Skip to main content
×
×
Home

How psychiatrists think

  • Niall Crumlish and Brendan D. Kelly
Summary

Over the past decade, the study of error in medicine has expanded to incorporate new insights from cognitive psychology, generating increased research and clinical interest in cognitive errors and clinical decision-making. The study of cognitive error focuses on predictable errors in thinking that result from the use of cognitive shortcuts or ‘heuristics’. Heuristics reduce the time, resources and cognitive effort required for clinical decision-making and are a feature of mature clinical thinking. Heuristics can also lead to bias and must be used with an awareness of their weaknesses. In this article, we describe heuristics commonly used in clinical decision-making and discuss how failure of heuristics results in cognitive error. We apply research findings on decision-making in medicine to decision-making in psychiatry and suggest directions for training and future research into cognitive error in psychiatry.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      How psychiatrists think
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      How psychiatrists think
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      How psychiatrists think
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Dr Niall Crumlish, Jonathan Swift Clinic, St James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland. Email: niall.crumlish@tcd.ie
Footnotes
Hide All

Declaration of Interest

None.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
American Psychiatric Association (1997) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn) (DSM–III). APA.
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn, revised) (DSM–IV–TR). APA.
Beekman, ATF, Geerlings, SW, Deeg, DJH et al (2002) The natural history of late-life depression. A 6-year prospective study in the community. Archives of General Psychiatry; 59: 605–11.
Birchwood, M, Mason, R, MacMillan, F et al (1993) Depression, demoralization and control over psychotic illness: a comparison of depressed and non-depressed patients with a chronic psychosis. Psychological Medicine; 23: 387–95.
Bradley, CP (2005) Can we avoid bias? BMJ; 330: 784.
Cohen, T, Blatter, B, Almeida, C et al (2006) A cognitive blueprint of collaboration in context: distributed cognition in the psychiatric emergency department. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine; 37: 7383.
Coles, C (2006) Uncertainty in a world of regulation. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment; 12: 397401.
Crichton, M (2007) Where does it hurt? New York Times; April 1 (www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/books/review/Crichton.t.html).
Croskerry, P (2002) Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Academic Emergency Medicine; 9: 1184–204.
Croskerry, P (2003) The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine; 78: 775–80.
Crumlish, N, Whitty, P, Kamali, M et al (2005) Early insight predicts depression and attempted suicide after 4 years in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica; 112: 449–55.
Davidoff, F (1997) Time. Annals of Internal Medicine; 127: 483–5.
Fiske, ST, Taylor, SE (1991) Social Cognition (2nd edn). McGraw-Hill.
Flanagan, E, Blashfield, R (2006) Do clinicians see Axis I and Axis II as different kinds of disorders? Comprehensive Psychiatry; 47: 496502.
Freedman, D (2001) False prediction of future dangerousness: error rates and Psychopathy Checklist – Revised. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law; 29: 8995.
Gawande, A (2002) Complications: A Surgeon's Notes on an Imperfect Science. Metropolitan Books.
Grasso, BC, Bates, DW (2003) Medication errors in psychiatry: are patients being harmed? Psychiatric Services; 54: 599.
Groopman, J (2007) How Doctors Think. Houghton Mifflin.
Holland, J (2007) A role for morbidity and mortality conferences in psychiatry. Australasian Psychiatry; 15: 338–42.
Holloway, F (1997) The assessment and management of risk in psychiatry: can we do better? Psychiatric Bulletin; 21: 283–5.
Horton, R (1999) The uses of medical error. Lancet; 353: 422–3.
Kapur, N (2000) Evaluating risks. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment; 6: 399406.
Kessler, RC, McGonagle, KA, Zhao, S et al (1994) Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM–III–R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry; 51: 819.
Kisely, S, Smith, M, Lawrence, D et al (2007) Inequitable access for mentally ill patients to some medically necessary procedures. Canadian Medical Association Journal; 176: 779–84.
Kohn, KT, Corrigan, JM, Donaldson, MS (1999) To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press.
Leape, LL, Berwick, DM (2005) Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned? JAMA; 293: 2384–90.
Nafisi, N, Stanley, B (2007) Developing and maintaining the therapeutic alliance with self-injuring patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology; 63: 1069–79.
Nath, SB, Marcus, SC (2006) Medical errors in psychiatry. Harvard Review of Psychiatry; 14: 204–11.
Pear, R (1999) A Clinton order seeks to reduce medical errors. New York Times; 7 December: 1.
Read, J (2004) Does schizophrenia exist? Reliability and validity. In Models of Madness. Psychological, Social and Biological Approaches to Schizophrenia (eds Read, J, Mosher, LR, Bentall, R) 4356. Brunner-Routledge.
Redelmeier, DA, Ferris, LE, Tu, JV et al (2001) Problems for clinical judgement: introducing cognitive psychology as one more basic science. Canadian Medical Association Journal; 164: 358–60.
Richards, MS, Wierzbicki, M (1990) Anchoring errors in clinical-like judgements. Journal of Clinical Psychology; 46: 358–65.
Ross, LD (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (ed Berkowitz, L) 173220. Academic Press.
Schwarz, N (2005) When thinking feels difficult: meta-cognitive experiences in judgement and decision making. Medical Decision Making; 25: 105–12.
Spiegel, A (2005) The dictionary of disorder. New Yorker; 5 January: 5663.
Thomson, AD, Cook, CC, Guerrini, I et al (2008) Wernicke's encephalopathy: ‘plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose’. Alcohol and Alcoholism; 43: 180–6.
Timmons, S, Kingston, M, Hussain, M et al (2003) Pulmonary embolism: differences in presentation between older and younger patients. Age and Ageing; 32: 601–5.
Tversky, A, Kahneman, D (1974) Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science; 185: 1124–31.
Waddington, L, Morley, S (2000) Availability bias in clinical formulation: the first idea that comes to mind. British Journal of Medical Psychology; 73: 117–27.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Advances
  • ISSN: 1355-5146
  • EISSN: 1472-1481
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-advances
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 40 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 126 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 22nd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

How psychiatrists think

  • Niall Crumlish and Brendan D. Kelly
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *