Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:36:06.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2018

Dean R. Knight
Dean R. Knight
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review , pp. 259 - 276
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, D., ‘Conflicts of Evidence in Judicial Review Proceedings’ [1999] JR 221Google Scholar
Ahmed, F. and Perry, A., ‘Expertise, Deference, and Giving Reasons’ [2012] PL 221Google Scholar
Airo-Farulla, G., ‘Rationality and Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (2000) 24 MULR 543Google Scholar
Alder, J., Constitutional and Administrative Law (6th edn, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007)Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., ‘Fairness, Equality, Rationality: Constitutional Theory and Judicial Review’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Oxford University Press, 1998), 15Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: Conceptual Conundrum or Interpretative Inquiry?’ (2002) 61 CLJ 87Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., ‘Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review’ (2003) 23 OJLS 563Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., ‘Legislative Supremacy and Legislative Intent: A Reply to Professor Craig’ (2004) 24 OJLS 563Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of Due Deference’ (2006) 65 CLJ 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., ‘Deference, Defiance and Doctrine: Defining the Limits of Judicial Review’ (2010) 60 UTLJ 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’ (2011) 127 LQR 96Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and Common Law (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Allars, M., ‘On Deference to Tribunals, With Deference to Dworkin’ (1994) 20 Queen's LJ 163Google Scholar
Allars, M., ‘Chevron in Australia, A Duplicitous Rejection?’ (2002) 54 Ad L Rev 569Google Scholar
Allison, J., ‘Transplantation and Cross Fertilisation in European Public Law’ in Beatson, J. and Tridimas, T. (eds.), New Directions in European Public Law (Hart Publishing, 1998)Google Scholar
Allison, J., The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects (Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S., ‘Judicial Review’ [2010] NZLJ 373 (book review)Google Scholar
Anonymous, ‘Professor SA de Smith’ (1974) 33 CLJ 177Google Scholar
Anthony, G., Judicial Review in Northern Ireland (2nd edn, Hart Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar
Arancibia, J., Judicial Review of Commercial Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Aronson, M., ‘The Resurgence of Jurisdictional Facts’ (2001) 12 PLR 17Google Scholar
Aronson, M., ‘Is the ADJR Act Hampering the Development of Australian Administrative Law?’ (2005) 15 PLR 202Google Scholar
Aronson, M., ‘Jurisdictional Error without the Tears’ in Groves, M. and Lee, H. (eds.), Australian Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 330Google Scholar
Aronson, M., ‘Process, Quality and Variable Standards: Responding to an Agent Provocateur’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009), 5Google Scholar
Aronson, M. and Groves, M., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (5th edn, Thomson Reuters, 2013)Google Scholar
Arthurs, H., ‘Jonah and the Whale: The Appearance, Disappearance and Reappearance of Administrative Law’ (1980) 30 UTLJ 225Google Scholar
Austin, R., ‘Administrative Law's Reaction to the Changing Concepts of Public Service’ in Leyland, P. and Woods, T. (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future (Blackstone, 1997), 30Google Scholar
Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basten, J., ‘The Supervisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court’ (2011) 85 ALJ 273Google Scholar
Basten, J., ‘Jurisdictional Error After Kirk: Has it a Future?’ (2012) 23 PLR 94Google Scholar
Beatson, J., ‘The Scope of Judicial Review for Error of Law’ (1984) 4 OJLS 22Google Scholar
Beatson, J., ‘The Discretionary Nature of Public Law Remedies’ (1991) NZ Recent Law 81Google Scholar
Beck, A., ‘Farewell to the Forum Otiosum?’ [2011] NZLJ 269Google Scholar
Beloff, M.J., ‘The Concept of “Deference in Public Law”’ [2006] JR 213Google Scholar
Bennett, M., ‘Hart and Raz on the Non-Instrumental Moral Value of Law: A Reconsideration’ (2011) 30 Law & Phil 603Google Scholar
Bingham, T., The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches (Oxford University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, T., ‘The Human Rights Act’ [2010] EHRLR 568Google Scholar
Bingham, T., The Rule of Law (Penguin, 2011)Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, P., ‘De Smith's Judicial Review’ (2009) 15 EPL 279 (book review)Google Scholar
Blake, N., ‘Importing Proportionality: Clarification or Confusion’ [2002] EHRLR 19Google Scholar
Boughley, J., ‘Administrative Law: The Next Frontier for Comparative Law’ (2013) 62 ICLQ 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughley, J., ‘The Reasonableness of Proportionality in the Australian Administrative Law Context’ (2015) 43 Fed L Rev 59Google Scholar
Bradley, A. and Ewing, K., Constitutional and Administrative Law (14th edn, Pearson Longman, 2007)Google Scholar
Brady, A.D., Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act: An Institutionally Sensitive Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Burnton, S., ‘Proportionality’ [2011] JR 179Google Scholar
Cameron, B., ‘Legal Change over Fifty Years’ (1987) 3 Canta LR 199Google Scholar
Cane, P., ‘Merits Review and Judicial Review – The AAT as Trojan Horse’ (2000) 28 Fed L Rev 213Google Scholar
Cane, P., ‘The Making of Australian Administrative Law’ (2003) 23 Aust Bar Rev 114Google Scholar
Cane, P., Administrative Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Cane, P., ‘Understanding Judicial Review and its Impact’ in Hertogh, M. and Halliday, S. (eds.), Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 15Google Scholar
Cane, P., Administrative Tribunals and Adjudication (Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar
Cane, P. and McDonald, L., Principles of Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Carnwath, R., ‘Tribunal Justice – A New Start’ [2009] PL 48Google Scholar
Carnwath, R., ‘From Judicial Outrage to Sliding Scales’ (ALBA Annual Lecture, November, 2013)Google Scholar
Cartier, G., ‘Keeping a Check on Discretion’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (Emond Montgomery, 2008), 269Google Scholar
