Ackerman, B. A., We the People: Foundations (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Adler, H. M., ‘The Interpretation of Treaties’ (1900) 26 Law Magazine or: Quarterly Review of Jurisprudence 62–91 and 164–71Google Scholar

Alexy, R., A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification (Adler, R. and MacCormick, N. trans., Clarendon Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Alford, R. P., ‘The Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: International Adjudication in Ascendance’ (2000) 94 ASIL Proceedings 160Google Scholar

Allott, P., ‘The Concept of International Law’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 31Google Scholar

Alland, D., ‘L'Interprétation de droit international public’ (2014) 326 RdC 41Google Scholar

Alter, K. J., The New Terrain of International Law (Princeton University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Alvarez, A., Le Droit international nouveau dans ses rapport avec la vie actuelle des peuples (Pedone, 1959)Google Scholar

Aly, S., L'Interprétation évolutive en droit international public (on file at the library of the Institut des Hautes Etudes Internationales, Geneva, Ref. HEIDS 576, 1997)Google Scholar

American Institute of International Law, ‘Project No. 21: Treaties’ (1926) 20 AJIL Supplement 348Google Scholar

Amr, M. S. M., The Role of the International Court of Justice as the Principal Judicial Organ of the United Nations (Kluwer, 2003)Google Scholar

Andenas, M., and Bjorge, E., ‘National Implementation of ECHR Rights’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Andenas, M., and Fairgrieve, D., ‘Intent on Making Mischief: Seven Ways of Using Comparative Law’ in Montaneri, P. G. (ed.), Methods of Comparative Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar

Appert, G., ‘De l'interprétation des traités diplomatiques au cours d'un procès’ [1989] Journal du Droit International Privé 433Google Scholar

Aragoneses, A., Recht im Fin de siècle: Briefe von Raymond Saleilles an Eugen Huber (1895–1911) (Klostermann, 2007)Google Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Y., The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Intersentia, 2002)Google Scholar

Arato, J., ‘Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation: Techniques of Treaty Interpretation over Time and Their Diverse Consequences’ (2010) 9 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 443Google Scholar

Arnauld, A., ‘Möglichkeiten und Grenzen dynamischer Interpretation von Rechtsnormen’ (2001) 32 Rechtstheorie 465Google Scholar

Arnauld, A., Völkerrecht (2nd edn, C. F. Müller, 2014)Google Scholar

Arnauld, A., and Nicole, P., Logic Or the Art of Thinking (Buroker, J. V. trans., Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Aust, A., Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Aust, H., ‘Alejandro Álvarez’ in Fassbender, B., and Aust, H. (eds.), Basistexte: Völkerrechtsdenken (Nomos, 2012)Google Scholar

Aust, H., Rodiles, A., and Staubach, P., ‘Unity or Uniformity?: Domestic Courts and Treaty Interpretation’ (2014) 27 Leiden Journal of International Law 75Google Scholar

Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words: [The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955] (Harvard University Press, 1978)Google Scholar

Austin, J. L., ‘Performative Utterances’ in Austin, J. L., Philosophical Papers (3rd edn, Oxford University Press, 1979)Google Scholar

Azevedo Alexandrino Fernandes, J. M., Die Theorie der Interpretation des Gesetzes bei Francisco Suárez (Peter Lang, 2005)Google Scholar

Badura, P., ‘Verfassungsänderung, Verfassungswandel, Verfassungsgewohnheitsrecht’ in Isensee, J., and Kirchhof, P. (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Vol. 7, C. F. Müller, 1992)Google Scholar

Bank, R., ‘Verbot von Folter’ in Dörr, O., Grote, R., and Marauhn, T. (eds.), EMRK / GG: Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (vol. 1, 2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck, 2013)Google Scholar

Bankowski, Z., and others, ‘On Method and Methodology’ in MacCormick, N., and Summers, R. S. (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Ashgate, Dartmouth, 1991)Google Scholar

Barthes, R., ‘Death of the Author’ 5–6 (1967), www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/threeEssays.html#barthesGoogle Scholar

Bates, E., The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Beckett, E., ‘Comments’ (1950) 43 I Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International 435Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., Classical Canons: Rhetoric, Classicism and Treaty Interpretation (Ashgate, 2001)Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., ‘Revivalist Canons and Treaty Interpretation’ (1994) 41 UCLA Law Review 953Google Scholar

Benavides Casals, M. A., Die Auslegungsmethoden bei Menschenrechtsverträgen: Die Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte und des Interamerikanischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte (Nomos, 2010)Google Scholar

Bentham, J., Papers Relative to Codification and Public Instruction: Including Correspondence with the Russian Emperor and Divers Constituted Authorities in the American United States (J. McCreery, 1817)Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., ‘The Principles of International Law’ in Bowring, J. (ed.), Works of Jeremy Bentham (Vol. 1, Part 2, W. Tait, 1838)Google Scholar

Bernhardt, R., ‘Anmerkungen zur Rechtsfortbildung und Rechtsschöpfung durch internationale Gerichte’ in Ginther, K., and others (eds.), Völkerrecht zwischen normativem Anspruch und politischer Realität: Festschrift für Karl Zemanek zum 65. Geburtstag (Duncker & Humblot, 1994)Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., ‘Der Übergang vom “alten” zum “neuen” Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte’ in Bröhmer, J., and others (eds.), Internationale Gemeinschaft und Menschenrechte: Festschrift für Georg Ress zum 70. Geburtstag am 21. Januar 2005 (Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2005)Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., Die Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge insbesondere in der neueren Rechtsprechung internationaler Gerichte (Carl Heymanns Verlag, 1963)Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., ‘Evolutive Treaty Interpretation, Especially of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1999) 42 German Yearbook of International Law 11Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., ‘Homogenität, Kontinuität und Dissonanzen in der Rechtsprechung des Internationalen Gerichtshofs: Eine Fall-Studie zum Südwestafrika / Namibia-Komplex’ (1973) 33 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrech 1Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., ‘Rechtsfortbildung durch den Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte’ in Ginther, K., and others (eds.), Völkerrecht zwischen normativem Anspruch und politischer Realität: Festschrift für Karl Zemanek zum 65. Geburtstag (Duncker & Humblot, 1994)Google Scholar

Bederman, D. J., ‘Völkerrechtliche und verfassungsrechtliche Aspekte konkludenter Vertragsänderungen’ in Arndt, H.-W., and others (eds.), Völkerrecht und deutsches Recht: Festschrift für Walter Rudolf zum 70. Geburtstag (C. H. Beck, 2001)Google Scholar

Besson, S., ‘Getting over the Amour Impossible between International Law and Adjudication’ in Romano, C., Alter, K. J., and Shany, Y. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Bianchi, A., ‘Law, Time, and Change: The Self-Regulatory Function of Subsequent Practice’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Bianchi, A., ‘Textual Interpretation and (International) Law Reading: The Myth of (In)Determinacy and the Genealogy of Meaning’ in Bekker, P. H. F., and others (eds.), Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy: Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts (Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Binder, C., Die Grenzen der Vertragstreue im Völkerrecht (Springer, 2013)Google Scholar

Binder, C., and Zemanek, K., ‘Das Völkervertragsrecht’ in Rheinisch, A. (ed.), Österreichisches Handbuch des Völkerrechts (Vol. 1, 5th edn, Manz, 2013)Google Scholar

Bjorge, E., ‘Evolutionary Interpretation and the Intention of the Parties’ (2012) http://ssrn.com/abstract=2159657 (accessed 8 December 2012)Google Scholar

Bjorge, E., The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Bleckmann, A., ‘Analogie im Völkerrecht’ (1977 / 8) 17 Archiv des Völkerrechts 161Google Scholar

Bleckmann, A., ‘Die Rechtsanalogie im Völkerrecht’ (1993) 31 Archiv des Völkerrechts 353Google Scholar

Bleckmann, A., Grundprobleme und Methoden des Völkerrechts (Verlag Karl Alber, 1983)Google Scholar

Bleckmann, A., ‘Zur Feststellung und Auslegung von Völkergewohnheitsrecht’ (1977) 37 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrech 504Google Scholar

Blokker, N., ‘International Organizations or Institutions, Implied Powers’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Bluntschli, J. C., Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisirten Staten: als Rechtsbuch dargestellt (C. H. Beck, 1868)Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E.-W., ‘Anmerkungen zum Begriff Verfassungswandel’ in Badura, P., and Scholz, R. (eds.), Wege und Verfahren des Verfassungslebens: Festschrift für Peter Lerche zum 65. Geburtstag (C. H. Beck, 1993)Google Scholar

Bogdandy, A., and Venzke, I., ‘Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 983Google Scholar

Bogdandy, A., and Venzke, I., In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Bogdandy, A., and Venzke, I., ‘In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification’ (2012) 23 EJIL 7Google Scholar

