Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:33:27.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2019

David Rueda
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Daniel Stegmueller
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Who Wants What?
Redistribution Preferences in Comparative Perspective
, pp. 259 - 278
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. A. (2005). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Achen, C. H. and Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., and Glasgow, G. (2004). Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results? British Journal of Political Science 34(4), 589610.Google Scholar
Adams, J., Dow, J., and Merrill, S. (2006). The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention: Applications to presidential elections. Political Behavior 28(1), 6586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J., Haupt, A. B., and Stoll, H. (2009). What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 42(5), 611639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: Spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies. British Journal of Political Science 39(4), 825846.Google Scholar
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2, 267299.Google Scholar
Adsera, A. and Boix, C. (2002). Trade, democracy, and the size of the public sector: The political underpinnings of openness. International Organization 56(2), 229262.Google Scholar
Afonso, A. and Rennwald, L. (2018). The changing welfare state agenda of populist radical right parties in Europe. In Manow, P., Palier, B., and Schwander, H. (Eds.), Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, J. H. and Chib, S. (1993). Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(422), 669679.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Angeletos, G.-M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review 95(4), 960980.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., and Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8(2), 155194.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Fuchs-Schündeln, N. (2007). Good-bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people’s preferences. American Economic Review 97(4), 15071528.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2011). Preferences for Redistribution. In Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., and Jackson, M. O. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Economics, pp. 93– 131. San Diego: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., and Sacerdote, B. (2001). Why doesn’t the US have a European-style welfare system? Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E. L. (2004). Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe. A World of Difference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics 89(5–6), 897931.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., and Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In Hanushek, E. A., Machin, S., and Woess-mann, L. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, pp. 1181. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Almond, G. A. and Verba, S. (1965). The Civic Culture. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Alt, J. (1985). Political parties, world demand, and unemployment. American Political Science Review 79, 10161040.Google Scholar
Alt, J. and Iversen, T. (2017). Inequality, labor market segmentation, and preferences for redistribution. American Journal of Political Science 61(1), 2136.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. M. and Nagler, J. (1995). Voter choice in 1992: Economics, issues and anger. American Journal of Political Science 39(3), 714744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. M. and Nagler, J. (1998). Economics, entitlements, and social issues: Voter choice in the 1996 presidential election. American Journal of Political Science 42(4), 1349– 1363.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. M., Nagler, J., and Willette, J. R. (2000). Measuring the relative impact of issues and the economy in democratic elections. Electoral Studies 19(2), 237253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. J. and Beramendi, P. (2008a). Income inequality and democratic representation. In Beramendi, P. and Anderson, C. J. (Eds.), Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. J. and Beramendi, P. (2008b). Income, inequality, and electoral participation. In Beramendi, P. and Anderson, C. J. (Eds.), Democracy, Inequality, and Representation. A Comparative Perspective, pp. 278311. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. J. and Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies 41(4/5), 564599.Google Scholar
Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy 97(6), 14471458.Google Scholar
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal 100(401), 464477.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. (2014). The political economy of ownership: Housing markets and the welfare state. American Political Science Review 108(2), 383402.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. W. (2010). From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, B. W. and Samuels, D. J. (2014). Inequality and Democratization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., and Snyder, J. M. J. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review 102(2), 215232.Google Scholar
Ashok, V., Kuziemko, I., and Washington, E. (2015). Support for redistribution in an age of rising inequality: New stylized facts and some tentative explanations. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2015(1), 367433.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1997). Growth-rate heterogeneity and the covariance structure of life-cycle earnings. Journal of Labor Economics 15(2), 338375.Google Scholar
Baldwin, P. (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnard, J. and Rubin, D. B. (1999). Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation. Biometrika 86(4), 948955.Google Scholar
Barnes, L. (2013). Does median voter income matter? The effects of inequality and turnout on government spending. Political Studies 61(1), 82100.Google Scholar
Barro, R. (1973). The control of politicians: An economic model. Public Choice 14(1), 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2006). What’s the matter with what’s the matter with Kansas? Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(1), 201226.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2009). Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bean, C. and Papadakis, E. (1998). A comparison of mass attitudes towards the welfare state in different institutional regimes, 1985–1990. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10(3), 211236.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76(2), 169217.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. and Chiswick, B. R. (1966). Education and the distribution of earnings. American Economic Review 56(1/2), 358369.Google Scholar
