Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T03:33:09.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex, fertility and menstruation among the Beng of the Ivory Coast: a symbolic analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Alma Gottlieb
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Menstrual blood has proved a popular subject for discussion in the anthropological literature but, surprisingly, only a single theme has emerged: societies either do or do not consider menstrual blood and menstruating women to be polluting. If they are not considered polluting, it is taken as a sign of sex-role egalitarianism; conversely, if they are considered polluting, it is taken as a sign of women's lower status vis-a-vis men and/or of the potential danger or threat that women represent to men (e.g. Kessler, 1976: 72-4; Meggitt, 1964; Ortner, 1974; Sacks, 1974; Young, 1965: 155). Friedl (1975: 29) goes so far as to suggest that menstruating women are viewed as threatening and polluting because menstrual blood is a symbol of death: when a woman menstruates, it is a sign that she has not conceived a child and thus during this time she is ‘the antithesis of life’.

Résumé

Sexualité, fertilité et menstruation chez les Beng de la Côte d'lvoire: une analyse symbolique

Cet article explore les dimensions symboliques des croyances rattachées à la menstruation chez les Beng de la Côte d'lvoire. On a trouvé trois règles qui restreignent les activités sexuelles des femmes qui ont leurs règles ou les activités des hommes en contact avec ces femmes. Normalement les anthropologues se servent de telles règles pour indiquer le caractère contaminant du flot menstruel ou des femmes qui ont leurs règies, et déduisent de cela la condition inférieure de la femme en général. Cependant, dans le cas des Beng, ces règles et croyances ne justifient pas une telle interprétation. Plutôt, elles correspondent à une vue du monde fondée sur la séparation symbolique du village, de la forêt, qui est associée avec la Terre. Spécialement, la fertilité humaine qui est symbolisée par le flot menstruel, ne doit pas être confondue avec la fertilité de la forêt ou de la Terre, et l'ensemble de ces trois règles est révélé être associé avec ce principe. Cet essai par conséquent analyse les croyances se rattachant à la menstruation du point de vue indigène et les trouve inconsistantes avec cette interprétation des croyances qui indiquent la contamination intrinsèque de la femme, explication commune dans la littérature.

Type
Sex, marriage, children and divorce
Information
Africa , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , October 1982 , pp. 34 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahern, Emily, 1975. ‘The power and pollution of Chinese women’, in Wolf, Marjorie and Witke, Roxanne (eds.), Women in Chinese Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 193–214.Google Scholar
Armengaud, M. 1949. ‘Autour de la culture de la kola chez les Ngan de Mbaiakro’, Notes africaines 44, 114.Google Scholar
Buckley, Thomas. 1982. ‘Menstruation and the power of Yurok women: methods in cultural reconstruction’, American Ethnologist 9(1): 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, Ralph. 1967. ‘Why is the cassowary not a bird? A problem of zoological taxonomy among the Karam of the New Guinea highlands’, Man 2, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Capitaine. 1903. ‘Les Gans du Diamala’, Journal Officiel de la Côte d'Ivoire, 15 mai, 12; 31 mai, 6–7; 15 juin, 9.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary 1972 ‘Self-evidence’, Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland for 1972, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etienne, Mona. 1981. ‘Gender relations and conjugality among the Baule (Ivory Coast)’, Culture 1(1), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faithorn, Elizabeth. 1975. ‘The concept of pollution among the Kafe of the Papua New Guinea highlands’, in Reiter, R. R. (ed.), Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press, 127–40.Google Scholar
Friedl, Ernestine. 1975. Women and Men: an Anthropologisfs View. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Hammond, Dorothy, and Jablow, Alta. 1976. Women in Cultures of the World. Menlo Park, Cal.: Cummings Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kessler, Evelyn S. 1976. Women: an Anthropological View. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
La Fontaine, J. S. 1972. ‘Ritualization of women's life-crises in Bugisu’, in Fontaine, J. S. La (ed.), The Interpretation of Ritual: Essays in Honour of A. I. Richards. London: Tavistock, 159–86.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1976. Culture and Communication: the Logic by which Symbols are Connected; an Introduction to the Use of Structuralist Analysis in Social Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963a. ‘Language and the analysis of social laws’, in Lévi-Strauss (1963d), 55–66.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1963b. ‘Linguistic anthropology’, in Lévi-Strauss (1963d), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1963c. ‘Structural analysis in linguistics and in anthropology’, in Lévi-Strauss (1963d), 31–54.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1963d. Structural Anthropology, Vol. I. Jacobsen, Claire and Schoepf, Brooke Grundfes, trans. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1963d. Totemism. Rodney Needham, trans. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Needham, Rodney et al. , trans. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1969–1981. Introduction to a Science of Mythology, 4 vols. John, and Weightman, Doreen, trans. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1976. ‘Jean-Jacques Rousseau, founder of the science of man’, in Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Structural Anthropology, Vol. 2. Monique Lay ton, trans. New York: Basic Books, 33–43.Google Scholar
Meggitt, M. J. 1964. ‘Male-female relationships in the highlands of Australian New Guinea’, American Anthropologist 66(4, 2), 204–22.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry. 1974. ‘Is female to male as nature is to culture?’, in Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist and Lamphere, Louise (eds.), Woman, Culture, and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 67–87.Google Scholar
Powers, Maria N. 1980. ‘Menstruation and reproduction: an Oglala case’,Signs 6(1), 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Karen. 1974. ‘Engels revisited: women, the organization of production, and private property’, in Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist and Lamphere, Louise (eds.), Women, Culture, and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 207–23.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1980. ‘No nature, no culture: the Hagen case’, in MacCormack, Carol and Strathern, Marilyn (eds.), Nature, Culture, and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174–222.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. H. 1969. ‘Animals are good to think and good to prohibit’,Ethnology 7, 423–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauxier, Louis. 1920. Le Noir de Bondoukou. Paris: Leroux.Google Scholar
Young, Frank W. 1965. Initiation Ceremonies: a Cross-cultural Study of Status Dramatization. Indianapolis: Bobbs-MerrillGoogle Scholar