Abaelardus, Petrus. Letters of Abelard and Heloise. To Which Is Prefix’d, A Particular Account of Their Lives, Amours, and Misfortunes, Extr. Chiefly from [the Dictionnaire Of] M. Bayle, Tr. [by J. Hughes]. By J. Hughes. Together with the Poem of Eloisa to Abelard, by Mr. Pope, and the Poem of Abelard to Eloisa, by Mrs. Madan. Translated by Pierre Bayle. London, 1782.Google Scholar

Adelman, Janet. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Adelman, Janet Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest. London: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpers, Paul. What Is Pastoral? Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Aparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy. London: Verso, 1971.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics: Aristotle. Edited by Ostwald, Martin. New York: Prentice Hall, 1962.Google Scholar

Attie, Katherine B. “Passion Turned to Prettiness: Rhyme or Reason in Hamlet.” Shakespeare Quarterly 63, no. 3 (2012): 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Badiou, Alain. In Praise Of Love. Translated by Truong, Nicolas. London: Serpent’s Tail, 2012.Google Scholar

Badiou, Alain. Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism. Translated by Brassier, Ray. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bailey, Amanda. “Shylock and the Slaves: Owing and Owning in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 62, no. 1 (2011): 1–24. doi:10.1353/shq.2011.0000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, C. L. Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy: A Study of Dramatic Form and Its Relation to Social Custom. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Barrell, John, and Bull, John, eds. The Penguin Book of English Pastoral Verse. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1982.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments. Translated by Howard, Richard. New York: Hill & Wang, 2010.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan. Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Berger, Harry Jr.. “Mercifixion in The Merchant of Venice: The Riches of Embarrassment.” Renaissance Drama 38, no. 1 (2010): 3–45. doi:10.1353/rnd.2010.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, Allan. Shakespeare on Love and Friendship. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bray, Alan. The Friend. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Bray, Alan. Homosexuality in Renaissance England. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth. Kenneth Burke on Shakespeare. Edited by Newstok, Scott L.. West Lafayette, Ind.: Parlor Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Burnett, Mark Thornton. Masters and Servants in English Renaissance Drama and Culture. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Clark. Hegel’s Logic: Between Dialectic and History. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Callaghan, Dympna. Weyward Sisters: Shakespeare and Feminist Politics. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.Google Scholar

Callaghan, Dympna C. “The Ideology of Romantic Love: The Case of Romeo and Juliet.” In The Weyward Sisters: Shakespeare and Feminist Politics, edited by Helms, Lorraine, Singh, Jyotsna G., and Callaghan, Dympna, 59–101. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lily B. Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes: Slaves of Passion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1930.Google Scholar

Carson, Anne. Eros the Bittersweet. Champaign, Ill.: Dalkey Archive Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Carson, Anne. Eros the Bittersweet. Second edition. Normal, Ill.: Dalkey Archive Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerasano, S. P. A Routledge Literary Sourcebook on William Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice.” New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Charney, Maurice. Shakespeare on Love and Lust. New edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Cirillo, Albert R. “As You Like It: Pastoralism Gone Awry.” ELH 38, no. 1 (1971): 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colie, Rosalie L. Shakespeare’s Living Art. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Cook, Carol. “Unbodied Figures of Desire.” Theater Journal 38, no. 1 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cormack, Bradin. “On Will: Time and Voluntary Action in Coriolanus and the Sonnets.” Shakespeare 5, no. 3 (2009): 253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damasio, Antonio. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. London: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2003.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Edited by Paul Ekman. London: Harper Perennial, 2009.Google Scholar

Davis, Lloyd. “‘Death-Marked Love’: Desire and Presence in Romeo and Juliet.” In Shakespeare Survey, edited by Wells, Stanley, 49:57–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Grazia, Margreta. “The Scandal of Shakespeare’s Sonnets.” In Shakespeare Survey, edited by Wells, Stanley, 46:35–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Acts of Literature. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. Chicago, Ill.: University Of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Descombes, Vincent. Objects of All Sorts: A Philosophical Grammar. Baltimore, Md.: John Hopkins University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dollimore, Jonathan. Death, Desire, and Loss in Western Culture. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Dollimore, Jonathan. Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Edman, Irwin, ed. The Works of Plato. Translated by Jowett, Benjamin. New York: Modern Library, 1956.Google Scholar

