Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Model Organisms
  • Cited by 1
    • Access
    • Open access

Model Organisms

This Element presents a philosophical exploration of the concept of the 'model organism' in contemporary biology. Thinking about model organisms enables us to examine how living organisms have been brought into the laboratory and used to gain a better understanding of biology, and to explore the research practices, commitments, and norms underlying this understanding. We contend that model organisms are key components of a distinctive way of doing research. We focus on what makes model organisms an important type of model, and how the use of these models has shaped biological knowledge, including how model organisms represent, how they are used as tools for intervention, and how the representational commitments linked to their use as models affect the research practices associated with them.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
  • View HTML
    • Send element to Kindle

      To send this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Model Organisms
      Available formats
      ×

      Send element to Dropbox

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Model Organisms
      Available formats
      ×

      Send element to Google Drive

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Model Organisms
      Available formats
      ×
  • Export citation
  • Buy the Element
  • Copyright

  • COPYRIGHT: © Rachel A. Ankeny and Sabina Leonelli 2020

References

Hide all
Cannatella, David C. and De Sá, Rafael O.. 1993. ‘Xenopus Laevis as a Model Organism’. Systematic Biology 42: 476–507. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hickford, Daniel, Frankenberg, Stephen, and Renfree, Marilyn B.. 2009. ‘The Tammar Wallaby, Macropus eugenii: A Model Kangaroo for the Study of Developmental and Reproductive Biology’. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2009(12): pdb.emo137. Google Scholar
Griesemer, James. 2000. ‘Development, Culture, and the Units of Inheritance’. Philosophy of Science 67: S348–68. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Grunwald, David J. and Eisen, Judith S.. 2002. ‘Headwaters of the Zebrafish: Emergence of a New Model Vertebrate’. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 717–24. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Ankeny, Rachel A. 2001. ‘The Natural History of Caenorhabditis Elegans Research’. Nature Reviews Genetics 2: 474–8. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Burian, Richard M. 1993. ‘How the Choice of Experimental Organism Matters: Epistemological Reflections on an Aspect of Biological Practice’. Journal of the History of Biology 26: 351–67. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Burian, Richard M. 1997. ‘Exploratory Experimentation and the Role of Histochemical Techniques in the Work of Jean Brachet, 1938–1952’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 19: 27–45. Google Scholar
    Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2019. Emerging Model Organisms, http://cshprotocols.cshlp.org/site/emo/. Google Scholar
    Cook, Daniel E., Zdraljevic, Stefan, Roberts, Joshua P., and Andersen, Erik C.. 2017. ‘CeNDR, The Caenorhabditis Elegans Natural Diversity Resource’. Nucleic Acids Research 45: D650–7. Google Scholar
    Davies, Gail. 2013. ‘Arguably Big Biology: Sociology, Spatiality and the Knockout Mouse Project’. BioSocieties 8: 417–31. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Griesemer, James. 1990. ‘Material Models in Biology’. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 79–93. Google Scholar
    Güttinger, Stephen. 2019. ‘A New Account of Replication in the Experimental Life Sciences’. Philosophy of Science 86: 453–71. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Ankeny, Rachel A. and Leonelli, Sabina. 2011. ‘What’s So Special about Model Organisms?’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 313–23. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Ankeny, Rachel A., Leonelli, Sabina, Nelson, Nicole C., and Ramsden, Edmund. 2014. ‘Making Organisms Model Human Behavior: Situated Models in North-American Alcohol Research, since 1950’. Science in Context 27: 485–509. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Bolker, Jessica A. 2009. ‘Exemplary and Surrogate Models: Two Modes of Representation in Biology’. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52: 485–99. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Dietrich, Michael R., Ankeny, Rachel A., and Chen, Patrick M.. 2014. ‘Publication Trends in Model Organism Research’. Genetics 198: 787–94. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gilbert, Scott F. 2009. ‘The Adequacy of Model Systems for Evo-Devo: Modeling the Formation of Organisms/Modeling the Formation of Society’. In Mapping the Future of Biology, edited by Barberousse, Anouk, Morange, Michel, and Pradeu, Thomas, 57–68. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Chang, Hasok. 2012. Is Water H2O? Evidence, Pluralism and Realism. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hilgartner, Stephen. 1995. ‘Biomolecular Databases: New Communication Regimes for Biology?’ Science Communication 17: 240–63. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gelfert, Axel. 2016. How to Do Science with Models: A Philosophical Primer. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Green, Sara. 2013. ‘When One Model Is Not Enough: Combining Epistemic Tools in Systems Biology’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44: 170–80. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hedges, S. Blair. 2002. ‘The Origin and Evolution of Model Organisms’. Nature Review Genetics 3: 838–49. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Ankeny, Rachel A. and Leonelli, Sabina. 2015. ‘Valuing Data in Postgenomic Biology: How Data Donation and Curation Practices Challenge the Scientific Publication System’. In Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome, edited by Stevens, Hallam and Richards, Sarah, 126–49. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
    Bangham, Jenny. 2019. ‘Living Collections: Care and Curation at Drosophila Stock Centres’. BJHS Themes 4: 123–47. Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Caporael, Linnda R., Griesemer, James R., and Wimsatt, William C.. 2014. ‘Developing Scaffolds: An Introduction’, In Developing Scaffolds in Evolution, Cognition, and Culture, edited by Caporael, Linnda R., Griesemer, James R., and Wimsatt, William C., 1–20. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
    Cicero, Theodore J. 1979. ‘Critique of Animal Analogues of Alcoholism’. In Biochemistry and Pharmacology of Ethanol, vol. 2, edited by Majchrowicz, Edward and Noble, Ernest P., 533–60. New York: Plenum. Google Scholar
    de Chadaravian, Soraya and Hopwood, Nick, editors. 2004. Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
    Frigg, Roman and Nguyen, James. 2018. ‘The Turn of the Valve: Representing with Material Models’. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8: 205–44. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Griesemer, James. 2004. ‘Three-Dimensional Models in Philosophical Perspective’. In Models: The Third Dimension of Science, edited by de Chadarevian, Soraya and Hopwood, Nick, 433–42. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
    Hoffmann, Ary A. 2010. ‘Physiological Climatic Limits in Drosophila: Patterns and Implications’. Journal of Experimental Biology 213: 870–80. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Ankeny, Rachel A. 2010. ‘Historiographic Reflections on Model Organisms: Or How the Mureaucracy May Be Limiting Our Understanding of Contemporary Genetics and Genomics’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32: 91–104. Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Cook-Deegan, Robert. 1994. The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar
    Craver, Carl F. and Darden, Lindley. 2013. In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Davis, Rowland H. 2004. ‘The Age of Model Organisms’. Nature Reviews Genetics 5: 69–76. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Dietrich, Michael R., Ankeny, Rachel A., Crowe, Nathan, Green, Sara, and Leonelli, Sabina. 2020. ‘How to Choose Your Research Organism’. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 80: 101227. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Germain, Pierre Luc. 2014. ‘From Replica to Instruments: Animal Models in Biomedical Research’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36: 114–28. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Ankeny, Rachel A. and Leonelli, Sabina. 2020. ‘Using Repertoires to Explore Changing Practices in Recent Coral Research’. In From the Beach to the Bench: Why Marine Biological Studies? edited by Matlin, Karl, Maienschein, Jane, and Ankeny, Rachel A., 249–70. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    Davies, Jamie A. 2007. ‘Developmental Biologists’ Choice of Subjects Approximates to a Power Law, with No Evidence for the Existence of a Special Group of “Model Organisms”’. BMC Developmental Biology 7: 40–46. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Frigg, Roman and Hartmann, Stephan. 2018. ‘Models in Science’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/models-science/. Google Scholar
    Bevan, Michael and Walsh, Sean. 2004. ‘Positioning Arabidopsis in Plant Biology: A Key Step toward Unification of Plant Research’. Perspectives on Translational Biology 135: 602–06. Google Scholar
    Gilbert, Scott F. 2001. ‘Ecological Developmental Biology: Developmental Biology Meets the Real World’. Developmental Biology 233: 1–12. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Adams, Bryn L. 2016. ‘The Next Generation of Synthetic Biology Chassis: Moving Synthetic Biology from the Laboratory to the Field’. ACS Synthetic Biology 5: 1328–30. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Blum, Martin and Ott, Tim. 2019. ‘Xenopus: An Undervalued Model Organism to Study and Model Human Genetic Disease’. Cells Tissues Organs 205: 303–12. Google Scholar
