Skip to main content
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: May 2014

Chapter 23 - Non-mammalian models of nerve regeneration

from Section 5 - Determinants of regeneration in the injured nervous system
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation
  • Online ISBN: 9780511995583
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *


1. CebriàF. Regenerating the central nervous system: how easy for planarians! Dev Genes Evol 2007; 217: 733–48.
2. AgataK, SoejimaY, KatoK, et al. Structure of the planarian central nervous system (CNS) revealed by neuronal cell markers. Zoolog Sci 1998; 15: 433–40.
3. GentileL, CebriàF, BartschererK. The planarian flatworm: an in vivo model for stem cell biology and nervous system regeneration. Dis Model Mech 2011; 4: 12–19.
4. UmesonoY, AgataK. Evolution and regeneration of the planarian central nervous system. Dev Growth Differ 2009; 51: 185–95.
5. KobayashiC, SaitoY, OgawaK, et al. Wnt signaling is required for antero-posterior patterning of the planarian brain. Dev Biol; 306: 714–24.
6. WhiteJG, SouthgateE, ThomsonJN, et al. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1986; 314: 1–340.
7. YanikMF, CinarH, CinarHN, et al. Neurosurgery: functional regeneration after laser axotomy. Nature 2004; 432: 822.
8. HammarlundM, NixP, HauthL, et al. Axon regeneration requires a conserved MAP kinase pathway. Science 2009; 323: 802–6.
9. Ghosh-RoyA, WuZ, GoncharovA, et al. Calcium and cyclic AMP romote axonal regeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans and require DLK-1 kinase. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 3175–83.
10. NeumannB, NguyenKCQ, HallDH, et al. Axonal regeneration proceeds through specific axonal fusion in transected C. elegans neurons. Dev Dyn 2011; 240: 1365–72.
11. BittnerGD. Long-term survival of anucleate axons and its implications for nerve regeneration. Trends Neurosci 1991; 14: 188–93.
12. FrankE, JansenJK, RinvikE. A multisomatic axon in the central nervous system of the leech. J Comp Neurol 1975; 159: 1–13.
13. HoyRR, BittnerGD, KennedyD. Regeneration in crustacean motoneurons: evidence for axonal fusion. Science 1967; 156: 251–2.
14. CohenAH, MacklerSA, SelzerME. Behavioral recovery following spinal transection: functional regeneration in the lamprey CNS. Trends Neurosci 1988; 11: 227–31.
15. RovainenCM. Neurobiology of lampreys. Physiol Rev 1979; 59: 1007–77.
16. BullockTH, MooreJK, FieldsRD. Evolution of myelin sheaths: both lamprey and hagfish lack myelin. Neurosci Lett 1984; 48: 145–8.
17. SelzerME. Variability in maps of identified neurons in the sea lamprey spinal cord examined by a wholemount technique. Brain Res 1979; 163: 181–93.
18. YinHS, SelzerME. Axonal regeneration in lamprey spinal cord. J Neurosci 1983; 3: 1135–44.
19. SelzerME. Mechanisms of functional recovery and regeneration after spinal cord transection in larval sea lamprey. J Physiol (Lond) 1978; 277: 395–408.
20. YinHS, MacklerSA, SelzerME. Directional specificity in the regeneration of lamprey spinal axons. Science 1984; 224: 894–6.
21. MacklerSA, SelzerME. Specificity of synaptic regeneration in the spinal cord of the larval sea lamprey. J Physiol (Lond) 1987; 388: 183–98.
22. ShifmanMI, SelzerME. Differential expression of Class 3 and 4 semaphorins and netrin in the lamprey spinal cord during regeneration. J Comp Neurol 2007; 501: 631–46.
23. ShifmanMI, YumulRE, LaramoreC, et al. Expression of the repulsive guidance molecule RGM and its receptor neogenin after spinal cord injury in sea lamprey. Exp Neurol 2009; 217: 242–51.
24. DavisGR, McClellanAD. Extent and time course of restoration of descending brainstem projections in spinal cord-transected lamprey. J Comp Neurol 1994; 344: 65–82.
25. JacobsAJ, SwainGP, SnedekerJA, et al. Recovery of neurofilament expression selectively in regenerating reticulospinal neurons. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 5206–20.
26. ShifmanMI, SelzerME. Semaphorins and their receptors in lamprey CNS: cloning, phylogenetic analysis and developmental changes during metamorphosisJ Comp Neurol 2006; 497: 115–32.
27. ShifmanMI, SelzerME. Expression of netrin receptor UNC-5 in lamprey brain; modulation by spinal cord transection. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000; 14: 49–58.