Chan, C., ‘Deference and the Separation of Powers: An Assessment of the Court's Constitutional and Institutional Competences’ (2011) 41 HKLJ 7Google Scholar
Clayton, R., ‘Legitimate Expectations, Policy, and the Principle of Consistency’ (2003) 62 CLJ 93Google Scholar
Clayton, R., ‘Judicial Deference and Democratic Dialogue: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2004] PL 33Google Scholar
Clayton, R., ‘Principles for Judicial Deference’ [2006] JR 109Google Scholar
Clayton, R., ‘New Arrangements for the Administrative Court’ [2008] JR 164Google Scholar
Clyde, L. and Edwards, D., Judicial Review (W. Green, 2000)Google Scholar
Cochrane, T., ‘A General Public Law Duty to Provide Reasons: Why New Zealand Should Follow the Irish Supreme Court’ (2013) 11 NZJPIL 517Google Scholar
Cohen, F.S., ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’ (1935) 35 Colum L Rev 809Google Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, M. and Porat, I., ‘American Balancing and German Proportionality: The Historical Origins’ (2010) 8 ICON 263Google Scholar
Cooke, F., ‘A Personal Word’ (2008) 39 VUWLR 15Google Scholar
Cooke, F., ‘The Future of Public Law in New Zealand’ in Administrative Law (NZ Law Society, 2011), 75Google Scholar
Cooke, R., ‘The Struggle for Simplicity in Administrative Law’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Cooke, R., ‘Fairness’ (1989) 19 NZULR 421Google Scholar
Cooke, R., Turning Points of the Common Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 1997)Google Scholar
Cooke, R., ‘The Discretionary Heart of Administrative Law’ in Hare, I. and Forsyth, C. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays on Public Law in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Clarendon, 1998), 203Google Scholar
Cooke, R., ‘Foreword’ in Joseph, P.A. (ed.), Constitutional and Administrative Law in New Zealand (2nd edn, Brookers, 2001)Google Scholar
Cooke, R., ‘The Road Ahead for the Common Law’ (2004) 53 ICLQ 273Google Scholar
Corder, H., ‘Administrative Justice Across the Commonwealth: A First Scan’ [2006] AJ 1Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘The Common Law, Reasons and Administrative Justice’ [1994] CLJ 282Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations in Community and Domestic Law’ (1996) 55 CLJ 289Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Unreasonableness and Proportionality in UK Law’ in Ellis, E. (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Hart Publishing, 1999), 85Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Public Law, Political Theory and Legal Theory’ [2000] PL 211Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review’ (2001) 117 LQR 589Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Constitutional Foundations, the Rule of Law and Supremacy’ (2003) PL 92Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Administrative Law in the Anglo-American Tradition’ in Peters, B.G. and Pierre, J. (eds.), Handbook of Public Administration (Sage, 2003), 269Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Judicial Review, Appeal and Factual Error’ [2004] PL 788Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘The Common Law, Shared Power and Judicial Review’ (2004) 24 OJLS 237Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Legislative Intent and Legislative Supremacy: A Reply to Professor Allan’ (2004) 24 OJLS 585Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Theory, “Pure Theory” and Values in Public Law’ (2005) PL 440Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Administrative Law’ in Dickson, B. and Drewry, G. (eds.), The Judicial House of Lords 1876–2009 (Oxford University Press, 2009), 524Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Fundamental Principles of Administrative Law’ in Feldman, D. (ed.), English Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Judicial Review and Questions of Law: A Comparative Perspective’ in Rose-Ackerman, S. and Lindseth, P. (eds.), Comparative Administrative Law (Edward Elgar, 2010)Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Proportionality, Rationality and Review’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 265Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘The Nature of Reasonableness Review’ (2013) 66 CLP 131Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., UK, EU and Global Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P.P., ‘Judicial Review and Anxious Scrutiny’ [2015] PL 60Google Scholar
Craig, P.P., Administrative Law (8th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2016)Google Scholar
Craig, P.P. and Rawlings, R. (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Crown Law Office, A Judge Over Your Shoulder: A Guide to Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions (Crown Law Office (NZ), 2005)Google Scholar
Daley, J., ‘Defining Judicial Restraint’ in Campbell, T. and Goldsworthy, J. (eds.), Judicial Power, Democracy and Legal Positivism (Ashgate, 2000), 279Google Scholar
Daly, P., ‘Deference on Questions of Law’ (2011) 74 MLR 649Google Scholar
Daly, P., ‘Wednesbury's Reasoning and Structure’ [2011] PL 238Google Scholar
Daly, P., A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Daly, P., ‘Dunsmuir's Flaws Exposed’ (2012) 58 McGill LJ 1Google Scholar
Daly, P., ‘The Unfortunate Triumph of Form over Substance in Canadian Administrative Law’ (2012) 50 Osgoode Hall LJ 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, P., ‘The Scope and Meaning of Reasonableness Review’ (2015) 52 Alta Law Rev 799Google Scholar
Davis, D.M., ‘To Defer and then When? Administrative Law and Constitutional Democracy’ [2006] AJ 23Google Scholar
De Smith, S., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action: A Study in Case Law’ (London School of Economics and Political Science, 1959)Google Scholar
De Smith, S., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (Stevens & Sons, 1959)Google Scholar
De Smith, S., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (2nd edn, Stevens & Sons, 1968)Google Scholar
De Smith, S., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (3rd edn, Stevens & Sons, 1973)Google Scholar
De Smith, S. and Evans, H.M., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (4th edn, Stevens & Sons, 1980)Google Scholar
De Ville, J., ‘The Rule of Law and Judicial Review’ [2006] AJ 62Google Scholar
Diplock, K., ‘Administrative Law’ (1974) 33 CLJ 233Google Scholar
