Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T04:00:23.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - An ethical perspective on the United Kingdom’s Improving Lives: The Future of Work, Health and Disability

from Part III - Social Choice and Capabilities in Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2024

Flavio Comim
Affiliation:
Universitat Ramon Llull
P. B. Anand
Affiliation:
University of Bradford
Shailaja Fennell
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

The headline aim of the UK governments ten-year strategy for work, health and disability is to have 1 million more disabled people in work by 2027. Good work can be health-enhancing, so there is a prima facie case for encouraging those with chronic health conditions and disabilities to work. The use of assistive technology could help improve their ability to work. However, disabled individuals may have greater difficulty in both accessing good work and having opportunities to improve their health. The concern is that disabled people who remain unable to work may find themselves stigmatized (as freeloaders), though their inability to work may be due to their greater difficulty in achieving sufficient health, or the medical assessment process, or both. These multidimensional barriers should be reflected in the strategys implementation, and valuing the agency of disabled people - respecting their choices in relation to working or not (and not blaming them if they choose not to work) - would increase their health more than the current strategy. The chapter suggests that the headline aim should really be to give 1 million more disabled people the opportunity to work by 2027.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkire, S., Chiappero-Martinetti, E., Deneulin, S., Ryan, R., and Silva, S. (2019) Measuring the freedom aspects of capabilities. www.researchgate.net/publication/228355513_Measuring_the_Freedom_Aspects_of_Capabilities%27.Google Scholar
Black, C. (2008) Working for a Healthier Tomorrow: Dame Carol Black’s Review of the Health of Britain’s Working Age Population. London: TSO.Google Scholar
DWP and DH (2017) Improving Lives: The Future of Work, Health and Disability, Cm 9526. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Fevre, R. (2017) Why work is so problematic for people with disabilities and long-term health problems. Occupational Medicine, 67 (8): 593–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fevre, R., Foster, D., Jones, M., and Wass, V. (2016) Closing disability gaps at work: deficits in evidence and variations in experience. Cardiff: Cardiff University.Google Scholar
Kuklys, W. (2005) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Theoretical insights and Empirical Applications. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Litchfield, P. (2014) An Independent Review of the Work Capability Assessment: Year Five. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. (2010) Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review. London: Institute of Health Equity, University College London.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. (2017) Disability, Health and Human Development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruger, J. P. (2010) Health and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1988) Freedom of choice: concept and content. European Economic Review, 32 (2/3): 269–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (2009) The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tamin, J. (2018) Should we give preference to Rogini? An ethical perspective on disability, health inequalities and work. Paper presented at the Human Development & Capability Association conference ‘Human development and social inclusion in an urbanizing world’, Buenos Aires, 1 September.Google Scholar
UK government (2010) Equality Act.Google Scholar
Venkatapuram, S. (2013) Health, vital goals and capabilities. Bioethics, 27 (5): 271–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waddell, G., and Burton, A. K. (2006) Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-Being? London: TSO.Google Scholar
WHO (1998) The Solid Facts: Social Determinants of Health. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×