Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T01:44:33.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Modernity and Postmodernity in a Transatlantic Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Detlef Junker
Affiliation:
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Translated by Tradukas

THE CONCEPT OF POSTMODERNITY

Attempts to define the present epoch have identified the symptoms of a shift from modernity to postmodernity in the most varied phenomena. These range from urban planning and architecture to various stylistic features in literature, theater, film, music, dance, and painting, to MTV, CNN, and the Internet. Computers, microtechnology, cyberspace, and cyborg fantasies are deemed to be just as postmodern as the threat of nuclear and ecological self-destruction, the morbid projections of Generation X, or a hedonistic yuppie lifestyle. Neoliberal economic concepts such as globalization and deregulation have also been called postmodern. So, too, have the revisionist philosophies deriving from the crisis of reason and dialectics from the passing of historical metanarratives and the concept of the autonomous subject. A growing skepticism toward systematic thought and binary oppositions has led to the rejection of concepts and terms of reference such as origin, center, structure, and causality, which are seen as “arbitrary acts of modernity.” But traditional historical periodizations - romanticism, realism, modernism, the avant-garde, and postmodernism itself - have also been called into question on account of their elusive and blurred parameters.

Given the plurality of possible interpretations, it is hardly surprising that the new zeitgeist is often accused of being arbitrary and confused. But the simple fact that it is possible to use modernist categories to explain these phenomena clearly shows that it cannot be postmodernity itself that is responsible for this arbitrariness and lack of clarity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×