Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:50:21.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - United States – Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998 (WT/DS176/AB/R): A Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Robert Howse
Affiliation:
Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School
Damien J. Neven
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, Graduate Institute of International Studies, University of Geneva and CEPR
Henrik Horn
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Petros C. Mavroidis
Affiliation:
Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

As usual the authors have divided their labor, based on expertise. In particular, the economic analysis in section 4 was the responsibility of Damien Neven; Robert Howse's own understanding of the costs and benefits of international trade law rules with respect to intellectual property protection in general depends on a rather different framework for analysing the problem. However, in so far as the legal and economic analysis of the Havana Club case itself is concerned, which deals only with trademarks as a form of IP protection, the authors are in agreement.

Introduction

The first part of the chapter (section 2) summarizes the facts of the case and the decision taken by the Appellate Body (AB). We emphasize two issues that the AB dealt with, namely the extent to which the TRIPs may contain a substantive obligation to grant protection to a trademark registered in another country and National Treatment. Section 3 discusses the notion of trademarks, the trade-offs involved in protecting trademarks and the extent to which trademark protection should be coordinated across jurisdictions. We observe that there is a strong case in favor of trademark protection in terms of alleviating moral hazard and adverse selection in product choices but we also identify instances where trademark protection can be abused. We also observe that the case for coordination across jurisdictions is less compelling for trademarks than other forms of intellectual property.

Type
Chapter
Information
The WTO Case Law of 2002
The American Law Institute Reporters' Studies
, pp. 179 - 219
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beebe, B. (2003), The semiotic analyis of trademark law, Mimeo, Benjamin Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University.
Coombe, R. (1998), The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economides, N. (1984), The economics of trademarks, WP 21, Columbia.
Grossman, G. and E. Lai (2002), International protection of intellectual property, NBER Working Paper N° 8704.
Howse, R. (2000), Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence, in The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? edited by Weiler, J. H. H., 35–69. The Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, 9/1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howse, R. and Nicolaidis, K. (2003), Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity?Governance 16, no. 1 (2003): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. and E. Tuerk (2001), The WTO Impact on Internal Regulations – A Case Study of the Canada-EC Asbestos Dispute, in The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues, edited by Búrca, G. and Scott, J., 283–328. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Landes, W. and Posner, R. (1987), Trademark law: an economic perspective, The Journal of Law and Economics, XXX (2), 265–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, W. and Posner, R. (2003), The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maskus, K. (2000), Intellectual Property Rights in the Gobal Economy. Washington, DC: The Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. (1969), Invention, Growth and Welfare: a Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scotchmer, S. (2002), The political economy of intellectual property treaties, NBER Working Paper N° 9114.
Van Wezel Stone, Katherine (1999), To the Yukon and Beyond: Local Laborers in a Global Labor Market. Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×