Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T07:15:55.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supernova Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars

from Type Ib and Type II Supernovae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

M. Hashimoto
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Fukuoka 810, Japan
K. Nomoto
Affiliation:
University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
T. Tsujimoto
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
F.-K. Thielemann
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Richard McCray
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
ZhenRu Wang
Affiliation:
Nanjing University, China
Get access

Summary

Presupernova evolution and explosive nucleosynthesis in massive stars for main-sequence masses from 13 M to 70 M are calculated. We examine the dependence of the supernova yields on the stellar mass, 12C(α,γ)16O rate, and explosion energy. The supernova yields integrated over the initial mass function are compared with the solar abundances.

Presupernova models and the 12C(α,γ)16O rate

Presupernova models are obtained for helium stars with masses of Mα = 3.3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 16, and 32 M as an extension of the studies by Nomoto & Hashimoto (1988), Thielemann et al. (1993), and Hashimoto et al. (1993). These helium star masses correspond approximately to main-sequence masses of Mms = 13, 15, 18, 20, 25, 40, and 70 M, respectively (Sugimoto & Nomoto 1980). The systematic study for such a dense grid of stellar masses enables us to understand how explosive nucleosynthesis depends on the presupernova stellar structure and to apply the results to the chemical evolution of galaxies. We use the Schwarzschild criterion for convection and neglect overshooting. The initial composition is given by X(4He) = 0.9879 and X(14N) = 0.0121. These helium stars are evolved from helium burning through the onset of the Fe core collapse.

Nuclear reaction rates are mostly taken from Caughlan & Fowler (1988). For the uncertain rate of 12C(α,γ)16O, we use the rate by Caughlan et al. (1985; CFHZ85), which is larger than the rate by Caughlan & Fowler (1988; CF88) by a factor of ∼ 2.4.

Type
Chapter
Information
Supernovae and Supernova Remnants
IAU Colloquium 145
, pp. 157 - 164
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×