28. ShifmanMI, ZhangG, SelzerME. Delayed death of identified reticulospinal neurons after spinal cord injury in lampreys. J Comp Neurol 2008; 510: 269–82.
29. BernsteinJJ, BernsteinME. Effect of glial-ependymal scar and Teflon arrest on the regenerative capacity of goldfish spinal cord. Exp Neurol 1967; 19: 25–32.
30. CoggeshallRE, YoungbloodCS. Recovery from spinal transection in fish: regrowth of axons past the transection. Neurosci Lett 1983; 38: 227–31.
31. TakedaA, GorisRC, FunakoshiK. Regeneration of descending projections to the spinal motor neurons after spinal hemisection in the goldfish. Brain Res 2007; 1155: 17–23.
32. BernsteinJJ, GelderdJB. Synaptic reorganization following regeneration of goldfish spinal cord. Exp Neurol 1973; 41: 402–10.
33. ZottoliSJ, FreemerMM. Recovery of C-starts, equilibrium and targeted feeding after whole spinal cord crush in the adult goldfish Carassius auratus. J Exp Biol 2003; 206: 3015–29.
34. ZottoliSJ, BentleyAP, FeinerDG, et al. Spinal cord regeneration in adult goldfish: implications for functional recovery in vertebrates. Prog Brain Res 1994; 103: 219–28.
35. BeckerCG, BeckerT. Adult zebrafish as a model for successful central nervous system regeneration. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2008; 26: 71–80.
36. BhattDH, PatzelovaH, McLeanDL, et al. Functional regeneration in the larval zebrafish spinal cord. In BeckerCG, BeckerT, eds. Model Organisms in Spinal Cord Regeneration. KGaA:Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., 2007; 263–88.
37. BeckerT, WullimannMF, BeckerCG, et al. Axonal regrowth after spinal cord transection in adult zebrafish. J Comp Neurol 1997; 377: 577–95.
38. BeckerT, BeckerCG. Regenerating descending axons preferentially reroute to the gray matter in the presence of a general macrophage/microglial reaction caudal to a spinal transection in adult zebrafish. J Comp Neurol 2001; 433: 131–47.
39. BeckerT, LieberothBC, BeckerCG, et al. Differences in the regenerative response of neuronal cell populations and indications for plasticity in intraspinal neurons after spinal cord transection in adult zebrafish. Mol Cell Neurosci 2005; 30: 265–78.
40. BeckerCG, LieberothBC, MorelliniF, et al. L1.1 is involved in spinal cord regeneration in adult zebrafish. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 7837–42.
41. BeckerT, BernhardtRR, ReinhardE, et al. Readiness of zebrafish brain neurons to regenerate a spinal axon correlates with differential expression of specific cell recognition molecules. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 5789–803.
42. DunlopSA. Functional aspects of optical nerve regeneration in non-mammalian vertebrates. In BeckerCG, BeckerT, eds. Model Organisms in Spinal Cord Regeneration. KGaA: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co; 2007; 323–54.
43. SandvigA, BerryM, BarrettLB, et al. Myelin-, reactive glia-, and scar-derived CNS axon growth inhibitors: Expression, receptor signaling, and correlation with axon regeneration. Glia 2004; 46: 225–51.
44. FawcettJW, AsherRA. The glial scar and central nervous system repair. Brain Res Bull 1999; 49: 377–91.
45. FawcettJW. Overcoming inhibition in the damaged spinal cord. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23: 371–83.
46. GigerRJ, HollisER, TuszynskiMH. Guidance molecules in axon regeneration. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2: a001867.
47. WannerM, LangDM, BandtlowCE, et al. Reevaluation of the growth-permissive substrate properties of goldfish optic nerve myelin and myelin proteins. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 7500–8.
48. BastmeyerM, BeckmannM, SchwabM, et al. Growth of regenerating goldfish axons is inhibited by rat oligodendrocytes and CNS myelin but not by goldfish optic nerve tract oligodendrocytelike cells and fish CNS myelin. J Neurosci 1991; 11: 626–40.
49. BormannP, ZumstegVM, RothLW, et al. Target contact regulates GAP-43 and alpha-tubulin mRNA levels in regenerating retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci Res 1998; 52: 405–19.
50. MatsukawaT, AraiK, KoriyamaY, et al. Axonal regeneration of fish optic nerve after injury. Biol Pharm Bull 2004; 27: 445–51.
51. BeckerCG, MeyerRL, BeckerT. Gradients of ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5b mRNA during retinotopic regeneration of the optic projection in adult zebrafish. J Comp Neurol 2000; 427: 469–83.
