Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T02:24:42.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Commerce, Contagion, and Cleanliness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Peter McCandless
Affiliation:
College of Charleston, South Carolina
Get access

Summary

I trust that the learned practitioners of Europe and America … will easily detect the fallacy of the doctrine of the contagious nature of the yellow fever; and that disease being proved … not contagious, will no longer subject our city to the fear, or the terrors of foreigners, and to the injurious effects that such a belief has upon our commerce, our wealth, and our population.

John L. E. W. Shecut, 1819

It is the object and interest of all commercial societies to establish, if possible, the non-contagious character of all diseases; and for the very plain reason, that the restrictions necessary to prevent the extension of such diseases, are calculated to interrupt free intercourse between commercial cities.

Benjamin B. Strobel, 1840

A COMMERCIAL PROBLEM

In the nineteenth-century South, as Margaret Humphreys has noted, “yellow fever was above all a commercial problem.” That was also true before the nineteenth century for ports all along the Atlantic coast, but during the early nineteenth century it became an acute commercial problem for Charleston, as the local economy began to stagnate and then decline. Although the disease killed many more people in other places, especially New Orleans, the economic malaise of Charleston and its hinterland magnified the perception of yellow fever as a commercial catastrophe. During the eighteenth century, smallpox could also shut down the port and cut off trade by land and sea. But there was a major difference. Smallpox struck Charleston less often than yellow fever and it was easily recognizable.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coclanis, Peter, The Shadow of a Dream: Economic Life and Death in the South Carolina Low Country, 1670–1920 (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Baldwin, Peter, Contagion and the State in Europe, 1830–1930 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerknecht, Erwin, “Anticontagionism between 1821 and 1867,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 22 (1948), 117–153Google ScholarPubMed
Journals of the Privy Council 1783–1789, ed. by Edwards, Adele S. (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1971), 84, 91, 334, 365Google Scholar
Lining, John, “A Description of the American Yellow Fever,” Essays and Observations, Physical and Literary (Edinburgh, 1756) 2: 373–374Google Scholar
Rush, Benjamin, Observations upon the Origin of the Malignant Bilious, or Yellow Fever (Philadelphia, 1799), 17Google Scholar
Waring, Joseph I., “John Moultrie, Jr., M.D., Lieutenant Governor of East Florida, His Thesis on Yellow Fever,” The Journal of the Florida Medical Association 54 (1967), 774–775Google Scholar
Watts, Sheldon, Epidemics and History: Disease, Power and Imperialism (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1997), 15–23Google Scholar
Carmichael, Ann G., Plague and the Poor in Renaissance Florence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Cipolla, Carlo, Cristofano and the Plague (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973)Google Scholar
Ramsay, David, “Facts concerning the yellow fever, as it appears at Charleston (South Carolina)Medical Repository 4 (1801): 217–220Google Scholar
Ramsay, David, An Eulogium upon Benjamin Rush, M. D. (Philadelphia, 1813), 28–31Google Scholar
Rush, Benjamin, Observations upon the Origin of the Malignant Bilious, or Yellow Fever (Philadelphia, 1799), 3–5
Currie, William, An Impartial Review of Dr. Rush's Late Publication Entitled “An Account of the Bilious Remitting Fever” (Philadelphia, 1794)
Stevenson, Lloyd G., “Putting Disease on the Map: The Early Use of Spot Maps in the Study of Yellow Fever,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 20 (1965), 229–233Google Scholar
Banov, Leon, As I Recall: the Story of the Charleston County Health Department (Columbia, SC: R. L. Bryan Co., 1970)Google Scholar
Chernin, E., “The Disappearance of Bancroftian filariasis from Charleston, South Carolina,” American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 37 (1987), 111–114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×