Dodek, A.M. and Wright, D.A., ‘The McLachlin Court's First Decade – A Dynamic Time for Public Law’ in Dodek, A.M. and Wright, D.A. (eds.), Public Law at the McLachlin Court (Irwin Law, 2011), 1Google Scholar
Douglas, R. and Jones, M., Douglas and Jones’ Administrative Law (6th edn, Federation Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press, 1978)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Law's Empire (Harper Collins, 1998)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 1997), 279Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik's Conception of Legal Culture’ (1998) 14 SAJHR 11Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Form and Substance in the Rule of Law’ in Forsyth, C. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Constituting the Rule of Law: Fundamental Values of Administrative Law’ (2002) 27 Queens LJ 445Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Formalism's Hollow Victory’ [2002] NZ Law Rev 525Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Baker: Unity of Public Law’ in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The Genealogy of Legal Positivism’ (2004) 24 OJLS 39Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘David Mullan's Theory of the Rule of (Common) Law’ in Huscroft, G. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law: Essays in Honour of David Mullan (Toronto University Press, 2006), 448Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The Legitimacy of the Rule of Law’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Murray, H. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009), 33Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘The Very Idea of a Judge’ (2010) 60 UTLJ 61Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Dignity in Administrative Law: Judicial Deference in a Culture of Justification’ (2012) 17 Rev Const Stud 87Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Proportionality and Defence in a Culture of Justification’ in Huscroft, G., Miller, B.W. and Webber, G. (eds.), Proportionality and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 234Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Process and Substance as Aspects of the Public Law Form’ (2015) 74 Camb LJ 284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. and Fox-Decent, E., ‘Rethinking the Process/Substance Distinction’ (2001) 51 UTLJ 193Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Taggart, M., ‘The Principle of Legality in Administrative Law: Internationalisation as Constitutionalisation’ (2001) 1 OUCLJ 5Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. and Taggart, M., ‘Judicial Review, Jurisprudence and the Wizard of Oz’ (1990) 1 PLR 21Google Scholar
Edwards, R.A., ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’ (2002) 65 MLR 859Google Scholar
Elias, S., ‘Administrative Law for Living People’ (2009) 68 CLJ 47Google Scholar
Elias, S., ‘Righting Administrative Law’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009), 55Google Scholar
Elias, S., ‘National Lecture on Administrative Law’ (Australian Institute of Administrative Law Conference, Canberra, 2013)Google Scholar
Elias, S., ‘The Unity of Public Law?’ (Public Law conference, September 2016, Cambridge)Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Standard of Substantive Review’ (2001) 60 CLJ 301Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Wednesbury and Proportionality: Complementary Principles of Substantive Review’ [2002] JR 97Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Unlawful Representations, Legitimate Expectations and Estoppel in Public Law’ [2003] JR 71Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Legitimate Expectation, Consistency and Abuse of Power’ [2005] JR 71Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Legitimate Expectations and the Search for Principle: Reflections on Abdi & Nadarajah’ [2009] JR 281Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Proportionality and Deference: The Importance of a Structured Approach’ in Forsyth, C. and others (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press, 2010), 264Google Scholar
Elliott, M., Beatson, Matthews and Elliott's Administrative Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Has the Common Law Duty to Give Reasons Come of Age Yet?’ [2011] PL 56Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Judicial Review's Scope, Foundations and Purposes’ [2012] NZ Law Rev 75Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review’ (working paper, September 2013)Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘Proportionality and Deference’ (working paper, September 2013)Google Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘From Bifurcation to Calibration’ in Wilberg, H. and Elliott, M., The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review (Hart Publishing, 2015), 61Google Scholar
Elster, J., ‘Deliberation and Constitution Making’ in Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Endicott, T.A., ‘Questions of Law’ (1998) 114 LQR 292Google Scholar
Endicott, T.A., ‘The Impossibility of the Rule of Law’ (1999) 19 OJLS 1Google Scholar
Endicott, T.A., ‘Are There Any Rules?’ (2001) 5 Legal Ethics 199Google Scholar
Endicott, T.A., Vagueness in Law (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Endicott, T.A., Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Feldman, D., ‘Judicial Review: A Way of Controlling Government?’ (1998) 66 Pub Admin 21Google Scholar
Fenwick, H., Phillipson, G. and Masterman, R. (eds.), Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (Emond Montgomery, 2008)Google Scholar
>Flood, C. and Sossin, L. Administrative Law in Context (2nd edn, Emond Montgomery, 2012)Google Scholar
Foley, B., ‘Diceyan Ghosts – Deference, Rights, Policy and Spatial Distinctions’ (2006) 28 DULJ 77Google Scholar
Foley, B., Deference and the Presumption of Constitutionality (Institute of Public Administration, Dublin, 2008)Google Scholar
Fordham, M., ‘Surveying the Grounds’ in Leyland, P. and Woods, T. (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future (Blackstone, 1997)Google Scholar
Fordham, M., ‘Common Law Proportionality’ [2002] JR 110Google Scholar
Fordham, M., ‘Common Law Rights’ [2011] JR 14Google Scholar
Fordham, M., Judicial Review Handbook (6th edn, Hart Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar
Fordham, M. and de la Mare, T., ‘Anxious Scrutiny, the Principle of Legality and the Human Rights Act’ [2001] JR 40Google Scholar
