Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T15:24:31.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Using an ecosystem services-based approach to measure the benefits of reducing diversions of freshwater: a case study in the Murray-Darling basin, Australia

from Part III - Assessing water ecosystem services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Neville D. Crossman
Affiliation:
CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences
Rosalind H. Bark
Affiliation:
CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences
Matthew J. Colloff
Affiliation:
CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences
Darla Hatton MacDonald
Affiliation:
CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences
Carmel A. Pollino
Affiliation:
CSIRO Land and Water
Julia Martin-Ortega
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Robert C. Ferrier
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Iain J. Gordon
Affiliation:
The James Hutton Institute, Scotland
Shahbaz Khan
Affiliation:
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France
Get access

Summary

10.1 INTRODUCTION

Ecosystem services-based approaches have been applied to decisions about trade-offs between alternative uses of land (RaudseppHearne et al. 2010; Maes et al. 2012; Bryan & Crossman 2013; Geneletti 2013; Seppelt et al. 2013), but have been used less commonly to assess trade-offs in alternative uses of water (Schluter et al. 2009; Rouquette et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2013). In this chapter we provide an overview of a case study into quantifying the ecosystem services and associated benefits (and their monetary values) of a new water-sharing plan that will return water to the environment in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. This serves as an illustration of how to operationalize an ecosystem services-based approach, as defined in this book. Chapter 2 in this book emphasizes that there is a gap between the conceptualization and endorsement of ecosystem services by both researchers and policy makers and the incorporation of ecosystem services-based approaches into natural resources management practice. The present chapter demonstrates the operationalization of an ecosystem services-based approach in the context of water resource planning and management. We estimate the changes to a range of final ecosystem services (Boyd & Banzhaf 2007; Kumar 2010) that result from the implementation of a discrete policy scenario, and provide economic estimates for the associated benefits. Our work contributes to the still scarce literature on real-world examples of integrating empirical data on the biophysical supply of ecosystem services with their socio-cultural context and monetary valuation to inform investment decisions (Martín-Loópez et al. 2014; see also Mulligan et al., this book).

The Murray-Darling Basin contains iconic and internationally important wetlands and is Australia's major food-producing area. In terms of gross value, about 40% of Australia's agriculture and 50% of irrigated agriculture is produced in the Basin (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2013). However, the dominance of food production has come at the expense of other ecosystem services provided by land and water resources in the Basin, primarily due to the decline in health of river, wetland, and floodplain ecosystems (Kingsford 2000; Kingsford et al. 2011).

Type
Chapter
Information
Water Ecosystem Services
A Global Perspective
, pp. 82 - 89
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, G., Bateman, I., & Mourato, S. (2012). Recent advances in the valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 28, 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013). Gross Value of Irrigated Agricultural Production, 2011–12. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.
Banerjee, O., Bark, R., Connor, J., & Crossman, N. D. (2013). An ecosystem services approach to estimating economic losses associated with drought. Ecological Economics 91, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. (2007). Nonmarket benefits of nature: what should be counted in green GDP? Ecological Economics 61, 716–723.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63, 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K. E., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32, 67–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, B. A. & Crossman, N. D. (2013). Impact of multiple interacting financial incentives on land use change and the supply of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, B. A., Crossman, N. D., King, D., & Meyer, W. S. (2011). Landscape futures analysis: assessing the impacts of environmental targets under alternative spatial policy options and future scenarios. Environmental Modelling & Software 26, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 74, 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia (2007) Water Act 2007: Basin Plan 2012. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
Crossman, N. D. & Bryan, B. A. (2009). Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality. Ecological Economics 68, 654–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CSIRO (2012). Assessment of the ecological and economic benefits of environmental water in the Murray-Darling Basin. In: CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country. National Research Flagship, Canberra.
De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7, 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geneletti, D. (2013). Assessing the impact of alternative land-use zoning policies on future ecosystem services. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 40, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, L. J., Finlayson, C. M., & Falkenmark, M. (2010). Managing water in agriculture for food production and other ecosystem services. Agricultural Water Management 97, 512–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, R. Q., Pittock, J., Davis, R., et al. (2013). Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance. Nature Climate Change 3, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, D. & Sadoff, C. W. (2007). Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy 9, 545–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Raffaelli, D. G. & Frid, C. L. J. (eds), Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hatton MacDonald, D., Morrison, M. D., Rose, J. M., & Boyle, K. J. (2011). Valuing a multistate river: the case of the River Murray. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 55, 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatton MacDonald, D., Bark, R. H., & Coggan, A. (2014). Is ecosystem service research used by decision-makers? A case study of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Landscape Ecology 29, 1447–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeler, B. L., Polasky, S., Brauman, K. A., et al. (2012). Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 18619–18624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsford, R. T. (2000). Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecology 25, 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsford, R. T., Walker, K. F., Lester, R. E., et al. (2011). A Ramsar wetland in crisis: the Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 62, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, P.(2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Earthscan, London and Washington, DC.
Liu, S., Crossman, N. D., Nolan, M., & Ghirmay, H. (2013). Bringing ecosystem services into integrated water resources management. Journal of Environmental Management 129, 92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maes, J., Paracchini, M. L., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M. B., & Alkemade, R. (2012). Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation 155, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltby, E. & Acreman, M. C. (2011). Ecosystem services of wetlands: pathfinder for a new paradigm. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56, 1341–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M., & Montes, C. (2014). Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators 37(Part A), 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, M. & Hatton MacDonald, D. (2010). Economic Valuation of Environmental Benefits in the Murray-Darling Basin. Report Prepared for the Murray–Darling Basin Authority. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.
Murray-Darling Basin Authority (2012a). Regulation Impact Statement: Basin Plan. Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.
Murray-Darling Basin Authority (2012b). The Socio-economic Implications of the Proposed Basin Plan. Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.
National Research Council (2005). Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E., & Bieling, C. (2013). Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33, 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010). Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 5242–5247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolfe, J. & Dyack, B. (2011). Valuing recreation in the Coorong, Australia, with travel cost and contingent behaviour models. Economic Record 87, 282–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouquette, J. R., Posthumus, H., Morris, J., Hess, T. M., Dawson, Q. L., & Gowing, D. J. G. (2011). Synergies and trade-offs in the management of lowland rural floodplains: an ecosystem services approach. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56, 1566–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluter, M., Leslie, H., & Levin, S. (2009). Managing water-use trade-offs in a semi-arid river delta to sustain multiple ecosystem services: a modeling approach. Ecological Research 24, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppelt, R., Lautenbach, S., & Volk, M. (2013). Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5, 458–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, N. C. & Colloff, M. J. (2012). Remote sensing of vegetation responses to flooding of a semi-arid floodplain: implications for monitoring ecological effects of environmental flows. Ecological Indicators 18, 387–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tapsuwan, S., MacDonald, D. H., King, D., & Poudyal, N. (2012). A combined site proximity and recreation index approach to value natural amenities: an example from a natural resource management region of Murray-Darling Basin. Journal of Environmental Management 94, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×