    Alfred, Jane and Baldwin, Ian T.. 2015. ‘The Natural History of Model Organisms: New Opportunities at the Wild Frontier’. eLife 4: e06956. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Ankeny, Rachel A. 2000. ‘Fashioning Descriptive Models in Biology: Of Worms and Wiring Diagrams’. Philosophy of Science 67: S260–72. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Baetu, Tudor. 2016. ‘The “Big Picture”: The Problem of Extrapolation in Basic Research’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67: 941–64. Google Scholar
    Bolker, Jessica A. and Raff, Rudolf A.. 1997. ‘Beyond Worms, Flies and Mice: It’s Time to Widen the Scope of Developmental Biology’. Journal of NIH Research 9: 35–39. Google Scholar
    Brigandt, Ingo and Love, Alan. 2017. ‘Reductionism in Biology’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=reduction-biology. Google Scholar
    Callon, Michel. 1984. ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’. The Sociological Review 32: 196–233. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gan, Xiangchao, Stegle, Oliver, Behr, Jonas, Steffen, Joshua G., Drewe, Philipp, Hildebrand, Katie L., Lyngsoe, Rune, et al. 2011. ‘Multiple Reference Genomes and Transcriptomes for Arabidopsis Thaliana’. Nature 477: 419–23. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gest, Howard. 1995. ‘Arabidopsis to Zebrafish: A Commentary on “Rosetta Stone” Model Systems in the Biological Sciences’. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 39: 77–85. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Ankeny, Rachel A. and Leonelli, Sabina. 2018. ‘Organisms in Experimental Research’. In The Historiography of Biology, edited by Dietrich, Michael, Borrello, Mark, and Harman, Oran, 1–25. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar
    Green, Sara, Dietrich, Michael R., Leonelli, Sabina, and Ankeny, Rachel A.. 2018. ‘“Extreme” Organisms and the Problem of Generalization: Interpreting the Krogh Principle’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40: 1–22. Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Hopwood, Nick. 2011. ‘Approaches and Species in the History of Vertebrate Embryology. In Vertebrate Embryogenesis: Embryological, Cellular and Genetic Methods, edited by Pelegri, Francisco J., 1–20. New York: Humana Press. Google Scholar
    Ankeny, Rachel. 2009. ‘Model Organisms as Fictions’. In Fiction in Science: Philosophical Essay on Modeling and Idealization, edited by Suárez, Mauricio, 193–204. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
    Ankeny, Rachel A. and Leonelli, Sabina. 2016. ‘Repertoires: A Post-Kuhnian Perspective on Scientific Change and Collaborative Research’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 60: 18–28. Google Scholar
    C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. 1998. ‘Genome Sequence of the Nematode C. Elegans: A Platform for Investigating Biology’. Science 282: 2012–18. Google Scholar
    Cartwright, Nancy. 1989. Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    de Chadaravian, Soraya. 2002. Designs for Life: Molecular Biology after World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    Hilgartner, Stephen. 2017. Reordering Life: Knowledge and Control in the Genomics Revolution. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hoffer, L. John. 2003. ‘Complementary or Alternative Medicine: The Need for Plausibility’. Canadian Medical Association Journal 168: 180–82. Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Bolker, Jessica A. 1995. ‘Model Systems in Developmental Biology’. BioEssays 17: 451–55. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Griesemer, James R. 2013. ‘Integration of Approaches in David Wake’s Model-Taxon Research Platform for Evolutionary Morphology’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44: 525–36. Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Mitchell, Sandra D. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Maher, Brendan. 2009. ‘Biology’s Next Top Model?’ Nature 458: 695–98. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Nelson, Nicole C. 2018. Model Behavior: Animal Experiments, Complexity, and the Genetics of Psychiatric Disorders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Ransohoff, Richard M. 2018. ‘All (Animal) Models (of Neurodegeneration) Are Wrong. Are They Also Useful?’ The Journal of Experimental Medicine 215: 2955–58. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Ratti, Emanuele. 2018. ‘“Models of” and “Models for”: On the Relation between Mechanistic Models and Experimental Strategies in Molecular Biology’. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, axy018, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy018 CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Rhee, Seung Y. 2004. ‘Carpe Diem: Retooling the “Publish or Perish” Model into the “Share and Survive” Model’. Plant Physiology 134: 543–47. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Kohler, Robert E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    Rosenberg, Alexander. 1996. ‘The Human Genome Project: Research Tactics and Economic Strategies’. Social Philosophy and Policy 13: 1–17. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Krebs, Hans A. 1975. ‘The August Krogh Principle: “For Many Problems There Is an Animal on Which It Can Be Most Conveniently Studied”’. Journal of Experimental Zoology 194: 221–26. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Leonelli, Sabina. 2018. ‘Re-Thinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality’. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including a Symposium on the Work of Mary Morgan: Curiosity, Imagination, and Surprise 36B: 129–46. Google Scholar