Fordham, M. and de La Mare, T., ‘Identifying the Principles of Proportionality’ in Jowell, J. and Cooper, J. (eds.), Understanding Human Rights Principles (Hart Publishing, 2001), 32Google Scholar
Forsyth, C., ‘Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review’ (1996) 55 CLJ 122; also published in Forsyth, C. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2000), 29Google Scholar
Forsyth, C., ‘The Metaphysics of Nullity’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford University Press, 1998), 141Google Scholar
Forsyth, C., ‘Showing the Fly the Way Out of the Flybottle: The Value of Formalism and Conceptual Reasoning in Administrative Law’ (2007) 66 CLJ 325Google Scholar
Forsyth, C., ‘Legitimate Expectations Revisited’ (2011) 16 JR 429Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. and Elliott, M., ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review’ [2003] PL 286Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. and Whittle, L., ‘Judicial Creativity and Judicial Legitimacy in Administrative Law’ (2002) 8 Canta L Rev 453Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. and others (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Franklin, C.N.K., ‘The Burgeoning Principle of Consistency in EU Law’ (2011) 30 YEL 42Google Scholar
Freckleton, A., ‘The Concept of Deference in Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Australia – Part 1’ (2013) 73 AIAL Forum 52Google Scholar
Freckleton, A., ‘The Concept of Deference in Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Australia – Part 2’ (2013) 73 AIAL Forum 48Google Scholar
French, R., ‘Administrative Law in Australia: Themes and Values Revisited’ in Groves, M. (ed.), Modern Administrative Law in Australia: Concepts and Context (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 24Google Scholar
Fuller, L.L., The Morality of Law (Yale University Press, 1964)Google Scholar
Fuller, L.L., The Anatomy of Law (Greenwood Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Gageler, S., ‘The Underpinnings of Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Common Law or Constitution?’ (2000) 28 Fed L Rev 303Google Scholar
Gageler, S., ‘Impact of Migration Law on the Development of Australian Administrative Law’ (2010) 17 AJ Admin L 92Google Scholar
Galligan, D., ‘Judicial Review and the Textbook Writers’ (1982) 2 OJLS 257Google Scholar
Galligan, D., Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S., The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Gearty, C., Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Geiringer, C., ‘Tavita and All That’ (2004) 21 NZULR 66Google Scholar
Geiringer, C., ‘International Law Through the Lens of Zaoui: Where is New Zealand At?’ (2006) 17 PLR 300Google Scholar
Geiringer, C., ‘The Principle of Legality and the Bill of Rights Act: A Critical Examination of R v. Hansen’ in Geiringer, C. and Knight, D. (eds.), Seeing the World Whole: Essays in Honour of Sir Kenneth Keith (Victoria University Press, 2008), 69Google Scholar
Geiringer, C., ‘Sources of Resistance to Proportionality Review of Administrative Power Under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act’ (2013) 11 NZJPIL 123Google Scholar
Gleeson, M., ‘Judicial Legitimacy’ (2000) 20 Aust Bar Rev 4Google Scholar
Gordon, R., ‘Two Dogmas of Proportionality’ [2011] JR 18Google Scholar
Graham, C., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1997) 3 EPL 149 (book review)Google Scholar
Green, A.J., ‘Can There Be Too Much Context in Administrative Law? Setting the Standard of Review in Canadian Administrative Law’ (2014) 47 UBC Law Rev 443Google Scholar
Griffith, J., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1960) 18 CLJ 228 (book review)Google Scholar
Grimm, D., ‘Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence’ (2007) 57 UTLJ 393Google Scholar
Groves, M., ‘Treaties and Legitimate Expectations – The Rise and Fall of Teoh in Australia’ [2010] JR 323Google Scholar
Groves, M., ‘Should We Follow the Gospel of the ADJR Act?’ (2010) 34 MULR 736Google Scholar
Groves, M., (ed.), Modern Administrative Law in Australia: Concepts and Context (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Groves, M. and Lee, H.P. (eds.), Australian Administrative Law: Fundamentals, Principles and Doctrines (Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms (MIT Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Halliday, S., Judicial Review and Compliance with Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar
Hare, I., ‘The Separation of Powers and Judicial Review for Error of Law’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford University Press, 2008), 113Google Scholar
Harlow, C., ‘Politics and Principles: Some Rival Theories of Administrative Law’ (1981) 44 MLR 114 (book review)Google Scholar
Harlow, C., ‘Changing the Mindset: The Place of Theory in English Administrative Law’ (1994) 14 OJLS 419Google Scholar
Harlow, C., ‘A Special Relationship? American Influences on Judicial Review in England’ in Loveland, I. (ed.), A Special Relationship? American Influences on Public Law in the UK (Oxford University Press, 1995), 79Google Scholar
Harlow, C., ‘Export, Import: The Ebb and Flow of English Public Law’ [2000] PL 240Google Scholar
Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R., Law and Administration (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Harris, B., ‘Judicial Review, Justiciability and the Prerogative of Mercy’ (2003) 62 CLJ 631Google Scholar
Hartogh, M. and Halliday, S., Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact (Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Hayne, K., ‘Deference: An Australian Perspective’ [2011] PL 75Google Scholar
Heckman, G., ‘Substantive Review in Appellate Courts Since Dunsmuir’ (2009) 47 Osgoode Hall LJ 751Google Scholar
Hertogh, M. and Halliday, S. (eds.), Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact (Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Hickman, T., ‘The Reasonableness Principle’ (2004) 63 CLJ 166Google Scholar
Hickman, T., ‘The Reasonableness Principle: Reassessing its Place in the Public Sphere’ (2004) 63 CLJ 166Google Scholar
Hickman, T., ‘In Defence of the Legal Constitution’ (2005) 55 UTLJ 981Google Scholar
Hickman, T., ‘Problems for Proportionality’ (2010) NZ Law Rev 303Google Scholar
Hickman, T., Public Law after the Human Rights Act (Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar
Hogg, P.W., ‘The Supreme Court of Canada and Administrative Law, 1949–1971’ (1973) 11 Osgoode Hall LJ 187Google Scholar
Hood, Phillips O., ‘Book Review: Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1960) 23 MLR 458 (book review)Google Scholar
Hunt, M., Using Human Rights in English Courts (Hart Publishing, 1997)Google Scholar
Hunt, M., ‘Sovereignty's Blight: Why Contemporary Public Law Needs a Concept of Due Deference’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2003), 337Google Scholar
Hunt, M., ‘Against Bifurcation’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Hart Publishing, 2009), 99Google Scholar
Huscroft, G., ‘The Duty of Fairness’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (Emond Montgomery, 2008), 115Google Scholar
Huscroft, G., ‘Judicial Review from CUPE to CUPE’ in Huscroft, G. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law (University of Toronto Press, 2009), 296Google Scholar
Huscroft, G. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law: Essays in Honour of David Mullan (Toronto UP, 2006)Google Scholar
Hutcheson, J.C., ‘The Judgment Intuitive: The Function of the Hunch in Judicial Decision’ (1929) 14 Cornell L Rev 274Google Scholar
Illingworth, G., ‘Fundamental Rights and the Margin of Appreciation’ [2010] NZLJ 424Google Scholar
Jaffe, L.T., ‘Book Review: Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1961) 74 Harv Law Rev 636 (book review)Google Scholar
Jones, D. and de Villars, A., Principles of Administrative Law (5th edn, Carswell, 2009)Google Scholar
Jones, T.H., ‘Judicial Review and Codification’ (2006) 20 LS 517Google Scholar
Jones, T.H. and Williams, J.M., ‘Wales as a Jurisdiction’ [2004] PL 78Google Scholar
Joseph, P.A., ‘The Demise of Ultra Vires: Judicial Review in the New Zealand Courts’ [2001] PL 354Google Scholar
Joseph, P.A., ‘The Demise of Ultra Vires – A Reply to Christopher Forsyth and Linda Whittle’ (2002) 8 Canta LR 463Google Scholar
Joseph, P.A., ‘The Contributions of the Court of Appeal to Commonwealth Administrative Law’ in Bigwood, R. (ed.), The Permanent New Zealand Court of Appeal: Essays on the First 50 Years (Hart Publishing, 2009), 41Google Scholar
Joseph, P.A., ‘The Rule of Law’ in Ekins, R. (ed.), Modern Challenges to the Rule of Law (LexisNexis, 2011), 47Google Scholar
Joseph, P.A., ‘Exploratory Questions in Administrative Law’ (2012) 25 NZULR 75Google Scholar
Joseph, P.A., Constitutional and Administrative Law (4th edn, Brookers, 2014)Google Scholar
Joseph, P.A., ‘False Dichotomies in Administrative Law’ [2016] NZ Law Rev 127Google Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘Proportionality’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), New Directions in Judicial Review (Steven & Sons, 1988), 51Google Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘Is Equality a Constitutional Principle’ (1994) 7 CLP 1Google Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review’ [1999] PL 448Google Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘Beyond the Rule of Law: Towards Constitutional Judicial Review’ [2000] PL 671Google Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘Judicial Deference: Servility, Civility or Institutional Capacity?’ [2003] PL 592Google Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘Judicial Deference and Human Rights’ in Craig, P. and Rawlings, R. (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2003), 67.Google Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘Administrative Law’ in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century (Oxford University Press, 2003), 373Google Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘The Democratic Necessity of Administrative Justice’ [2006] AJ 13Google Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘The Rule of Law and its Underlying Values’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution (6th edn, Oxford University Press, 2007), 5Google Scholar
Jowell, J. and Lester, A., ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’ [1988] PL 368Google Scholar
Jowell, J. and Lester, A., ‘Proportionality: Neither Novel nor Dangerous’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), New Directions in Judicial Review (Steven & Sons, 1988), 51Google Scholar
Kaplow, L., ‘Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’ (1992) 42 Duke LJ 557Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A., ‘The Elusive Divide Between Interpretation and Legislation Under the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2004) 24 OJLS 259Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A., ‘Deference or Defiance? The Limits of the Judicial Role in Constitutional Adjudication’ in Huscroft, G. (ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2008), 184Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A., Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A., ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’ (2010) 126 LQR 222Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A., ‘Judicial Restraint in the Pursuit of Justice’ (2010) UTLJ 23Google Scholar
Keene, D., ‘Principles of Deference Under the Human Rights Act’ in Fenwick, H., Phillipson, G. and Masterman, R. (eds.), Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 206Google Scholar
Kenall, D., ‘De-Regulating the Regulatory Compact: The Legacy of Dunsmuir and the “Jurisdictional” Question Doctrine’ (2011) 24 CJALP 115Google Scholar
King, J.A., ‘The Justiciability of Resource Allocation’ (2007) 70 MLR 197Google Scholar
King, J.A., ‘Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint’ (2008) 28 OJLS 409Google Scholar
King, J.A., ‘Proportionality: A Halfway House’ (2010) NZ Law Rev 327Google Scholar
King, J.A., ‘The Instrumental Value of Legal Accountability’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2013), 124Google Scholar
Kirk, J., ‘The Concept of Jurisdictional Error’ in Williams, N. (ed.), Key Issues in Judicial Review (Federation Press, 2014), 11Google Scholar
Klinck, J.A., ‘Reasonableness Review: Conceptualizing a Single Contextual Standard from Divergent Approaches in Dunsmuir and Khosa’ (2011) 24 CJALP 41Google Scholar
Knight, D.R., ‘A Murky Methodology: Standards of Review in Administrative Law’ (2008) 6 NZJPIL 117Google Scholar
Knight, D.R., ‘Simple, Fair, Discretionary Administrative Law’ (2008) 39 VUWLR 99Google Scholar
Knight, D.R., ‘Mapping the Rainbow of Review’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 393Google Scholar
