Book contents
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes: A Practitioner’s View
- Part II The Use of Economics in International Trade Disputes: Economic Versus Legal Thinking
- 8 What to do if Economic Insights are Disputed: On the Challenge to Deal with Competing and Evolving Theories or Empirics in International Trade Disputes
- 9 Lost in Translation: Communication and Interpretation Challenges Related to Economic Evidence in Trade Disputes
- 10 Land Rich and Cash Poor? The Reluctance of the WTO Dispute Settlement System to Entertain Economics Expertise: An Institutional Analysis
- 11 The Economics of Actionable Subsidy Disputes
- 12 In Search of a “Genuine and Substantial” Cause: The Analysis of Causation in Serious Prejudice Claims
- 13 The Games We Play – Simulation Models in Merger Analysis and Their Potential Use in Trade Litigation
- Part III The Use of Economics in International Investment Disputes: Liability and Damages
- Conclusion
- Appendix to the Conclusion
- Index
- References
13 - The Games We Play – Simulation Models in Merger Analysis and Their Potential Use in Trade Litigation
from Part II - The Use of Economics in International Trade Disputes: Economic Versus Legal Thinking
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
Book contents
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes: A Practitioner’s View
- Part II The Use of Economics in International Trade Disputes: Economic Versus Legal Thinking
- 8 What to do if Economic Insights are Disputed: On the Challenge to Deal with Competing and Evolving Theories or Empirics in International Trade Disputes
- 9 Lost in Translation: Communication and Interpretation Challenges Related to Economic Evidence in Trade Disputes
- 10 Land Rich and Cash Poor? The Reluctance of the WTO Dispute Settlement System to Entertain Economics Expertise: An Institutional Analysis
- 11 The Economics of Actionable Subsidy Disputes
- 12 In Search of a “Genuine and Substantial” Cause: The Analysis of Causation in Serious Prejudice Claims
- 13 The Games We Play – Simulation Models in Merger Analysis and Their Potential Use in Trade Litigation
- Part III The Use of Economics in International Investment Disputes: Liability and Damages
- Conclusion
- Appendix to the Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Australian Competition Tribunal (2014) Application for Authorisation of Acquisition of Macquarie Generation by AGL Energy Limited [2014] ACompT 1.Google Scholar
Australian Federal Court (2003) Australian Gas Light Company (ACN 052 167 405) v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (No. 3) [2003] FCA 1525 (19 December 2003).Google Scholar
Bertrand, Joseph-Louis (1883) ‘Théorie des Richesses: revue de Théories mathématiques de la richesse sociale par Léon Walras et Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses par Augustin Cournot’, Journal des Savants, 67, pp. 499–508.Google Scholar
Budzinski, Oliver and Christiansen, Arndt (2007) ‘The Oracle/PeopleSoft Case: Unilateral Effects, Simulation Models and Econometrics in Contemporary Merger Control’, in Legal Issues of Economic Integration, Vo. 34, No.2, pp. 133–166.Google Scholar
Budzinski, Oliver and Ruhmer, Isabel (2010) ‘Merger Simulation in Competition Policy: A Survey’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol 6(2), pp. 277–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cournot, Augustin (1838) Recherches Sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses, Paris: Editions L, Hachette.Google Scholar
Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (2010) Horizontal Merger Guidelines.Google Scholar
Economides, Nicholas (1984) ‘The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Revisited’, European Economic Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2004) Case No COMP/M.5644 – Kraft Foods / Cadbury Notification of 9/11/2009 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/2004, Paragraphs 66–69.Google Scholar
European Commission (2004) Guidelines on the Assessment of Horizontal Mergers under the Council Regulation on the Control of Concentrations Between Undertakings (2004/C 31/03).Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry and Leonard, Gregory (2005) ‘Using Merger Simulation Models: Testing the Underlying Assumptions’, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, Vol. 23, pp. 693–698.Google Scholar
Hotelling, Harold (1929) ‘Stability in Competition’, Economic Journal, Vol. 39, No. 153, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
Huschelrath, Kai (2008) ‘Competition Policy: An Integrated Approach’, ZEW Economic Studies, No. 41.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul (1986) (ed.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul and Smith, Alastair (1994) (eds), Empirical Studies of Strategic Trade Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research and University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nash, John (1950) ‘Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36(1):48–49.Google Scholar
Nevo, Aviv (2000) ‘Mergers with Differentiated Products: The Case of the Ready-to-eat Cereal Industry’, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, No.3, pp. 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2012) ‘Economic Evidence in Merger Analysis’, OECD Competition Policy Roundtables, Document DAF/COMP(2011)23 pp. 32–34.Google Scholar
Office of the United States Attorney General (1955) Report of the U.S. Attorney-General’s National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws, March 31.Google Scholar
Reath, Howard (2011) Analysis and Review of J. Padilla, ‘The Impact of Plain Packaging of Cigarettes in the UK: A Simulation Exercise’, Colchester: Landman Economics.Google Scholar
Scherer, Frederic, and Ross, David (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (3rd edn.), Houghton Mifflin Company, UK.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl (2010) ‘The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: From Hedgehog to Fox in Forty Years’, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol 77, pp. 702–757.Google Scholar
Train, Kenneth (2002) Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werden, Gregory (2005) ‘Merger Simulation: Potential and Pitfalls’ in van Bergeijk, Peter and Kloosterhuis, Erik (eds), Modelling European Mergers: Theory, Competition Policy and Case Studies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Werden, Gregory and Froeb, Luke (1998) ‘Simulation as an Alternative to Structural Merger Policy in Differentiated Product Industries’ in Coate, Malcolm and Kleit, Andrew (eds), The Economics of the Anti-Trust Process, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Werden, Gregory and Froeb, Luke (2011) ‘Choosing Among Tools for Assessing Unilateral Merger Effects’, Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11–19.Google Scholar
WTO (2004) United States – Subsidies to Upland Cotton, Report of the Panel, WT/DS267/R.Google Scholar
WTO (2011) United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft, Report of the Panel, Document WT/ DS353/ R.Google Scholar
WTO (2012a) United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft, Report of the Appellate Body, Document WT/ DS353/ AB/R.Google Scholar
WTO (2012b) Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Renewable Energy Generation sector and Canada – Measures Relating to the Feed-in tariff Programme, WT/DS412/R, WT/DS426/R.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by