    Leonelli, Sabina. 2009. ‘The Impure Nature of Biological Knowledge’. In Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by de Regt, Henk, Leonelli, Sabina, and Eigner, Kai, 189–209. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Levy, Arnon and Currie, Adrian. 2015. ‘Model Organisms Are Not (Theoretical) Models’. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66: 327–48. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Piotrowska, Monika. 2013. ‘From Humanized Mice to Human Disease: Guiding Extrapolation from Model to Target’. Biology and Philosophy 28: 439–55. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Provart, Nicholas J. et al. 2016. ‘50 Years of Arabidopsis Research: Highlights and Future Directions’. New Phytologist 209: 921–44. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg and Staffan, Müller-Wille. 2010. A Cultural History of Heredity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    Leonelli, Sabina. 2010. ‘Packaging Small Facts for Re-Use: Databases in Model Organism Biology’. In How Well Do Facts Travel?: The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge, edited by Howlett, Peter and Morgan, Mary S., 325–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    Schaffner, Kenneth F. 1998. ‘Model Organisms and Behavioral Genetics: A Rejoinder’. Philosophy of Science 65: 276–88. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Huber, Lara and Keuck, Lara K.. 2013. ‘Mutant Mice: Experimental Organisms as Materialised Models in Biomedicine’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44: 385–91. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Kelty, Christopher M. 2012. ‘This Is Not an Article: Model Organism Newsletters and the Question of “Open Science”’. BioSocieties 7: 140–68. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hunter, Philip. 2008. ‘The Paradox of Model Organisms’. EMBO Reports 9: 717–20. Google Scholar
    Jenner, Ronald A. and Wills, Matthew A.. 2007. ‘The Choice of Model Organisms in Evo-Devo’. Nature Reviews Genetics 8: 311–9. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2000. ‘Models of and Models for: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Biology’. Philosophy of Science 67: S72–86. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Leonelli, Sabina. 2008. ‘Performing Abstraction: Two Ways of Modelling Arabidopsis Thaliana’. Biology & Philosophy 23: 509–23. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Leonelli, Sabina. 2013. ‘Global Data for Local Science: Assessing the Scale of Data Infrastructures in Biological and Biomedical Research’. BioSocieties 8: 449–65. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Minelli, Alessandro and Baedke, Jan. 2014. ‘Model Organisms in Evo-Devo: Promises and Pitfalls of the Comparative Approach’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36: 42–59. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Perlman, Robert L. 2016. ‘Mouse Models of Human Disease: An Evolutionary Perspective’. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health 2016: 170–76. Google Scholar
    Pickstone, John. 2001. Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology, and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    Mungall, Christopher J., Emmert, David B., and The FlyBase Consortium. 2007. ‘A Chado Case Study: An Ontology-Based Modular Schema for Representing Genome-Associated Biological Information’. Bioinformatics 23: i337–46. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Mungall, Chistopher J., Washington, Nicole L., Nguyen‐Xuan, Jeremy, Condit, Christopher, Smedley, Damian, Köhler, Sebastian, et al. 2015. ‘Use of Model Organism and Disease Databases to Support Matchmaking for Human Disease Gene Discovery’. Human Mutation 36: 979–84. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Schaffner, Kenneth F. 1986. ‘Exemplar Reasoning about Biological Models and Diseases: A Relation between the Philosophy of Medicine and Philosophy of Science’. Journal of Philosophy and Medicine 11: 63–80. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Leonelli, Sabina. 2016. Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Russell, James J., Theriot, Julie A., Pranidhi Sood, Wallace F. Marshall, Laura F. Landweber, Lillian Fritz-Laylin, , et al. 2017. ‘Non-Model Model Organisms’. BMC Biology 15: 1–31. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Leonelli, Sabina. 2007b. ‘Growing Weed, Producing Knowledge: An Epistemic History of Arabidopsis thaliana’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29: 55–87. Google Scholar
    Kimmel, Charles B. 1989. ‘Genetics and Early Development of Zebrafish’. Trends in Genetics 5: 283–88. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    National Institutes of Health (NIH). Model organisms for biomedical research. www.nih.gov/science/models/. Google Scholar
    Rosenthal, Nadia and Ashburner, Michael. 2002. ‘Taking Stock of Our Models: The Function and Future of Stock Centres’. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 711–17. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Leonelli, Sabina and Ankeny, Rachel A.. 2012. ‘Re-Thinking Organisms: The Impact of Databases on Model Organism Biology’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43: 29–36. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Phifer-Rixey, Megan and Nachman, Michael W.. 2015. ‘The Natural History of Model Organisms: Insights into Mammalian Biology from the Wild House Mouse Mus musculus’. eLife 4: e05959. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Ramsden, Edmund. 2015. ‘Making Animals Alcoholic: Shifting Laboratory Models of Addiction’. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 51: 164–94. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2010. An Epistemology of the Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
    Jørgenson, C. Barker. 2001. ‘August Krogh and Claude Bernard on Basic Principles in Experimental Physiology’. BioScience 51: 59–61. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Nicholson, Daniel J. and Dupré, John, editors. 2018. Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Parkkinen, Veli Pekka. 2017. ‘Are Model Organisms Theoretical Models?’ Disputatio 9: 471–98. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
    Rosenthal, Nadia and Brown, Steve. 2007. ‘The Mouse Ascending: Perspectives for Human-Disease Models’. Nature Cell Biology 9: 993–99. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Knuuttila, Tarja. 2011. ‘Modeling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 262–71. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Laubichler, Manfred D. and Müller, Gerd B., editors. 2007. Modeling Biology: Structures, Behaviors, Evolution. Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Lewis, Jamie, Atkinson, Paul, Harrington, Jean, and Featherstone, Katie. 2013. ‘Representation and Practical Accomplishment in the Laboratory: When Is an Animal Model Good-Enough?’ Sociology 47: 776–92. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Love, Alan C. and Travisano, Michael. 2013. ‘Microbes Modeling Ontogeny’. Biology & Philosophy 28: 161–88. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Morgan, Mary S. 2003. ‘Experiments without Material Intervention: Model Experiments, Virtual Experiments and Virtually Experiments’. In The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, edited by Radder, Hans, 216–35. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
    O’Malley, Maureen A., Brigandt, Ingo, Love, Alan C., Crawford, John W., Gilbert, Jack A., Knight, Rob, et al. 2014. ‘Multilevel Research Strategies and Biological Systems’. Philosophy of Science 81: 811–28. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Love, Alan C. 2008. ‘Explaining Evolutionary Innovation and Novelty: Criteria of Explanatory Adequacy and Epistemological Prerequisites’. Philosophy of Science 75: 874–86. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Markow, Theresa A. 2015. ‘The Natural History of Model Organisms: The Secret Lives of Drosophila Flies’. eLife 4: e06793. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Morgan, Mary S. 2012. The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    O’Malley, Maureen A. 2007. ‘Exploratory Experimentation and Scientific Practice: Metagenomics and the Proteorhodopsin’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29: 337–60. Google Scholar
    Krogh, August. 1929. ‘Progress in Physiology’. American Journal of Physiology 90: 243–51. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Jones, Kathryn Maxson, Ankeny, Rachel A., and Cook-Deegan., Robert 2018. ‘The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project’. Journal of the History of Biology 51: 693–805. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Leonelli, Sabina. 2007a. ‘What is in a Model? Using Theoretical and Material Models to Develop Intelligible Theories’. In Modeling Biology: Structures, Behaviors, Evolution. Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology, edited by Laubichler, Manfred D. and Müller, Gerd B., 15–36. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
    Rader, Karen A. 2004. Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Schaffner, Kenneth F. 2001. ‘Extrapolation from Animal Models: Social Life, Sex, and Super Models’. In Theory and Method in the Neurosciences, edited by Machamer, Peter K., Grush, Rick, and McLaughlin, Peter, 200–30. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
    Meunier, Robert. 2012. ‘Stages in the Development of a Model Organism as a Platform for Mechanistic Models in Developmental Biology: Zebrafish, 1970–2000’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43: 522–31. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Morgan, Mary S. 2007. ‘Reflections on Exemplary Narratives, Cases, and Model Organisms’. In Science Without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives, edited by Creager, Angela N. H., Norton Wise, M., and Lunbeck, Elizabeth, 264–74. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