Bell, D. A. (1992). Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ben-Porath, Y. (1967). The production of human capital and the life cycle of earnings. Journal of Political Economy 75(4), 352365.Google Scholar
Benabou, R. and Ok, E. A. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The Poum hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2), 447487.Google Scholar
Benabou, R. and Tirole, J. (2006). Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2), 699746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006). Party Policy in Modern Democracies. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2007). Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies 26, 90107.Google Scholar
Beramendi, P. (2012). The Political Geography of Inequality. Regions and Redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beramendi, P. and Rehm, P. (2016). Who gives, who gains? Progressivity and preferences. Comparative Political Studies 49(4), 529563.Google Scholar
Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., and Fehr, E. (2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature 442(7105), 912915.Google Scholar
Berry, W. D., Fording, R. C., Ringquist, E. J., Hanson, R. L., and Klarner, C. E. (2010). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the US states: A re-appraisal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10(2), 117135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., and Hanson, R. L. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science 42(1), 327348.Google Scholar
Blackwell, M., Honaker, J., and King, G. (2012). Multiple overimputation: A unified approach to measurement error and missing data. Working paper.Google Scholar
Blackwell, M., Honaker, J., and King, G. (2017). A unified approach to measurement error and missing data: overview and applications. Sociological Methods & Research 46(3), 303341.Google Scholar
Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies a comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review 19(5), 415427.Google Scholar
Boes, S. and Winkelmann, R. (2006). Ordered response models. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 90(1), 167181.Google Scholar
Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2005). The politics of the new social policies: Providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states. Policy & Politics 33(3), 431449.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, F. (1999). Crime as a social cost of poverty and inequality: A review focusing on developing countries. Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad 44, 6199.Google Scholar
Boyce, J. K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Economics 11(3), 169178.Google Scholar
Braun, M. and Müller, W. (1997). Measurement of education in comparative research. Comparative Social Research 16, 163201.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. and Brady, D. (1999). Income, economic voting, and long-term political change in the U.S., 1952–1996. Social Forces 77(4), 13391374.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. and Manza, J. (1997). The social and ideological bases of middle-class political realignment in the United States, 1972 to 1992. American Sociological Review 62(2), 191208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownstone, D. and Valletta, R. (2001). The bootstrap and multiple imputations: Harnessing increased computing power for improved statistical tests. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4), 129141.Google Scholar
Brynin, M. (2010). Social class as a moving average. ISER Working Paper 2010–06.Google Scholar
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Tanenbaum, E., Fording, R. C., Hearl, D. J., Kim, H. M., McDonald, M., and Mendez, S. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945– 1998. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burgoon, B., Koster, F., and Van Egmond, M. (2012). Support for redistribution and the paradox of immigration. Journal of European Social Policy 22(3), 288304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, V. and Gish, M. (1999). Welfare reform: Work trigger time limits, exemptions and sanctions under TANF. Congressional Research Service 98-697.Google Scholar
Burns, P. and Gimpel, J. G. (2000). Economic insecurity, prejudicial stereotypes, and public opinion on immigration policy. Political Science Quarterly 115(2), 201225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. S. and Chatterjee, P. (1997). Tests of the specification of univariate and bivariate ordered probit. Review of Economics and Statistics 79(2), 343347.Google Scholar
Cameron, C. A. and Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics. Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. R. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review 72(04), 12431261.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. R. (1984). Social democracy, corporatism, labour quiescence and the representation of economic interest in advanced capitalist society. In Goldthorpe, J. H. (Ed.), Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, pp. 143178. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cavaillé, C. and Trump, K.-S. (2015). The two facets of social policy preferences. Journal of Politics 77(1), 146160.Google Scholar
CBS (2002). Demografische kerncijfers per gemeente, 2002. Voorburg: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
CBS (2004). Demografische kerncijfers per gemeente, 2004. Voorburg: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
CBS (2006). Demografische kerncijfers per gemeente, 2006. Voorburg: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
CBS (2008). Demografische kerncijfers per gemeente, 2008. Voorburg: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. G. and Palda, K. S. (1983). Electoral turnout in rational voting and consumption perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research 9(4), 337346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G. and Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 817869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesher, A. (1991). The effect of measurement error. Biometrika 78(3), 451462.Google Scholar
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., and Saez, E. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(4), 15531623.Google Scholar
Cho, W. K. T., Gimpel, J. G., and Dyck, J. J. (2006). Residential concentration, political socialization, and voter turnout. Journal of Politics 68(1), 156167.Google Scholar
Citrin, J. and Green, D. P. (1990). The self-interest motive in American public opinion. Research in Micropolitics 3(1), 128.Google Scholar
Citrin, J., Green, D. P., Muste, C., and Wong, C. (1997). Public opinion toward immigration reform: The role of economic motivations. Journal of Politics 59(3), 858881.Google Scholar
