Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Admission into the Great-Power Club
- Part III Status Signaling
- 5 Status Dilemmas and Interstate Conflict
- 6 Status Signaling, Multiple Audiences, and China’s Blue-Water Naval Ambition
- Part IV International Institutions and Status
- Part V Status, Authority, and Structure
- Part VI Conclusions
- Index
- References
5 - Status Dilemmas and Interstate Conflict
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Admission into the Great-Power Club
- Part III Status Signaling
- 5 Status Dilemmas and Interstate Conflict
- 6 Status Signaling, Multiple Audiences, and China’s Blue-Water Naval Ambition
- Part IV International Institutions and Status
- Part V Status, Authority, and Structure
- Part VI Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
A rising China seeks the status of a great power second to none in a multipolar world. A developing China wants to retain the status of a poor country, a proud member of the Group of 77 (G77), resisting attempts to accord it developed country status. The United States is the “indispensable nation,” the world’s Number One, whose proper role in all global endeavors is that of the leader. Washington is a coequal partner with all other major powers, “leading from behind” and no longer seeking a special role. Which of these stories about status is true? Is a rising China challenging or seeking equality with the United States? Or is the real problem China’s lack of status aspirations and penchant for free riding? And is the United States, for its part, clinging to sole superpower status or desperately seeking to be seen as on par with other great powers? There is evidence for all of these stories because officials in Beijing and Washington send different signals about their status to different audiences at different times, as the situation seems to demand. As a result, the real state of their mutual status politics remains uncertain.
The process of signaling and recognizing status claims is at least as subject to uncertainty and complex strategic incentives as are the security politics with which scholars of international politics are familiar. Some proportion of the conflictual behavior of states may thus derive from their inability to signal status claims. That is, status conflict may occur among states that would be satisfied with their status if only they could obtain an accurate estimate of it. Or, very costly conflict may occur in a system of states whose beliefs about each other’s statuses are only minimally inconsistent. Just as the security dilemma may foster or amplify conflict among states that seek only security, so might a status dilemma create or amplify conflict among states that seek only to maintain their relative standing.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Status in World Politics , pp. 115 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
, Rational Theory of International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Two States, Two Types, Two Actions,”Security Studies 20, no. 3 (December 2011), 431–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma,”World Politics 30 (January 1978), 167–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Trust and Mistrust in International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
, “The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis,”Security Studies 18, no. 3 (July 2009), 587–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Dueling Realisms,” International Organization 51, no. 3 (Summer 1997), 445–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, War and the State: The Theory of International Politics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994)Google Scholar
, Identity, Interest and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Games of Status,”Journal of Public Economic Theory 3, no. 4 (October 2001), 349–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Unipolarity, Status Competition and Great Power War,”World Politics 61, no. 1 (January 2009), 28–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Recognition and Collective Identity Formation in International Politics,”European Journal of International Relations 14, no.2 (June 2008), 343–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Identity, Insecurity, and Great Power Politics: The Tragedy of German Naval Ambition Before the First World War,”Security Studies 19, no.4 (October 2010), 656–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003)Google Scholar
, “The Transatlantic Dimension,” in European Union Foreign and Security Policy: Towards a Neighbourhood Strategy, ed. (London: Routledge, 2004), 186–201Google Scholar
, “Hierarchy and Legitimacy in International Systems: The Tribute System in Early Modern East Asia,”Security Studies 19, no. 3 (October 2010), 591–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
and , International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
, , and , The Balance of Power in World History (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Organized Hypocrisy in Nineteenth-Century East Asia,”International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1, no. 2 (August 2001), 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions,”International Organization 51, no. 4 (Autumn 1997), 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis,”World Politics 35, no. 2 (January 1983), 261–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Systems of States,”Review of International Studies 16, no. 2 (April 1990), 99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, A Cultural Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth,”International Organization 55, no. 2 (Spring 2001), 251–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Sovereign State and Its Competitors (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
, “Sovereignty, Survival, and the Westphalian Blind Alley in International Relations,”Review of International Studies 25, no. 2 (April 1999), 217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), and his influential Austria, Britain and the Crimean War: The Destruction of the European Concert (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1972)Google Scholar
, “Sviatye mesta is zemnye dela anglo-Russkie otnosheniia nakanune Krymskoi voine,”Novaia i noveishaia istoriia, no. 5 and no. 6 (1983), 136–152 and 129–144 respectivelyGoogle Scholar
, “Russland vor dem Krimkrieg: Die russische Aussenpolitik 1853/54 im Urteil des britischen Gesandten George Hamilton Seymour,”Jahfbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 30, no. 3 (1992), 376–380Google Scholar
, “Sviatye mesta v tsentre vostochnogo voprosa: tserkovo-politicheskiy faktor kak odna iz prchin krymskoi voiuny,”Rossiiskaia istoriia, no. 6 (2008), 70Google Scholar
, Zerstörung der Großmach Rußland? Die britischen Kriegsziele im Krimkrieg (Göttigen and Zürich: Vandenhoek and Rupprecht, 1993), 53, 60Google Scholar
, The Aberdeen Coalition, 1852–1855: A Study of Nineteenth-Century Party Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968)Google Scholar
, The Origins of the Crimean Alliance (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1977)Google Scholar
, Napoleon III and the Concert of Europe (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
, Nicholas I and Official Nationality in Russia, 1825–1855 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959)Google Scholar
, Nicholas I: Emperor and Autocrat of all the Russias (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978)Google Scholar
, “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help,”International Security 19, no. 3 (Winter 1994–1995), 50–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Case for Finite Containment: Analyzing U.S. Grand Strategy,”International Security 41, no. 1 (Summer 1989), 3–43Google Scholar
, “The Gorbachev Revolution: A Waning of Soviet Expansionism?”International Security 12, no. 3 (Winter 1987–1988), 93–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
, Kholodnaia voina – svideltel’svto ee uchastnika (Moscow: Mezhdundarodnaia otnosheniia, 1994)Google Scholar
, In Confidence: Moscow’s Ambassador to America’s Six Cold War Presidents (New York: Random House, 1995)Google Scholar
, “Moscow and the Angolan Crisis, 1974–76: A New Pattern of Intervention,” Cold War International History Project [CWIHP], Bulletin 8–9 (Winter 1996–1997), 21Google Scholar
, ed., The Fall of Détente: Soviet-American Relations in the Carter Years (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
, Détente and Confrontation: Soviet-American Relations from Nixon to Reagan, rev. ed., (Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1994)Google Scholar
, “The Road to Kabul: Soviet Perceptions of World Affairs and the Afghan Crisis,” in The Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan: Three Perspectives, eds. , , and , ACIA Working Paper no. 27 (Los Angeles: UCLA Center for International and Strategic Affairs, September 1980), 57Google Scholar
, Inside the Kremlin During the Yom Kippur War (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
, Russian Policy in the Middle East: From Messianism to Pragmatism (Reading: Ithaca Press, 1993)Google Scholar
, Hard Choices: Critical Years in America’s Foreign Policy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983)Google Scholar
, Morality, Reason and Power: American Diplomacy in the Carter Years (New York: Hill and Wang, 1986)Google Scholar
“Prelude to Invasion: The Soviet Union and the Afghan Communists,” International History Review 16, no. 1 (February 1994), 49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds., The Intervention in Afghanistan and the Fall of Détente, Nobel Symposium 95, trans. (Oslo: 1995)Google Scholar
and , Out of Afghanistan: The Inside Story of the Soviet Withdrawal (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
, A Long Goodbye: The Soviet Withdrawal from Afghanistan (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jr. and , “An Identity of Opinion: Historians and July 1914,”The Journal of Modern History 79, no. 2 (June 2007), 382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10
- Cited by