Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T13:30:48.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Judicial Commentary on Thomas More's Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Michael Tugendhat
Affiliation:
The Law of Privacy and the Media
Sidney Fitzwater
Affiliation:
Chair of the Advisory Committee
Michael Tugendhat
Affiliation:
The Law of Privacy and the Media
Henry Ansgar Kelly
Affiliation:
UCLA
Louis W. Karlin
Affiliation:
University of Dallas
Gerard B. Wegemer
Affiliation:
University of Dallas
Get access

Summary

The term “maliciously”

What did the word “maliciously” mean in a criminal statute in the sixteenth century?

The noun “malice,” and its adverb, “maliciously,” have long been used as terms of art in legal English (as in “malice aforethought”). According to the OED, these words are derived from Latin and French. The example given for Latin is the word malitia (as in malitia praecogitata”), and for French is the word malice (as in “malice prepensé”). Examples given in the dictionary from English sources show that, in English by the fourteenth century, the word malice had acquired the meaning “ill will,” which it bears to this day. That is a secondary meaning that the word bore in Latin.

In legal English the adverb “maliciously,” and Law Latin maliciose, are used to mean the same as “with malice.” Examples are in the indictment of Thomas More.

In legal English the words “malice” and “malicious” each have two distinct meanings. They are commonly referred to as “malice in law” (or “legal malice”) and “malice in fact” (or “actual malice”).

J. H. Baker discusses murder in the period 1483–1558. He states that what premeditation was required for murder was not precisely defined. None of the cases Baker cites suggests that ill will (or any other motive) was ever required as a constituent of the offense of murder, in addition to intent to do the act in question (actus reus).

Type
Chapter
Information
Thomas More's Trial by Jury
A Procedural and Legal Review with a Collection of Documents
, pp. 111 - 136
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×