation strategies has received increased recognition in recent years. Behaviourists realize now that evolutionary studies rely on a diversity of species occurring in their natural habitats, whereas conservationists now recognize that animal behaviour plays a large role in ecological processes and, therefore, can have great implications for conservation. Several recent texts (Clemmons & Buchholz, 1997; Caro, 1998; Gosling & Sutherland, 2000; Festa-Bianchet & Apollonio, 2003) have been dedicated to this important union. Nonetheless, much remains to be learned about the specific ways by which animal behaviour influences populations, and how that knowledge can best be incorporated into effective conservation strategies (Shumway, 1999).

Sexual segregation is a behavioural and ecological phenomenon that can have great implications for wildlife conservation. A number of hypotheses have been proposed for explaining sexual segregation (Main et al., 1996; Ruckstuhl & Neuhaus, 2002; see general overview in Chapter 2). Understanding the causes of sexual segregation will provide further insight on the selective forces shaping animal behaviour and will lead to improved conservation strategies. Regardless of the mechanism(s) leading to sexual segregation, the outcome itself is an important issue that should be considered in conservation programmes. Indeed, the temporal and spatial groupings of males and females have implications for habitat management, population monitoring, research and management.

In this chapter, we review ways in which sexual segregation can influence effectiveness of conservation strategies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×