Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T20:09:19.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Can't We Disagree without Being Disagreeable? The Role of Reflection in a Polarized Polity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Kevin Arceneaux
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Ryan J. Vander Wielen
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

On September 9, 2009, President Obama spoke at a joint session of Congress about his proposal to expand health care insurance. The issue had deeply divided Democrats and Republicans in Congress as well as within the electorate. About midway through the speech, Obama noted that his proposal would not extend coverage to individuals living in the country illegally, despite concerns voiced by Republicans to the contrary. The claim was too much to take for JoeWilson, the Republican representative of South Carolina's second congressional district. From the back of the chamber he shouted, “You lie!” It was an extraordinary breach of decorum. Presidential addresses to Congress are generally only interrupted by applause, rather than name calling. YetWilson's outburst is not an isolated story in today's divisive political climate. Discourse among members of Congress has become less civil (Ahuja, 2008), and members from both parties have increasingly resorted to calling members from the other side names (Annenberg Public Policy Center, 2011). Partisan incivility extends beyond Congress, as well. Partisan talk show hosts on the radio and television routinely minimize those who disagree with them as idiots, pinheads, and just plain stupid (Sobieraj and Berry, 2011). It also reaches down to discourse among citizens. In a study of exchanges in the comment section of newspapers, Coe, Kenski, and Rains (2014) find that over a half include uncivil words.

The rise in partisan incivility tracks with increasing levels of polarization in Congress. Since the 1970s, Democrats and Republicans in the US House of Representatives as well as the US Senate have become steadily more likely to take ideologically divergent positions on issues and vote along party lines (McCarty, Poole, and Rosenthal, 2006). The passage of Medicare in 1965 and the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 illustrate this profound transformation in Congress. Both count as landmark pieces of legislation that expanded health care coverage in the United States. Denounced as “socialized medicine” by opponents, both sparked controversy that divided the electorate (Klein, 2010). Despite the similarities in the prevailing opposition to these programs, half of the Republican caucus supported the passage of Medicare, while not one Republican voted for the Affordable Care Act (Herszenhorn and Pear, 2010; Social Security History, 2014).

Type
Chapter
Information
Taming Intuition
How Reflection Minimizes Partisan Reasoning and Promotes Democratic Accountability
, pp. 135 - 151
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×