Corneo, G. and Grüner, H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 83(1), 83107.Google Scholar
Covington, J. and Taylor, R. B. (1991). Fear of crime in urban residential neighborhoods: Implications of between- and within-neighborhood sources for current models. Sociological Quarterly 32(2), 231249.Google Scholar
Cowell, F. A. (2000). Measurement of inequality. In Atkinson, A. B. and Bourguignon, F. (Eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, Volume 1, pp. 87166. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W. and McCubbins, M. D. (1986). Electoral politics as a redistributive game. Journal of Politics 48, 370389.Google Scholar
Cramer, K. J. (2016). The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, T., Iversen, T., and Rehm, P. (2006). Risks at work: The demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(3), 365389.Google Scholar
Cusack, T. R. and Beramendi, P. (2006). Taxing work. European Journal of Political Research 45(1), 4373.Google Scholar
Cutright, P. (1965). Political structure, economic development, and national social security programs. American Journal of Sociology 70, 537550.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2002). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Western Democracies. London: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Davies, J. B., Sandström, S., Shorrocks, A., and Wolff, E. N. (2011). The level and distribution of global household wealth. The Economic Journal 121(551), 223254.Google Scholar
Davis, J. A. and Smith, T. W. (1994). General social surveys, 1972–1994. Machine-readable data file. Chicago: Nat. Opinion Res. Center; distributed by Roper Center Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
Davis, M. L. (1988). Time and punishment: An intertemporal model of crime. Journal of Political Economy 96(2), 383390.Google Scholar
Dawson, M. C. (1995). Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
De Koster, W., Achterberg, P., and Van der Waal, J. (2013). The new right and the welfare state: The electoral relevance of welfare chauvinism and welfare populism in the Netherlands. International Political Science Review 34(1), 320.Google Scholar
De La O, A. L. and Rodden, J. A. (2008). Does religion distract the poor? Income and issue voting around the world. Comparative Political Studies 41(4-5), 437476.Google Scholar
De Lange, S. L. (2007). A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics 13(4), 411435.Google Scholar
DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2), 315372.Google Scholar
Deltas, G. (2003). The small-sample bias of the Gini coefficient: Results and implications for empirical research. Review of Economics and Statistics 85(1), 226234.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services (2003). Comparison of prior law and the personal responsibility and work opportunity reconciliation act. In Mink, G. and Solinger, R. (Eds.), Welfare: A Documentary History of U.S. Policy and Politics, pp. 663679. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dimick, M., Rueda, D., and Stegmueller, D. (2016). The altruistic rich? Inequality and other-regarding preferences for redistribution. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11(4), 385439.Google Scholar
Dimick, M., Rueda, D., and Stegmueller, D. (2018). Models of other-regarding preferences, inequality, and redistribution. Annual Review of Political Science 21(1), 441460.Google Scholar
Dion, M. (2010). When is it rational to redistribute? A cross-national examination of attitudes toward redistribution. In Delivery at the 2010 Summer Meeting of the Society of Political Methodology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, pp. 2224.Google Scholar
Dion, M. L. and Birchfield, V. (2010). Economic development, income inequality, and preferences for redistribution. International Studies Quarterly 54(2), 315334.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. and Londregan, J. (1996). The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. Journal of Politics 58, 11321155.Google Scholar
Donohue, J. and Siegleman, P. (1998). Allocating resources among prisons and social programs in the battle against crime. Journal of Legal Studies 27(1), 143.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Drazen, A. (2000). Political Economy in Macroeconomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
DuBow, F., McCabe, E., and Kaplan, G. (1980). Reactions to Crime: A Critical Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Duch, R. and Stevenson, R. (2008). The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, M. (2003). Education in Europe. Key statistics 2000/01. Technical report, Eurostat, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Dynan, K. E., Skinner, J., and Zeldes, S. P. (2004). Do the rich save more? Journal of Political Economy 112(2), 397444.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4), 12031250.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, I. (1973). Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy 81(3), 521565.Google Scholar
Ellwood, J. W. and Guetzkow, J. (2009). Footing the bill: Causes and budgetary consequences of state spending on corrections. In Steven Raphael, M. A. S. (Ed.), Do Prisons Make Us Safer? The Benefits and Costs of the Prison Boom. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Engels, F. (1993). The Condition of the Working Class in England. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford, UK: Claredon Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eulau, H. (1986). Politics, Self, and Society: A Theme and Variations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eurostat, (2007). Regions in the European Union. Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics. NUTS 2006. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1999). The End of Class Politics?: Class Voting in Comparative Context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. and de Graaf, N. D. (Eds.) (2013). Political Choice Matters: Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross-National Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Facchini, G. and Mayda, A. M. (2012). Individual attitudes towards skilled migration: An empirical analysis across countries. The World Economy 35(2), 183196.Google Scholar
Fair, R. C. (1978). The effect of economic events on votes for president. The Review of Economics and Statistics 60(2), 159173.Google Scholar
Fajnzlber, P., Lederman, D., and Loayza, N. (2002). Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics 45, 140.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3), 159181.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (2006a). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism–experimental evidence and new theories. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity 1, 615691.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (2006b). The economics of fairness, reciprocity, and altruism: Experimental evidence and new theories. In Kolm, S.-C. and Ythier, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity, and Altruism. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice 50(1–3), 525.Google Scholar
