Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T18:22:50.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The appeal in Germany to the quantum theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Bruce R. Wheaton
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

The unit of light energy does not travel in all directions away from an oscillator, but only in a single [direction.]

German-speaking physicists arrived at an explanation for the problems facing radiation theory different from that of their British colleagues. Moreover, their attempt to discover a consistent theory formed a complete contrast to the British attempt. The problems themselves were perceived differently. It would be an exaggeration to say that the problems ever reached the same status as paradoxes in Germany as they did in Britain. Physics as practiced in Germany was not as dependent on conceptual pictures, and physicists there were much more willing to adopt formal principles to solve the difficulties without demanding a consistent physical interpretation.

By 1905 the very word mechanics meant to many Germans something essentially different from its meaning in Britain. Influential voices had proclaimed that matter itself is only a construct of the mind, fashioned out of the more ontologically significant electromagnetic forces that give rise to human perceptions of mass and extension. The more influential Germans were not closely tied to the logical requirements of mechanistic thought. When the electromagnetic impulse hypothesis of x-rays was accepted in Germany, it was interpreted by many as a further example of the versatility of an electromechanical ontology. Electromagnetic impulses were considered by some, most notably those who first tried to make sense of x-ray behavior, as a form of wave with extended properties in space. Consequently, as we shall see in this chapter, the sharp distinction between x-rays and periodic light was never made as strongly in Germany as it was in Britain.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Tiger and the Shark
Empirical Roots of Wave-Particle Dualism
, pp. 104 - 132
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×