52. MatsunagaE, NakamuraH, ChedotalA. Repulsive guidance molecule plays multiple roles in neuronal differentiation and axon guidance. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 6082–8.
53. DavisBM, AyersJL, KoranL, et al. Time course of salamander spinal cord regeneration and recovery of swimming: HRP retrograde pathway tracing and kinematic analysis. Exp Neurol 1990; 108: 198–213.
54. ChevallierS, LandryM, NagyF, et al. Recovery of bimodal locomotion in the spinal-transected salamander, Pleurodeles waltlii. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 20: 1995–2007.
55. DavisBM, DuffyMT, SimpsonSB Jr. Bulbospinal and intraspinal connections in normal and regenerated salamander spinal cord. Exp Neurol 1989; 103: 41–51.
56. ZukorKA, KentDT, OdelbergSJ. Meningeal cells and glia establish a permissive environment for axon regeneration after spinal cord injury in newts. Neural Dev 2011; 6: 1.
57. BleschA, TuszynskiMH. Spinal cord injury: plasticity, regeneration and the challenge of translational drug development. Trends Neurosci 2009; 32: 41–7.
58. SimsRT. Transection of the spinal cord in developing Xenopus laevis. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1962; 10: 115–26.
59. ForehandCJ, FarelPB. Anatomical and behavioral recovery from the effects of spinal cord transection: dependence on metamorphosis in anuran larvae. J Neurosci 1982; 2: 654–52.
60. BeattieMS, BresnahanJC, LopateG. Metamorphosis alters the response to spinal cord transection in Xenopus laevis frogs. J Neurobiol 1990; 21: 1108–22.
61. GibbsKM, ChitturSV, SzaroBG. Metamorphosis and the regenerative capacity of spinal cord axons in Xenopus laevis. Eur J Neurosci 2011; 33: 9–25.
62. GibbsKM, SzaroBG. Regeneration of descending projections in Xenopus laevis tadpole spinal cord demonstrated by retrograde double labeling. Brain Res 2006; 1088: 68–72.
63. PiattJ, PiattM. Transection of the spinal cord in the adult frog. Anat Rec 1958; 131: 81–95.
64. MladinicM, MullerKJ, NichollsJG. Central nervous system regeneration: from leech to opossum. J Physiol 2009; 587: 2775–82.
65. SmithJ, MorganJR, ZottoliSJ, et al. Regeneration in the era of functional genomics and gene network analysis. Biol Bull 2011; 221: 18–34.
66. Marsh-ArmstrongN, CaiL, BrownDD. Thyroid hormone controls the development of connections between the spinal cord and limbs during Xenopus laevis metamorphosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 165–70.
67. LangDM, RubinBP, SchwabME, et al. CNS myelin and oligodendrocytes of the Xenopus spinal cord–but not optic nerve–are nonpermissive for axon growth. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 99–109.
68. VargaZM, BandtlowCE, ErulkarSD, et al. The critical period for repair of CNS of neonatal opossum (Monodelphis domestica) in culture: correlation with development of glial cells, myelin and growth-inhibitory molecules. Eur J Neurosci 1995; 7: 2119–29.
69. FitchMT, SilverJ. CNS injury, glial scars, and inflammation: inhibitory extracellular matrices and regeneration failure. Exp Neurol 2008; 209: 294–301.
70. LurieDI, PijakDS, SelzerME. Structure of reticulospinal axon growth cones and their cellular environment during regeneration in the lamprey spinal cord. J Comp Neurol 1994; 344: 559–80.
71. ZornerB, SchwabME. Anti-Nogo on the go: from animal models to a clinical trial. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1198: E22–34.
72. BartusK, JamesND, BoschKD, et al. Chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans: key modulators of spinal cord and brain plasticity. Exp Neurol 2012; 235: 5–17.
73. ZhengB, HoC, LiS, et al. Lack of enhanced spinal regeneration in Nogo-deficient mice. Neuron 2003; 38: 213–24.
74. StewardO, SharpK, YeeKM, et al. A re-assessment of the effects of a Nogo-66 receptor antagonist on regenerative growth of axons and locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. Exp Neurol 2008; 209: 446–68.
75. LeeJK, GeoffroyCG, ChanAF, et al. Assessing spinal axon regeneration and sprouting in Nogo-, MAG-, and OMgp-deficient mice. Neuron 2010; 66: 663–70.
76. GargioliC, SlackJM. Cell lineage tracing during Xenopus tail regeneration. Development 2004; 131: 2669–79.
77. BenraissA, ArsantoJP, CoulonJ, et al. Neurogenesis during caudal spinal cord regeneration in adult newts. Dev Genes Evol 1999; 209: 363–9.