Finseraas, H. (2008a). Immigration and preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis of European survey data. Comparative European Politics 6(4), 407431.Google Scholar
Finseraas, H. (2008b). Immigration and preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis of European survey data. Comparative European Politics 6(4), 407431.Google Scholar
Finseraas, H. (2009). Income inequality and demand for redistribution: A multilevel analysis of European public opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies 32(1), 94119.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, T. (2004). What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. A. and Sekhon, J. S. (2010). Endogeneity in probit response models. Political Analysis 18(2), 138150.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. P. (2009). Immigration, diversity, and welfare chauvinism. The Forum 7(3), 116.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. (1983). Crime and the labor market. In Wilson, J. and Petersilia, J. (Eds.), Crime and Public Policy. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. B. and Schettkat, R. (2000). The role of wage and skill differences in US–German employment differences. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1957). A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1982). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. (1998). Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, A. (2006). Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis 1(3), 515534.Google Scholar
Gelman, A. and Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multi-level/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, A., Park, D. K., Shor, B., Bafumi, J., and Cortina, J. (2008). Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, A. and Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician 60(4), 328331.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. (2005). Inequality and democratic responsiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5), 778796.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. (2009). Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. and Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12(3), 564581.Google Scholar
Gill, J. (2008). Is partial-dimension convergence a problem for inferences from MCMC algorithms? Political Analysis 16(2), 153178.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, P. (1997). Inequality, income growth, and mobility: The basic facts. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(2), 2140.Google Scholar
Gouveia, M. and Masia, N. A. (1998). Does the median voter model explain the size of government? Evidence from the states. Public Choice 97(1-2), 159177.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., Ha, S. E., and Bullock, J. G. (2010). Enough already about “black box” experiments: Studying mediation is more difficult than most scholars suppose. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 628(1), 200208.Google Scholar
Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., and Schickler, E. (2004). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. (2010). Introduction. In Greenberg, D. (Ed.), Crime and Capitalism: Readings in Marxist Criminology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, W. (2004). The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. Econometrics Journal 7, 98119.Google Scholar
Greene, W. and Hensher, D. (2010). Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. (2002). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gronke, P. (1992). Overreporting the vote in the 1988 senate election study: A response to Wright. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(1), 113129.Google Scholar
Habyarimana, J., Humphreys, M., Posner, D. N., and Weinstein, J. M. (2007, 11). Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision? American Political Science Review Null, 709–725.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. and Pierson, P. (2011). Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Haider, S. and Solon, G. (2006). Life-cycle variation in the association between current and lifetime earnings. American Economic Review 96(4), 13081320.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J. and Hiscox, M. J. (2007). Educated preferences: Explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization 61(2), 399442.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J. and Hiscox, M. J. (2010). Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review 104(1), 6184.Google Scholar
Haisken-DeNew, J. P. and Frick, J. R. (2005). Desktop companion to the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (GSOEP). www.diw.de/deutsch/sop/service/dtc/dtc.pdf.Google Scholar
Hale, C. (1996). Fear of crime: A review of the literature. International Review of Victimology 4(2), 79150.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanmer, M. J. and Kalkan, K. O. (2013). Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from limited dependent variable models. American Journal of Political Science 57(1), 263277.Google Scholar
Hanson, G. H., Scheve, K., and Slaughter, M. J. (2007). Public finance and individual preferences over globalization strategies. Economics & Politics 19(1), 133.Google Scholar
Hausman, J. A. and Wise, D. A. (1979). Attrition bias in experimental and panel data: The Gary income maintenance experiment. Econometrica 47(2), 455473.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (1981a). Heterogeneity and state dependence. In Rosen, S. (Ed.), Studies in Labor Markets, pp. 91140. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (1981b). The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process. In Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D. (Eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, pp. 179195. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J., Lochner, L. J., and Todd, P. E. (2006). Earnings functions, rates of return and treatment effects: The Mincer equation and beyond. In Hanushek, E. A. and Welch, F. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, Volume 1, pp. 307458. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hersh, E. D. and Nall, C. (2016). The primacy of race in the geography of income-based voting: New evidence from public voting records. American Journal of Political Science 60(2), 289303.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71(4), 14671487.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D. J. (2010). Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review 104(1), 4060.Google Scholar
