Hostname: page-component-f7d5f74f5-6v6cv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-10-02T19:54:02.375Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Financial support and practical help between older parents and their middle-aged children in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2010

Research Institute for Sociology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, University of Mannheim, Germany.
Address for correspondence: Christian Deindl, University of Cologne, Research Institute for Sociology, Greinstrasse 2, 50939 Cologne, Germany. E-mail:


Financial support and practical help between older parents and their middle-aged children vary greatly among the regions of Europe. Northern and Western Europe is characterised by a high likelihood of practical help to and financial transfers from parents, while in Southern and Eastern Europe these kinds of support are much less likely. Financial transfers to parents show an almost opposite distribution, with more children supporting a parent in Southern and Eastern welfare regimes. Using the second wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe encompassing 14 European countries conducted in 2006–07, these country differences can be linked to different social policies. Controlling for different aspects of country composition in terms of individual characteristics and family structures impacting on intergenerational support, it was found that the more services and transfers provided publicly, the more people aged 50 or more years helped their older parents sporadically, and the less monetary support they provided. On the other hand, generous public transfers enabled parents aged 64 or more years to support their offspring financially. Thus, neither ‘crowding in’ nor ‘crowding out’, but a modification of private transfers depending on public transfers and vice versa is found, suggesting a specialisation of private and public support.