Kress, K., ‘Coherence and Formalism’ (1993) 16 Harv J L & Pub Pol'y 639Google Scholar
Kumm, M., ‘The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification’ (2010) 4 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 147Google Scholar
Laws, J., ‘De Smith, Woolf and Jowell’ (1996) 1996 JR 49 (book review)Google Scholar
Laws, J., ‘Illegality’ in Supperstone, M. and Goudie, J. (eds.), Judicial Review (2nd edn, Butterworths, 1997), 51Google Scholar
Laws, J., ‘Wednesbury’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford University Press, 1998), 141Google Scholar
Lawson, G. and Kam, S., ‘Making Law Out of Nothing at All’ (2013) 65 Admin LR 1Google Scholar
Le Sueur, A., ‘The Judicial Review Debate: From Partnership to Friction’ (1996) 31 Government and Opposition 8Google Scholar
Le Sueur, A., ‘Legal Duties to Give Reasons’ (1999) 52 CLP 150Google Scholar
Le Sueur, A., ‘The Rise and Ruin of Unreasonableness?’ [2005] JR 32Google Scholar
Le Sueur, A., Herberg, J. and English, R., Principles of Public Law (Cavendish, 1999)Google Scholar
Leigh, I., ‘Taking Rights Proportionately’ (2002) 47 PL 265Google Scholar
Leigh, I., ‘The Standard of Judicial Review after the Human Rights Act’ in Fenwick, H., Phillipson, G. and Masterman, R. (eds.), Judicial Reasoning Under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 174Google Scholar
Lewans, M., ‘Deference and Reasonableness since Dunsmuir’ (2012) 38 Queen's LJ 59Google Scholar
Lewis, C., Judicial Remedies in Public Law (5th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2014)Google Scholar
Leyland, P. and Woods, T. (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future (Blackstone, 1997)Google Scholar
Leyland, P. and Woods, T., Textbook on Administrative Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Lipton, T., ‘Justifying True Questions of Jurisdiction’ (2015) 46 Ottawa Law Rev 275Google Scholar
Liston, M., ‘Governments in Miniature’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (Emond Montgomery, 2008), 105Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., ‘A Study of the Crisis in Administrative Law Theory’ (1978) 28 UTLJ 215Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., ‘The Pathways of Public Law Scholarship’ in Wilson, G.P. (ed.), Frontiers of Legal Scholarship (Wiley, 1995), 163Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., The Idea of Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., Foundations of Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Loveland, I., Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Human Rights (5th edn, Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
MacCormick, N., Rhetoric and The Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Macklin, A., ‘Standard of Review: Back to the Future?’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (2nd edn, Emond Montgomery, 2012), 279Google Scholar
Mason, A., ‘Mike Taggart and Australian Exceptionalism’ in Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Huscroft, G. (eds.), A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Bloomsbury, 2009), 179Google Scholar
Mason, K., ‘What is Wrong with Top-Down Legal Reasoning?’ (2004) 78 ALJ 574Google Scholar
McCrudden, E., ‘Equality and Non-Discrimination’ in Feldman, D. (ed.), English Public Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press, 2009), 499Google Scholar
McDonald, L., ‘Rethinking Unreasonableness Review’ (2014) 25 PLR 117Google Scholar
McGarry, J., ‘Effecting Legal Certainty under the Human Rights Act’ [2011] JR 66Google Scholar
McMillan, J., ‘Judicial Restraint and Activism in Administrative Law’ (2002) 30 Fed L Rev 335Google Scholar
Meazell, E., ‘Deference and Dialogue in Administrative Law’ (2011) 111 Colum L Rev 1722Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ [1975] NZLJ 154Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., Administrative Law (Irwin Law, 2001)Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., ‘Establishing the Standard of Review: the Struggle for Complexity?’ (2004) 17 CJALP 59Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., ‘Deference from Baker to Suresh and Beyond’ in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing, 2004), 21Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., ‘Deference: Is it Useful Outside Canada?’ (2006) AJ 42Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., ‘The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Direct Driver of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Canada?’ in Pearson, L., Harlow, C. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Administrative Law in a Changing State: Essays in Honour of Mark Aronson (Hart Publishing, 2008), 123Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., ‘Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, Standard of Review and Procedural Fairness for Public Servants: Let's Try Again!’ (2008) 21 CJALP 117Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., ‘Judicial Review of the Executive: Principled Exasperation’ (2010) 8 NZJPIL 1Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., ‘Proportionality – A Proportionate Response to an Emerging Crisis in Canadian Judicial Review Law?’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 233Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., ‘Unresolved Issues on the Standard of Review in Canadian Judicial Review of Administrative Action – the Top Fifteen!’ (2013) 42 AQ 1Google Scholar
Mullan, D.J., Taggart, M. and Huscroft, G., Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law: Essays in Honour of David Mullan (University of Toronto Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Mureinik, E., ‘A Bridge to Where?’ (1994) 10 SAJHR 31Google Scholar
Murphy, C., ‘Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law’ (2005) 24 Law & Phil 239Google Scholar
Murray, P., ‘Process, Substance and the History of Error of Law Review’ in Bell, J. and others, Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems (Bloomsbury, 2016), 87Google Scholar
Neill, P., ‘The Duty to Give Reasons’ in Forsyth, C. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Neuberger, L., Thompson, P.K. and Di Mambro, L., Civil Court Practice 2009 (The Green Book) (LexisNexis, 2009)Google Scholar
Oliver, D., ‘Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review?’ [1987] PL 543Google Scholar
Oliver, D., ‘The Judge Over Your Shoulder’ (1989) 42 Parliamentary Affairs 302Google Scholar