Hout, M. (2004). Getting the most out of the GSS income measures. GSS Methodological Report 101.Google Scholar
Huber, J. D. (2017). Exclusion by Elections. Inequality, Ethnic Identity, and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, J. D. and Stanig, P. (2008). Voting polarization on redistribution across democracies. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Huber, J. D. and Stanig, P. (2011). Church-state separation and redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 95(7-8), 828836.Google Scholar
Iceland, J. (2004). Beyond black and white: Metropolitan residential segregation in multi-ethnic America. Social Science Research 33(2), 248271.Google Scholar
Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., and Yamamoto, T. (2011). Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review 105(4), 765789.Google Scholar
Imai, K., Keele, L., and Yamamoto, T. (2010). Identification, inference and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statistical Science 25(1), 5171.Google Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E. (2005). The vulnerable populist right parties: No economic realignment fuelling their electoral success. European Journal of Political Research 44(3), 465492.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. (2005). Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Cusack, T. R. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics 52(3), 313349.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Rosenbluth, F. M. (2010). Women, Work, and Politics: The Political Economy of Gender Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review 95(4), 875893.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2009). Distribution and redistribution: The shadow of the nineteenth century. World Politics 61(3), 438.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2010). Real exchange rates and competitiveness: The political economy of skill formation, wage compression, and electoral systems. American Political Science Review 104(03), 601623.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Stephens, J. D. (2008). Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies 41(4–5), 600637.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. and Jenkins, S. P. (1995). Do the poor stay poor? New evidence about income dynamics from the British Household Panel Survey. Occasional Paper No. 95–2. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S. P. (2010). The British Household Panel Survey and its income data. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5242.Google Scholar
Jurado, E., Brochmann, G., and Dølvik, J. E. (2013). Introduction. Immigration, work and welfare: Towards an integrated approach. In Jurado, E. and Brochmann, G. (Eds.), Europe’s Immigration Challenge: Reconciling Work, Welfare and Mobility. New York: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
Karagiannis, E. and Kovacevic, M. (2000). A method to calculate the jackknife variance estimator for the Gini coefficient. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 62(1), 119122.Google Scholar
Katz, L., Levitt, S. D., and Shustorovich, E. (2003). Prison conditions, capital punishment, and deterrenc. American Law and Economics Review 5(2), 318343.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kedar, O. and Shively, W. P. (2005). Introduction to the special issue. Political Analysis 13(4), 297300.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, L. and Pontusson, J. (2005). Rising inequality and the politics of redistribution in affluent countries. Perspectives on Politics 3(3), 449471.Google Scholar
Kerckhoff, A. C. and Dylan, M. (1999). Problems with international measures of education. Journal of Socio-Economics 28(6), 759775.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. (1966). The Responsible Electorate. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Kinder, D. R. and Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(3), 414.Google Scholar
King, D. S. and Smith, R. M. (2011). Still a House Divided: Race and Politics in Obama’s America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, G., Honaker, J., Anne, J., and Kenneth, S. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review 95(1), 4969.Google Scholar
King, G., Keohane, R. O., and Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and McGann, A. J. (1995). The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and Rehm, P. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies 47(12), 16701706.Google Scholar
Kopczuk, W., Saez, E., and Song, J. (2010). Earnings inequality and mobility in the United States: Evidence from social security data since 1937. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(1), 91128.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983). The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003). New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review 97(3), 425446.Google Scholar
Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964. American Political Science Review 65(3), 131143.Google Scholar
Kumlin, S. and Svallfors, S. (2007). Social stratification and political articulation: Why attitudinal class differences vary across countries. In Mau, S. and Veghte, B. (Eds.), Social Justice, Legitimacy and the Welfare State, pp. 19– 46. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2015). Solidarity in diverse societies: Beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism. Comparative Migration Studies 3(1), 17.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1950). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: P. Smith.Google Scholar
Lawrance, E. C. (1991). Poverty and the rate of time preference: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Political Economy 99, 5477.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. Z. (1984). Is deindustrialization a myth? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 475, 3951.Google Scholar
Lee, D. S. and McCrary, J. (2005). Crime, punishment, and myopia. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Lee, D. S., Moretti, E., and Butler, M. J. (2002). Are politicians accountable to voters?: Evidence from US House roll call voting records. Center for Labor Economics, University of California.Google Scholar
Leighley, J. E. (1995). Attitudes, opportunities and incentives: A field essay on political participation. Political Research Quarterly 48(1), 181209.Google Scholar
Lerman, R. I. and Yitzhaki, S. (1989). Improving the accuracy of estimates of Gini coefficients. Journal of Econometrics 42(1), 4347.Google Scholar
Levitt, S. D. and List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(2), 153174.Google Scholar
Levy, F. and Murnane, R. J. (1992). US earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature 30(3), 13331381.Google Scholar