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Albertini, M. and Kohli, M. 2009. Is the generational link broken? Childless older people's giving. Ageing & Society, 29, 8, 1169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertini, M., Kohli, M. and Vogel, C. 2007. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns – different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 4, 319–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrondel, L. and Masson, A. 2001. Family transfers involving three generations. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 103, 3, 415–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C. 1995. Les solidarités entre générations. Vieillesse, amilles, état [Solidarity Between Generations: Ageing, Families and the State]. Nathan, Paris.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C., Ogg, J. and Wolff, F.-C. 2005. European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 3, 161–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attias-Donfut, C. and Wolff, F.-C. 2000. Complementarity between private and public transfers. In Arber, S. and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies. Routledge, London, 4768.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V. L., Giarrusso, R., Mabry, J. B. and Silverstein, M. 2002. Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 3, 568–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, V. L. and Roberts, R. E. L. 1991. Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 4, 856–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björnberg, U. and Latta, M. 2007. The roles of the family and the welfare state: the relationship between public and private financial support in Sweden. Current Sociology, 55, 3, 415–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsang, E. 2007. How do middle-aged children allocate time and money transfers to their older parents in Europe? Empirica, 34, 2, 171–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, M. 2009. Hilfe zwischen Generationen. Ein europäischer Vergleich [Help Between Generations. A European Comparison]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.Google Scholar
Brandt, M., Deindl, C., Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2008. Reziprozität zwischen erwachsenen Generationen: Familiale Transfers im Lebenslauf [Reciprocity between adult generations: family transfers over the life course]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 41, 5, 374–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, M., Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2009. Intergenerational help and care in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25, 5, 585601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, M. and Szydlik, M. 2008. Soziale Dienste und Hilfe zwischen Generationen in Europa [Social services and help between generations in Europe]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37, 4, 301–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. and Jakubson, G. 1995. The connection between public transfers and private interfamily transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 1, 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daatland, S. O. and Herlofson, K. 2003. Families and welfare states: substitution or complementarity. In Lowenstein, A. and Ogg, J. (eds), OASIS: Old Age and Autonomy. The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. The Final Report. University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, 281305.Google Scholar
Deindl, C. 2011. Finanzielle Transfers zwischen Generationen in Europa [Financial Transfers Between Generations in Europe]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J. 1996. Inheritance and financial transfers in families. In Walker, A. (ed.), The New Generational Contract. Intergenerational Relations, Old Age and Welfare. UCL Press, London, 120–34.Google Scholar
Fritzell, J. and Lennartsson, C. 2005. Financial transfers between generations in Sweden. Ageing & Society, 25, 3, 397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2010. State care provision, societal opinion and children's care of older parents in 11 European countries. Ageing & Society, 30, 2, 299323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hank, K. 2007. Proximity and contacts between elderly parents and their adult children: a European comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1, 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hank, K. and Buber, I. 2009. Grandparents caring for their grandchildren: findings from the 2004 Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1, 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, A., Kendig, H. L. and Coppard, L. C. 1992. Family support to the elders in international perspective. In Kendig, H. L., Hashimoto, A. and Coppard, L. C. (eds), Family Support for the Elders: The International Experience. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 293308.Google Scholar
Höpflinger, F. and Hugentobler, V. 2003. Pflegebedürftigkeit in der Schweiz. Prognosen und Szenarien für das 21. Jahrhundert [Care in Switzerland. Outlook and Scenarios for the 21st Century]. Hans Huber, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Hox, J. J. 2002. Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Igel, C., Brandt, M., Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2009. Specialization between family and state: intergenerational time transfers in Western Europe. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 40, 2, 203–27.Google Scholar
Kalmijn, M. and Saraceno, C. 2008. A comparative perspective on intergenerational support: responsiveness to parental needs in individualistic and familialistic countries. European Societies, 10, 3, 479508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, M. 1999. Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state. European Societies, 1, 1, 81104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künemund, H. and Rein, M. 1999. There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing & Society, 19, 1, 93121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingsom, S. 1997. The Substitution Issue: Care Policies and Their Consequences for Family Care. Norwegian Social Research, Oslo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwak, E., Silverstein, M., Bengtson, V. L. and Wilson Hirst, Y. 2003. Theories about families, organizations and social supports. In Bengtson, V. L. and Lowenstein, A. (eds), Global Aging and Challenges to Families. Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 2753.Google Scholar
Motel-Klingebiel, A. and Tesch-Römer, C. 2006. Familie im Wohlfahrtsstaat – Zwischen Verdrängung und gemischter Verantwortung [Families in modern welfare states: between crowding out and mixed responsibility]. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 18, 3, 290314.Google Scholar
Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C. and von Kondratowitz, H.-J. 2005. Welfare states do not crowd out the family: evidence for mixed responsibility from comparative analyses. Ageing & Society, 25, 6, 863–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogg, J. and Renaut, S. 2006. The support of parents in old age by those born during 1945–1954: a European perspective. Ageing & Society, 26, 5, 723–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2007 a. OECD Social Expenditure Data Base (SOCX). OECD, Paris. Available online at [Accessed 11 May 2007].Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2007 b. Annual Labour Force Statistics. OECD, Paris. Available online at,3343,en_ 21571361_ 33915056_39095792_1_1_1_1,00.html#EmpDB [Accessed 7 November 2007].Google Scholar
Poirine, B. 2006. Remittances sent by a growing altruistic diaspora: how do they grow over time? Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 47, 1, 93108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, S. and Skrondal, A. 2008. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. Stata, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Reher, D. S. 1998. Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24, 2, 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reil-Held, A. 2006. Crowding out or crowding in? Public and private transfers in Germany. European Journal of Population, 22, 3, 263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraceno, C. (ed.)2008. Families, Ageing and Social Policy. Generational Solidarity in European Welfare States. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, F. A., Zhang, H. H. and Wang, J. 2002. Upstream intergenerational transfers. Southern Economic Journal, 69, 2, 363–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. and Bosker, R. J. 2004. Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Szydlik, M. 2004. Inheritance and inequality: theoretical reasoning and empirical evidence. European Sociological Review, 20, 1, 3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szydlik, M. 2008. Intergenerational solidarity and conflict. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39, 1, 97114.Google Scholar
Therborn, G. 2000. Die Gesellschaften Europas 1945–2000. Ein soziologischer Vergleich [The Societies of Europe 1945–2000: A Sociological Comparison]. Campus, Frankfurt. (Updated and revised edition of Therborn, G. 1995. European Modernity and Beyond: The Trajectory of European Societies 1945–2000. Sage, London.)Google Scholar
van Gaalen, R. I. and Dykstra, P. A. 2006. Solidarity and conflict between adult children and parents: a latent class analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 4, 947–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. J., Pratt, C. C. and Eddy, L. 1995. Informal caregiving to aging family members: a critical review. Family Relations, 44, 4, 402–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, F.-C. and Dimova, R. 2006. How do migrants care for their elderly parents? Time, money and location. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Sondernummer, 123–30.Google Scholar