Bogdandy, A., and Venzke, I., ‘On the Democratic Legitimation of International Judicial Lawmaking’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1341Google Scholar

Bogdandy, A., and Venzke, I., ‘On the Functions of International Courts: An Appraisal in Light of Their Burgeoning Public Authority’ (2013) 26 Leiden Journal of International Law 49Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L., ‘Subsequent Practice, Practices and “Family Resemblance”: Towards Embedding Subsequent Practice in Its Operative Milieu’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L., La Rosa, A., and Mbengue, M. M., ‘Art. 18 VCLT’ in Corten, O., and Klein, P. (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Bonfils, H., Manuel de droit international public (Arthur Rousseau, 1894)Google Scholar

Bork, R., ‘Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems’ (1971) 47 Indiana Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Bork, R., The Tempting of America (Simon & Schuster, 1997)Google Scholar

Borscheid, P., Das Tempo Virus (Campus, 2004)Google Scholar

Bos, M., A Methodology of International Law (North-Holland, 1984)Google Scholar

Böth, K., Evolutive Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge: Eine Untersuchung zu Voraussetzungen und Grenzen in Anbetracht der Praxis internationaler Streitbeilegungsinstitutionen (Peter Lang, 2013)Google Scholar

Boyle, A. E., ‘Further Development of the Law of the Sea Convention: Mechanisms for Change’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 563Google Scholar

Bratza, N., ‘Living Instrument or Dead Letter – The Future of the European Convention on Human Rights’, [2014] European Human Rights Law Review 116Google Scholar

Brems, E., Human Rights: Universality and Diversity (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001)Google Scholar

Brest, P., ‘The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding’ (1980) 60 Boston University Law Review 204Google Scholar

Brierly, J., ‘The Future of Codification’ (1931) 12 BYIL 1Google Scholar

Briggs, H. W., ‘The Travaux Préparatoires of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1971) 65 AJIL 705Google Scholar

Brölmann, C., ‘Law-Making Treaties: Form and Function in International Law’ (2005) 74 Nordic Journal of International Law 383Google Scholar

Brölmann, C., ‘Specialized Rules of Treaty Interpretation: International Organizations’ in Hollis, D. B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Broom, H., A Selection of Legal Maxims, Classified and Illustrated (Lawbook Exchange, 2000 [1845])Google Scholar

Brown, C., A Common Law of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Buchanan, A., Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Buergenthal, T., ‘Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: Is It Good or Bad?’ (2001) 14 Leiden Journal of International Law 267Google Scholar

Buffard, I., and Hafner, G. (eds.), International Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008)Google Scholar

Buffard, I., and Zemanek, K., ‘The “Object and Purpose” of a Treaty: An Enigma?’ (1998) 3 Austrian Review of International and European Law 311Google Scholar

Burling, R., Patterns of Language: Structure, Variation, Change (Academic Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Burri, T., ‘Do Lawyers Knead the Dough? – How Law, Chaos, and Uncertainty Interact’ (2010) 4 European Journal of Risk Regulation 371Google Scholar

Burri, T., ‘Workers and Case Law as Vehicles for the European Hegemon’ (2010) 3–4 Studia Diplomatica 119Google Scholar

Burri, T., and Pirker, B., ‘Stromschnellen im Freizügigkeitsfluss: von der Bedeutung von Urteilen des Europäischen Gerichtshofes im Rahmen des Personenfreizügigkeitsabkommens’ (2010) 20 Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationales und europäisches Recht 165Google Scholar

Byrde, B.-O., Verfassungsentwicklung: Stabilität und Dynamik im Verfassungsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Nomos, 1982)Google Scholar

Calabresi, S. G., and Scalia, A., Originalism: A Quarter-Century of Debate (Regnery Publishing, 2007)Google Scholar

Calhoun, C. J., Dictionary of the Social Sciences (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Çali, B., ‘Specialized Rules of Treaty Interpretation: Human Rights’ in Hollis, D. B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Campbell, L., Historical Linguistics: An Introduction (2nd edn, Edinburgh University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, E., ‘The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures’ (2001) 12 EJIL 889Google Scholar

Caplan, D. N., and Gould, J. L., ‘Language’ in Squire, L., and others (eds.), Fundamental Neuroscience (Elsevier, 2013)Google Scholar

Carnap, R., Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logics (University of Chicago Press, 1947)Google Scholar

Cartier-Bresson, H., ‘The Decisive Moment 1952’ in Goldberg, V. (ed.), Photography in Print: Writings from 1816 to the Present (University of New Mexico Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Carvalho, E. M., Semiotics of International Law: Trade and Translation (Springer, 2011)Google Scholar

Cassese, A., International Law (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., and Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (Wiley-Blackwell, 2002)Google Scholar

Chanaki, A., L'Adaptation des traités dans le temps (Bruylant, 2013)Google Scholar

Chandler, D., Semiotics: The Basics (Taylor and Francis, 2007)Google Scholar

Christakis, T., ‘Art. 56 VCLT’ in Corten, O., and Klein, P. (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Cohen, H. G., ‘International Law's Erie Moment’ (2013) 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 249Google Scholar

Conrad, P., Modern Times, Modern Places (Knopf, 1999)Google Scholar

Corten, O., ‘Les Techniques reproduites aux articles 31 à 33 des Conventions de Vienne: Approche objectiviste ou approche volontariste de l'interprétation?’ (2011) 115 RGDIP 351Google Scholar

Costa, J., ‘What Are the Limits to Evolutive Interpretation of the Convention?’ in Council of Europe (ed.), Dialogue Between Judges, European Court of Human Rights: What Are the Limits to Evolutive Interpretation of the Convention? (Council of Europe, 2011)Google Scholar

Cotterrell, R., Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory (Ashgate, 2006)Google Scholar

Council of Europe (ed.), Dialogue Between Judges, European Court of Human Rights: What Are the Limits to Evolutive Interpretation of the Convention? (Council of Europe, 2011)Google Scholar

Council of Europe (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Colloquy About the European Convention on Human Rights: Organised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Italy and the Secretariat General of the Council of Europe; Rome, 5–8 November 1975 (Council of Europe, 1975)Google Scholar

Craven, M. C. R., Fitzmaurice, M., and Vogiatzi, M. (eds.), Time, History and International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007)Google Scholar

Crawford, J., ‘A Consensualist Interpretation of Article 31(3) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Crawford, J., Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law (8th edn, Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Crawford, J., ‘Sovereignty as a Legal Value’ in Crawford, J., and Koskenniemi, M. (eds.), International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Crawford, J., and Viles, T., ‘International Law on a Given Day’ in Ginther, K., and others (eds.), Völkerrecht zwischen normativem Anspruch und politischer Realität: Festschrift für Karl Zemanek zum 65. Geburtstag (Duncker & Humblot, 1994)Google Scholar

Crema, L., ‘Disappearance and New Sightings of Restrictive Interpretation(s)’ (2010) 21 EJIL 681Google Scholar

Crema, L., ‘Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice Within and Outside the Vienna Convention’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Cremer, H., ‘Regeln der Konventionsinterpretation’ in Dörr, O., Grote, R., and Marauhn, T. (eds.), EMRK / GG: Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (vol. 1, 2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck, 2013)Google Scholar

Crnic-Grotic, V., ‘Object and Purpose of Treaties in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1997) 7 Asian Yearbook of International Law 141Google Scholar

Crowe, J., ‘Pre-Reflective Law’ in Del Mar, M. (ed.), New Waves in the Philosophy of Law (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)Google Scholar

Dahm, G., Delbrück, J., and Wolfrum, R., Völkerrecht (vol. 1 / 3, 2nd edn, De Gruyter, 2002)Google Scholar

Daillier, P., Forteau, M., and Pellet, A., Droit international public (8th edn, LGDJ, 2009)Google Scholar

d'Amato, A. A., ‘International Law, Intertemporal Problems’ in Bernhardt, R., and Macalister-Smith, P. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (North-Holland Publishers, 2003)Google Scholar

Danesi, M., The Quest for Meaning: A Guide to Semiotic Theory and Practice (University of Toronto Press, 2007)Google Scholar

D'Aspremont, J., Formalism and the Sources of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Davidson, D., ‘Radical Interpretation’ (1973) 27 Dialectica 314Google Scholar

Dawidowicz, M., ‘The Effect of the Passage of Time on the Interpretation of Treaties: Some Reflections on Costa Rica v. Nicaragua’ (2011) 24 Leiden Journal of International Law 201Google Scholar

de Fernàndez Casadevante Romani, C., Sovereignty and Interpretation of International Norms (Springer, 2007)Google Scholar

Degan, V., L'Interprétation des accords en droit international (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1963)Google Scholar

