Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Nomenclature
- Abbreviations
- Figure Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Propulsive Power
- 3 Components of Hull Resistance
- 4 Model-Ship Extrapolation
- 5 Model-Ship Correlation
- 6 Restricted Water Depth and Breadth
- 7 Measurement of Resistance Components
- 8 Wake and Thrust Deduction
- 9 Numerical Estimation of Ship Resistance
- 10 Resistance Design Data
- 11 Propulsor Types
- 12 Propeller Characteristics
- 13 Powering Process
- 14 Hull Form Design
- 15 Numerical Methods for Propeller Analysis
- 16 Propulsor Design Data
- 17 Applications
- Appendix A1 Background Physics
- Appendix A2 Derivation of Eggers Formula for Wave Resistance
- Appendix A3 Tabulations of Resistance Design Data
- Appendix A4 Tabulations of Propulsor Design Data
- Index
- References
14 - Hull Form Design
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Nomenclature
- Abbreviations
- Figure Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Propulsive Power
- 3 Components of Hull Resistance
- 4 Model-Ship Extrapolation
- 5 Model-Ship Correlation
- 6 Restricted Water Depth and Breadth
- 7 Measurement of Resistance Components
- 8 Wake and Thrust Deduction
- 9 Numerical Estimation of Ship Resistance
- 10 Resistance Design Data
- 11 Propulsor Types
- 12 Propeller Characteristics
- 13 Powering Process
- 14 Hull Form Design
- 15 Numerical Methods for Propeller Analysis
- 16 Propulsor Design Data
- 17 Applications
- Appendix A1 Background Physics
- Appendix A2 Derivation of Eggers Formula for Wave Resistance
- Appendix A3 Tabulations of Resistance Design Data
- Appendix A4 Tabulations of Propulsor Design Data
- Index
- References
Summary
General
The hydrodynamic behaviour of the hull over the total speed range may be separated into three broad categories as displacement, semi-displacement and planing. The approximate speed range of each of these categories is shown in Figure 14.1. Considering the hydrodynamic behaviour of each, the displacement craft is supported entirely by buoyant forces, the semi-displacement craft is supported by a mixture of buoyant and dynamic lift forces whilst, when planing, the hull is supported entirely by dynamic lift. The basic development of the hull form will be different for each of these categories.
This chapter concentrates on a discussion of displacement craft, with some comments on semi-displacement craft. Further comments and discussion of semi-displacement and planing craft are given in Chapters 3 and 10.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ship Resistance and PropulsionPractical Estimation of Propulsive Power, pp. 313 - 336Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
Methodical series experiments on single-screw ocean-going merchant ship forms. Extended and revised overall analysisBSRA Report NS333 1971Google Scholar
1998
The position of the longitudinal centre of buoyancy for minimum resistanceTransactions of the Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland 97 1953 11Google Scholar
Cargo ship lines on simple formTransactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 25 1917Google Scholar
Experiments with straight framed shipsTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 106 1964 197Google Scholar
Hydrodynamic design of merchant ships for high speed operationTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 109 1967 167Google Scholar
The effect of forebody section shape on ship behaviour in wavesTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 103 1961 297Google Scholar
The effect of speed, forebody shape and weight distribution on ship motionsTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 109 1967 337Google Scholar
The effect of bow shape on deck wetness in heads seasTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 128 1986 9Google Scholar
Design of bulbous bowsTransactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 86 1978 197Google Scholar
Experimental determination of the distribution of skin friction on a model of a high speed linerTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 110 1968 79Google Scholar
The theory of the bulbous bow and its practical applicationTransactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders 52 1935Google Scholar
Hull and bulbous bow interactionTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 112 1970 421Google Scholar
A statistical re-analysis of resistance and propulsion dataInternational Shipbuilding Progress 31 1984 272Google Scholar
Principles of Naval ArchitectureThe Society of Naval Architects and Marine EngineersNew York 1989Google Scholar
Resistance and propulsion properties of some modern single screw tanker and bulk carrier formsTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 117 1975 201Google Scholar
A bulbous bow design methodology for high-speed shipsTransactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 94 1986 31Google Scholar
Prediction of the behaviour and propulsive performance of ships with bulbous bows in wavesTransactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 93 1985 79Google Scholar
Model experiments with stern variations of a 0.65 block coefficient formTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 111 1969 299Google Scholar
Model experiments with stern variations of a 0.80 block coefficient formTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 111 1969 507Google Scholar
BSRA Trawler Series (Part III). Block coefficient and longitudinal centre of buoyancy variation series, tests with bow and stern variationsTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 111 1969 317Google Scholar
2005
Stern wedges and stern flaps for improved powering – US Navy experienceTransactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 107 1999 67Google Scholar
Numerical computation for the comparison of stern flows around various twin skegsJournal of Ship and Ocean Technology 10 2006Google Scholar
The propulsive performance of podded propulsion ships with different shape of stern hullSecond International Conference on Technological Advances in Podded Propulsion, T-PODUniversity of BrestFrance 2006Google Scholar
2004
The prediction of separation of the turbulent boundary layerJournal of Fluid Mechanics 5 1959 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuel efficiency through hull form and propulsion research – a review of recent MARIN activitiesTransactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 95 1987 167Google Scholar
Pod propellers with 5 and 6 bladesProceedings of International Conference on Ship and Shipping Research, NAV'2003PalermoItaly 2003Google Scholar
Ducted propeller installation on a 130,000 TDW tanker ??? A research and development projectRINA Symposium on Ducted PropellersRINALondon 1973Google Scholar
1973
Towards a CFD- based prediction of ship performance – progress in predicting full-scale resistance and scale effectsTransactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects 150 2008 31Google Scholar
Hydrodynamic development for a large fast monohull passenger ferryTransactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 106 1998 413Google Scholar
Model tests and CFD in hull form optimisationTransactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 106 1998 391Google Scholar
A numerical study of additive bulb effects on the resistance and self-propulsion characteristics of a full form shipShip Technology Research 44 1997Google Scholar
URANS simulations of static drift and dynamic manoeuvres of the KVLCC2 TankerProceedings of the SIMMAN International Manoeuvring WorkshopCopenhagen 2008Google Scholar
2010