Empson, William. Some Versions of Pastoral. New York: New Directions, 1974.Google Scholar

Engle, Lars. Shakespearean Pragmatism: Market of His Time. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Everett, Barbara. “Romeo and Juliet: The Nurse’s Story.” Critical Quarterly 14, no. 2 (1 June 1972): 129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evett, David. Discourses of Service in Shakespeare’s England. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fink, Bruce. Lacan on Love: An Exploration of Lacan’s Seminar VIII, Transference. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. Freud’s On Narcissism: An Introduction. Edited by Sandler, Joseph, Fonagy, Peter, and Person, Ethel Spector. London: Karnac Books, 2012.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. The Psychology of Love. London: Penguin Classics, 2006.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop. A Natural Perspective: Development of Shakespearian Comedy and Romance. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Girard, René. A Theatre of Envy. Leominster: Gracewing Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Jonathan, ed. Queering the Renaissance. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press Books, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gollancz, Israel, ed. The Love Letters of Abelard and Heloise. Aziloth Books, 2012.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (The New Historicism: Studies in Cultural Poetics). Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hardimon, Michael O. Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, Jonathan Gil. “Mechanical Turks, Mammet Tricks and Messianic Time.” Postmedieval: A Journal of Medieval Cultural Studies 1, no. 1 (March 2010): 80–87. doi:10.1057/pmed.2010.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hillman, David. “‘If It Be Love Indeed’: Transference, Love, and Anthony and Cleopatra.” Shakespeare Quarterly 64, no. 3 (2013): 301–33. doi:10.1353/shq.2013.0045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, Jean E. “Crossdressing, The Theatre, and Gender Struggle in Early Modern England.” Shakespeare Quarterly 39, no. 4 (1 December 1988): 418–40. doi:10.2307/2870706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, Jean E., and O’Connor, Marion F.. Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology. Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Jardine, Lisa. Still Harping on Daughters. New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben. The Complete Poems. Edited by Parfitt, George. London: Penguin Classics, 1981.Google Scholar

Kesel, Marc De. Eros and Ethics: Reading Jacques Lacan’s Seminar VII. State University of New York Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Kirsch, Arthur. Shakespeare and Experience of Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Kottman, Paul A. “Defying the Stars: Tragic Love as the Struggle for Freedom in Romeo and Juliet.” Shakespeare Quarterly 63, no. 1 (2012): 1–38. doi:10.1353/shq.2012.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kottman, Paul A. Tragic Conditions in Shakespeare: Disinheriting the Globe. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. Tales of Love. Translated by Roudiez, Leon S.. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959–1960. New York: Norton, 1997.Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Bk. 20: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge. Edited by Miller, Jacques-Alain. Translated by Fink, Bruce. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000.Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book VIII. Translated by Gallagher, Cormack. 2002.Google Scholar

Lear, Jonathan. Freud. New edition. New York: Routledge, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggatt, Alexander. Shakespeare’s Comedy of Love. London: Routledge, 1974.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Eleanor Terry, ed. Pastoral and Romance Modern Essays in Criticism. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1969.Google Scholar

Lucking, David. “Translation and Metamorphosis in A Midsummer Night’s Dream.” Essays in Criticism 61, no. 2 (1 April 2011): 137–54. doi:10.1093/escrit/cgr002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucretius Carus, Titus. On the Nature of Things. Translated by Smith, Martin Ferguson. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett, 2001.Google Scholar

Lupton, Julia Reinhard. Citizen-Saints: Shakespeare and Political Theology. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. Martin Luther: A Selection from His Writings. Edited by Dillenberger, John. New York: Anchor, 1962.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, Alan. Marriage and Love in England: Modes of Reproduction, 1300–1840. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-luc. The Erotic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Martin, Priscilla, ed. Troilus and Cressida: A Casebook. London: Macmillan, 1976.Google Scholar

Masten, Jeffrey. Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexualities in Renaissance Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by Cunnison, Ian. Eastwood, Conn.: Martino Fine Books, 2011.Google Scholar

McCandless, D. Gender and Performance in Shakespeare’s Problem Comedies. Bloomington, Ind.: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.Google Scholar

Meek, Richard, and Sullivan, Erin, eds. The Renaissance of Emotion: Understanding Affect in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Montaigne, Michel de. Essays. Edited by Stewart, J.I.M.. Translated by Florio, John. London: The Modern Library, 1931.Google Scholar

