Elsig, Manfred and Pollack, Mark A.. 2014. ‘Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at the World Trade Organization’, European Journal of International Relations, 20:391–415.Google Scholar

Flett, J. 2015. ‘The Client’s Perspective’, in The Use of Economics in Trade Disputes: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead, Jansen, M., Pauwelyn, J. and Carpenter, T. (eds), Berlin: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friederiszick, H. and Röller, Lars-Hendrik. 2010. Quantification of Harm in Damages Actions for Antitrust Infringements – Insights from German Cartel Cases, mimeo, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1588126.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene M., Horn, Henrik, and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2013. ‘Domestic Instruments’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), Legal and Economic Principles of World Trade Law, ALI, The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Law, New York City: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–345.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene M., and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2007. ‘Recurring Misunderstandings of Non-Recurring Subsidies’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Case Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–90.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, P.C.. 2007 ‘US – Lamb’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Case Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–127.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Weiler, Joseph H. H.. 2003. ‘European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case-Law of 2001: The American Law Institute Reports’ Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–40.Google Scholar

Jansen, Marion and Iacovides, Marios. 2015. ‘Economic versus Legal Thinking in International Economic Law: Communication and Interpretation Challenges Related to Economic Evidence’, in Jansen, M., Pauwelyn, J. and Carpenter, T. (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johannesson, Louise, and Mavroidis, Petros C.. 2014. Black Cat, White Cat: The Identity of the WTO Judges. Mimeo.Google Scholar

Keck, A. 2004. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: What Role for Economic Analysis?’, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 4(4): 365–371.Google Scholar

Neven, Damien, and Trachtman, Joel P.. 2013. ‘Philippines-Taxes on Distilled Spirits: Like Products and Market Definition’, World Trade Review, 12: 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordström, Håkan. 2005. ‘The WTO Secretariat in a Changing World’, Journal of World Trade, 39: 819–853.Google Scholar

Parisi, F. 2002. ‘Rent-seeking through Litigation: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems Compared’, International Review of Law and Economics 22(2), 193–216.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J. 2013. ‘The Use, Non-use and Abuse of Economics in WTO and Investment Litigation’, in WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, and Commercial Arbitration, Huerta-Goldman, Jorge A., Romanetti, Antoine and Stirnimann, Franz X. (eds), Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, chapter 6.Google Scholar

Australian Competition Tribunal (2014) Application for Authorisation of Acquisition of Macquarie Generation by AGL Energy Limited [2014] ACompT 1.Google Scholar

Australian Federal Court (2003) Australian Gas Light Company (ACN 052 167 405) v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (No. 3) [2003] FCA 1525 (19 December 2003).Google Scholar

Bertrand, Joseph-Louis (1883) ‘Théorie des Richesses: revue de Théories mathématiques de la richesse sociale par Léon Walras et Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses par Augustin Cournot’, Journal des Savants, 67, pp. 499–508.Google Scholar

Budzinski, Oliver and Christiansen, Arndt (2007) ‘The Oracle/PeopleSoft Case: Unilateral Effects, Simulation Models and Econometrics in Contemporary Merger Control’, in Legal Issues of Economic Integration, Vo. 34, No.2, pp. 133–166.Google Scholar

Budzinski, Oliver and Ruhmer, Isabel (2010) ‘Merger Simulation in Competition Policy: A Survey’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol 6(2), pp. 277–319.Google Scholar

Cournot, Augustin (1838) Recherches Sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses, Paris: Editions L, Hachette.Google Scholar

Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission (2010) Horizontal Merger Guidelines.Google Scholar

Economides, Nicholas (1984) ‘The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Revisited’, European Economic Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Commission (2004) Case No COMP/M.5644 – Kraft Foods / Cadbury Notification of 9/11/2009 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/2004, Paragraphs 66–69.Google Scholar

European Commission (2004) Guidelines on the Assessment of Horizontal Mergers under the Council Regulation on the Control of Concentrations Between Undertakings (2004/C 31/03).Google Scholar

European Commission (2008) Case No COMP/M.4854 – TOMTOM/ TELE ATLAS.Google Scholar

Hausman, Jerry and Leonard, Gregory (2005) ‘Using Merger Simulation Models: Testing the Underlying Assumptions’, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, Vol. 23, pp. 693–698.Google Scholar

Hotelling, Harold (1929) ‘Stability in Competition’, Economic Journal, Vol. 39, No. 153, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar

Huschelrath, Kai (2008) ‘Competition Policy: An Integrated Approach’, ZEW Economic Studies, No. 41.Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul (1986) (ed.), Strategic Trade Policy and the New International Economics, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul and Smith, Alastair (1994) (eds), Empirical Studies of Strategic Trade Policy, National Bureau of Economic Research and University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nash, John (1950) ‘Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36(1):48–49.Google Scholar

Nevo, Aviv (2000) ‘Mergers with Differentiated Products: The Case of the Ready-to-eat Cereal Industry’, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, No.3, pp. 395–421.Google Scholar

OECD (2012) ‘Economic Evidence in Merger Analysis’, OECD Competition Policy Roundtables, Document DAF/COMP(2011)23 pp. 32–34.Google Scholar

Office of the United States Attorney General (1955) Report of the U.S. Attorney-General’s National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws, March 31.Google Scholar

Reath, Howard (2011) Analysis and Review of J. Padilla, ‘The Impact of Plain Packaging of Cigarettes in the UK: A Simulation Exercise’, Colchester: Landman Economics.Google Scholar

Scherer, Frederic, and Ross, David (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (3rd edn.), Houghton Mifflin Company, UK.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Carl (2010) ‘The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: From Hedgehog to Fox in Forty Years’, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol 77, pp. 702–757.Google Scholar

Train, Kenneth (2002) Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Werden, Gregory (2005) ‘Merger Simulation: Potential and Pitfalls’ in van Bergeijk, Peter and Kloosterhuis, Erik (eds), Modelling European Mergers: Theory, Competition Policy and Case Studies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Werden, Gregory and Froeb, Luke (1998) ‘Simulation as an Alternative to Structural Merger Policy in Differentiated Product Industries’ in Coate, Malcolm and Kleit, Andrew (eds), The Economics of the Anti-Trust Process, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Werden, Gregory and Froeb, Luke (2011) ‘Choosing Among Tools for Assessing Unilateral Merger Effects’, Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11–19.Google Scholar

WTO (2004) United States – Subsidies to Upland Cotton, Report of the Panel, WT/DS267/R.Google Scholar

WTO (2011) United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft, Report of the Panel, Document WT/ DS353/ R.Google Scholar

WTO (2012a) United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft, Report of the Appellate Body, Document WT/ DS353/ AB/R.Google Scholar

WTO (2012b) Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Renewable Energy Generation sector and Canada – Measures Relating to the Feed-in tariff Programme, WT/DS412/R, WT/DS426/R.Google Scholar