78. EcheverriK, TanakaEM. Ectoderm to mesoderm lineage switching during axolotl tail regeneration. Science 2002; 298: 1993–6.
79. Sanchez AlvaradoA, TsonisPA. Bridging the regeneration gap: genetic insights from diverse animal models. Nat Rev Genet 2006; 7: 873–84.
80. TsengAS, LevinM. Tail regeneration in Xenopus laevis as a model for understanding tissue repair. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 806–16.
81. TanakaEM, FerrettiP. Considering the evolution of regeneration in the central nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 713–23.
82. Del Rio-TsonisK, TsonisPA. Eye regeneration at the molecular age. Dev Dyn 2003; 226: 211–24.
83. YoshiiC, UedaY, OkamotoM, et al. Neural retinal regeneration in the anuran amphibian Xenopus laevis post-metamorphosis: transdifferentiation of retinal pigmented epithelium regenerates the neural retina. Dev Biol 2007; 303: 45–56.
84. VergaraMN, Del Rio-TsonisK. Retinal regeneration in the Xenopus laevis tadpole: a new model system. Mol Vis 2009; 15: 1000–13.
85. KarlMO, RehTA. Regenerative medicine for retinal diseases: activating endogenous repair mechanisms. Trends Mol Med 2010; 16: 193–202.
86. CheonEW, KanekoY, SaitoT. Regeneration of the newt retina: order of appearance of photoreceptors and ganglion cells. J Comp Neurol 1998; 396: 267–74.
87. SakaguchiDS, JanickLM, RehTA. Basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) induced transdifferentiation of retinal pigment epithelium: generation of retinal neurons and glia. Dev Dyn 1997; 209: 387–98.
88. SperryRW. Optic nerve regeneration with return of vision in anurans. J Neurophysiol 1944; 7: 57–69.
89. StensaasLJ, FeringaER. Axon regeneration across the site of injury in the optic nerve of the newt Triturus pyrrhogaster. Cell Tissue Res 1977; 179: 501–16.
90. FujisawaH. Retinotopic analysis of fiber pathways in the regenerating retinotectal system of the adult newt cynops Pyrrhogaster. Brain Res 1981; 206: 27–37.
91. FawcettJW, GazeRM. The organization of regenerating axons in the Xenopus optic nerve. Brain Res 1981; 229: 487–90.
92. OkamotoM, OhsawaH, HayashiT, et al. Regeneration of retinotectal projections after optic tectum removal in adult newts. Mol Vis 2007; 13: 2112–8.
93. SperryRW. Visuomotor coordination in the newt (Triturus viridescens) after regeneration of the optic nerve. J Comp Neurol 1943; 79: 33–55.
94. BachH, ArangoV, FeldheimD, et al. Fiber order of the normal and regenerated optic tract of the frog (Rana pipiens). J Comp Neurol 2004; 477: 43–54.
95. FeldheimDA, O’LearyDD. Visual map development: bidirectional signaling, bifunctional guidance molecules, and competition. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2: a001768.
96. RuthazerES, ClineHT. Insights into activity-dependent map formation from the retinotectal system: a middle-of-the-brain perspective. J Neurobiol 2004; 59: 134–46.
97. RehermannMI, MarichalN, RussoRE, et al. Neural reconnection in the transected spinal cord of the freshwater turtle Trachemys dorbignyi. J Comp Neurol 2009; 515: 197–214.
98. RehermannMI, SantinaqueFF, Lopez-CarroB, et al. Cell proliferation and cytoarchitectural remodeling during spinal cord reconnection in the fresh-water turtle Trachemys dorbignyi. Cell Tissue Res 2011; 344: 415–33.
99. FernandezA, RadmilovichM, Trujillo-CenozO. Neurogenesis and gliogenesis in the spinal cord of turtles. J Comp Neurol 2002; 453: 131–44.
100. BeazleyLD, SheardPW, TennantM, et al. Optic nerve regenerates but does not restore topographic projections in the lizard Ctenophorus ornatus. J Comp Neurol 1997; 377: 105–20.
101. DunlopSA, TeeLB, StirlingRV, et al. Failure to restore vision after optic nerve regeneration in reptiles: interspecies variation in response to axotomy. J Comp Neurol 2004; 478: 292–305.
102. BeazleyLD, RodgerJ, ChenP, et al. Training on a visual task improves the outcome of optic nerve regeneration. J Neurotrauma 2003; 20: 1263–70.
103. FongAJ, RoyRR, IchiyamaRM, et al. Recovery of control of posture and locomotion after a spinal cord injury: solutions staring us in the face. Prog Brain Res 2009; 175: 393–418.