Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:44:42.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - The WTO-Plus Obligations: Dual Class or a Strengthened System?

from PART III - Accessions Acquis: Thematic Perspectives and Implementation Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2017

Nannan Gao
Affiliation:
paralegal at Dechert LLP
Fangying Zheng
Affiliation:
Benchmark Chambers International
Alexei Kireyev
Affiliation:
International Monetary Fund Institute, Washington DC
Chiedu Osakwe
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Obligations in accession protocols that go beyond the multilateral trade agreements are commonly referred to as ‘WTO-plus’ obligations. This chapter reviews the so-called WTO-plus obligations and argues that even though they are perceived to expand the existing obligations under multilateral trade agreements, they in fact do not create two classes of membership within the World Trade Organization (WTO). First, all accession processes are conducted on a case-by-case basis, and thus result in different obligations for each acceding government. Second, the WTO legal system is evolving continuously; therefore, to adopt new rules and advance the legal system, obligations cannot remain the same as in previous accessions. Third, non-discrimination remains one of the fundamental principles of the multilateral trading system. Accessions to WTO follow this principle and hence WTO-plus obligations have been and will continue to be set on a non-discriminatory basis. At the same time, WTO-plus obligations help upgrade the rules-based multilateral trading system. They fill gaps in the WTO rules on anti-dumping, countervailing and safeguard regimes, and they advance WTO rules by promoting plurilateral agreements.

WTO-plus obligations represent specific obligations contained in accession protocols that are perceived to expand the existing obligations under multilateral trade agreements and go beyond the existing requirements (Qin, 2016). The term ‘WTO-plus obligations’ has been widely used in the literature and addressed by trade negotiators. However, the content of such obligations is yet to be specifically and consensually defined by multilateral trade policy negotiators.

Unlike negotiations for accession to other international organizations, negotiations for accession to the WTO are open-ended. Article XII of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO Agreement) does not put any limit on the ‘terms to be agreed’ between acceding governments and WTO members, including obligations the acceding governments shall undertake. All members that joined the WTO through accession, in contrast to those General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) contracting parties which automatically became members of the WTO upon its creation in 1995, negotiated their terms and conditions of membership on a case-by-case basis, using the national legislation of each applicant as the starting point.

Type
Chapter
Information
Trade Multilateralism in the Twenty-First Century
Building the Upper Floors of the Trading System through WTO Accessions
, pp. 357 - 368
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cattaneo, O. and Primo Braga, C. A. (2009). ‘Everything You Always Wanted to Know About WTO Accession (But Were Afraid to Ask)’, Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 5116. The World Bank. Retrieved from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-5116.CrossRef
Charnovitz, S. (2007). ‘Mapping the Law of WTO Accession’, in Janow, M. E., Donaldson, V. and Yanovich, A. (eds.), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement, and Developing Countries. Huntington, NY, Juris Publishing, pp. 855–920.Google Scholar
Chen, C. (ed.) (2009). China's Integration with the Global Economy: WTO Accession, Foreign Direct Investment and International Trade. Cheltenham. Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadush, U. and Osakwe, C. (2015). ‘A Reflection on Accessions as the WTO Turns Twenty’, in Dadush, U. and Osakwe, C. (eds.), WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty. WTO, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, H.-G., Pei, C. and Zhang, K. H (eds.) (2006). China and the Challenge of Economic Globalization: The Impact of WTO Membership. Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Marceau, G. (2002). ‘A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods: The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’, Journal of World Trade, 36(5): 811–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marceau, G. and Trachtman, P. J. (2014). ‘A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods: The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’, Journal of World Trade, 48(2): 351–432. Retrieved from www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=TRAD2014013.Google Scholar
Osakwe, C. (2011). ‘Developing Countries and GATT/WTO Rules: Dynamic Transformations in Trade Policy Behaviour and Performance’, Minnesota Journal of International Law, 20(2): 365–436. Retrieved from www.minnjil.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Osakwe-Final-Version.pdf.Google Scholar
Osakwe, C. (2015). ‘Contributions and Lessons From WTO Accessions: The Present and Future of the Rules-Based Multilateral Trading System’, in Dadush, U. and Osakwe, C. (eds.), WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty. WTO, Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–308.Google Scholar
Qin, J. Y. (2003). ‘ “WTO-Plus” Obligations and Their Implications for the World Trade Organization Legal System – An Appraisal of the China Accession Protocol’, Journal of World Trade, 37(3): 483–522.Google Scholar
Qin, J. Y. (2016). ‘Mind the Gap: Navigating between the WTO Agreement and its Accession Protocols’, Wayne State University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No. 2016-05. Retrieved from www.ssrn.com/link/Wayne-State-U-LEG.html.
Williams, P. J. (2008). A Handbook on Accession to the WTO. WTO Secretariat Publication, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaoka, T. (2013). ‘Analysis of China's Accession Commitments in the WTO: New Taxonomy of More and Less Stringent Commitments, and the Struggle for Mitigation by China’, Journal of World Trade, 47(1): 105–58.Google Scholar
Yang, D. T., Chen, V. and Monarch, R. (2010). ‘Rising Wages: Has China Lost its Global Labour Advantage?’ Bonn, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit/Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Discussion Paper No. 5008, June.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×