Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T06:13:26.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The War of the Roses: An Interdependence Analysis of Betrayal and Forgiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2009

By
Caryl E. Rusbult ,
Madoka Kumashiro ,
Eli J. Finkel  and
Tim Wildschut
Edited by
Patricia Noller  and
Judith A. Feeney
Caryl E. Rusbult
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Madoka Kumashiro
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Eli J. Finkel
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Tim Wildschut
Affiliation:
University of Southhampton
Patricia Noller
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Judith A. Feeney
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Barbara and Oliver Rose – I think you should hear their story … I won't start the clock yet. My fee is $450 an hour. When a man who makes $450 an hour wants to tell you something for free, you should listen.

–Gavin D'Amata, The War of the Roses

Gavin D'Amata is a divorce lawyer. With the preceding words to a prospective client, Gavin begins to recount The War of the Roses, a (sometimes hilarious) marital cautionary tale. The unfolding narrative reveals the troubled marriage of Barbara and Oliver Rose: Oliver belittles Barbara's career; Barbara neglects Oliver during a frightening health crisis; each humiliates the other, delivering impossible-to-forget attacks on the other's tastes and habits. During their marital Armageddon, Barbara and Oliver become entangled in a chandelier suspended above a hallway. The mechanism supporting the chandelier gives way, and – embraced in the arms of the chandelier – the two crash to the unyielding terazzo floor 30 feet below. With his dying breath, Oliver reaches out to touch Barbara's shoulder, offering amends and seeking forgiveness. Barbara's hand slowly rises to meet Oliver's … (perhaps, one imagines, to reciprocate Oliver's act) … and with her dying breath, Barbara flings Oliver's hand away from her.

Why is the Rose marriage interesting, from a scientific point of view? The Roses are interesting because their marital woes do not stem from the sorts of faulty communication patterns traditionally emphasized in marital research – patterns involving negative reciprocity, demand-withdraw, or coercive interaction (cf. Gottman, Coan, Carrere, & Swanson, 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Marriage
Developments in the Study of Couple Interaction
 , pp. 251 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1997). Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 251–270). Chichester, England: Wiley
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books
Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness (pp. 79–104). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1995). Personal narratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 173–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A., & Wotman, S. R. (1990). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict: Autobiographical narratives about anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 994–1005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boon, S. D., & Sulsky, L. M. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 19–44Google Scholar
Bui, K. T., Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1996). Testing the Rusbult model of relationship commitment and stability in a 15-year study of heterosexual couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1244–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couch, L. L., Jones, W. H., & Moore, D. S. (1999). Buffering the effects of betrayal: The role of apology, forgiveness, and commitment. In J. M. Adams & W. J. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 451–469). New York: PlenumCrossRef
Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Children's reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 742–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorff, E. N. (1992). Individual and communal forgiveness. In D. H. Frank (Ed.), Autonomy and Judaism (pp. 193–218). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
Drigotas, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1992). Should I stay or should I go?: A dependence model of breakups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 62–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmons, R. A. (2000). Personality and forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thorsen (Eds.), Forgiveness (pp. 156–175). New York: Guilford
Enright, R. D. (1996). Counseling within the forgiveness triad: On forgiving, receiving forgiveness, and self-forgiveness. Counseling and Values, 40, 107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Expressing forgiveness and repentance. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thorsen (Eds.), Forgiveness (pp. 133–155). New York: Guilford
Fagenson, E. A., & Cooper, J. (1987). When push comes to power: A test of power restoration theory's explanation for aggressive conflict escalation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 273–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7, 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashird, M., & Hannon, P. A. (in press). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Freedman, S. R., & Enright, R. D. (1996). Forgiveness as an intervention goal with incest survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 983–992CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzales, M. H., Haugen, J. A., & Manning, D. J. (1994). Victims as “narrative critics”: Factors influencing rejoinders and evaluative responses to offenders' accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 691–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, M. H., Manning, D. J., & Haugen, J. A. (1992). Explaining our sins: Factors influencing offender accounts and anticipated victim responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 958–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, K. C., & Baucom, D. H. (1998). Understanding betrayals in marriage: A synthesized model of forgiveness. Family Process, 37, 425–449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannon, P. (2001). Perpetrator amends and victim forgiveness. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
Hodgins, H. S., Liebeskind, E., & Schwartz, W. (1996). Getting out of hot water: Facework in social predicaments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 300–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. G. (1981). The exchange process in close relationships: Microbehavior and macromotives. In M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 261–284). New York: PlenumCrossRef
Holmes, J. G., & Murray, S. L. (1996). Conflict in close relationships. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 622–645). New York: Guilford
Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (vol. 10, pp. 187–220). London: Sage
Johnson, D. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 967–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1983). The situational origins of human tendencies: A further reason for the formal analysis of structures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 8–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1984). The theoretical description of interdependence by means of transition lists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 956–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Stahelski, A. J. (1970). Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley
Komorita, S. S., Hilty, J. A., & Parks, C. D. (1991). Reciprocity and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 494–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, J. F., & Stephens, L. (1983). Attributions and arousal as mediators of mitigation's effect on retaliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumashiro, M., Finkel, E. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (2001). Commitment, forgiveness, and trust. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
Marty, M. E. (1998). The ethos of Christian forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness (pp. 9–28). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press
Mauger, P. A., Perry, J. E., Freeman, T., Grove, D. C., McBride, A. G., & McKinney, K. E. (1992). The measurement of forgiveness: Preliminary research. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 170–180Google Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W.Jr., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Sandage, S. J., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (1997). To forgive is human. Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity
McCullough, M. E., & Worthington, E. L. Jr. (1995). Promoting forgiveness: A comparison of two brief psychoeducational group interventions with a waiting-list control. Counseling and Values, 40, 55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, R. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millon, T. M. (1998). DSM narcissistic personality disorder. In E. F. Ronningstam (Ed.), Disorders of narcissism: Diagnostic, clinical, and empirical implications (pp. 75–101). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
North, J. (1987). Wrongdoing and forgiveness. Philosophy, 62, 499–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. R. (1983). Conflict. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 360–396). New York: W. H. Freeman
Ridley, M. (1996). The origins of virtue: Human instincts and the evolution of cooperation. New York: Penguin Books
Rosenzweig-Smith, J. (1988). Factors associated with successful reunions of adult adoptees and biological parents. Child Welfare, 67, 411–422Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Davis, J. L., Finkel, E. J., Hannon, P. A., & Olsen, N. (2001). Forgiveness of betrayal in close relationships: Does it rest on transformation of motivation? Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., & Verette, J. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In D. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 115–139). New York: Academic Press
Rusbult, C. E., Finkel, E. J., Kumashiro, M., Davis, J. L., Hannon, P., Clarke, J., & Kirchner, J. (2001). Forgiveness of betrayal in marital relationships. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In J. H. Harvey & A. E. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 564–596). New York: Guilford
Rusbult, C. E., Lange, P. A. M., Wildschut, T., Yovetich, N. A., & Verette, J. (2000). Perceived superiority in close relationships: Why it exists and persists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 521–545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillwell, A. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). The construction of victim and perpetrator memories: Accuracy and distortion in role-based accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1157–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Hill-Barlow, D., Marschall, D. E., & Gramzow, R. (1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 797–809CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley
Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., Arriaga, X. B., Witcher, B. S., & Cox, C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, B., Graham, S., Peter, O., & Zmuidinas, M. (1991). Public confession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59, 281–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieselquist, J., Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, prorelationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×