Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:12:56.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fighting for Democracy: Popular Organizations and Postapartheid Government in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Elke K. Zuern
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Elite, top-down models of democratic transition commonly miss key popular challenges and opportunities for institutionalizing stable, representative regimes. Civil society theorists often mistakenly assume that civil society organizations will support the creation and strengthening of a democratic regime. This article argues that in order to understand the process of regime change, we must look at both macro- and micro-level institutions and practices, as well as at the practical and ideological struggles over democracy that will define the regime. In South Africa, this struggle is seen most clearly in the interactions between popular organizations, such as the civics, and the African National Congress (ANC). How popular organizations make demands and how these demands are met will determine not only the form of the new regime, but also the stability of the most basic rights associated with democracy.

Résumé:

Résumé:

Les modèles de transition démocratique prévus par les élites au plus haut niveau pour le bénéfice du peuple ont coutume de manquer les défis populaires et les opportunitiés clé nécessaires à l'institutionnalisation de régimes stables et représentatifs. Les théoriciens de la société civile supposent souvent à tort que les organisations de sociétés civiles soutiendront la création et la consolidation d'un régime démocratique. Cet article veut montrer que pour comprendre le processus de changement de régime, il faut regarder les institutions et les pratiques à la fois au macro- et au microniveau, ainsi que les luttes d'ordre pratique et idéologique pour la démocratie qui définiront le régime. En Afrique du Sud, on peut percevoir cette lutte le plus clairement en observant les interactions entre les organisations populaires telles que les Civics, et l'ANC, le Congrès National Africain. La manière dont les organisations populaires formulent leurs demandes et la manière dont l'ANC répond à ces demandes déterminera non seulement la forme du nouveau régime, mais aussi la stabilité des droits les plus fondamentaux associés au concept de démocratie.

Type
Articles
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , April 2002 , pp. 77 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bratton, Michael. 1994. “Civil Society and Political Transitions in Africa.” In Civil Society and the State in Africa, ed. Harbeson, John W., Rothchild, Donald, and Chazan, Naomi, 51–81. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and van de Walle, Nicolas. 1997. Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Charles Edward. 1991. Comrades and Community: Politics and the Construction of Hegemony in Alexandra Township, South Africa, 1984–1987. Ph.D. diss., Mansfield College, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dawisha, Karen. 1997. “Democratization and Political Participation: Research Concepts and Methodologies.” In The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe, ed. Dawisha, Karen and Parrott, Bruce, 40–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1994. “Towards Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 5 (3): 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatton, Robert Jr. 1995. “Africa in the Age of Democratization: The Civic Limitations of Civil Society.” African Studies Review 38 (2): 67–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Steven. 1992. “Bonaparte at the Barricades: The Colonization of Civil Society.” Theoria 79: 83–95.Google Scholar
Giliomee, Hermann, and Simkins, Charles, eds. 1999. The Awkward Embrace: One-Party Domination and Democracy. Cape Town: Tafelberg Publishers.Google Scholar
Glaser, Daryl. 1997. “South Africa and the Limits of Civil Society.” Journal of Southern African Studies 23 (1): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, Richard, Diamandouros, P. Nikiforos, and Puhle, Hans-Jürgen. 1996. “Debate: Democratic Consolidation—‘O'Donnell's Illusions’: A Rejoinder.” Journal of Democracy 7 (4): 151–59.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harbeson, John W. 1994. “Civil Society and Political Renaissance in Africa.” In Civil Society and the State in Africa, edited by Harbeson, John W., Rothchild, Donald, and Chazan, Naomi, 1–29. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Patrick. 2000. “‘Technocratic Creep’ Threatens Local Government Reform.” Synopsis 4 (1).Google Scholar
Hlongwane, Mlungisi. 1997. “Building a Revolutionary Social Movement to Conquer Challenges of the 21st Century.” Presidential Address, Sanco 2nd National Conference, 04 16–20.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
James, Wilmot, and Caliguire, Daria. 1996. “The New South Africa: Renewing Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 7(1): 56–66.Google Scholar
Lanegran, Kimberly. 1995. “South Africa's Civic Association Movement: ANC's Ally or Society's ‘Watchdog’? Shifting Social Movement-Political Party Relations.” African Studies Review 38 (2): 101–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanegran, Kimberly. 1996. “Civic Associations in Transitional Local Government Structures in South Africa.” Critical Sociology 22 (3): 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan,, and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. “Toward Consolidated Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 7 (2): 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Tom. 1999a. “Policy Process within the African National Congress and the Tripartite Alliance.” Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 28: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Tom. 1999b. South African Politics since 1994. Cape Town: David Phillip Publishers.Google Scholar
Lodge, Tom. 2001. “The South African Local Government Elections of December 2000.” Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 28: 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1992. “Transitions to Democracy and Democratic Consolidation: Theoretical and Comparative Issues.” In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective, edited by Mainwaring, Scott, O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Valenzuela, J. Samuel. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mattes, Robert, Davids, Yul Derek, and Africa, Cherrel. 2000. “Views of Democracy in South Africa and the Region: Trends and Comparisons.” Afrobarometer Paper No. 8.Google Scholar
Mayekiso, Mzwanele. 1996. Township Politics: Civic Struggles for a New South Africa. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Michels, Robert. [1911] 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1991. “The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics.” American Political Science Review 85 (1): 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndegwa, Stephen N. 1996. The Two Faces of Civil Society: NGOs and Politics in Africa. Bloomfield, Conn.: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1996a. “Illusions about Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 7 (2): 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1996b. “Debate: Democratic Consolidation: Illusions and Conceptual Flaws.” Journal of Democracy 7 (4): 160–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Phillipe. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D.. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Resler, Tamara J., and Kanet, Roger E.. 1993. “Democratization: The National–Subnational Linkage.” In Depth 3(1): 5–22.Google Scholar
Robinson, Pearl. 1994. “Democratization: Understanding the Relationship between Regime Change and the Culture of Politics.” African Studies Review 37 (1): 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanco (South African National Civic Organization). 1997. “Secretary's Report.”Google Scholar
Sanco (South African National Civic Organization). 1999. “A Radical Reshaping of the Vision and Role of SANCO.” Umrabulo 7 (www.anc.org.za).Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seekings, Jeremy. 1996. “The Decline of South Africa's Civic Organizations, 1990–1996.” Critical Sociology 22 (3): 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seekings, Jeremy. 2000. “After Apartheid: Civic Organizations in the ‘New’ South Africa.” In From Comrades to Citizens: The South African Civics Movement and the Transition to Democracy, edited by Adler, Glenn and Steinberg, Jonny, 205–24. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisk, Timothy D. 1995. Democratization in South Africa: The Elusive Social Contract. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sparks, Allister. 1995. Tomorrow Is Another Country: The Inside Story of South Africa's Road to Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swilling, Mark. 1992a. “Socialism, Democracy and Civil Society: The Case for Associational Socialism.” Theoria 79: 75–82.Google Scholar
Swilling, Mark. 1992b “Quixote at the Windmills: Another Conspiracy Thesis from Steven Friedman.” Theoria 79: 97–104.Google Scholar
Taylor, Helen, and Mattes, Robert. 1998. “Public Evaluations of and Demands on Local Government.” Idasa Public Opinion Service (POS), Report 3.Google Scholar
Zuern, Elke. 2001. “South Africa's Civics in Transition: Agents of Change or Structures of Constraint?” Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 28: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar