Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T15:41:11.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Observational “Windows” to Intimacy Processes in Marriage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

Linda J. Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Danielle R. Greenberg
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Patricia Noller
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Judith A. Feeney
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Wife (W): There's lots of things I love about you … the way you laugh.

Husband (H): The whole package.

W: You look at me and you know what I'm thinking. The way you smile. The way your clothes are all over the house.

H: You don't love that. Don't lie.

W: No, but that's you, and I love you.

In the past two decades, researchers using behavioral observation methods to study marital functioning have focused almost exclusively on interaction processes related to conflict. As Fincham and Beach (1999) have noted, conflict processes have enjoyed a “privileged status” in marital interaction research. Negative affect and negative affect reciprocity have been established as robust correlates of marital discord (Gottman, 1998; Karney & Bradbury, 1995; Weiss & Heyman, 1990; for reviews). Distressed husbands and wives are more likely than their happily married counterparts to engage in hostile, blaming, and attacking behaviors, and further, they are more likely to reciprocate their partner's negative behavior. Although early behavioral theories of marital discord (for example, Birchler, Weiss, & Vincent, 1975; Jacobson & Margolin, 1979) explicitly acknowledged the functional role of positive behavioral transactions in successful marriages, the emphasis in recent years has been on the corrosive role of conflictual interactions in the development of marital dysfunction.

One reason for the current emphasis on negativity and conflict behavior may be the tremendous success of the problem-solving or “conflict” discussion task as a “window” to marital behavior.

Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Marriage
Developments in the Study of Couple Interaction
, pp. 118 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, M. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston
Argyle, M. (1975). Bodily communication. New York: International Universities Press
Barbee, A. P. (1990). Interactive coping: The cheering-up process in close relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 46–65). London: Sage Publications
Birchler, G., Weiss, R., & Vincent, J. (1975). Multimethod analysis of social reinforcement exchange between maritally distressed and nondistressed spouse and stranger dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books
Burleson, B. R. (1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1578–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burleson, B. R. (1984). Age, social-cognitive development, and the use of comforting strategies. Communication Monographs, 51 (2), 140–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnelley, K. B., Pietromonaco, P. R., & Jaffe, K. (1996). Attachment, caregiving, and relationship functioning in couples: Effects of self and partner. Personal Relationships, 3, 257–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, A., & Schenk, J. L. (1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59 (3), 458–463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1960), A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support as a determinant of marital quality: The interplay of negative and supportive behaviors. In G. R. Pierce, B. R. Sarason, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 173–194). New York: Plenum PressCrossRef
Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1994). Social support communication in the context of marriage: An analysis of couples' supportive interactions. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support (pp. 113–135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Cutrona, C. E., Suhr, J. A., & McFarlane, R. (1990). Interpersonal transactions and the psychological sense of support. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 30–45). London: Sage Publications
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dindia, K., Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Kenny, D. A. (1997). Self-disclosure in spouse and stranger interaction: A social relations analysis. Human Communication Research, 23, 388–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Psychological Issues, 1, 1–71Google Scholar
Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1996). Adult attachment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Ward, C. (1997). Marital satisfaction and spousal interaction. In R. J. Sternberg & M. Hojjat (Eds.), Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 160–189). New York: Guilford
Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (1999). Conflict in marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Gottman, J. M. (1996). What predicts divorce? The measures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of the marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, L. S., & Johnson, S. M. (1988). Emotionally focused therapy for couples. New York: Guilford
Guthrie, D. M., & Noller, P. (1988). Spouses' perceptions of one another in emotional situations. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction. Monographs in social psychology of language, No. 1 (pp. 153–181). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters
Hazan C., & Zeifman, D. (1997). Attachment: The bond in pair-bonds. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 237–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52Google Scholar
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Stuart, G. L., Sandin, E., Smutzler, N., & McLaughlin, W. (1997). Comparing the social support behaviors of violent and nonviolent husbands during discussions of wife personal problems. Personal Relationships, 4, 395–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huesmann, L. R., & Levinger, G. (1976). Incremental exchange theory: A formal model for progression in dyadic social interaction. In L. Berkowitz and E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 9 (pp. 191–229). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Huston, T. L., Caughlin, J. P., Houts, R. M., Smith, S. E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1979). Marital therapy: Strategies based on social learning and behavior exchange principles. New York: Bruner/Mazel
Julien, D., Markman, H. J., & Lindahl, K. M. (1989). A comparison of a global and a microanalytic coding system: Implications for future trends in studying interactions. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 81–100Google Scholar
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunce, L. J., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). An attachment-theoretical approach to caregiving in romantic relationships. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood. Advances in personal relationships, vol. 5 (pp. 205–237). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Schlee, K. A., Monson, C. M., Ehrensaft, M., & Heyman, R. (1998). What's love got to do with it? Perceptions of marital positivity in H-to-W aggressive, distressed, and happy marriages. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, C., & Clark, R. D. (1982). Marital satisfaction: A validation approach. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3 (3), 169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, L. S., Wickrama, K. A. S., & Conger, R. D. (1996). Predicting marital instability from spouse and observer reports of marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 641–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton
Melby, J. N., Ge, X., Conger, R. D., & Warner, T. D. (1995). The importance of task in evaluating positive marital interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 981–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noller, P., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Marital communication in the eighties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 832–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasch, L. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 219–230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petronio, S. (1991). Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between married couples. Communication Theory, 1, 311–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523–563). New York: Guilford
Reis, H. T., Senchak, M., & Solomon, B. (1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: Further examination of potential explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1204–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). Chichester, England: Wiley
Roberts, L. J. (2000). Fire and ice in marital communication: Hostile and distancing behaviors as predictors of marital distress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 693–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L. J., & Linney, K. (2001). Observing intimacy process behavior: Vulnerability and partner responsiveness in marital interactions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Roberts, L. J. with Linney, K. D., Lord, S. E., & Lindenfelser, K. (1999). Intimate Interaction Coding System (IICS): Manual for Observers, unpublished coding manual
Roberts, L. J., Salem, D., Rappaport, J., Luke, D. A., Toro, P. A., & Seidman, E. (1999). Giving and receiving help: Interpersonal transactions in mutual-help meetings and psychosocial adjustment of members. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 841–869CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
Saitzyk, A. R., Floyd, F. J., & Kroll, A. B. (1997). Sequential analysis of autonomy-interdependence and affiliation-disaffiliation in couples' social support interactions. Personal Relationships, 4, 341–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, P. R., Morgan, H. J., & Wu, S. (1996). Is love a “basic” emotion? Personal Relationships, 3, 81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Sedikides, C. (1993). Gender differences in perceptions of emotionality: The case of close heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 28, 511–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow
Tolstedt, B. E., & Stokes, J. P. (1983). Relation of verbal, affective, and physical intimacy to marital satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 573–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veroff, J., Douvan, E., Orbuch, T. L., & Acitelli, L. K. (1998). Happiness in stable marriages: The early years. In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 152–179). New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Wallerstein, J. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1995). The good marriage: How and why love lasts. New York: Houghton-Mifflin
Weick, K. E. (1985). Systematic observational methods. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology vol. 2 (3rd ed., pp. 567–634). New York: Random House
Weiss, R. L., & Heyman, R. E. (1990). Observation of marital interaction. In F. D. Fincham & T. N. Bradbury (Eds.), The psychology of marriage (pp. 150–171). New York: Guilford
Weiss, R., & Summers, K. J. (1983). Marital interaction coding system III. In E. Filsinger (Ed.), Marriage and family assessment (pp. 35–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×