Oliver, D., ‘Judge Over Your Shoulder – Mark II’ [1994] PL 514Google Scholar
Orsi, S.D., ‘Legitimate Expectations: An Overview’ [2010] JR 388Google Scholar
Pearson, L., Harlow, C. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Administrative Law in a Changing State: Essays in Honour of Mark Aronson (Hart Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar
Phillipson, G., ‘Deference, Discretion and Democracy in the Human Rights Act Era’ (2007) 60 CLP 40Google Scholar
Picinali, F., ‘Two Meanings of “Reasonableness”: Dispelling the “Floating” Reasonable Doubt’ (2013) 76 MLR 845Google Scholar
Pocock, J., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Justice, Rights and Judicial Humility: ex p Simms’ [2000] JR 106Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism’ (2003) 23 OJLS 454Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Legitimacy, Rights and Judicial Review’ (2005) 25 OJLS 697Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Tilting at Windmills? Truth and Illusion in “The Political Constitution”’ (2007) 70 MLR 250Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea: Administrative Law in an Age of Rights’ in Pearson, L., Harlow, C. and Taggart, M. (eds.), Administrative Law in a Changing State: Essays in Honour of Mark Aronson (Hart Publishing, 2008), 15Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’ (2009) 68 CLJ 142Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Judicial Review at the Margins’ (2010) 60 UTLJ 81Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Proportionality in Perspective’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 369Google Scholar
Posner, E.A., ‘Standards, Rules, and Social Norms’ (1997) 211 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 101Google Scholar
Posner, R.A., ‘Legal Reasoning From the Top Down and From the Bottom Up’ [1992] U Chicago LR 433Google Scholar
Posner, R.A., ‘The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Restraint’ (2012) 100 CLR 519Google Scholar
Rawlings, R., ‘Modelling Judicial Review’ (2008) 61 CLP 95Google Scholar
Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples (Harvard UP, 2001)Google Scholar
Raz, J., ‘The Rule of Law and its Virtue’ (1977) 93 LQR 195Google Scholar
Raz, J., The Authority of Law (Clarendon, 1979)Google Scholar
Rishworth, P. (ed.), The Struggle for Simplicity in the Law: Essays for Lord Cooke of Thorndon (Butterworths, 1997)Google Scholar
Rivers, J., ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’ (2006) 65 CLJ 174Google Scholar
Robson, W.A., ‘Administrative Law in England, 1919–1948’ in Campion, G. (ed.), British Government Since 1918 (Allan and Unwin, 1950), 85Google Scholar
Robson, W.A., ‘Administrative Law’ in Ginsberg, M. (ed.), Law and Opinion in England in the 20th Century (University of California Press, 1959), 193Google Scholar
Rodriguez Ferrere, M., ‘The Unnecessary Confusion in New Zealand's Appellate Jurisdictions’ (2012) 12 OLR 829Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. and Lindseth, P.L., ‘Comparative Administrative Law: Outlining a Field of Study’ (2010) 28 Windsor YB Access Just 435Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. and Lindseth, P.L. (eds.), Comparative Administrative Law (Edward Elgar, 2010)Google Scholar
Sales, P., ‘A Comparison of the Principle of Legality and Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2009) 125 LQR 598Google Scholar
Sales, P. and Clement, J., ‘International Law in Domestic Courts’ [2008] LQR 388Google Scholar
Samuel, G., ‘Can the Common Law be Mapped?’ (2005) 55 UTLJ 271Google Scholar
Saunders, C., ‘Apples, Oranges and Comparative Administrative Law’ [2006] AJ 423Google Scholar
Saunders, C., ‘Constitution, Codes and Administrative Law’ in Forsyth, C. and others (eds.), Effective Judicial Review (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Saunders, C., ‘Constitution as Catalyst: Different Paths within Australasian Administrative Law’ (2012) 10 NZJPIL 143Google Scholar
Schlag, P.J., ‘Rules and Standards’ (1985) 33 UCLA L Rev 379Google Scholar
Schønberg, S., Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Sedley, S.S., ‘The Sound of Silence’ in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century (Oxford University Press, 2003), 373Google Scholar
Smith, M., ‘Embracing Proportionality Review’ [2011] NZLJ 224Google Scholar
Smith, M., The New Zealand Judicial Review Handbook (2nd edn., Thomson Reuters, 2016)Google Scholar
Soper, P., The Ethics of Deference: Learning from Law's Morals (Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Sossin, L. and Flood, C., ‘The Contextual Turn’ (2007) 57 UTLJ 581Google Scholar
Spiegelman, J., ‘The Centrality of Jurisdictional Error’ (2010) 21 PLR 77Google Scholar
Stern, K., ‘Substantive Fairness in UK and Australian Law’ (2007) 29 Aust Bar Rev 266Google Scholar
Steyn, J., ‘Deference: A Tangled Story’ [2005] PL 346Google Scholar
Stratas, D., ‘The Canadian Law of Judicial Review’ (2016) Queen's LR 27Google Scholar
Sumption, J., ‘Judicial and Political Decision-making: The Uncertain Boundary’ [2011] JR 301Google Scholar
Sunkin, M. and Richardson, G., ‘Judicial Review: Questions of Impact’ (1996) PL 79Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘Rival Theories of Invalidity in Administrative Law’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986), 93Google Scholar
Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘Outside Canadian Administrative Law’ (1996) 46 UTLJ 649Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘Introduction to JR in New Zealand’ [1997] JR 236Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘The Contribution of Lord Cooke to Scope of Review Doctrine in Administrative Law: A Comparative Common Law Perspective’ in Rishworth, P. (ed.), The Struggle for Simplicity in the Law: Essays for Lord Cooke of Thorndon (Butterworths, 1997), 189Google Scholar
Taggart, M., The Province of Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 1997)Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘Reinvented Government, Traffic Lights and the Convergence of Public and Private Law’ [1999] PL 124Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘Ultra Vires as a Distraction’ in Forsyth, C. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2000), 427Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘Reinventing Administrative Law’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Hart Publishing, 2003), 311Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘The New Zealandness of New Zealand Public Law’ (2004) 15 PLR 81Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘The Tub of Public Law’ in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘Prolegomenon to an Intellectual History of Administrative Law in the Twentieth Century: the Case of John Willis and Canadian Administrative Law’ (2005) 43 Osgoode Hall LJ 224Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘Administrative Law’ [2006] NZ Law Rev 75Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘“Australian Exceptionalism” in Judicial Review’ (2008) 36 Fed LR 1Google Scholar
