Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T15:04:37.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Ultrasound in acute ischemic stroke

from Section I - Etiology, pathophysiology and imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Michael Brainin
Affiliation:
Zentrum für Klinische Neurowissenschaften, Donnau-Universität, Krems, Austria
Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The results of non-invasive tests (e.g. ultrasound) can be highly variable, often providing ambiguous results. Although other parameters can be reviewed, calculation of overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values are useful to the clinician who is managing the patient.

To calculate these statistics, ultrasound results must be compared to the established gold standards, usually angiography, surgery or autopsy findings. The simplest statistic compares the outcome of each test as either positive or negative. A true-positive result indicates that both tests are positive. A true-negative result indicates that both tests are negative. A false-positive result means that the gold standard is negative, indicating the absence of disease, while the non-invasive study is positive, indicating the presence of disease. A false-negative result occurs when the non-invasive test indicates the absence of disease but the gold standard is positive. True-positive and true-negative results can be used to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity is the ability of a test to correctly diagnose disease. It can be calculated by dividing the number of true-positive tests by the total number of positive results obtained by the gold standard.

Specificity is the ability to diagnose the absence of disease and is calculated by dividing the true negative by the total number of negative results obtained by the gold standard. The positive predictive value (PPV) or likelihood means that disease is present and negative predictive values (NPV) means that disease is not present.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Silver, B.http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1155193-overview. Updated: 15 Dec 2008.
Grant, EG, Benson, CB, Moneta, GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis –Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Ultrasound Q 2003; 19(4):190–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadalo, , Walters, MC. Carotid artery, stenosis: imaging http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/417524-imaging.
Cao, JJ, Thach, C, Manolio, TA, Psaty, BM, Kuller, LH, Chaves, PH, et al. C-reactive protein, carotid intima-media thickness, and incidence of ischemic stroke in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation 2003; 108(2):166–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masdeu, JC, Irimiaa, P, Asenbaumb, S, Bogousslavsky, J, Brainin, M, Chabriate, H, et al. EFNS guideline on neuroimaging in acute stroke. Report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13:1271–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zipper, SG, Stolz, E. Clinical application of transcranial colour-coded duplex sonography-a review. Eur J Neurol 2002; 9:1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, MA, Alexandrov, AV, Tegeler, CH, Spencer, MP, Caplan, LR, Feldman, E, et al. Assessment transcranial Doppler ultrasonography report of the therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2004; 62:1468–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumgartner, RW. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography. J Neurol 1999; 246(8):637–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdueza, JM, Schreiber, SJ, Roehl, JE, Klingebiel, R. Neurosonology and Neuroimaging of Stroke. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2008.Google Scholar
Gerriets, T, Goertler, M, Stolz, E, Postert, T, Sliwka, U, Schlachetzki, F, et al. Feasibility and validity of transcranial duplex sonography in patients with acute stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73:17–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernyshev, OY, Garami, Z, Calleja, S, Song, J, Campbell, MS, Noser, EA, et al. Yield and accuracy of urgent combined carotid-transcranial ultrasound testing in acute cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2005; 36:32–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, VK, Venketasubramanian, N, Khurana, DK, Tsivgoulis, G, Alexandrov, AV. Role of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in acute stroke. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2008; 11:39–51.Google Scholar