Levy, H. and Jenkins, S. P. (2008). Documentation for derived current and annual net household income variables, BHPS waves 1–16. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2009). The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. H. (1996). What limits social spending? Explorations in Economic History 33, 134.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. H. (2004). Growing Public: Volume 1, The Story: Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1983). Political Man. The Social Bases of Politics. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments. Cross-National Perspectives, pp. 164. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Little, R. J. A. and Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Logan, J. R., Xu, Z., and Stults, B. (2014). Interpolating US decennial census tract data from as early as 1970 to 2010: A longitudinal tract database. The Professional Geographer 66(3), 412420.Google Scholar
Lowe, W., Benoit, K., Mikhaylov, S., and Laver, M. (2011). Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1), 123– 155.Google Scholar
, X., Scheve, K. F., and Slaughter, M. J. (2010). Envy, altruism, and the international distribution of trade protection. Working Paper 15700, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Lupu, N. and Pontusson, J. (2011). The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution. American Political Science Review 105(2), 316336.Google Scholar
Luttmer, E. F. (1999). Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution. Working paper No. 61. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Luttmer, E. F. (2001). Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy 109(3), 500528.Google Scholar
Lynn, P. (2006). Quality profile: British Household Panel Survey version 2.0: Waves 1 to 13: 1991–2003. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Mahler, V. A. and Jesuit, D. K. (2006). Fiscal redistribution in the developed countries: New insights from the Luxembourg income study. Socio-Economic Review 4(3), 483511.Google Scholar
Mair, P. and Mudde, C. (1998). The party family and its study. Annual Review of Political Science 1(1), 211229.Google Scholar
Malhotra, N., Margalit, Y., and Mo, C. H. (2013). Economic explanations for opposition to immigration: Distinguishing between prevalence and conditional impact. American Journal of Political Science 57(2), 391410.Google Scholar
Manza, J. and Brooks, C. (1999). Social Cleavages and Political Change: Voter Alignments and U.S. Party Coalitions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, I. (2003). The Politics of Social Risk. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Margalit, Y. (2013). Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the great recession. American Political Science Review 107(1), 80103.Google Scholar
Mayda, A. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88(3), 510530.Google Scholar
McCarty, N. and Pontusson, J. (2009). The political economy of inequality and redistribution. In Salverda, W., Nolan, B., and Smeeding, T. M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, pp. 665692. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., and Rosenthal, H. (2008). Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McKelvey, R. D. and Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 4, 103120.Google Scholar
Mehlum, H., Moene, K., and Torvik, R. (2005). Crime induced poverty traps. Journal of Development Economics 77(2), 325340.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A. H. and Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89(5), 914927.Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2000). The median-voter hypothesis, income inequality, and income redistribution: An empirical test with the required data. European Journal of Political Economy 16(3), 367410.Google Scholar
Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy 66(4), 281302.Google Scholar
Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Moene, K. O. and Wallerstein, M. (2001). Inequality, social insurance and redistribution. American Political Science Review 95(4), 859874.Google Scholar
Moene, K. O. and Wallerstein, M. (2003). Earnings inequality and welfare spending: A disaggregated analysis. World Politics 55(4), 485516.Google Scholar
Moulton, B. R. (1990). An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. The Review of Economics and Statistics 72(2), 334338.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muthén, B. and Asparouhov, T. (2015). Causal effects in mediation modeling: An introduction with applications to latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 22(1), 1223.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. (1999). Redistribution and the income of the median voter. Public Choice 98(1/2), 187194.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Phelps, E. S. (1966). Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. The American Economic Review 56(2), 6975.Google Scholar
Openshaw, S. (1983). The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Norwick, UK: Geo Books.Google Scholar
O’Rand, A. and Ellis, R. A. (1974). Social class and social time perspective. Social Forces 53(1), 5362.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, K. H. and Sinnott, R. (2006). The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration. European Journal of Political Economy 22(4), 838861.Google Scholar
Ortega, F. and Polavieja, J. G. (2012). Labor-market exposure as a determinant of attitudes toward immigration. Labour Economics 19(3), 298311.Google Scholar
Pacheco, J. (2011). Using national surveys to measure state public opinion over time: A guideline for scholars and applications. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11(4), 415439.Google Scholar
Page, B. I. and Jacobs, L. (2009). Class War? What Americans Really Think about Economic Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Paulus, A., Čok, M., Figari, F., Hegedüs, P., Kump, N., Lelkes, O., Levy, H., Lietz, C., Lüpsik, S., Mantovani, D., et al. (2009). The effects of taxes and benefits on income distribution in the enlarged EU. Technical report, EUROMOD Working Paper EM8/09.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and indirect effects. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
Pepper, J. V. (2002). Robust inferences from random clustered samples: An application using data from the panel study of income dynamics. Economics Letters 75(3), 341345.Google Scholar
Pergament, K. (1997). The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: What the data say. Journal of Economic Growth 1(2), 149187.Google Scholar
Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics. Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3), 551584.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. and Saez, E. (2003). Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1), 141.Google Scholar
