Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T05:05:53.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Origins of x-ray spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Bruce R. Wheaton
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

[X-rays] are a kind of wave with properties no wave has any business to have.

In the spring of 1912 two research assistants in Munich directed an x-ray beam through a crystal and found that the beam was reformed into a well-defined interference pattern. The property most characteristic of periodic waves – their ability to interfere – is shared by the x-rays. Max Laue, the man chiefly responsible for the discovery, thought he had found proof that characteristic secondary x-rays from the crystal are periodic waves. But H. A. Lorentz quickly pointed out that impulses should interfere too. He showed, in a tour de force argument, that the accepted square pulse is an impossible representation of x-rays. William Henry Bragg and his son concluded that the interference maxima could, indeed, be due to irregular x-ray pulses. But, as such, x-ray impulses were not different from ordinary white light. They supported this claim with a new technique of crystal analysis fully analogous to ordinary optical spectroscopy.

Crystal diffraction provided a new tool for the analysis of x-rays. Pushed furthest by Henry Moseley and Charles Darwin, the technique soon showed that some x-rays comprise periodic wave trains of great length. The extremely sharp angular resolution of observed x-ray interference maxima indicated beyond doubt that x-rays are no different, except in frequency, from ordinary light. Rutherford soon extended the technique to the y-rays. Not only could one isolate characteristic γ-rays, he believed, one could show, with some effort, that they interfere too.

The successful integration of the new spectroscopy with the Bohr atom came, as had x-ray diffraction, from Sommerfeld's Munich.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Tiger and the Shark
Empirical Roots of Wave-Particle Dualism
, pp. 199 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×