Azarpazhooh, MR, Chambers, BR. Clinical application of transcranial Doppler monitoring for embolic signals. J Clin Neurosci 2006; 13(8):799–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segura, T, Serena, J, Castellanos, M, Teruel, J, Vilar, C, Dávalos, A. Embolism in acute middle cerebral artery stenosis. Neurology 2001; 56:497–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tegos, TJ, Sabetai, MM, Nicolaides, AN, Robless, P, Kalodiki, E, Elatrozy, TS, et al. Correlates of embolic events detected by means of transcranial Doppler in patients with carotid atheroma. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33:131–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Sette, M, Angeli, S, Stara, I, Finocchi, C, Gandolfo, C. Microembolic signals with serial transcranial Doppler monitoring in acute focal ischemic deficit. A local phenomenon?Stroke 1997; 28:1311–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markus, HS, Droste, DW, Kaps, M, Larrue, V, Lees, KR, Siebler, M, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin in symptomatic carotid stenosis evaluated using doppler embolic signal detection: the Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CARESS) trial. Circulation 2005; 111:2233–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritter, MA, Dittrich, R, Thoenissen, N, Ringelstein, EB, Nabavi, DG. Prevalence and prognostic impact of microembolic signals in arterial sources of embolism. A systematic review of the literature. J Neurol 2008; 255(7):953–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Della Martina, A, Meyer-Wiethe, K, Allemann, E, Seidel, G. Ultrasound contrast agents for brain perfusion imaging and ischemic stroke therapy. J Neuroimaging 2005; 15:217–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidel, G, Meyer-Wiethe, K. Acute stroke: perfusion imaging. Front Neurol Neurosci 2006; 21:127–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meairs, S. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion imaging in acute stroke patients. Eur Neurol 2008; 59(suppl 1):17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidel, G, Meyer-Wiethe, K, Berdien, G, Hollstein, D, Toth, D, Aach, T. Ultrasound perfusion imaging in acute middle cerebral artery infarction predicts outcome. Stroke 2004; 35:1107–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allendoerfer, J, Goertler, M, Reutern, GM. Prognostic relevance of ultra-early doppler sonography in acute ischaemic stroke: a prospective multicentre study. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5:835–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demchuk, AM, Burgin, WS, Christou, I, Felberg, RA, Barber, PA, Hill, MD, et al. Thrombolysis in brain ischemia (TIBI) transcranial Doppler flow grades predict clinical severity, early recovery, and mortality in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke 2001; 32:89–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baracchini, C, Manara, R, Ermani, M, Meneghetti, G. The quest for early predictors of stroke evolution: can TCD be a guiding light?Stroke 2000; 31:2942–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perren, F, Loulidi, J, Graves, R, Yilmaz, H, Rüfenacht, D, Landis, T, et al. Combined IV–intraarterial thrombolysis: a color-coded duplex pilot study. Neurology 2006; 67:324–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saqqur, M, Uchino, K, Demchuk, AM, Molina, CA, Garami, Z, Calleja, S, et al. Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke 2007; 38(3):948–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexandrov, AV, Burgin, SW, Demchuk, AM, El-Mitwalli, A, Grotta, JC. Speed of intracranial clot lysis with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy: sonographic classification and short-term improvement. Circulation 2001; 103:2897–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubiera, M, Ribo, M, Delgado-Mederos, R, Santamarina, E, Delgado, P, Montaner, J, et al. Tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion: an independent predictor of poor outcome after systemic thrombolysis. Stroke 2006; 37:2301–05.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexandrov, AV, Molina, CA, Grotta, JC, Garami, Z, Ford, SR, Alvarez-Sabin, J, et al. For the CLOTBUST Investigators: Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:2170–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molina, CA, Ribo, M, Rubiera, M, Montaner, J, Santamarina, E, Delgado-Mederos, R, et al. Microbubbles administration accelerates clot lysis during continuous 2-MHz ultrasound monitoring in stroke patients treated with intravenous tPA. Stroke 2006; 37:425–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, HS, Harrison, MJ. Estimation of cerebrovascular reactivity using transcranial Doppler, including the use of breath-holding as the vasodilatory stimulus. Stroke 1992; 23:668–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvestrini, M, Vernieri, F, Pasqualetti, P, Matteis, M, Passarelli, F, Troisi, E. Impaired cerebral vasoreactivity and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. JAMA 2000; 283:2122–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droste, DW, Silling, K, Stypmann, J, Grude, M, Kemeny, V, Wichter, T, et al. Contrast transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the detection of right-to-left shunts: time window and threshold in microbubble numbers. Stroke 2000; 31:1640–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belvis, R, Leta, RG, Marti-Fabregas, J, Cocho, D, Carreras, F, Pons-Llado, G, et al. Almost perfect concordance between simultaneous transcranial Doppler and transesophageal echocardiography in the quantification of right-to-left shunts. J Neuroimaging 2006; 16:133–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×