Desierto, D., and Gillespie, C., ‘Evolutive Interpretation and Subsequent Practice: Interpretative Communities and Processes in the Optional Protocol to the ICESCR’ (2013) 73 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrech 549Google Scholar

Despagnet, F., Cours de droit international public (L. Larose, 1899)Google Scholar

Dhokalia, R. P., The Codification of Public International Law (Manchester University Press, 1970)Google Scholar

Djeffal, C., ‘Commentaries on the Law of Treaties: A Review Essay Reflecting on the Genre of Commentaries’ (2013) 24 EJIL 1223Google Scholar

Djeffal, C., ‘Establishing the Argumentative DNA of International Law: A Cubistic View on the Rule of Treaty Interpretation and Its Underlying Legal Culture(s)’ (2014) 5 Journal of Transnational Legal Theory 128Google Scholar

Djeffal, C., ‘Neue Akteure und das Völkerrecht: eine begriffsgeschichtliche Reflexion’ in Berhard, T., Nikol, R., and Schniederjahn, N. (eds.), Transnationale Unternehmen und Nichtregierungsorganisationen im Völkerrecht (Nomos, 2013)Google Scholar

Doehring, K., Völkerrecht: Ein Lehrbuch (Müller, 2004)Google Scholar

Dörr, O., ‘Art. 31’ in Dörr, O., and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Dörr, O., ‘Art. 32’ in Dörr, O., and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Dörr, O., and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Drzemczewski, A., ‘The Sui Generis Nature of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1980) 29 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54Google Scholar

Dugard, J., ‘The Opinion on South-West Africa (“Namibia”): The Teleologists Triumph’ (1971) 88 South African Law Journal 460Google Scholar

Duplessix, E., La Loi des nations: Projet d'institution d'une autorité internationale législative, administrative et judiciaire (J. B. Sirey, 1906)Google Scholar

Dupuy, P., ‘Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties: Between Memory and Prophecy’ in Cannizzaro, E. (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Dupuy, P., ‘On the “Doctrine” of Approximate Application of Treaties in International Law’ in Hafner, G. (ed.), Liber Amicorum Professor Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern in Honour of His 80th Birthday (Martinus Nijhoff, 1980)Google Scholar

Dupuy, P., ‘The Danger of Fragmentation or Unification of the International Legal System and the International Court of Justice’ (1998–9) 31 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 791Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., Law's Empire (Hart Publishing, 1998)Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K., ‘European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1730Google Scholar

Eco, U., A Theory of Semiotics (Indiana University Press, 1979)Google Scholar

Ehrlich, E., Gesetz und lebendes Recht: vermischte kleinere Schriften (Duncker & Humblot, 1986)Google Scholar

Ehrlich, L., ‘L'Interprétation des traités’ (1928) 24 RdC 1Google Scholar

Elias, T. O., ‘The Doctrine of Intertemporal Law’ (1980) 74 AJIL 285Google Scholar

Eriksen, T. H., Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age (Pluto Press, 2001)Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, Annual Report (Registry of the European Court of Human Rights, 2013), www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Annual_report_2013_ENG.pdf (accessed 23 June 2015)Google Scholar

Falk, R. A., ‘On Treaty Interpretation and the New Haven Approach: Achievements and Prospects’ in Falk, R. A. (ed.), The Status of the International Society (Princeton University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Farber, D. A., ‘Originalism Debate: A Guide for the Perplexed’ (1988) 49 Ohio State Law Journal 1085Google Scholar

Farber, D. A., ‘Disarmed by Time: The Second Amendment and the Failure of Originalism’ (2000) 76 Chicago–Kent Law Review 167Google Scholar

Fassbender, B., ‘Denkschulen im Völkerrecht’ in Fassbender, B., and others (eds.), Paradigmen im internationalen Recht Implikationen der Weltfinanzkrise für das internationale Recht (C. F. Müller, 2012)Google Scholar

Fassbender, B., The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community (2nd edn, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009)Google Scholar

Fauchille, P., Traité de droit international public (vol. 1, Rousseau, 1926)Google Scholar

Feldman, A. M., ‘Evolving Treaty Obligations: A Proposal for Analyzing Subsequent Practice Derived from WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2009) 41 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 655Google Scholar

Feteris, E. T., Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories on the Justification of Judicial Decisions (Kluwer, 1999)Google Scholar

Field, D. D., Draft Outlines of an International Code (Diossy, 1872)Google Scholar

Fikentscher, W., Methoden des Rechts: Frühe und religiöse Rechte – Romanischer Rechtskreis (Mohr Siebeck, 1975)Google Scholar

Finegan, E., Language: Its Structure and Use (Thomson, 2008)Google Scholar

Fiore, P., Le Droit international codifié et sa sanction juridique (Charles Antoine trans., A. Pedone, 1911)Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., Regime-Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts (Suhrkamp, 2006)Google Scholar

Fish, S. E., ‘Fish v. Fiss’, Doing What Comes Naturally (Duke University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Fish, S. E., ‘Is There a Text in This Class’ in Veseer, H. A. (ed.), The Stanley Fish Reader (Blackwell, 1999)Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘Hersch Lauterpacht – The Scholar as Judge – Part III’ (1963) 39 BYIL 133Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘De l'interprétation des traités’ (1956) 46 Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International 317Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–4: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’ (1957) 33 BYIL 203Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: Treaty Interpretation’ (1951) 28 BYIL 1Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, G., ‘Vae Victis or Woe to the Negotiators! Your Treaty or Our “Interpretation” of It?’ (1971) 65 AJIL 358Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., ‘Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of Treaties, Part I’ (2008) 21 Hague Yearbook of International Law 101Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., ‘Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of Treaties, Part II’ (2010) 22 Hague Yearbook of International Law 3Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the Human Right to a Clean Environment: The English Perspective’ in Revesz, R. L., Sands, P., and Stewart, R. B. (eds.), Environmental Law, the Economy and Sustainable Development: The United States, the European Union, and the International Community (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., Olufemi, E., and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention: 30 Years on (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010)Google Scholar

Focarelli, C., International Law as a Social Construct: The Struggle for Global Justice (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Fogelin, R. J., Taking Wittgenstein at His Word: A Textual Study (Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Folke-Schuppert, G., ‘Verfassungswandel im Kontext. Aspekte einer Theorie des Verfassungswandels’ in Hönnige, C., Kneip, S., and Lorenz, A. (eds.), Verfassungswandel im Mehrebenensystem (VS Verlag, 2011)Google Scholar

Forowicz, M., The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Fox, A., Linguistic Reconstruction: An Introduction to Theory and Method (Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Francioni, F., ‘Equity in International Law’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Franck, T. M., ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’ (2008) 102 AJIL 715Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M., ‘Proportionality in International Law’ (2010) 4 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 230Google Scholar

French, D., ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 281Google Scholar

Friedmann, W., ‘The Changing Dimensions of International Law’ (1962) 62 Columbia Law Review 1147Google Scholar

Friedmann, W., The Changing Structure of International Law (Stevens, 1964)Google Scholar

Frowein, J. A., ‘Die evolutive Auslegung der EMRK’ in Marauhn, T. (ed.), Recht, Politik und Rechtspolitik in den internationalen Beziehungen (Mohr Siebeck, 2005)Google Scholar

Frowein, J. A., ‘European Integration Through Fundamental Rights’ (1984) 18 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 5Google Scholar

Gadamer, H., Truth and Method (Continuum, 1975)Google Scholar

Gaja, G., ‘Does the European Court of Human Rights Use Its Stated Methods of Interpretation?’ in Capotorti, F. (ed.), Divenire sociale e adeguamento del diritto: studi in onore di Francesco Capotorti (A. Giuffrè, 1999)Google Scholar

Ganshof van der Meersch, W. J., ‘Quelques apercus de la methode d'interpretation de la Convention de Rome du 4 Novembre 1950 par la Cour Europeenne des droit de l'homme’ in Legros, R. (ed.), Mélanges offerts à Robert Legros (Ed. de l'University de Bruxelles, 1985)Google Scholar

Garapon, A., ‘Les Limites à l'interprétation évolutive de la Convention Européenne’ (2011) 87 Revue trimestrielle de droit de l'homme 439Google Scholar

Gardam, J. G., Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States (Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Gardiner, R., ‘The Vienna Convention Rules on Treaty Interpretation’ in Hollis, D. B. (ed.), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Gardiner, R., Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Gaudemet, E., ‘L'Oeuvre de Saleilles et l'oeuvre de Gény en méthodologie juridique et en philosophie du droit’, in Les Sources générales des systèmes juridiques actuels (Recueil Sirey, 1934)Google Scholar

Gentili, A., De jure bellis libri tres (vol. II, translation of the edition originally published in 1612, Rolf, J. C. trans., Hein, 1993)Google Scholar

