Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:15:07.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Army transformation: imperatives and innovations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Theo Farrell
Affiliation:
King's College London
Sten Rynning
Affiliation:
University of Southern Denmark
Terry Terriff
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access

Summary

In an uncertain and still dangerous world, a key challenge for Western states is to maintain their military edge. For the United States, the challenge is to stay ahead of rising state competitors and new non-state opponents. For the main European powers, the challenge is as much to catch up with the US military, as it is to meet a range of regional and global military commitments. These past two decades, Western militaries have been operating in an environment that has been characterized by profound strategic and socio-technological change, with the fall of the Soviet Union and the rise of networked computers, as well as continuous expeditionary operations. This, in turn, has produced powerful imperatives and opportunities for Western militaries to transform themselves.

The major Western states ended the Cold War with a surplus of military power. Armies, navies and air forces constructed to fight a global war against the Eastern bloc suddenly were left without peer competitors. Western policymakers and their publics soon found new things to worry about, including terrorism, nuclear proliferation, ethnic civil wars and failing states. These new challenges concern less the amount of military power, and more military agility; i.e. the ability of military forces to adapt to meet new risks and requirements.

Type
Chapter
Information
Transforming Military Power since the Cold War
Britain, France, and the United States, 1991–2012
, pp. 1 - 14
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