Pontusson, J. and Rueda, D. (2010). The politics of inequality: Voter mobilization and left parties in advanced industrial states. Comparative Political Studies 43(6), 675705.Google Scholar
Pontusson, J., Rueda, D., and Way, C. R. (2002). Comparative political economy of wage distribution: The role of partisanship and labour market institutions. British Journal of Political Science 32(2), 281308.Google Scholar
Powell, G. B. (1982). Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. and Wallerstein, M. (1988). Structural dependence of the state on capital. American Political Science Review 82(1), 1129.Google Scholar
Psacharopoulos, G. and Patrinos, H. A. (2004). Returns to investment in education: A further update. Education Economics 12(2), 111134.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. M. (2004). Bayesian factor analysis for mixed ordinal and continuous responses. Political Analysis 12, 338353.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. M. and Martin, A. D. (2002). An integrated computational model of multiparty electoral competition. Statistical Science 17(4), 405419.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, G., Gurian, P.-H., and Macdonald, S. E. (1984). The structure of presidential elections and the process of realignment, 1944 to 1980. American Journal of Political Science 27, 611635.Google Scholar
Rainey, C. and Jackson, R. A. (2013). Modeling misreports in self-reported vote choice data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Rector, R. E. and Youssef, S. E. (1999). The determinants of welfare caseload decline. Heritage Foundation CDA99–04.Google Scholar
Rehm, P. (2005). Citizen support for the welfare state. WZB discussion paper 2005-02.Google Scholar
Rehm, P. (2009). Risks and redistribution: An individual-level analysis. Comparative Political Studies 42(7), 855881.Google Scholar
Rehm, P. (2011). Risk inequality and the polarized American electorate. British Journal of Political Science 41(2), 363387.Google Scholar
Rehm, P. (2016). Risk Inequality and Welfare States: Social Policy Preferences, Development, and Dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robins, J. M. (2003). Semantics of causal DAG models and the identification of direct and indirect effects. In Green, P., Hjort, N., and Richardson, S. (Eds.), Highly Structured Stochastic Systems, pp. 7081. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodden, J. (2010). The geographic distribution of political preferences. Annual Review of Political Science 13(1), 321340.Google Scholar
Rodrigiuez, F. C. (1999). Does distributional skewness lead to redistribution? Evidence from the United States. Economics & Politics 11, 171199.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106(5), 9971032.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98(5), S71–S102.Google Scholar
Romer, T. (1975). Individual welfare, majority voting and the properties of a linear income tax. Journal of Public Economics 7, 163188.Google Scholar
Rothstein, B. (1998). Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rovny, J. (2013). Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition. European Political Science Review 5(1), 126.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(434), 473489.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. B. (1986). Statistical matching using file concatenation with adjusted weights and multiple imputations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 4(1), 8794.Google Scholar
Rueda, D. (2005). Insider–outsider politics in industrialized democracies: The challenge to Social Democratic parties. American Political Science Review 99(1), 6174.Google Scholar
Rueda, D. (2006). Social democracy and active labour-market policies: Insiders, outsiders and the politics of employment promotion. British Journal of Political Science 36(3), 385406.Google Scholar
Rueda, D. (2007). Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Industrialized Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rueda, D. (2018). Food comes first, then morals: Redistribution preferences, parochial altruism, and immigration in Western Europe. The Journal of Politics 80(1), 225239.Google Scholar
Rueda, D. and Pontusson, J. (2000). Wage inequality and varieties of capitalism. World Politics 52(03), 350383.Google Scholar
Rueda, D. and Stegmueller, D. (2016). The externalities of inequality: Fear of crime and preferences for redistribution in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science 60(2), 472489.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in 20th Century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rushton, P. J., Chrisjohn, R. D., and Cynthia Fekken, G. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences 2(4), 293302.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schenker, N. and Taylor, J. M. (1996). Partially parametric techniques for multiple imputation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 22(4), 425446.Google Scholar
Scheve, K. and Stasavage, D. (2006). Religion and preferences for social insurance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(3), 255286.Google Scholar
Scheve, K. F. and Slaughter, M. J. (2001). Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. Review of Economics and Statistics 83(1), 133145.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K. L. (1984). What accent the heavenly chorus? Political equality and the American pressure system. The Journal of Politics 46(4), 10061032.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., and Brady, H. E. (2012). The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. L. and Kogan, I. (2008). The international standard classification of education 1997: Challenges in the application to national data and the implementation in cross-national surveys. The International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-97). An Evaluation of Content and Criterion Validity for 15 European Countries. Mannheim: MZES.Google Scholar
Selb, P. and Munzert, S. (2013). Voter overrepresentation, vote misreporting, and turnout bias in postelection surveys. Electoral Studies 32(1), 186196.Google Scholar
Shalev, M. (1983). The social democratic model and beyond: Two generations of comparative research on the welfare state. Comparative Social Research 3(6), 315551.Google Scholar
Shayo, M. (2009). A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution. American Political Science Review 103(2), 147174.Google Scholar
Sinn, H.-W. (1995). A theory of the welfare state. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97(4), 495526.Google Scholar
Skrondal, A. and Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Sniderman, P. M. and Tetlock, P. E. (1986). Reflections on American racism. Journal of Social Issues 42(2), 173187.Google Scholar
Sobel, M. E. (2008). Identification of causal parameters in randomized studies with mediating variables. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 33(2), 230251.Google Scholar