    Morrison, Margaret and Morgan, Mary S.. 1999. ‘Models as Mediating Instruments’. In Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by Morrison, Margaret and Morgan, Mary S., 10–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Robert, Jason Scott. 2008. ‘The Comparative Biology of Human Nature’. Philosophical Psychology 21: 425–36. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Wimsatt, William. 2000. ‘Generative Entrenchment and the Developmental Systems Approach to Evolutionary Processes’. In Cycles of Contingency, edited by Oyama, Susan, Griffiths, Paul E., and Grey, Russell D., 219–37. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
    Srinivasan, Balaji S., Shah, Nigam H., Flannick, Jason A., Eduardo Abeliuk, Antal F. Novak, and Serafim Batzoglou, . 2007. ‘Current Progress in Network Research: Toward Reference Networks for Key Model Organisms’. Briefings in Bioinformatics 8: 318–32. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sundberg, J. P., Ward, J. M., and Schofield, P.. 2009. ‘Where’s the Mouse Info?’ Veterinary Pathology 46: 1241–44. Google Scholar
    Philosophy of Immunology Pradeu, Thomas CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Wood, William, and the Community of C. elegans Researchers, editors. 1988. The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Google Scholar
    Model Organisms Ankeny, Rachel A. and Leonelli, Sabina Google Scholar
    Steel, Daniel. 2008. Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Mechanisms in Molecular Biology Baetu, Tudor M. Google Scholar
    Games in the Philosophy of Biology O’Connor, Cailin CrossRef | Google Scholar
    The Challenge of Evolution to Religion Smedt, Johan De and Cruz, Helen De CrossRef | Google Scholar
    The Missing Two-Thirds of Evolutionary Theory Brandon, Robert N. and McShea, Daniel W. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Inheritance Systems and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis Jablonka, Eva and Lamb, Marion J. Google Scholar
    How to Study Animal Minds Andrews, Kristin Google Scholar
    Reduction and Mechanism Rosenberg, Alex CrossRef | Google Scholar
    The Biology of Art Richards, Richard A. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Strasser, Bruno J. and Soraya, de Chadarevian. 2011. ‘The Comparative and the Exemplary: Revisiting the Early History of Molecular Biology’. History of Science 49: 317–36. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    The Role of Mathematics in Evolutionary Theory Otsuka, Jun CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Waters, C. Kenneth. 2013. ‘Molecular Genetics’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy edited by Edward N. Zalta (ed.), plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/molecular-genetics/. Google Scholar
    The Darwinian Revolution Ruse, Michael Google Scholar
    Valenzano, Dario R., Aboobaker, Aziz, Seluanov, Andrei, and Gorbunova, Vera. 2017. ‘Non‐Canonical Aging Model Systems and Why We Need Them’. The EMBO Journal 36: 959–63. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Weber, Marcel. 2007. ‘Redesigning the Fruit Fly: The Molecularization of Drosophila’. In Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives, edited by Creager, Angela N. H., Lunbeck, Elizabeth, and Norton Wise, M., 23–45. Durham: Duke University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Woody, Andrea I. 2000. ‘Putting Quantum Mechanics to Work in Chemistry: The Power of Diagrammatic Representation’. Philosophy of Science 67: S612–27. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sommer, Ralf J. 2009. ‘The Future of Evo-Devo: Model Systems and Evolutionary Theory’. Nature 10: 416–22. Google Scholar
    Weisberg, Michael. 2007. ‘Who is a Modeler?’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58: 207ch33. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Waters, C. Kenneth. 2007. ‘The Nature and Context of Exploratory Experimentation: An Introduction to Three Case Studies of Exploratory Research’. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29: 275–84. Google Scholar
    Ecological Models Odenbaugh, Jay CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Slack, Jonathan M.W. 2009. ‘Emerging Market Organisms’. Science 323: 1674–75. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Schaffner, Kenneth F. 2016. Behaving: What’s Genetic, What’s Not, and Why Should We Care? New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Smith, Richard N., Aleksic, Jelena, Butano, Daniela, Carr, Adrian, Contrino, Sergio, Fengyuan, Hu, et al. 2012. ‘InterMine: A Flexible Data Warehouse System for the Integration and Analysis of Heterogeneous Biological Data’. Bioinformatics 1: 3163–65. Google Scholar
    Weisberg, Michael. 2013. Simulation and Similarity. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sterken, Mark G., Basten Snoek, L., Kammenga, Jan E., and Andersen, Erik Christian. 2015. ‘The Laboratory Domestication of Caenorhabditis elegans’. Trends in Genetics 31: 224–31. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Paleoaesthetics and the Practice of Paleontology Turner, Derek D. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Weber, Marcel. 2005. Philosophy of Experimental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Abstract views

    Total abstract views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.