Book contents
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Cambridge Ocean Technology Series
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- 1 Introduction to Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2 Structural Steel Selection and Construction
- 3 Ocean Environmental Conditions
- 4 Site-Specific Wave-Induced Hull Girder Loads
- 5 Serviceability Limit States
- 6 Fatigue Limit States
- 7 Ultimate Limit States
- 8 Accidental Limit States
- 9 Mooring System Engineering
- 10 Sloshing Impact Engineering
- 11 Seismic Impact Engineering
- 12 Aircraft Impact Engineering
- 13 Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management
- 14 Life-Cycle Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 15 Lifetime Healthcare and Safe Decommissioning
- Book part
- Index
- References
11 - Seismic Impact Engineering
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2022
Book contents
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Cambridge Ocean Technology Series
- Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- 1 Introduction to Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2 Structural Steel Selection and Construction
- 3 Ocean Environmental Conditions
- 4 Site-Specific Wave-Induced Hull Girder Loads
- 5 Serviceability Limit States
- 6 Fatigue Limit States
- 7 Ultimate Limit States
- 8 Accidental Limit States
- 9 Mooring System Engineering
- 10 Sloshing Impact Engineering
- 11 Seismic Impact Engineering
- 12 Aircraft Impact Engineering
- 13 Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management
- 14 Life-Cycle Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 15 Lifetime Healthcare and Safe Decommissioning
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
Ship-shaped offshore installations that are operated in shallow water (e.g., at depths of 10 m deep or less) are used for various purposes, such as oil terminals, floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs), power plants and bunkering. These usually remain afloat in operation, with a gap between the seabed and the bottom of the hull. In other situations, such as those for ship-shaped offshore power plant facilities containing nuclear reactors, hull bottoms are touched down onto the seabed by using heavy ballasting materials, such as concrete or sand. However, offshore installations are not fixed to the seabed and move under the effects of environmental actions, but may be moored.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ship-Shaped Offshore InstallationsDesign, Construction, Operation, Healthcare and Decommissioning, pp. 327 - 346Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Bae, D. M. and Zakki, A. (2011). ‘Comparisons of multi material ALE and single material ALE in LS-DYNA for estimation of acceleration response of free-fall lifeboat’. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 48(6): 552–559.Google Scholar
Bai, Y. and Jin, W. L. (2016). Marine Structural Design. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar
Chen, W. F. and Duan, L. (2014). Seismic Design: Bridge Engineering Handbook. Second Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Chopra, A. K. (1995). Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
FHWA (2004). Evaluation of LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147. Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.Google Scholar
ISO 19901-2 (2017). Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries: Specific Requirements for Offshore Structures: Part 2: Seismic Design Procedures and Criteria. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Jia, J. (2017). Modern Earthquake Engineering: Offshore and Land-Based Structures. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Jia, J. (2018). Soil Dynamics and Foundation Modeling: Offshore and Earthquake Engineering. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Jia, J. and Paik, J. K. (2019). Engineering Dynamics and Vibrations: Recent Developments. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. and Chang, B. (1996). ‘Structural design considerations’. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 8107: 781–793.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2018). Ultimate Limit State Analysis and Design of Plated Structures. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K. (2020). Advanced Structural Safety Studies with Extreme Conditions and Accidents. Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
Rijken, O. and Leverette, S. (2007). ‘Tension leg platform response to earthquake in Gulf of Mexico’. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Offshore Polar Engineering Conference, Lisbon, 1–6 July.Google Scholar
Rudan, S., Ćatipović, I., Berg, R., Völkner, S. and Pregeg, P. (2019). ‘Numerical study on the consequences of different’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14: 387–400.Google Scholar
Song, M., Ma, J. and Huang, Y. (2017). ‘Fluid-structure interaction analysis of ship-ship collisions’. Marine Structures, 55: 121–136.Google Scholar
Tokura, S. (2015). ‘Validation of fluid analysis capabilities in LS-DYNA based on experimental result’. Proceedings of 10th European LS-DYAN Conference, Wurzburg, 15–17 June.Google Scholar
Trentacoste, M. F. (2004). Evaluation of LS-DYNA Soil Material Model 147. US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar