Book contents
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Cambridge Ocean Technology Series
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- 1 Introduction to Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2 Structural Steel Selection and Construction
- 3 Ocean Environmental Conditions
- 4 Site-Specific Wave-Induced Hull Girder Loads
- 5 Serviceability Limit States
- 6 Fatigue Limit States
- 7 Ultimate Limit States
- 8 Accidental Limit States
- 9 Mooring System Engineering
- 10 Sloshing Impact Engineering
- 11 Seismic Impact Engineering
- 12 Aircraft Impact Engineering
- 13 Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management
- 14 Life-Cycle Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 15 Lifetime Healthcare and Safe Decommissioning
- Book part
- Index
- References
13 - Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2022
Book contents
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Cambridge Ocean Technology Series
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- 1 Introduction to Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2 Structural Steel Selection and Construction
- 3 Ocean Environmental Conditions
- 4 Site-Specific Wave-Induced Hull Girder Loads
- 5 Serviceability Limit States
- 6 Fatigue Limit States
- 7 Ultimate Limit States
- 8 Accidental Limit States
- 9 Mooring System Engineering
- 10 Sloshing Impact Engineering
- 11 Seismic Impact Engineering
- 12 Aircraft Impact Engineering
- 13 Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management
- 14 Life-Cycle Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 15 Lifetime Healthcare and Safe Decommissioning
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
Despite substantial preventive efforts, severe accidents continue to occur on engineering structures, resulting in catastrophic effects on personnel, assets and the environment. These accidents are caused by volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) environmental and operational conditions. The types of hazards associated with engineering structures, including ship-shaped offshore installations, are (Paik 2020)
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ship-Shaped Offshore InstallationsDesign, Construction, Operation, Healthcare and Decommissioning, pp. 374 - 399Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
API (2006). Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing Heliports for Fixed Offshore Platforms. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cameron, I. T. and Raman, R. (2005). Process Systems Risk Management. Elsevier, Oxford.Google Scholar
Crawley, F. and Tyler, B. (2003). Hazard Identification Methods. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Warwickshire.Google Scholar
DNV (2015). Offshore Standard: Helicopter Decks. DNV-OS-E401, Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.Google Scholar
Drysdale, D. (2011). An Introduction to Fire Dynamics. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Franssen, J. M. and Real, P. V. (2010). Fire Design of Steel Structures: ECCS Eurocode Design Manuals. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hare, J., Goff, R., Burrel, G. and McGillivray, A. (2017). Offshore Accident and Failure Frequency Data Sources: Review and Recommendations. Research Report RR1114, Health and Safety Executive, London.Google Scholar
HSE (2000). Effective Collision Risk Management for Offshore Installations. Offshore Technology Report OTO 1999 052, Health and Safety Executive, London.Google Scholar
HSE (2002). Marine Risk Assessment. Offshore Technology Report OTO 2001 063, Health and Safety Executive, London.Google Scholar
IAOGP (2010a). Risk Assessment Data Directory: Aviation Transport Accident Statistics. Report No. 434-11.1, International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, London.Google Scholar
IAOGP (2010b). Risk Assessment Data Directory: Ignition Probabilities. Report No. 434-6.1, International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, London.Google Scholar
IMCA (2018). International Guidelines for the Safe Operation of Dynamically Positioned Offshore Supply Vessels. International Marine Contractors Association, London.Google Scholar
INA (2002). Guidelines for the Design of Fender Systems. Report of Working Group 33 of the Maritime Navigation Commission, International Navigation Association, Brussels.Google Scholar
Kim, S. J., Lee, J., Paik, J. K., Seo, J. K., Shin, W. H. and Park, J. S. (2016). ‘A study on fire design accidental loads for aluminum safety helidecks’. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 8(6): 519–529.Google Scholar
Mujeeb-Ahmed, M. P., Ince, S. T. and Paik, J. K. (2020). ‘Computational models for the structural crashworthiness analysis of a fixed-type offshore platform in collisions with an offshore supply vessel’. Thin-Walled Structures, 154, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106868.Google Scholar
Mujeeb-Ahmed, M. P. and Paik, J. K. (2019). ‘A probabilistic approach to determine design loads for collision between an offshore supply vessel and offshore installations’. Ocean Engineering, 173: 358–374.Google Scholar
Mujeeb-Ahmed, M. P. and Paik, J. K. (2021). ‘Quantitative collision risk assessment of a fixed-type offshore platform with an offshore supply vessel’. Structures, 29: 2139–2161.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. P. (1996). Handbook of Fire and Explosion Protection Engineering Principles for Oil, Gas, Chemical, and Related Facilities. Noyes Publications, Westwood, NJ.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2018). Ultimate Limit State Analysis and Design of Plated Structures. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2020). Advanced Structural Safety Studies with Extreme Conditions and Accidents. Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Kim, J. H., Park, S. I., Islam, S. and Lee, D. H. (2013). ‘A new procedure for the nonlinear structural response analysis of offshore installations in fires’. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the US Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Bellevue, WA, 6–8 November.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Kim, S. J., Lee, J. C., Seo, J. K., Kim, B. J. and Ha, Y. C. (2014). ‘A new procedure for the nonlinear structural response analysis of offshore installations in explosions’. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the US Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Houston, TX, 22–24 October.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Ryu, M. G., He, K., Lee, D. H., Lee, S. Y., Park, D. K. and Thomas, G. (2021a). ‘Full-scale fire testing to collapse of steel stiffened plate structures under lateral patch loading (Part 1): Without passive fire protection’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 16(3): 227–242.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Ryu, M. G., He, K., Lee, D. H., Lee, S. Y., Park, D. K. and Thomas, G. (2021b). ‘Full-scale fire testing to collapse of steel stiffened plate structures under lateral patch loading (Part 2): With passive fire protection’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 16(3): 243–254.Google Scholar
Pedersen, P. T. and Zhang, S. (1999). ‘On impact mechanics in ship collisions’. Marine Structures, 11(10): 429–449.Google Scholar
Purkis, J. A. (2006). Fire Safety Engineering: Design of Structures. 2nd Edition, Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Ryu, M. G., He, K., Lee, D. H., Park, S. I., Thomas, G. and Paik, J. K. (2021). ‘Finite element modelling for the progressive collapse analysis of steel stiffened-plate structures in fires’. Thin-Walled Structures, 159, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107262.Google Scholar
SOLAS (2015). Construction: Fire Protection, Fire Detection and Fire Extinction. Chapter II-2. International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, International Maritime Organization, London.Google Scholar
Spouge, J. (1999). A Guide to Quantitative Risk Assessment for Offshore Installations. The Centre for Marine and Petroleum Technology, London.Google Scholar
Vinnem, J. E. (2007). Offshore risk assessment: Principles, Modelling and Application of QRA Studies. Springer, Stavanger.Google Scholar