Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T12:48:22.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Public assistance and guaranteed income proposals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Margaret S. Gordon
Affiliation:
University of California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Modern public assistance is usually the path of last resort for the needy who cannot qualify for benefits from other programs. It is more humane than old poor relief systems, less restrictive in applying the means test, and much less stigmatizing. Moreover, in many countries it is now subject to national standards and wholly or partly financed from national budgets, even though it tends to be administered locally. Nevertheless, it has not altogether lost its stigmatizing tendency, and this, along with ignorance of the provisions, helps to account for the fact that what the British call the “take-up” rate (the proportion of eligible persons who apply for and receive public assistance) tends to be far below 100 percent.

In the Middle Ages, poor relief was the province of the Church and was governed by Canon law. The Church distinguished between the holy voluntary poverty of a St. Francis of Assisi and idle parasitism. It also distinguished between the “able-bodied poor” and those who were poor because they were ailing or too young or too old to work – that is, between the deserving and undeserving poor. It was the duty of the wealthy to provide for the poor – this was the way to heaven. The role of the parish was central in the administration of poor relief, and this was the basis of the important role played by the parish after the Reformation. The medieval hospital also played an important role, as did the lord of the manor, who was expected to care for aging serfs, and the medieval guilds, which had mutual funds to care for ailing and aging members in some cases (Tierney, 1959).

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Security Policies in Industrial Countries
A Comparative Analysis
, pp. 306 - 327
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×