Montrose, Louis Adrian. “‘The Place of a Brother’ in ‘As You Like It’: Social Process and Comic Form.” Shakespeare Quarterly 32, no. 1 (1 April 1981): 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mowatt, Barbara, and Werstine, Paul. “Shakespeare: Folger Digital Texts.” Accessed 5 March 2017. www.folgerdigitaltexts.org.Google Scholar

Navarre, Marguerite De, and Chilton, Paul. The Heptameron. Reprint edition. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics, 1984.Google Scholar

Neill, Michael. Putting History to the Question: Power, Politics, and Society in English Renaissance Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Nietzsche: Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits. Edited by Hollingdale, R. J.. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordlund, Marcus. Shakespeare and the Nature of Love: Literature, Culture, Evolution. Evanston, Ill. Northwestern University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha Craven. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Nygren, Anders. Agape and Eros. Translated by Watson, P.. London: SPCK Publishing, 1983.Google Scholar

Orgel, Stephen. Impersonations: The Performance of Gender in Shakespeare’s England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ovid, . Metamorphoses. Translated by Martin, Charles. Reprint edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2010.Google Scholar

Ovid, and Bate, Jonathan. Ovid’s Metamorphoses: The Arthur Golding Translation, 1567. Edited by Nims, John Frederick. Translated by Golding, Arthur. Philadelphia: P. Dry Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Parker, Patricia. Shakespeare from the Margin: Language, Culture, Context. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Pascal, Blaise. The Thoughts, Letters, and Opuscules of Blaise Pascal. Nabu Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Paster, Gail Kern. Humoring the Body: Emotions and the Shakespearean Stage. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paster, Gail Kern, Rowe, Katherine, and Floyd-Wilson, Mary. Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Peer, Willie Van, ed. The Taming of the Text: Explorations in Language, Literature and Culture. Routledge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, J. A. Shakespeare’s Mercutio: His History and Drama. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Reddy, William M. The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rivlin, Elizabeth J. The Aesthetics of Service in Early Modern England. Evanston, Ill. Northwestern University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Mary Beth. The Expense of Spirit: Love and Sexuality in English Renaissance Drama. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Salingar, Leo. Shakespeare and the Traditions of Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Sanchez, Melissa E. Erotic Subjects: The Sexuality of Politics in Early Modern English Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, Marc D. Voluntary Servitude and the Erotics of Friendship: From Classical Antiquity to Early Modern France. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar

Schalkwyk, David. Literature and the Touch of the Real. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Schalkwyk, David. Shakespeare, Love and Service. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schalkwyk, David. Speech and Performance in Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoenfeldt, Michael C. Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England: Physiology and Inwardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert, and Milton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. Othello, the Moor of Venice. Edited by Neill, Michael. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shakespeare, William. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Edited by Booth, Stephen. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Singer, Irving. The Nature of Love: Plato to Luther. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce R. Homosexual Desire in Shakespeare’s England: A Cultural Poetics. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Snow, Edward. “Language and Sexual Difference in Romeo and Juliet.” In Romeo and Juliet: Critical Essays, edited by Andrews, John F, 371–402. New York: Garland, 1993.Google Scholar

Stockton, Will. Playing Dirty: Sexuality and Waste in Early Modern Comedy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stockton, Will, and Bromley, James M., eds. Sex Before Sex: Figuring the Act in Early Modern England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Todorov, Tzvetan. Imperfect Garden: The Legacy of Humanism. Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Traub, Valerie. The Renaissance of Lesbianism in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Trilling, Lionel. Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Turner, Henry S., ed. Early Modern Theatricality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vendler, Helen. The Art of Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weil, Judith. Service and Dependency in Shakespeare’s Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Wells, Stanley. Shakespeare, Sex, and Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Wilson, Richard. Free Will: Art and Power on Shakespeare’s Stage. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1973.Google Scholar

Wroth, Mary. The Poems of Lady Mary Wroth. Edited by Roberts, Josephine A.. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Zamir, Tzachi. Double Vision: Moral Philosophy and Shakespearean Drama. Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Susan, ed. Erotic Politics: The Dynamics of Desire in the Renaissance Theatre: Desire on the Renaissance Stage. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Zizek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso Books, 2009.Google Scholar

Zizek, Slavoj. The Zizek Reader. Edited by Wright, Elizabeth and Wright, Edmond. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1999.Google Scholar