Solt, F. (2016). The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly 97(5), 12671281.Google Scholar
Soss, J., Schram, S. F., Vartanian, T. P., and O’Brien, E. (2001). Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution. American Journal of Political Science 45(2), 378395.Google Scholar
Spence, A. M. (1974). Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stabe, M. and Maier-Borst, H. (2017). German election: AfD’s advance in six charts. How the populist party could upend the country’s politics on Sunday. Financial Times, September 20 2017, http://tinyurl.com/yaknalbg.Google Scholar
Stegmueller, D. (2013a). Modeling dynamic preferences: A Bayesian robust dynamic latent ordered probit model. Political Analysis 21(3), 314333.Google Scholar
Stegmueller, D. (2013b). Religion and redistributive voting in Western Europe. Journal of Politics 75(4), 10641076.Google Scholar
Stegmueller, D. (2014). Bayesian hierarchical age-period-cohort models with time-structured effects: An application to religious voting in the US, 1972–2008. Electoral Studies 33, 5262.Google Scholar
Stegmueller, D., Scheepers, P., Rossteutscher, S., and de Jong, E. (2012). Support for redistribution in Western Europe: Assessing the role of religion. European Sociological Review 28(4), 482497.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. D. (1979). The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1973). General economic conditions and national elections. The American Economic Review 63(2), 160167.Google Scholar
Stimson, J. A., MacKuen, M. B., and Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review 89(03), 543565.Google Scholar
Stoop, I., Billiet, J., Koch, A., and Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Improving survey response: Lessons learned from the European Social Survey. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S. (2010). Policy feedback, generational replacement, and attitudes to state intervention: Eastern and Western Germany, 1990–2006. European Political Science Review 2(01), 119.Google Scholar
Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38(2), 311323.Google Scholar
Tanzi, V. and Schuhknecht, L. (2000). Public Spending in the 20th Century: A Global Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tricomi, E., Rangel, A., Camerer, C. F., and O’Doherty, J. P. (2010). Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature 463(7284), 10891091.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1999). Operational Manual for ISCED 1997 (International Standard Classification of Education). UNESCO.Google Scholar
Van der Meer, T., Te Grotenhuis, M., and Pelzer, B. (2010). Influential cases in multilevel modeling: A methodological comment. American Sociological Review 75(1), 173178.Google Scholar
VanderWeele, T. and Vansteelandt, S. (2009). Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Statistics and Its Interface 2, 457468.Google Scholar
VanderWeele, T. J. (2010). Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology 21(4), 540.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (2008). Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare 17(1), 314.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. and Uunk, W. (2007). Welfare spending and the public’s concern for immigrants: Multilevel evidence for eighteen European countries. Comparative Politics 40(1), 6382.Google Scholar
Van Ourti, T. and Clarke, P. (2011). A simple correction to remove the bias of the Gini coefficient due to grouping. Review of Economics and Statistics 93(3), 982994.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1980). Redistributive taxation as social insurance. Journal of Public Economics 14, 4968.Google Scholar
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., and Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vining, A. and Weimer, D. L. (2010). An assessment of important issues concerning the application of benefit-cost analysis to social policy. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 1(1), 140.Google Scholar
Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Matthiess, T., Merz, N., and Regel, S. (2016). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).Google Scholar
Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., and Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)–scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch 127(1), 139169.Google Scholar
Wansbeek, T. and Meijer, E. (2000). Measurement Error and Latent Variables in Econometrics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Warr, M. (2000). Fear of crime in the United States: Avenues for research and policy. Criminal Justice 4(4), 451489.Google Scholar
Weil, A. and Finegold, K. (2002). Introduction. In Weil, A. and Finegold, K. (Eds.), Welfare Reform: The Next Act, pp. xi–xxxi. Lanham, MD: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Western, B. (2006). Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. (1975). The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. and Herrnstein, R. (1985). Crime and Human Nature. New York: Simon & Shuster.Google Scholar
Wong, C., Bowers, J., Williams, T., and Simmons, K. D. (2012). Bringing the person back in: Boundaries, perceptions, and the measurement of racial context. The Journal of Politics 74(4), 11531170.Google Scholar
Wong, C. J. (2010). Boundaries of Obligation in American Politics: Geographic, National, and Racial Communities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. The American Economic Review 93(2), 133138.Google Scholar
Wright, G. C. (1990). Misreports of vote choice in the 1988 NES senate election study. Legislative Studies Quarterly 15(4), 543563.Google Scholar
Wright, G. C. (1992). Reported versus actual vote: There is a difference and it matters. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(1), 131142.Google Scholar
Wu, C. F. J. (1986). Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis. The Annals of Statistics 14(4), 12611295.Google Scholar
Yatchew, A. and Griliches, Z. (1985). Specification error in probit models. The Review of Economics and Statistics 67(1), 134139.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • David Rueda, University of Oxford, Daniel Stegmueller, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Who Wants What?
  • Online publication: 22 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108681339.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • David Rueda, University of Oxford, Daniel Stegmueller, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Who Wants What?
  • Online publication: 22 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108681339.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • David Rueda, University of Oxford, Daniel Stegmueller, Duke University, North Carolina
  • Book: Who Wants What?
  • Online publication: 22 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108681339.011
Available formats
×