Taggart, M., ‘Proportionality, Deference, Wednesbury’ [2008] NZ Law Rev 424Google Scholar
Taylor, G.D.S., ‘May Judicial Review Become a Backwater?’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986), 153Google Scholar
Taylor, G.D.S. Judicial Review: A New Zealand Perspective (3rd edn, LexisNexis, 2014)Google Scholar
Thomas, R., Legitimate Expectations and Proportionality in Administrative Law (Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar
Thwaites, R. and Knight, D.R., ‘Review and Appeal of Regulatory Decisions’ in Frankel, S. (ed.), Learning from the Past, Adapting for the Future (LexisNexis, 2011)Google Scholar
Treasury Solicitor, The Judge Over Your Shoulder (4th edn, Government Legal Service, 2006)Google Scholar
Urbina, F.J., ‘A Critique of Proportionality’ (2012) 57 Am J Juris 49Google Scholar
Varuhas, J.N., ‘Keeping Things in Proportion: The Judiciary, Executive Action and Human Rights’ (2006) 22 NZULR 300Google Scholar
Varuhas, J.N., ‘Powerco v. Commerce Commission: Developing Trends of Proportionality in New Zealand Administrative Law’ (2006) 4 NZJPIL 339Google Scholar
Von Hayek, F., The Road to Serfdom (University of Chicago Press, 1944)Google Scholar
Waddams, S.M., ‘Judicial Discretion’ (2001) 1 OUCLJ 59Google Scholar
Wade, W., ‘The Twilight of Natural Justice?’ (1951) 67 LQR 103Google Scholar
Wade, W., ‘Anglo-American Administrative Law: More Reflections’ (1966) 82 LQR 226Google Scholar
Wade, W., ‘Constitutional and Administrative Aspects of the Anisminic Case’ (1969) 85 LQR 211Google Scholar
Wade, W. and Forsyth, C., Administrative Law (11th edn, Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Why Law? – Efficacy, Freedom or Fidelity?’ (1994) 13 Law & Phil 259Google Scholar
Walker, P., ‘What's Wrong with Irrationality’ [1995] PL 556Google Scholar
Walters, M.D., ‘Jurisdiction, Functionalism, and Constitutionalism in Canadian Administrative Law’ in Forsyth, C. and others (eds.), Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press, 2010), 300Google Scholar
Waluchow, W.J., ‘Legal Rules and Palm Tree Justice’ (1985) 4 Law & Phil 41Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplants (University of Georgia Press, 1974)Google Scholar
Watson, A., Comparative Law (2nd edn, Vandeplas, 2008)Google Scholar
Weaver, R.L. and Jellum, L.D., ‘Neither Fish nor Fowl: Administrative Judges in the Modern Administrative State’ (2010) 28 Windsor YB Access Just 243Google Scholar
Webber, G.C., The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Fights (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Webber, G.C., ‘Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship’ (2010) 23 CJLJ 179Google Scholar
Weber, M., Economy and Society (University of California Press, 1978)Google Scholar
Weinrib, E.J., ‘The Jurisprudence of Legal Formalism’ (1993) 16 Harv J L & Pub Pol'y 584Google Scholar
Wilberg, H., ‘Administrative Law’ [2010] NZ Law Rev 177Google Scholar
Wilberg, H., ‘Substantive Grounds of Review’ (Legal Research Foundation Conference, Auckland, April, 2011)Google Scholar
Wildeman, S., ‘Pas de Deux: Deference and non-Deference in Action’ in Flood, C. and Sossin, L. (eds.), Administrative Law in Context (2nd edn, Emond Montgomery, 2012), 323Google Scholar
Williams, D., ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Action’ (1974) 33 CLJ 324 (book review)Google Scholar
Williams, D., ‘Justiciability and the Control of Discretionary Power’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the 1980s (Oxford University Press, 1986), 103Google Scholar
Williams, R., ‘When is an Error not an Error: Reform of Jurisdictional Review of Error of Law and Fact’ [2007] PL 793Google Scholar
Willis, E., ‘Judicial Review and Deference’ [2011] NZLJ 283Google Scholar
Woolf, H., ‘The Role of the English Judiciary in Developing Public Law’ (1986) 27 Wm & Mary L Rev 669Google Scholar
Woolf, H. and Jowell, J., Judicial Review of Administrative Action (5th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 1995)Google Scholar
Woolf, H., Jowell, J. and Le Sueur, A., De Smith's Judicial Review (6th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)Google Scholar
Woolf, H. and others, De Smith's Judicial Review (7th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, 2013)Google Scholar
Woolley, A., ‘The Metaphysical Court: Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick and the Standard of Review’ (2008) 21 CJALP 259Google Scholar
Young, A.L., ‘Professor SA de Smith’ (1974) 33 CLJ 177 (obituary)Google Scholar
Young, A.L., ‘Professor SA de Smith’ (1974) 37 MLR 241 (obituary)Google Scholar
Young, A.L., ‘In Defence of Due Deference’ (2009) 74 MLR 554Google Scholar
Young, A.L., ‘Deference, Dialogue and the Search for Legitimacy’ (2010) 30 OJLS 815Google Scholar
Young, A.L., ‘Proportionality is Dead, Long Live Proportionality’ in Huscroft, G., Miller, B.W. and Webber, G. (eds.), Proportionality and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 43Google Scholar
Young, A.L., ‘Will You, Won't You, Will You Join in the Deference Dance’ (2014) 34 OJLS 375.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Dean R. Knight, Victoria University of Wellington
  • Book: Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review
  • Online publication: 02 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108100007.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Dean R. Knight, Victoria University of Wellington
  • Book: Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review
  • Online publication: 02 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108100007.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Dean R. Knight, Victoria University of Wellington
  • Book: Vigilance and Restraint in the Common Law of Judicial Review
  • Online publication: 02 April 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108100007.007
Available formats
×