Book contents
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Cambridge Ocean Technology Series
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- 1 Introduction to Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2 Structural Steel Selection and Construction
- 3 Ocean Environmental Conditions
- 4 Site-Specific Wave-Induced Hull Girder Loads
- 5 Serviceability Limit States
- 6 Fatigue Limit States
- 7 Ultimate Limit States
- 8 Accidental Limit States
- 9 Mooring System Engineering
- 10 Sloshing Impact Engineering
- 11 Seismic Impact Engineering
- 12 Aircraft Impact Engineering
- 13 Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management
- 14 Life-Cycle Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 15 Lifetime Healthcare and Safe Decommissioning
- Book part
- Index
- References
12 - Aircraft Impact Engineering
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2022
Book contents
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Cambridge Ocean Technology Series
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- 1 Introduction to Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2 Structural Steel Selection and Construction
- 3 Ocean Environmental Conditions
- 4 Site-Specific Wave-Induced Hull Girder Loads
- 5 Serviceability Limit States
- 6 Fatigue Limit States
- 7 Ultimate Limit States
- 8 Accidental Limit States
- 9 Mooring System Engineering
- 10 Sloshing Impact Engineering
- 11 Seismic Impact Engineering
- 12 Aircraft Impact Engineering
- 13 Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management
- 14 Life-Cycle Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 15 Lifetime Healthcare and Safe Decommissioning
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
Ship-shaped nuclear power plants may be subjected to aircraft impacts from terrorist attacks or accidents. Even in such a hazard scenario, the catastrophic consequences of casualties, property damage and environmental pollution must be prevented or minimised (Paik 2020).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ship-Shaped Offshore InstallationsDesign, Construction, Operation, Healthcare and Decommissioning, pp. 347 - 373Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Fan, J., Zhang, J., Chen, H. and Jin, Z. (2011). ‘Advances in heterogeneous material mechanics’. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Heterogeneous Material Mechanics, Shanghai, 22–26 May.Google Scholar
Fang, Q. and Wu, H. (2017). Concrete Structures under Projectile Impact. Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
FHA (2004). Manual for LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147. Report No. FHWA-HRT-04-095, Turner-Fairbank Research Center, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.Google Scholar
Itoh, M., Katayama, M. and Rainsberger, R. (2005). ‘Computer simulation of an F-4 Phantom crashing into a reinforced concrete wall’. WIT Transactions on Modelling and Simulations, 40: 207–217.Google Scholar
Lee, K. S., Han, S. E. and Hong, J. W. (2013). ‘Analysis of impact of large commercial aircraft on a prestressed containment building’. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 265: 431–449.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2018). Ultimate Limit State Analysis and Design of Plated Structures. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2020). Advanced Structural Safety Studies with Extreme Conditions and Accidents. Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. and Park, J. H. (2020). ‘Impact crashworthiness of a floating offshore nuclear power plant hull structure in a terrorist attack with an aircraft strike’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 15(S1): S176–S189.Google Scholar
Riera, J. D. (1968). ‘On the stress analysis of structures subjected to aircraft impact forces’. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 8(4): 415–426.Google Scholar
Sadiq, M., Khushnood, R. A., Ilyas, M., Khaliq, W., Khan, S. A. and Rong, P. (2020). ‘Comparative assessment of impact analysis methods applied to large commercial aircraft crash on reinforced concrete containment’. PLOS One, 15(10), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237264.Google Scholar
Sugano, T., Tsubota, H., Kasai, Y., Koshika, N., Orui, S., von Riesemann, W. A., Bickel, D. C. and Parks, M. B. (1993). ‘Full-scale aircraft impact test for evaluation of impact force’. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 140: 373–385.Google Scholar
Trentacoste, M. F. (2004). Evaluation of LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wierzbicki, T. and Teng, X. (2003). ‘How the airplane wing cut through the exterior columns of the World Trade Center’. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 28(6): 601–625.Google Scholar
Wierzbicki, T., Xue, L. and Hendry-Brogan, M. (2002). ‘Chapter 4 Aircraft impact damage.’ World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations, FEMA 403 Report, The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar