Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:14:24.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Three - To Go to Court or Not? The Evolution of Disputes in Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Marina Kurkchiyan
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Agnieszka Kubal
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

The chapter explores how and why Russians mobilize law and/or turn to the courts when faced with problems. The analysis is based on a series of nine focus groups conducted in 2014 in Moscow, Voronezh, and Novosibirsk. Participants were presented with two scenarios and asked to put themselves in the place of the claimant. The first involved a faulty mobile phone and the second presented a family squabble over a summer home after the death of an elderly relative. In both cases, the participants saw litigation as a last-ditch alternative. They were generally confident of their ability to find the relevant law on the internet and to use it when confronting those who had taken advantage of the claimant. But few were willing to turn to lawyers, fearing the cost and doubting their competence. The participants’ reluctance to go to court was not primarily due to fears of political interference or corruption. They worried about the time and emotional energy required to see a lawsuit through to its conclusion. These results are consistent with the findings of legal sociologists in other countries, suggesting that the rhetoric about the dysfunction of Russian courts is overblown, at least for fairly mundane civil cases.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arlidge, J. (2012) ‘Mayfair’s most wanted: ES meets Yevgeny Chichvarkin’, Evening Standard, 14 December. www.standard.co.uk/lifestyle/esmagazine/mayfair-s-most-wanted-es-meets-yevgeny-chichvarkin-8411511.html (accessed 12 March 2016).Google Scholar
Ayres, I. and Schwartz, A. (2014) ‘The no-reading problem in consumer contract law’, Stanford Law Review, 66(3): 545610.Google Scholar
Belov, B. A. (2015) ‘Raspredelenie bremeni dokazyvaniia v sporakh s postrebitelem’, Rossiiskaia iustitsiia, 12: 1315.Google Scholar
Bespalov, Iu. F. and Bespalova, A. Iu. (2013) Dela o Nasledovanii: Nekotorye Spornye Voprosy Pravoprimeneniia. Moscow: Prospekt.Google Scholar
Bogdanova, E. (2015) ‘The Soviet consumer: more than just a Soviet man’, in Vihavainen, T. and Bogdanova, E. (eds.) Communism and Consumerism: The Soviet Alternative to the Affluent Society. Boston: Brill, 113–38.Google Scholar
Butler, W. E. (2014) Russian Inheritance Law. London: Wildy, Simmonds and Hill.Google Scholar
Chekhov, A. (1982) ‘The complaints book’, in Chekhov: The Early Stories, 1883–1888. New York: Macmillan, 36–7 (transl. Miles, P. and Pitcher, H.).Google Scholar
Cormier, K. E. (2007) ‘Grievance practices in post-Soviet Kyrgyz agriculture’, Law and Social Inquiry, 32(2): 435−66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawisha, K. (2014) Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Elkov, I’. and Cherniak, I’. (2013) ‘Kvartirnyi vopros’, Rossiiskaia gazeta, 4 July, http://rg.ru/2013/07/04/socio.html (accessed 15 March 2016).Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. (1991) How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, D. M. (1984) ‘The oven bird’s song: insiders, outsiders, and personal injuries in an American community’, Law and Society Review, 18(4): 551−82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L. and Sarat, A. (1980–81) ‘The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming …’, Law and Society Review, 15(3−4): 631−54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, S. P. (1999) Crime, Cultural Conflict, and Justice in Rural Russia, 1865−1914. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, C. (2002) All Russia Is Burning! A Cultural History of Fire and Arson in the Late Imperial Russia. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. (1974) ‘Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change’, Law and Society Review, 9(1): 95160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gessen, M. (2015) ‘Is it 1937 yet?’ New York Times, 5 May. www.nytimes.com/2015/05/06/opinion/masha-gessen-putin-russia-is-it-1937-yet.html (accessed 10 April 2016).Google Scholar
Gessen, M. (2016) ‘Putin’s year in scandals’, New York Times, 6 January. www.nytimes.com/2016/01/06/opinion/putins-year-in-scandals.html?_r=1 (accessed 10 April 2016).Google Scholar
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii, chast’ pervaia, No. 51_FZ, 30 November 1994 [GK RF 1994] www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_5142/ (accessed 10 April 2016).Google Scholar
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii, chast’ tret’ia, No. 146-FZ, 26 November 2001 [GK RF 2001] www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34154/ (accessed 10 April 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grazhdanskii protsessual’nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii, No. 138-FZ, 14 November 2002 [GPK RF] www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_39570/ (accessed 10 April 2016).Google Scholar
Haltom, W. and McCann, M. (2004) Distorting the Law: Politics, Media, and the Litigation Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlund, S. (2005) Russian Path Dependence. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, K. (2001) ‘Beyond the tip of the iceberg: business disputes in Russia’, in Murrell, P. (ed.) Assessing the Value of Law in Transition Economies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2055.Google Scholar
Hendley, K. (2004) ‘Business litigation in Russia: a portrait of debt collection in Russia’, Law and Society Review, 31(1): 305–47.Google Scholar
Hendley, K. (2010) ‘Mobilizing law in contemporary Russia: the evolution of disputes over home repair projects’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 58(3): 631−78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, K. (2011a) ‘Resolving problems among neighbors in post-Soviet Russia: uncovering the law of the Pod“ezd’, Law and Social Inquiry, 36(2): 388418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, K. (2011b) ‘Varieties of legal dualism: making sense of the role of law in contemporary Russia’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 29(2): 233–62.Google Scholar
Hendley, K. (2017) Everyday Law in Russia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hendley, K. (2016) ‘Justice in Moscow?Post-Soviet Affairs, i32: 491511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, K., Murrell, P. and Ryterman, R. (2000) ‘Law, relationships and private enforcement: transactional strategies of Russian enterprises’, Europe-Asia Studies, 52(4): 627−56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, L. A. (2012) ‘Complaint-making as political participation in contemporary Russia’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45(1): 243–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herszenhorn, D. (2014) ‘Aleksei Navalny, Putin critic, is spared prison in a fraud case, but his brother is jailed’, New York Times, 30 December www.nytimes.com/2014/12/31/world/europe/aleksei-navalny convicted.html?_r=0 (accessed 10 April 2016).Google Scholar
Hilton, M. (2009) ‘The customer is always wrong; consumer complaint in late-NEP Russia’, Russian Review, 68(1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggs, P. B., Schwartz, O. and Burnham, W. (2015) Law and Legal System of the Russian Federation. Huntington, NY: Juris Publishing (6th edn).Google Scholar
McKillop, B. (1997) ‘Anatomy of a French murder case’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 45(3): 527–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. E. (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Michelson, E. (2007) ‘Climbing the dispute pagoda: grievances and appeals to the official justice system in rural China’, American Sociological Review, 72(3): 459−85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosyreva, E. I. (2010) ‘Spetsial’noe pravovoe regulirovanie posrednichestva (analiz zakonoproekta)’, Treteiskii sud, 2: 3944.Google Scholar
Otchet o rabote sudov obshchei iurisdiktsii o rassmotrenii grazhdanskikh del po pervoi instantsii za 12 mesiatsev 2012 g. www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (accessed 15 March 2016).Google Scholar
Otchet o rabote sudov obshchei iurisdiktsii o rassmotrenii grazhdanskikh del po pervoi instantsii za 12 mesiatsev 2013 g. www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (accessed 15 March 2016).Google Scholar
Otchet o rabote sudov obshchei iurisdiktsii o rassmotrenii grazhdanskikh del po pervoi instantsii za 12 mesiatsev 2014 g. www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (accessed 15 March 2016).Google Scholar
Otchet o rabote sudov obshchei iurisdiktsii o rassmotrenii grazhdanskikh, administrativnykh del po pervoi instantsii za 6 mesiatsev 2015 g. www.cdep.ru/index.php?id=79 (accessed 15 March 2016).Google Scholar
‘O zashchite prav potrebitelei’. Zakon Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 7 fevralia 1992, No. 2300–1, with amendments through 13 July 2015. 1992. www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_305/ (accessed 15 March 2016).Google Scholar
Pomorski, S. (2001) ‘Justice in Siberia: a case study of a lower criminal court in the city of Krasnoyarsk’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 34(4): 447–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanova, O. (2011) Butyrka. Moscow: Astrel’.Google Scholar
Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey-Higher School of Economics, www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/rlms-hse (accessed 10 April 2016).Google Scholar
Sandefur, R. (2007) ‘The importance of doing nothing: everyday problems and responses of inaction’, in Pleasence, P., Buck, A. and Balmer, N. (eds.) Transforming Lives: Law and Social Processes. Ontario: Legal Services Commission, 112–32.Google Scholar
Sakwa, R. (2009) The Quality of Freedom: Khodorkovsky, Putin, and the Yukos Affair. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, D., Austin, S., Felstiner, W. L. F., Kritzer, H. M. and Grossman, J. B. (1983) ‘The costs of ordinary litigation’, UCLA Law Review, 31(1): 72127.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, B. (1985) ‘Dispute processing: re-examining continuing relations and the law’, Wisconsin Law Review, 3: 623–46.Google Scholar
Zavisca, J. (2003) ‘Contesting capitalism at the post-Soviet dacha: the meaning of food cultivation for urban Russians’, Slavic Review, 62(4): 786810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×