Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:08:20.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Why Status Matters in World Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

By
Anne L. Clunan
Edited by
T. V. Paul ,
Deborah Welch Larson  and
William C. Wohlforth
Anne L. Clunan
Affiliation:
Naval Postgraduate School
T. V. Paul
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Deborah Welch Larson
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
William C. Wohlforth
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Get access

Summary

The Stakes

According to traditional theories of world politics, peaceful power transitions only happen when the rising power continues to profit from the institutional order held together by the material capabilities of the declining power. Peace today depends on whether states such as China can remain satisfied as they rise within the existing hierarchy of power and authority. Traditionalists, including some in this volume, reject an independent role for status in major power conflict for structural and rationalistic reasons, based on either material power or legitimate material power. So why bother studying international status? This chapter considers these arguments, and in so doing draws in and amplifies the contributions this volume makes in explaining why status matters in world politics and what further needs to be done to understand its role.

A state’s status is fundamentally different from its material position in the international system, because status is a product of social construction. The editors of this volume define status as “collective beliefs about a given state’s ranking on valued attributes (wealth, coercive capabilities, culture, demographic position, socio-political organization, diplomatic clout).... Status is collective, subjective, and relative” (Chapter 1, pp. 7–8). The material positionality so central to structural theories, such as those of William Thompson (Chapter 9) and David Lake (Chapter 10), is insufficient to explain the import of status or the politics surrounding it. For explanations, we must include other approaches that focus on how the self adopts identities that entail particular statuses, and those that emphasize the social institutions that shape the legitimacy and appropriateness of status claims. As the editors stress, status cannot be objectively inferred from the distribution of material capabilities in the system. Status is not fixed; it is a contingent and dynamic concept dependent on perceptual judgments of the self and others, social institutions, and the interaction of actors over time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Status in World Politics , pp. 273 - 296
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jackson, Robert H., Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Blau, Peter, “Critical Remarks on Weber’s Theory of Authority,”American Political Science Review 57, no. 2 (June 1963), 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian, After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007), 61Google Scholar
Darrington, Jeremy, “Authority,” in Encyclopedia of Governance, Volume I, ed. Bevir, Mark (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2007), 41Google Scholar
Zelditch, Morris, Jr., “Theories of Legitimacy,” in The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, eds. Jost, John T. and Major, Brenda (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 44Google Scholar
Cast, Alicia D. and Burke, Peter J., “A Theory of Self-Esteem,”Social Forces 80, no. 3 (March 2002), 1041–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter J. and Stets, Jan E., “Trust and Commitment through Self-Verification,”Social Psychology Quarterly 62, no. 4 (December 1999), 347–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stets, Jane E. and Burke, Peter J., “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory,”Social Psychology Quarterly 63, no. 3 (September 2000), 224–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Albert, “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective,”Annual Review of Psychology 52, no. 1 (February 2001), 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John, Social Construction of Reality (New York: Free Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Clunan, Anne L., The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security Interests (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009), 37–38Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch and Shevchenko, Alexei, “Shortcut to Greatness: The New Thinking and the Revolution in Soviet Foreign Policy,”International Organization 57, no. 1 (Winter 2003), 77–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinner-Halev, Jeff and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, “National Identity and Self-Esteem,”Perspectives on Politics 1, no. 3 (September 2003), 515–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Albert, “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency,”American Psychologist 37, no. 2 (February 1982), 122–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coggins, Bridget, “Friends in High Places: International Politics and the Emergence of States from Secessionism,”International Organization 65, no. 3 (Summer 2011), 433–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, Penelope, “Psychological Groups and Political Psychology: A Response to Huddy’s ‘Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory,’”Political Psychology 23, no. 4 (December 2002), 818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B., “The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, no. 5 (October 1991), 475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B., “Social Identity, Distinctiveness, and In-Group Homogeneity,”Social Cognition 11, no. 1 (March 1993), 150–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John, Speech Acts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Paul, “19th-Century International System,”World Politics 39, no. 1 (October 1986), 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977/1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard, Multilateralism Matters (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, Daniel, Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Clunan, Anne L., “Redefining Sovereignty: Humanitarianism’s Challenge to Sovereign Immunity,” in Negotiating Sovereignty and Human Rights, eds. Shawki, Noha and Cox, Michaelene (Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2009), 7–26Google Scholar
Clunan, Anne L. and Trinkunas, Harold A., “Conceptualizing Ungoverned Spaces: Territorial Sovereignty, Contested Authority and Softened Sovereignty,” in Ungoverned Spaces, eds. Clunan, Anne L. and Trinkunas, Harold A. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010), 17–33Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas, Saving Strangers: Humanitarianism in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Karaganov, Sergei, “Russia and the International Order,” in What Russia Sees, ed. Lynch, Dov (Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2005), 33Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne Marie, A New World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Lake, David A., Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted, “Commonsense Constructivism and Hegemony in World Politics,”International Organization, 67, no. 2 (April 2013), 317–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W. et al., “World Society and the Nation-State,”American Journal of Sociology 103, no. 1 (July 1997), 144–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, “International Organizations as Teachers of Norms: UNESCO and Science Policy,”International Organization 47, no. 4 (Autumn 1993), 565–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), 6Google Scholar
Moltz, James Clay, Asia’s Space Race: National Motivations, Regional Rivalries, and International Risks (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., ed., International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983)Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Mueller, John E., Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books, 1989)Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott and Waltz, Kenneth N., The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (New York: W. W. Norton, 2003), 24Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×