Gény, F., Méthode d'interprétation et sources en droit privé positif: Essai critique (vol. 1, 2nd edn, LGDJ, 1919)Google Scholar

Gény, F., Méthode d'interprétation et sources en droit privé positif: Essai critique (vol. 2, 2nd edn, LGDJ, 1919)Google Scholar

Giegerich, T., ‘Art. 56’ in Dörr, O., and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Giegerich, T., ‘Art. 62’ in Dörr, O., and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Gillich, I.-E., Konsens und Evolutive Vertragsauslegung (Peter Lang, 2014)Google Scholar

Gillman, H., ‘The Collapse of Constitutional Originalism and the Rise of the Notion of the “Living Constitution” in the Course of American State-Building’ (1997) 11 Studies in American Political Development 191Google Scholar

Goldford, D. J., The American Constitution and the Debate Over Originalism (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, J., ‘The Case for Originalism’ in Huscroft, G., and Miller, B. (eds.), The Challenge of Originalism: Theories of Constitutional Interpretation (Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Golsong, H., ‘Interpreting the Convention’ in MacDonald, R. St J., Matscher, F., and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993)Google Scholar

Gordon, E., ‘The World Court and the Interpretation of Constitutive Treaties’ (1965) 59 AJIL 794Google Scholar

Gottlieb, G., ‘The Interpretation of Treaties by Tribunals’ (1969) 9 ASIL Proceedings 122Google Scholar

Grabau, F., Über die Normen zur Gesetzes- und Vertragsinterpretation (Duncker & Humblot, 1993)Google Scholar

Grabenwarter, C., and Pabel, K., Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention: Ein Studienbuch (5th edn, C. H. Beck, 2012)Google Scholar

Graham, R., ‘In Defence of Maxims’ (2001) 22 Statute Law Review 45Google Scholar

Grano, J. D., ‘Judicial Review and a Written Constitution in a Democratic Society’ (1981) 28 Wayne Law Review 1Google Scholar

Grant, J. P., and Barker, J. C., Parry and Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Graziadei, M., ‘The Functionalist Heritage’ in Legrand, P., Munday, R., and Munday, R. J. C. (eds.), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Greenwalt, K., Legal Interpretation (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Greer, S. C., The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights (Council of Europe Publications, 2000)Google Scholar

Greig, D., Intertemporality and the Law of Treaties (British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2001)Google Scholar

Greig, D., ‘The Time of Conclusion and the Time of Application of Treaties as Points of Reference in the Interpretative Process’ in Craven, M. C. R., Fitzmaurice, M., and Vogiatzi, M. (eds.), Time, History and International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007)Google Scholar

Greschek, E., Die evolutive Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge am Beispiel des GATT (Peter Lang, 2012)Google Scholar

Grimm, D., Das öffentliche Recht vor der Frage nach seiner Identität (Mohr Siebeck, 2012)Google Scholar

Gross, L., ‘Treaty Interpretation: The Proper Role of an International Tribunal’ (1969) 63 ASIL Proceedings 108Google Scholar

Grotius, H., De jure belli ac pacis libri tres, (vol. II, translation of the edition originally published in 1646, Kelsey, F. W. trans., Humphrey Milford, 1925)Google Scholar

Grover, L., ‘A Call to Arms: Fundamental Dilemmas Confronting the Interpretation of Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’ (2010) 21 EJIL 543Google Scholar

Guillaume, G., ‘The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators’ (2011) 2 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5Google Scholar

Häberle, P., ‘Zeit und Verfassung’ (1974) 21 Zeitschrift für Politik 111Google Scholar

Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Rehg, William trans., MIT Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Habermas, J., Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats (Suhrkamp, 1992)Google Scholar

Habermas, J., ‘What Is Universal Pragmatics?’, Communication and Evolution of Society (Polity Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Hafner, G., ‘Subsequent Agreements and Practice: Between Interpretation, Informal Modification and Amendment’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Hale, Baroness, ‘Common Law and Convention Law: The Limits to Interpretation’ (2011) 5 European Human Rights Law Review 534Google Scholar

Hall, W. E., A Treatise on International Law (8th edn, Clarendon Press, 1924)Google Scholar

Haraszti, G., and Decsenyi, J., Some Fundamental Problems of the Law of Treaties (Akad. Kiadó, 1973)Google Scholar

Harris, D. J., O'Boyle, M., Buckley, C., and others, Harris, O'Boyle and Warbrick Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (3rd edn, Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Harvard Law School, ‘Harvard Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supplement 937Google Scholar

Heffter, A. W., Das europäische Völkerrecht der Gegenwart (2nd edn, G. H. Schroeder, 1848)Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, W., ‘Die völkerrechtlichen Verträge als Hauptquelle des Völkerrechts’ in Ipsen, K. (ed.), Völkerrecht (6th edn, C. H. Beck, 2014)Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, W. ‘Weitere Quellen Des Völkerrechts’ in Ipsen, K. (ed.), Völkerrecht (6th edn, C. H. Beck, 2014)Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W., ‘Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik’ [1927] Zeitschrift für Physik 172Google Scholar

Helfer, L. R., ‘Consensus, Coherence and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1993) 26 Cornell International Law Journal 133Google Scholar

Herbots, J. H., ‘Interpretation of Contracts’ in Smits, J. M. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (2nd edn, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Herdegen, M., ‘Interpretation in International Law’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Herdegen, M., Völkerrecht (Grundrisse des Rechts, C. H. Beck, 2013)Google Scholar

Hershey, A., The Essentials of International Law and Organization (Macmillan, 1927)Google Scholar

Hesse, K., ‘Grenzen der Verfassungswandlung’ in Ehmke, H., and others (eds.), Festschrift für Ulrich Scheuner (Duncker & Humblot, 1973)Google Scholar

Heyns, C., and Killander, M., ‘South West Africa / Namibia (Advisory Opinions and Judgments)’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Higgins, R., ‘Some Observations on the Inter-Temporal Rule in International Law’ in Makarczyk, J., and Skubiszewski, K. (eds.), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski (Kluwer, 1996)Google Scholar

Higgins, R., ‘The International Court and South West Africa’ (1966) 42 International Affairs 573Google Scholar

Higgins, R., ‘Time and the Law – International Perspectives on an Old Problem’ (1997) 46 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 501Google Scholar

Hilgevoord, J., and Uffink, J., ‘The Uncertainty Principle’, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/qt-uncertainty (accessed 8 May 2014)Google Scholar

Hock, H. H., and Joseph, B. D. (eds.), Trends in Linguistics: Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship (Mouton de Gruyter, 2009)Google Scholar

Hogg, J. F., ‘The International Law Commission and the Law of Treaties’ (1965) 59 ASIL Proceedings 8Google Scholar

Hollis, D., ‘The Existential Function of Interpretation in International Law’, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_Fid=2330642 (accessed 31 December 2014)Google Scholar

Honneth, A., Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit (Suhrkamp, 2011)Google Scholar

Horwitz, M. J., ‘Foreword: The Constitution of Change Legal Fundamentality Without Fundamentalism’ (1993) 107 Harvard Law Review 30Google Scholar

Hudson, M. O., The Permanent Court of International Justice (Macmillan, 1934)Google Scholar

Hudson, M. O., The Permanent Court of International Justice: 1920–1942 (2nd edn, Macmillan, 1943)Google Scholar

Huscroft, G., and Miller, B. (eds.), The Challenge of Originalism: Theories of Constitutional Interpretation (Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Hyde, C. C., ‘Concerning the Interpretation of Treaties’ (1909) 3 AJIL 46Google Scholar

Hyde, C. C., International Law Chiefly as Interpreted and Applied by the United States (1st edn, Little, Brown & Co., 1922)Google Scholar

Hyde, C. C., International Law Chiefly as Interpreted and Applied by the United States (2nd edn, Little, Brown & Co., 1945)Google Scholar

Hyde, C. C., ‘Judge Anzilotti on the Interpretation of Treaties’ (1933) 27 AJIL 502Google Scholar

Hyde, C. C., ‘The Interpretation of Treaties by the Supreme Court of the United States’ [1929] AJIL 824Google Scholar

International Commission of Jurists, ‘Project No. IV: Treaties’ (1928) 22 AJIL Supplement 244Google Scholar

Internoscia, J., New Code of International Law (The International Code Company of New York, 1910)Google Scholar

Jacobs, F. G., ‘Innovation and Continuity in the Law of Treaties’ (1970) 33 Modern Law Review 508Google Scholar

Jacobs, F. G., ‘To What Extent Have Restrictions on the Enjoyment of Freedoms Evolved?’ in Council of Europe (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Colloquy About the European Convention on Human Rights: Organised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Italy and the Secretariat General of the Council of Europe; Rome, 5–8 November 1975 (Council of Europe, 1975)Google Scholar

Jacobs, F. G., ‘Varieties of Approach to Treaty Interpretation: With Special Reference to the Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties Before the Vienna Diplomatic Conference’ (1969) 18 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 318Google Scholar

Jellinek, G., Verfassungsänderung und Verfassungswandlung (Goldbach, 1996 [1906])Google Scholar

Jennings, R. Y., ‘Treaties’ in Bedjaoui, M. (ed.), International Law: Achievements and Prospects (UNESCO, 1991)Google Scholar

Jessup, P. C., ‘The Palmas Island Arbitration’ (1928) 22 AJIL 735Google Scholar

Jiménez Aréchaga, E., ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century: General Course’ (1978) 159 RdC 1Google Scholar

Jonas, D. S., and Saunders, T. N., ‘The Object and Purpose of a Treaty: Three Interpretive Methods’ (2010) 43 Virginia Journal of International Law 565Google Scholar

Joseph, J. E., Limiting the Arbitrary: Linguistic Naturalism and Its Opposites in Plato's Cratylus and Modern Theories of Language (John Benjamins Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar

Kadelbach, S., ‘Interpretation of the Charter’ in Simma, B., Khan, D., Nolte, G., and Paulus, A. (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations (3rd edn, Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Kähler, L., Strukturen und Methoden der Rechtsprechungsänderung (2nd edn, Nomos, 2011)Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, J., Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (Routledge, 2010)Google Scholar

Karl, W., Vertrag und spaetere Praxis im Voelkerrecht: zum Einfluß der Praxis auf Inhalt und Bestand völkerrechtlicher Verträge (Springer, 1983)Google Scholar

Kay, R. S., ‘Adherence to the Original Intentions in Constitutional Adjudication: Three Objections and Responses’ (1987) 82 Northwestern University Law Review 226Google Scholar

Kearney, R. D., and Dalton, R. E., ‘The Treaty on Treaties’ (1970) 64 AJIL 495Google Scholar

Keith, A., ‘Metamorphosis’ in Weiden, B. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Ovid (Brill, 2001)Google Scholar

Keller, R., A Theory of Linguistic Signs (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Legal Technique in International Law: A Textual Critique of the League Covenant (Geneva Research Centre, 1939)Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Principles of International Law (Rinehart & Co., 1952)Google Scholar

Kempen, B., and Hillgruber, C., Völkerrecht (C. H. Beck, 2012)Google Scholar

Khan, D., ‘Max Huber as Arbitrator: The Palmas (Miangas) Case and Other Arbitrations’ (2007) 18 EJIL 145Google Scholar

Kingsburry, B., ‘International Courts: Uneven Judicialisation in Global Order’ in Crawford, J., and Koskenniemi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘Book Review’ (2013) 24 EJIL 718Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘International Legal Histories: “Declining Importance of Travaux Préparatoires in Treaty Interpretation?”’ (2003) 50 Netherlands International Law Review 267Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘Reluctant Grundnormen: Articles 31(3)(c) and 42 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Fragmentation of International Law’ in Craven, M. C. R., Fitzmaurice, M., and Vogiatzi, M. (eds.), Time, History and International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘Virtuous Interpretation’ in Fitzmaurice, M., Olufemi, E., and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention: 30 Years on (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010)Google Scholar

Klappstein, V., Die Rechtsprechungsänderung mit Wirkung für die Zukunft (Duncker & Humblot, 2009)Google Scholar

Klatt, M., and Meister, M., The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Klein, E., Statusverträge im Völkerrecht (Springer, 1980)Google Scholar

Klein, G., Rekonstruktion und Interpretation (Kaiser, 1969)Google Scholar

Kleinlein, T., ‘Judicial Lawmaking by Judicial Restraint? The Potential of Balancing in International Economic Law’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1175Google Scholar

Kleinlein, T., Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht: Konstruktion und Elemente einer idealistischen Völkerrechtslehre (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Klüber, J. L., Europäisches Völkerrecht (2nd edn, Hurter, 1851)Google Scholar

Koch, H. J., and Trapp, R., ‘Richterliche Innovation – Begriff und Begründbarkeit’ in Harenburg, J., Podlech, A., and Schlink, B. (eds.), Rechtlicher Wandel durch richterliche Entscheidung (Toeche-Mittler, 1980)Google Scholar

Köck, H. F., Vertragsinterpretation und Vertragsrechtskonvention: zur Bedeutung der Art. 31 und 32 der Wiener Vertragsrechtskonvention 1969 (Duncker & Humblot, 1976)Google Scholar

Kohen, M., ‘Keeping Subsequent Agreements and Practice in Their Right Limits’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Kolb, R., Interprétation et création du droit international: Esquisses d'une herméneutique juridique moderne pour le droit international public (Bruylant, 2006)Google Scholar

Kolb, R., ‘Les Maximes juridiques en droit international public: Questions historiques et théoriques’ (1999) 32 Revue Belge de Droit International 407Google Scholar

Koopmans, T., ‘Retrospectivity Reconsidered’ (1980) 39 Cambridge Law Journal 287Google Scholar

Koselleck, R., ‘Die Geschichte der Begriffe und Begriffe der Geschichte’ in Koselleck, R. (ed.), Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache (Suhrkamp, 2010)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Introduction’ in Koskenniemi, M. (ed.), Sources of International Law (Ashgate, 2000)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Methodology of International Law’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’ (2007) 70 Modern Law Review 1Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Kotzur, M., ‘Intertemporal Law’ in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Kotzur, M., ‘Non-Retroactivity and Its Discontents’ in Tams, C., Tzanakopoulos, A., and Zimmermann, A. (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (Edward Elgar, 2014)Google Scholar

Kratochwil, F. V., Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge University Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Krawietz, W., ‘Ausdifferenzierung von Praxis und Theorie in juristischer systemtheoretischer Perspektive’ (2001) 32 Rechtstheorie 345Google Scholar

Kretzmer, D., ‘The Inherent Right to Self-Defence and Proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum’ (2013) 24 EJIL 235Google Scholar

Kuijper, P. J., ‘The European Courts and the Law of Treaties: The Continuing Story’ in Cannizzaro, E. (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Laband, P., Die Wandlungen der deutschen Reichsverfassung (Zahn & Jaensch, 1895)Google Scholar

Lagerwall, A., ‘Art. 64 VCLT’ in Corten, O., and Klein, P. (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Lamond, G., ‘Precedent and Analogy in Legal Reasoning’, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-reas-prec (accessed 31 December 2014)Google Scholar

Lapidoth, R., ‘Equity in International Law’ (1987) 22 Israel Law Review 161Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., ‘De l'interprétation des traités’ [1950] Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International 345Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., 'De l'interprétation des traités’ [1950] Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International 366Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., ‘Les Travaux préparatoires et l'interprétation des traités’ [1937] RdC 713Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., ‘Nouveau projet définitif de résolutions’ (1950) Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International 390Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’ (1949) 36 BYIL 48Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., The Function of Law in the International Community (Clarendon Press, 1933)Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. J., The Principles of International Law (2nd edn, Macmillan, 1895)Google Scholar

Bouthillier, Y., ‘Art. 32’ in Corten, O., and Klein, P. (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Lege, J., ‘Was Juristen wirklich tun: Jurisprudential realism’ in Brugger, W., Kirste, S., and Neumann, U. (eds.), Rechtsphilosophie im 21. Jahrhundert (Suhrkamp, 2008)Google Scholar

Lessig, L., ‘Fidelity and Constraint’ (1996) 65 Fordham Law Review 1365Google Scholar

Lessig, L., ‘Fidelity in Translation’ (1992) 71 Texas Law Review 1165Google Scholar

Lessig, L., ‘Reading the Constitution in Cyberspace’ (1996) 45 Emory Law Journal 896Google Scholar

Lessig, L., ‘Understanding Changed Readings: Fidelity and Theory’ (1994) Stanford Law Review 395Google Scholar

Letsas, G., A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Letsas, G., ‘Intentionalism and the Interpretation of the ECHR’ in Fitzmaurice, M., Olufemi, E., and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention: 30 Years on (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010)Google Scholar

Letsas, G., ‘The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How to Interpret the ECHR’ (2004) 15 EJIL 279Google Scholar

Liacouras, P. J., ‘The International Court of Justice and Development of Useful Rules of Interpretation in the Process of Treaty Interpretation’ (1965) 59 ASIL Proceedings 161Google Scholar

Linderfalk, U., ‘Doing the Right Thing for the Right Reason – Why Dynamic and Static Approaches Should Be Taken in the Interpretation of Treaties’ (2008) 10 International Community Law Review 109Google Scholar

Linderfalk, U., On the Interpretation of Treaties: The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Springer, 2007)Google Scholar

Linderfalk, U., ‘Who Are the Parties: Article 31, Paragraph 3(c) of the 1969 Vienna Convention and the Principle of Systemic Integration Revisited’ (2008) 55 Netherlands International Law Review 343Google Scholar

Lissitzyn, O. J., ‘The Law of International Agreements in the Restatement’ (1966) 41 New York University Law Review 96Google Scholar

Liszt, F., Das Völkerrecht: systematisch dargestellt (4th edn, O. Haering, 1906)Google Scholar

Lofgren, C. A., ‘The Original Understanding of Original Intent’ (1988) 5 Constitutional Commentary 77Google Scholar

Lowe, V., ‘Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments’ in Boyle, A. E., and Freestone, D. A. C. (eds.), International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Lowe, V., ‘The Role of Equity in International Law’ (1988) 8 Australian Year Book of International Law 54Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Suhrkamp, 1993)Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie (2nd edn, Suhrkamp, 1985)Google Scholar

Luján, E. R., ‘Semantic Change’ in Luraghi, S., and Bebenik, V. (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics (Continuum, 2010)Google Scholar

Luraghi, S., ‘Causes of Language Change’ in Luraghi, S., and Bebenik, V. (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics (Continuum, 2010)Google Scholar

Luraghi, S., and Bebenik, V. (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics (Continuum, 2010)Google Scholar

Lycan, W. G., Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge, 1999)Google Scholar

MacCormick, N., ‘Argumentation and Interpretation in Law’ (1995) 9 Argumentation 467Google Scholar

MacCormick, N., Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

MacCormick, N., and Summers, R. S. (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Ashgate, Dartmouth, 1991)Google Scholar

Macdonald, R. St J., ‘The Margin of Appreciation’ in Matscher, F., and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993)Google Scholar

Mackenzie, R., Romano, C., and Shany, Y., The Manual on International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin’ (1990) 11 Human Rights Law Journal 57Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘Marvellous Richness of Diversity or Invidious Cultural Relativism’ (1998) 19 Human Rights Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Makarczyk, J., ‘The International Court of Justice on Implied Powers of International Organizations’ in Makarczyk, J. (ed.), Études de droit international en l'honneur du Juge Manfred Lachs (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1984)Google Scholar

Martens, F., Traité de droit international (Léo, Alfred trans., A. Chevalier-Marescq, 1883)Google Scholar

Martens, S. A. E., ‘Rechtliche und außerrechtliche Argumente’ (2011) 42 Rechtstheorie 145Google Scholar

Martin, A., ‘L'Interprétation dite évolutive de termes insérés dans des traités internationaux. Regards sur un arreêt du Tribunal fédéral suisse’ in La Faculté de Droit et des Sciences Économiques de l'Université de Neuchâtel (ed.), Mélanges en l'honneur de Jacques-Michel Grossen (Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1992)Google Scholar

Martinich, A., and Sosa, D. (eds.), The Philosophy of Language (6th edn, Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Mashaw, J., ‘Norms, Practices, and the Paradox of Deference: A Preliminary Inquiry Into Agency Statutory Interpretation’ (2005) 57 Administrative Law Review 501Google Scholar

Matscher, F., ‘Methods of Interpretation of the Convention’ in Matscher, F., and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993)Google Scholar

Matscher, F., ‘Wie sich die 1950 in der EMRK festgeschriebenen Menschenrechte weiterentwickelt haben’ in Breitenmoser, S., and others (eds.), Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber (Dike, 2007)Google Scholar

Mayer, F., ‘Verfassungswandel durch Annäherung? Der Europäische Gerichtshof, das Bundesverfassungsgericht und das Grundgesetz’ in Hönnige, C., Kneip, S., and Lorenz, A. (eds.), Verfassungswandel im Mehrebenensystem (VS Verlag, 2011)Google Scholar

McArthur, T., Concise Oxford Companion to the English Language (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

McBain, H., The Living Constitution (Macmillan, 1927)Google Scholar

McDougal, M. S., ‘Some Basic Theoretical Concepts About International Law: A Policy-Oriented Framework of Inquiry’ (1960) 4 Journal of Conflict Resolution 337Google Scholar

McDougal, M. S., ‘The International Law Commission's Draft Articles upon Interpretation: Textuality Redivivus’ (1967) 61 AJIL 992Google Scholar

McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., and Miller, J. C., The Interpretation of Agreements and World Public Order (Yale University Press, 1967)Google Scholar

McLachlan, C., ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’ (2008) 57 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 361Google Scholar

McLachlan, C., ‘The Evolution of Treaty Obligations in International Law’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

McLachlan, C., ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 279Google Scholar

McNair, A. D., ‘L'Application et l'interprétation des traités d'après la jurisprudence britannique’ (1933) 43 RdC 263Google Scholar

McNair, A. D., The Law of Treaties (Oxford University Press, 1961)Google Scholar

Meder, S., Mißverstehen und Verstehen: Savignys Grundlegung der juristischen Hermeneutik (Mohr Siebeck, 2004)Google Scholar

Merkouris, P., ‘Introduction: Interpretation Is a Science, Is an Art, Is a Science’ in Fitzmaurice, M., Olufemi, E., and Merkouris, P. (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention: 30 Years on (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010)Google Scholar

Merrills, J. G., ‘Two Approaches to Treaty Interpretation’ (1968–9) 57 Australian Year Book of International Law 55Google Scholar

Meyer, L. H. (ed.), Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., ‘The ICJ and Evolutionary Treaty Interpretation’ (2009) www.ejiltalk.org / the-icj-and-evolutionary-treaty-interpretation (accessed 15 April 2013)Google Scholar

Milej, T., ‘Rechtsquellen’ in Heintschel von Heinegg, W. (ed.), Casebook Völkerrecht (C. H. Beck, 2005)Google Scholar

Miller, A. S., ‘Notes on the Concept of the Living Constitution’ (1962) 31 George Washington Law Review 881Google Scholar

Mittelstrass, J., ‘Rationale Rekonstruktion der Wissenschaftsgeschichte’ in Janich, P. (ed.), Wissenschaftstheorie und Wissenschaftsforschung (C. H. Beck, 1981)Google Scholar

Mittelstrass, J., ‘Scientific Rationality and Its Reconstruction’ in Rescher, N. (ed.), Reason and Rationality in Natural Science: A Group of Essays (University Press of America, 1988)Google Scholar

Moerman, J., ‘A Critical Analysis of the Prohibition of Slavery and Forced Labour under Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2010) 3 Inter-American and European Human Rights Law Journal 86Google Scholar

Montaneri, P. G. (ed.), Methods of Comparative Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar

Moore, M., ‘Interpreting Interpretation’ in Marmor, A. (ed.), Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Morlok, M., and Kölbel, R., ‘Rechtspraxis und Habitus’ (2001) 32 Rechtstheorie 289Google Scholar

Mortenson, D. J., ‘The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History?’ (2013) 107 AJIL 780Google Scholar

Mowbray, A. R., Cases and Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Mowbray, A. R., Cases and Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights (3rd edn, Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Mowbray, A. R., ‘The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2005) 5 Human Rights Law Review 57Google Scholar

Müller, D., ‘Reservations and Time: Is There Only One Right Moment to Formulate and to React to Reservations?’ (2012) www.JeanMonnetProgram.org (accessed 10 March 2013)Google Scholar

Müller, F., Juristische Methodik (Duncker & Humblot, 1993)Google Scholar

Murphy, S., ‘The Evolution of Treaty Obligations in International Law’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Nascimento e Silva, G. E., ‘Le Facteur temps et les traités’ (1977) 154 RdC 221Google Scholar

Nerlich, B., Change in Language: Whitney, Breal and Wegener (Routledge, 1990)Google Scholar

Neuberger, Lord, ‘The Role of Judges in Human Rights Jurisprudence: A Comparison of the Australian and UK Experience’, https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-140808.pdf (accessed 30 December 2014)Google Scholar

Neuhold, P., ‘Die Wiener Vertragsrechtskonvention’ (1971) 15 Archiv des Völkerrechts 1Google Scholar

Nicol, D., ‘Original Intent and the ECHR’ [2005] Public Law 152Google Scholar

Nolte, G., ‘Between Contemporaneous and Evolutive Interpretation: The Use of “Subsequent Practice” in the Judgment of the International Court of Justice Concerning the Case of Costa Rica v. Nicaragua (2009)’ in Hestermeyer, H. P., and others (eds.), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012)Google Scholar

Nolte, G., ‘Introduction’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Nolte, G., ‘Multipurpose Self-Defence, Proportionality Disoriented: A Response to David Kretzmer’ (2013) 24 EJIL 283Google Scholar

Nolte, G., ‘Second Report for the ILC Study Group on Treaties Over Time: Jurisprudence Under Special Regimes Relating to Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Nolte, G., ‘Subsequent Practice as a Means of Interpretation in the Jurisprudence of the WTO Appellate Body’ in Cannizzaro, E. (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Nolte, G., ‘Thick or Thin Proportionality in International Humanitarian Law’ (2010) 4 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 245Google Scholar

Nolte, G., ‘Third Report for the ILC Study Group on Treaties Over Time Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice of States Outside of Judicial or Quasi-Judicial Proceedings’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Nolte, G., Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Nolte, G., ‘Treaties Over Time: Introductory Report’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Nöth, W., Handbook of Semiotics (Indiana University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Nys, E., ‘Codification of International Law’ (1911) 5 AJIL 871Google Scholar

O'Connor, J. F., Good Faith in International Law (Dartmouth, 1991)Google Scholar

Odendahl, K., ‘Art. 39’ in Dörr, O., and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Oellers-Frahm, K., ‘Multiplication of International Courts and Tribunals and Conflicting Jurisdiction – Problems and Possible Solutions’ (2001) 5 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 67Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K., and Richards, I. A., The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969)Google Scholar

Onofrio, J., Missouri Biographical Dictionary (3rd edn, Vol. 1, St Clair Shores, 2001)Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (1st edn, vol. 1, Longman, 1912)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A., The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Orellana Zabalza, G., The Principle of Systemic Integration: Towards a Coherent International Legal Order (Lit Verlag, 2012)Google Scholar

Örücü, A. E., ‘Methodology of Comparative Law’ in Smits, J. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (2nd edn, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Oxford University Press, Oxford English Dictionary: The definitive record of the English language (9 June 2013), www.oed.com (accessed 8 August 2013)Google Scholar

Parsons, T., The Social System (Free Press, 1951)Google Scholar

Paulus, A., ‘International Adjudication’ in Besson, S., and Tasioulas, J. (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., ‘The Nature of WTO Obligations’, Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 1 / 02 (2002), New York University School of Law, Jean Monnet Center, 2002Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’ [2001] AJIL 535Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., and Elsig, M., ‘The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations Across International Tribunals’ in Dunoff, J. L., and Pollack, M. A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Peanson, I., Manual of the Terminology of Public International Law (Law of Peace) and International Organizations (Bruylant, 1990)Google Scholar

Peck, C. J., ‘Comments on Judicial Creativity’ (1983) 69 Iowa Law Review 1Google Scholar

Pedersen, J., ‘Habermas’ Method: Rational Reconstruction’ (2008) 38 Philosophy of Social Science 457Google Scholar

Pehar, D., ‘International Law of Interpretation: An Ambiguous Response to Ambiguity’ (2006) 5 Journal of Diplomatic LanguageGoogle Scholar

Pellet, A., ‘Art. 19 VCLT’ in Corten, O., and Klein, P. (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Pellet, A., ‘Art. 38’ in Zimmermann, A., and others (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Perelman, C., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L., The New Rhetoric. (La nouvelle rhétorique). A Treatise on Argumentation. (University of Notre Dame Press, 1969)Google Scholar

Pergler, C., Judicial Interpretation of International Law in the United States (F. B. Rothman, 1928)Google Scholar

Peters, A., ‘Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures’ (2006) 19 Leiden Journal of International Law 579Google Scholar

Peters, A., Völkerrecht Allgemeiner Teil (3rd edn, Schulthess, 2012)Google Scholar

Peters, A., and Altwicker, T., Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention: Mit rechtsvergleichenden Bezügen zum deutschen Grundgesetz (C. H. Beck, 2012)Google Scholar

Peters, C., ‘Subsequent Practice and Established Practice of International Organizations: Two Sides of the Same Coin?’ (2011) 3 Goettingen Journal of International Law 617Google Scholar

Phillimore, R., Commentaries upon International Law (vol. 2, Butterworths, 1855)Google Scholar

Phillipson, C., Smith's International Law (J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, 1918)Google Scholar

Powell, J. H., ‘The Original Understanding of Original Intent’ (1985) 98 Harvard Law Review 885Google Scholar

Prebensen, S. C., ‘Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Mahoney, P., and Ryssdal, R. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective (Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2000)Google Scholar

Pree, H., Die evolutive Interpretation der Rechtsnorm im Kanonischen Recht (Springer, 1980)Google Scholar

Probst, T., Die Änderung der Rechtsprechung: eine rechtsvergleichende, methodologische Untersuchung zum Phänomen der höchstrichterlichen Rechtsprechungsänderung in der Schweiz (civil law) und den Vereinigten Staaten (common law) (Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1993)Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel, De jure naturae et gentium (Vol. II, translation of the edition of 1688, Oldfather, C. H. and Oldfather, W. O. trans., Clarendon Press, 1934)Google Scholar

Pulkowski, D., The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, F., The Neuroscience of Language: On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Quoc Dinh, N., Droit international public (LGDJ, 1975)Google Scholar

Rabl Blaser, C., Die clausula Rebus Sic stantibus im Völkerrecht (Dike, 2012)Google Scholar

Raffeiner, S., ‘Wege der Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht: Vorrang der UN-Charta und ius cogens’ in Pernice, I., Müller, M., and Peters, C. (eds.), Konstitutionalisierung jenseits des Staates: Zur Verfassung der Weltgemeinschaft und den Gründungsverträgen internationaler Organisationen (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Raney, B., Wicks, E., and Ovey, C., Jacobs, White and Ovey, The European Convention on Human Rights (6th edn, Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Registrar of the International Court of Justice, ‘Members of the Court’, www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1&p2=2 (accessed 27 November 2012)Google Scholar

Reglade, M., ‘De la nature juridique des Traités internationaux et du sens de la distinction des traités-lois et des traités-contrats’ [1924] Revue de Droit Public et de la Science Politique en France et à l'Etranger 507Google Scholar

Rehnquist, W. H., ‘Notion of a Living Constitution’ (1975) 54 Texas Law Review 693Google Scholar

Reinisch, A., ‘The Proliferation of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: The Threat of Fragmentation vs. the Promise of a More Effective System? Some Reflections from the Perspective of Investment Arbitration’ in Buffard, I., and Hafner, G. (eds.), International Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008)Google Scholar

Remy, B., ‘Techniques interpretatives et systemes de droit’ (2011) 115 RGDIP 329Google Scholar

Richter, D., ‘Lücken der EMRK’ in Dörr, O., Grote, R., and Marauhn, T. (eds.), EMRK / GG: Konkordanzkommentar zum europäischen und deutschen Grundrechtsschutz (vol. 1, 2nd edn, Mohr Siebeck, 2013)Google Scholar

Riehm, T., Abwägungsentscheidungen in der praktischen Rechtsanwendung: Argumentation, Beweis, Wertung (C. H. Beck, 2006)Google Scholar

Rietiker, D., ‘The Principle of “Effectiveness” in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Its Different Dimensions and Its Consistency with Public International Law: No Need for the Concept of Treaty Sui Generis’ (2010) 79 Nordic Journal of International Law 245Google Scholar

Rigaux, F., ‘Interprétation consensuelle et interprétation évolutive’ in Sudre, F. (ed.), L'Interprétation de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme: Actes du colloque des 13 et 14 mars 1998; Organisé par l'Institut de Droit Européen des Droits de l'Homme (UMR.CNRS.5815), Faculté de Droit de l'Université de Montpellier I (Nemesis, 1998)Google Scholar

Roberts, A., ‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States’ (2010) 104 AJIL 179Google Scholar

Roberts, A. ‘Subsequent Practice: The Battle Over Interpretive Power’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Roberts, A. ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 AJIL 757Google Scholar

Röhl, K. F., ‘Grundlagen der Methodenlehre II: Rechtspraxis, Auslegungsmethoden, Kontext des Rechts’, www.enzyklopädie-rechtsphilosophie.net (accessed 21 March 2013)Google Scholar

Rosa, H., Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity (Trejo-Mathys, J. trans., Columbia University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Rosa, H., ‘Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a Desynchronized High-Speed Society’ (2003) 10 Constellations 3Google Scholar

Rosa, H., Weltbeziehungen im Zeitalter der Beschleunigung: Umrisse einer neuen Gesellschaftskritik (Suhrkamp, 2012)Google Scholar

Rosen, J., ‘Introduction’ (1997) 66 George Washington Law Review 1081Google Scholar

Rosenne, S., ‘Conceptualism as a Guide to Treaty Interpretation’ in Rosenne, S. (ed.), An International Law Miscellany (Kluwer, 1993)Google Scholar

Rosenne, S., ‘Interpretation of Treaties in the Restatement and the International Law Commission's Draft Articles: A Comparison’ (1966) 5 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 205Google Scholar

Rosenne, S., The Law of Treaties: A Guide to the Legislative History of the Vienna Convention (Sijthoff, 1970)Google Scholar

Ruffert, M., and Walter, C., Institutionalised International Law (C. H. Beck, Hart, Nomos, 2015)Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G., ‘Stabilization Clauses and Human Rights: A Research Project Conducted for IFC and the United Nations Special Representative to the Secretary General on Business and Human Rights’ (2008), www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/9feb5b00488555eab8c4fa6a6515bb18/Stabilization%2BPaper.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (accessed 7 June 2015)Google Scholar

Ruse, M., Darwinism and Its Discontents (Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Rutherforth, T., Institutes of Natural Law (vol. II, edition originally published in 1756, William and Joseph Neal, 1832)Google Scholar

Sackville, R., ‘Continuity and Judicial Creativity – Some Observations’ (1997) 20 University of New South Wales Law Journal 145Google Scholar

Saleilles, R., ‘École historique et droit naturel’ (1902) 1 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil 80Google Scholar

Salmon, J., Dictionnaire de droit international public (Bruylant, 2001)Google Scholar

Sandrock, O., ‘“Versteinerungsklauseln” in Rechtswahlvereinbarungen für internationale Handelsverträge’ in Jayme, E., Kegel, G., and Lutter, M. (eds.), Ius Inter nationes (C. F. Müller, 1983)Google Scholar

Santulli, C., ‘Rapport general’ (2011) 115 RGDIP 297Google Scholar

Saussure, F., Cours de linguistique générale (Payot, 1986 [1915])Google Scholar

Sbolci, L., ‘Supplementary Means of Interpretation’ in Cannizzaro, E. (ed.), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Scalia, A., ‘Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law’ (1989) 3 Duke Law Journal 511Google Scholar

Scalia, A., ‘Originalism: The Lesser Evil’ (1988) 57 University of Cincinnati Law Review 849Google Scholar

Schachter, O., International Law in Theory and Practice (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991)Google Scholar

Schauer, F., ‘Balancing, Subsumption, and the Constraining Role of Legal Text’ (2010) 4 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 34Google Scholar

Schermers, H. G., and Blokker, N., International Institutional Law: Unity Within Diversity (5th edn, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011)Google Scholar

Scheuner, U., ‘Die Fortbildung der Grundrechte in internationale Konventionen durch die Rechtsprechung: zur Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte’ in Münch, I. (ed.), Staatsrecht, Völkerrecht, Europarecht: Festschrift für Hans-Jürgen Schlochauer zum 75. Geburtstag am 28. März 1981 (De Gruyter, 1981)Google Scholar

Schill, S., ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law, and Comparative Public Law’ in Schill, S. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Schlink, B., ‘Probleme und Ansätze einer Entscheidungstheorie der richterlichen Innovation’ in Harenburg, J., Podlech, A., and Schlink, B. (eds.), Rechtlicher Wandel durch richterliche Entscheidung (Toeche-Mittler, 1980)Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, K., ‘Art. 27’ in Dörr, O., and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, K., ‘Art. 53’ in Dörr, O., and Schmalenbach, K. (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Springer, 2012)Google Scholar

Schmitt, C., ‘The Motorized Legislator’ reprinted in Rosa, S., and Scheuermann, W. E. (eds.), High Speed Society: Social Acceleration, Power, and Modernity (Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Schneider, H., Richterrecht, Gesetzesrecht und Verfassungsrecht (Klostermann, 1969)Google Scholar

Scholtz, G., ‘Rekonstruktion’ in Ritter, J., and Gründer, K. (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie (Vol. 8, Schwabe, 1992)Google Scholar

Schott, C., ‘“Interpretatio cessat in Claris” – Auslegungsfähigkeit und Auslegungsbedürftigkeit in der juristischen Hermeneutik’ in Schröder, J. (ed.), Theorie der Interpretation vom Humanismus bis zur Romantik – Rechtswissenschaft, Philosophie, Theologie: Beiträge zu einem interdisziplinären Symposion in Tübingen, 29. September bis 1. Oktober 1999 (Steiner, 2001)Google Scholar

Schröder, J., ‘Juristische Methode’ in Cordes, A. (ed.), Handwörterbuch zur deutschen Rechtsgeschichte: HRG (2nd edn, Schmidt, 2008)Google Scholar

Schröder, J., Recht als Wissenschaft (2nd edn, C. H. Beck, 2012)Google Scholar

Schulte, C., Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger, G., ‘Myths and Realities of Treaty Interpretation: Articles 27–29 of the Vienna Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1968) 9 Virginia Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger, G., ‘Myths and Realities of Treaty Interpretation’ (1969) 22 Current Legal Problems 205Google Scholar

Schweisfurth, T., Völkerrecht (Mohr Siebeck, 2006)Google Scholar

Shahabuddeen, M., ‘Judicial Creativity and Joint Criminal Enterprise’ in Darcy, S., and Powderly, J. (eds.), Judicial Creativity at the International Criminal Tribunals (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Shanahan, T., The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology (Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Sharma, S. P., ‘The ILC Draft and Treaty Interpretation with Special Reference to Preparatory Works’ (1968) 8 Indian Journal of International Law 367Google Scholar

Shaw, M. N., International Law (6th edn, Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Simma, B., ‘Miscellaneous Thoughts on Subsequent Agreements and Practice’ in Nolte, G. (ed.), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Simma, B., ‘NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects’ (1999) 10 EJIL 1Google Scholar

Simma, B., and Richemond-Barak, D., ‘Art. 37’ in Zimmermann, A., and others (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Sinclair, I., The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edn, Manchester University Press, 1984)Google Scholar

Skinner, Q., ‘Retrospect: Studying Rhetoric and Conceptual Change’ in Skinner, Q. Visions of Politics (vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Skubiszewski, K., ‘Implied Powers of International Organizations’ in Dinstein, Y. (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1989)Google Scholar

Smend, R., Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht (Duncker & Humblot, 1929)Google Scholar

Smith, K. C., and Wylie, J., International Law (Little, Brown & Co., J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, 1911)Google Scholar

Solum, L. B., ‘The Interpretation–Construction Distinction’ (2010) 27 Constitutional Commentary 95Google Scholar

Solum, L. B., ‘What Is Originalism? The Evolution of Contemporary Originalist Theory’ in Huscroft, G., and Miller, B. (eds.), The Challenge of Originalism: Theories of Constitutional Interpretation (Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Sorel, J. M., and Eveno, V. B., ‘Art. 31 VCLT’ in Corten, O., and Klein, P. (eds.), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Sørensen, M., ‘Do the Rights Set Forth in the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950 Have the Same Significance in 1975?’ in Council of Europe (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Colloquy About the European Convention on Human Rights: Organised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Italy and the Secretariat General of the Council of Europe; Rome, 5–8 November 1975 (Council of Europe, 1975)Google Scholar

Sørensen, M., ‘Exposé prélimaire’ [1973] Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International 50Google Scholar

Sørensen, M., ‘Le Problème dit du droit intertemporel dans l'ordre international’ [1973] Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International 1Google Scholar

Sørensen, M., Les Sources du droit international: Etude sur la jurisprudence de la Cour Permanente de Justice Internationale (Munskgaard, 1946)Google Scholar

Stein, T., and Buttlar, C., Völkerrecht (12th edn, Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2012)Google Scholar

Stockton, C. H., Outlines of International Law (Charles Scribner's Sons, 1914)Google Scholar

Stone, M., ‘Focusing the Law: What Legal Interpretation Is Not’ in Marmor, A. (ed.), Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Strang, L. J., ‘Originalism and the “Challenge of Change”: Abduced-Principle Originalism and Other Mechanisms by Which Originalism Sufficiently Accommodates Changed Social Conditions’ (2009) 60 Hastings Law Journal 927Google Scholar

Strauss, D. A., The Living Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Suárez, F., Tractatus de legibus ac deo legislatore: in decem libros distributes (1612)Google Scholar

Suber, P., The Paradox of Self-Amendment (Peter Lang, 1990)Google Scholar

Szafarz, R., ‘Reservations to Multilateral Treaties’ (1970) 3 Polish Yearbook of International Law 293Google Scholar

Tammelo, I., Treaty Interpretation and Practical Reason: Towards a General Theory of Legal Interpretation (Law Book Co., 1967)Google Scholar

Tanaka, Y., ‘Navigational Rights on the San Juan River: A Commentary on the Costa Rica v. Nicaragua Case’ (2009) 4 Hague Justice Journal 215Google Scholar

Tate, A., ‘New Judicial Solution: Occasions for and Limits to Judicial Creativity’ (1979) 54 Tulane Law Review 877Google Scholar