Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T13:23:01.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Care Giving and Its Influence on Marital Interactions between Older Spouses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

Helen E. Edwards
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Patricia Noller
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychology, University of Queensland
Patricia Noller
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Judith A. Feeney
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

The following is an extract of a conversation between an elderly man and his wife who was caring for him:

Husband: Well I'd like to talk about the showering.

Wife: Oh we've been over that and over.

Husband: Because I have some problems in the night I might be smelly when people come to visit and I'd like to be fresh and clean for the day.

Wife: Poof – been over – over all this.

Husband: I know you want to clean me up before I go to bed but I'd rather you showered me in the morning.

Wife: Oh, let's talk about the garden. What should we plant this year? Do you think the roses need pruning?

Husband: I want to shower in the morning.

Wife: Enough, enough. Laughs Come on, let's talk about our beautiful garden.

Husband: Plant what you like.

Wife: Well how about your favourites, zinnias?

As this extract demonstrates, communication is an important, but sometimes difficult, part of care giving. Family care giving for older people has received much attention in the literature, especially from the perspective of the caregiver. Interestingly, only a limited number of studies have examined the interactional processes of care (for example, Phillips, Morrison, Steffl, Chae, Cromwell, & Russell, 1995). Studies that have examined these issues have shown that, in terms of well-being and quality of relationships, the outcomes of care giving may be just as “negative” for older care recipients as for their carers; further, communication is an important aspect of these relationships.

Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Marriage
Developments in the Study of Couple Interaction
, pp. 437 - 462
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baltes, M. M. (1996). The many faces of dependency in old age. New York: Cambridge University Press
Braithwaite, V. (1998). Institutional respite care: Breaking chores or breaking social bonds. The Gerontonlogist, 38(5), 610–617CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D., & Woodall, W. (1989). Nonverbal Communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper & Row
Caporael, L. R. (1981). The paralanguage of caregiving: Baby talk to the institutionalized aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 876–884CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carruth, A., Tate, U., Moffett, B., & Hill, K. (1997). Reciprocity, emotional well-being, and family functioning as determinants of satisfaction in caregivers of elderly parents. Nursing Research, 46(2), 93–100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31–52). Avon, England: Multilingual Matters
Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society, 17, 1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalley, G. (1993). The ideological foundations of informal care. In A. Kitson (Ed.), Nursing: Art and science (pp. 11–25). London: Chapman & Hall
Di Matteo, M. R. (1991). The Psychology of health, illness, and medical care: An individual perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks / Cole
Dwyer, J. W., & Coward, R. T. (1991). A multivariate comparison of the involvement of adult sons versus daughters in the care of impaired parents. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, 259–269CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, H. E. (2001). Family caregiving, communication, and the health of care receivers. In M. L. Hummert & J. Nussbaum (Eds.), Communication, aging and health: Theory and practice (pp. 203–224). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Edwards, H. E., Moyle, W., Clinton, M., Weir, D., & Eyeson-Annan, M. (1994, May). Nurses' talk in a dementia unit: What is said and what is not. Paper presented to the Second International Conference on Communication, Aging and Health, Hamilton, Canada
Edwards, H. E., & Noller, P. (1993). Perceptions of overaccommodation used by nurses in communication with the elderly. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, H. E., & Noller, P. (1998). Factors influencing caregiver-care receiver communication and its impact on the well-being of older care receivers. Health Communication, 10(4), 317–341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferris, C., & Bramston, P. (1994). Quality of life in the elderly: A contribution to its understanding. Australian Journal on Ageing, 13, 120–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). Between husbands and wives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Gallois, C., Franklyn-Stokes, A., Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1988). Communication accommodation in intercultural encounters: Intergroup and interpersonal considerations. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 157–185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Gibb, H., & O'Brien, B. (1990). Jokes and reassurances are not enough: Ways in which nurses related through conversation with elderly clients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15, 1389–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1991). Language: Context and consequences. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Wiemann, J. (Eds.). (1990). Communication, health and the elderly. Fulbright International Colloquium, 8. Manchester: Manchester University Press
Giles, H., Fox, W., & Smith, E. (1993). Patronizing the elderly: Intergenerational evaluations. Research in Language & Social Interactions, 26, 129–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, K., Atkinson, K., & Coupland, N. (1990). Responding to the elderly: Troubles talk in the caring context. In H. Giles, N. Coupland, & J. Wiemann (Eds.), Communication, health and the elderly (pp. 192–212). Manchester: Manchester University Press
Hagestad, G. O. (1985). Continuity and connectedness. In V. L. Bengston & J. F. Robertson (Eds.), Grandparenthood (pp. 31–48). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Harwood, J., Giles, H., Fox, S., Ryan, E. B., & Williams, A. (1993). Patronizing young and elderly adults: Response strategies in a community setting. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. (1985). Sex differences and miscommunication: Some data from New Zealand. In J. B. Pride (Ed.), Cross-cultural encounters: Communication and miscommunication (pp. 24–43). Melbourne: Riversein
Kemper, S. (1994). “Elderspeak”: Speech accommodation to older adults. Aging and Cognition, 1, 17–28Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (1995). The effect of nonindependence on significance testing in dyadic research. Personal Relationships, 2, 67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanceley, A. (1985). Use of controlling language in the rehabilitation of the elderly. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 10, 125–135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montepare, J. M., Steinberg, J., & Rosenberg, B. (1992). Characteristics of vocal communication between young adults and their parents and grandparents. Communication Research, 19, 479–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, R. J., & Kamo, Y. (1989). Parent care by sons and daughters. In J. A. Mancini (Ed.), Aging parents and adult children. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
Neufeld, A., & Harrison, M. (1998). Men as caregivers: Reciprocal relationships or obligation? Journal of Advance Nursing, 28(5), 959–968CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noller, P. (1993). Communication in marriage: Different cultures or differential social power. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 132–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, L., Morrison, E., Steffl, B., Chae, Y., Cromwell, S., & Russell, C. (1995). Effects of the situational context and interactional process on the quality of family caregiving. Research in Nursing, 18, 205–216Google ScholarPubMed
Raush, H. L., Barry, W. A., Hertel, R. K., & Swain, M. E. (1974). Communication and conflict in marriage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Roloff, M., & Cloven, D. H. (1990). The chilling effect in interpersonal relationships: The reluctance to speak one's mind. In D. D. Cahn (Ed.), Intimates in conflict: A communication perspective (pp. 49–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Ryan, E. B., Bourhis, R., & Knops, U. (1991). Evaluative perceptions of patronizing speech addressed to elders. Psychology and Aging, 6, 442–450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., & Henwood, K. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Language and Communication, 6, 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Hamilton, J. M., & See, Kwong S. (1994). Younger and older adult listeners' evaluations of baby talk addressed to institutionalized elders. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Hummert, M. L., & Boich, L. H. (1995). Communication predicaments of aging: Patronizing behavior toward older adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 144–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Meredith, D. S., & Shantz, G. D. (1994). Changing the way we talk with elders: Promoting health using the communication enhancement model. International Journal of Ageing and Human Development, 41, 89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1986). That's not what I meant!: How conversational style makes or breaks relationships. New York: Ballantine Books
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow
Thompson, S. C., & Sobolew-Shubin, A. (1993). Perceptions of overprotection in ill adults. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. C., Sobolew-Shubin, A., Graham, M. A., & Janigian, A. S. (1989). Psychosocial adjustment following a stroke. Social Science and Medicine, 28, 239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbeck, L., Hoyt, D. R., & Huck, S. M. (1994). Early family relationships, intergenerational solidarity and support provided to parents by their adult children. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 49, S85–S84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, L. K. (1991). The impact of Alzheimer's disease on the marital relationship. The Gerontologist, 31, 224–237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×