“adaptable strategic posture”: Securing Britain in An Age of Uncertainty: The Strategic Defence and Security Review, Cm 7948 (London: TSO, 2010), pp. 9–10
Adamsky, Dima, The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Revolution in Military Affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Biddle, , “Victory Misunderstood: What the Gulf War Tells Us about the Future of Conflict,” International Security, vol. 21, no. 2 (1996), p. 176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symposium on the Gulf War and the Revolution in Military Affairs,” International Security, vol. 22, no. 2 (1997)
Shimko, Keith L. reasonably concludes, “it strains credulity to argue that there was no evidence of a possible RMA” from the Gulf War. Shimko, The Iraq Wars and America’s Military Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Eliot A., “A Revolution in Warfare,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 75, no. 2 (March/April 1996)Google Scholar
Krepinevich, Andrew F., “Cavalry to Computer: The Patterns of Military Revolutions,” National Interest, vol. 37 (Fall 1994)Google Scholar
Knox, MacGregor and Murray, Williamson, The Dynamics of Military Revolution, 1300–2050 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rupert, The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World (London: Penguin, 2006)Google Scholar
Demchak, Chris, “Creating the Enemy: Global Diffusion of the Information-Technology Based Military Model,” in Goldman, Emily O. and Eliason, Leslie C. (eds.), The Diffusion of Military Technologies and Ideas (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003), pp. 307–347Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael and Trainor, Bernard, The General’s War: The Inside Story of the Gulf War (Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1995)Google Scholar
Tomes, Robert R., US Defense Strategy from Vietnam to Operation Iraqi Freedom: Military Innovation and the New American Way of War, 1973–2003 (London: Routledge, 2007), pp. 111–122Google Scholar
King, Anthony, The Transformation of Europe’s Armed Forces: From the Rhine to Afghanistan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebrowski, Arthur K. and Gartska, John J., “Network-Centric Warfare: Its Origins and Future,” Proceedings of the Naval Institute (January 1998)
Owens, William, High Seas (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Lifting the Fog of War (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2000)
Murray, Williamson, “Clausewitz Out, Computer In: Military Culture and Technological Hubris,” National Interest, vol. 48 (Summer 1997), pp. 57–64Google Scholar
Cogan, Charles, The Third Option: The Emancipation of European Defense, 1989–2000 (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001)Google Scholar
Howorth, Jolyon and Keeler, John T. S. (eds.), Defending Europe: The EU, NATO, and the Quest for European Autonomy (London: Palgrave, 2003)CrossRef
Cohen, Elliot A., “A Tale of Two Secretaries,” Foreign Affairs (May/June 2002)
Pfeiffer, Holger, “Defence and Force Planning in Historical Perspective: The Case of NATO,” Baltic Security and Defence Review, vol. 10 (2008), pp. 103–120 at p. 112Google Scholar
Gordon, Philip H. and Shapiro, Jeremy, Allies at War: America, Europe and the Crisis over Iraq (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004)Google Scholar
Korteweg, Rem, The Superpower, the Bridge-Builder and the Hesitant Ally: How Defense Transformation Divided NATO, 1991–2008 (Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo and Rynning, Sten, “NATO’s Transformation Gaps: Transatlantic Differences and the War in Afghanistan,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 33, no. 5 (2010), pp. 673–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grissom, Adam, “The Future of Military Innovation Studies,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 29, no. 5 (2006), pp. 906–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack, “Richness, Rigor and Relevance in the Study of Soviet Foreign Policy,” International Security, vol. 9, no. 3 (1984–85), pp. 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukunda, Gautam, “We Cannot Go On: Disruptive Innovation and the First World War Royal Navy,” Security Studies, vol. 19, no. 1 (2010), pp. 124–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dombrowski, Peter and Gholz, Eugene, Buying Military Transformation: Technological Innovation and the Defence Industry (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terriff, Terry, “Warriors and Innovators: Military Change and Organizational Culture in the US Marine Corps,” Defence Studies, vol. 6, no. 2 (2006), pp. 215–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapolsky, Harvey M., Green, Brendan Rittenhouse and Friedman, Benjamin H., “The Missing Transformation,” in Sapolsky, Harvey M., Friedman, Benjamin H. and Green, Brendan Rittenhouse (eds.), US Military Innovation (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009), p. 6Google Scholar
Rosen, Stephen Peter, Winning the Next War: Innovation and the Modern Military (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), p. 2Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel in his classic study, The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil–Military Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
Hampson, Fen, Unguided Missiles: How America Buys Its Weapons (New York: W. W. Norton, 1989)Google Scholar
McNaugher, Thomas, New Weapons, Old Politics: America’s Military Procurement Muddle (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1989)Google Scholar
Brown, Michael E., Flying Blind: The Politics of the US Strategic Bomber Program (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo, Weapons Without a Cause: The Politics of Weapons Acquisition in the United States (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posen, Barry R., The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Murray, Williamson and Millett, Allan R. (eds.), Military Innovation in the Interwar Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRef
Kier, Elizabeth, Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Johnson, David E., Fast Tanks and Heavy Bombers: Innovation in the US Army, 1917–1945 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Mahnken, Thomas G., Uncovering Ways of War: US Intelligence and Foreign Military Innovation, 1919–1941 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew, Innovation and the Arms Race: How the United States and the Soviet Union Develop New Military Technologies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Demchak, Chris C., Military Organizations, Complex Machines: Modernization in the US Armed Services (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Zisk, Kimberly Martin, Engaging the Enemy: Organization Theory and Soviet Military Innovation, 1955–1991 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, Deborah D., Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Rhodes, Edward, “Do Bureaucratic Politics Matter? Some Disconfirming Findings from the Case of the US Navy,” World Politics, vol. 47 (1994), pp. 1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, Mark, “Institutionalizing a Political Idea: Navalism and the Emergence of American Sea Power,” in Trubowitz, Peter, Goldman, Emily O. and Rhodes, Edward (eds.), The Politics of Strategic Adjustment: Ideas, Institutions, and Interests (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), pp. 29–104Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T., “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory,” World Politics, vol. 50, no. 2 (1998), pp. 324–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)
Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996)
Farrell, Theo, The Norms of War: Cultural Beliefs and Modern Conflict (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2005)Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain, Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Sondhaus, Lawrence, Strategic Culture and Ways of War (London: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar
Meyer, Christoph O., The Quest for a European Strategic Culture (New York: Palgrave, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rynning, Sten, “Peripheral or Powerful? The European Union’s Strategy to Combat the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” European Security, vol. 16, no. 3 (September 2007), pp. 267–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W., Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint During World War II (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Mahnken, Thomas G., Technology and the American Way of War Since 1945 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo, “Professionalization and Suicidal Defence Planning by the Irish Army, 1921–41,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 21, no. 3 (1998), pp. 67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, Isabel V., Absolute Destruction: Military Culture and the Practices of War in Imperial Germany (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Ward, Thomas, The Ethics of Destruction: Norms and Force in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Price, Richard M., The Chemical Weapons Taboo (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina, The Nuclear Weapons Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., The Ambiguities of Experience (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010), p. 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Theo, Osinga, Frans and Russell, James A. (eds.), Military Adaptation in Afghanistan (Stanford, CA; Stanford University Press, 2013)
Russell, James A., Innovation, Transformation and War: Counterinsurgency Operations in Anbar and Ninewa Provinces, Iraq, 2005–2007 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Serena, Chad C., A Revolution in Military Adaptation: The US Army in the Iraq War (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Ucko, David H., The New Counterinsurgency Era: Transforming the US Military for Modern Wars (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Doubler, Michael, Closing with the Enemy: How GIs Fought the War in Europe, 1944–1945 (Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Carafano, James Jay, GI Ingenuity: Improvisation, Technology, and Winning WWII (Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 2006)Google Scholar
Bickel, Keith B., Mars Learning: The Marine Corps’ Development of Small Wars Doctrine, 1915–1940 (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2001)Google Scholar
Russell, James A., “Innovation in War: Counterinsurgency Operations in Anbar and Ninewa Provinces, Iraq, 2005–2007,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 33, no. 4 (2010), pp. 595–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Theo, “Improving in War: Military Adaptation and the British in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 2006–2009,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 33, no. 4 (2010), pp. 567–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, David, Raising Churchill’s Army: The British Army and the War against Germany, 1919–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Habeck, Mary R., Storm of Steel: The Development of Armor Doctrine in Germany and the Soviet Union, 1919–1939 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Griffith, Paddy, Battle Tactics of the Western Front: The British Army’s Art of Attack, 1916–1918 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Boemeke, Manfred F., Chickering, Roger and Forster, Stig (eds.), Anticipating Total War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×