Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-7jw6s Total loading time: 0.327 Render date: 2022-12-01T16:45:08.444Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Formal and informal social participation of the ‘young-old’ in The Netherlands in 1992 and 2002

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2010

MARJOLEIN BROESE VAN GROENOU*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
DORLY J. H. DEEG
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, EMGO-Institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
*
Address for correspondence: M. I. Broese van Groenou, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, VU University, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HVAmsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: mi.broese@fsw.vu.nl.

Abstract

The study compares the formal and informal social participation of 60–69 year olds in The Netherlands in 1992 and 2002, and examines which attributes of the two cohorts favour social participation. Using data from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, it was found that cohort differences in formal participation (as members of organisations, in volunteer work and in religious organisations) and in informal participation (having a large social network, and in cultural and recreational activities) associated with cohort differences in individual characteristics (level of education, health, employment status and marital status). Descriptive analyses showed an increase between 1992 and 2002 in all forms of participation except religious involvement. The 2002 cohort members were more educated and more engaged in employment, but in worse health and had a higher prevalence of divorce than the 1992 cohort members. Logistic regression analyses showed that the positive effect on social participation of the recent cohort's higher educational level was suppressed by the negative effect of their worse health. Being divorced had mixed effects on formal and informal participation, but the difference in the number of divorcees did not explain cohort differences in social participation. Interaction effects showed that the influence of sex and health on volunteer work and religious involvement changed over time. The paper concludes with a discussion of the prospects for higher levels of formal and informal social participation among future cohorts of young-older people.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agahi, N. and Parker, M. G. 2005. Are today's older people more active than their predecessors? Participation in leisure-time activities in Sweden in 1992 and 2002. Ageing & Society, 25, 6, 925–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahacic, K., Parker, M. G. and Thorslund, M. 2003. Mobility limitations 1974–1991: period changes explaining improvement in the population. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 12, 2411–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ajrouch, K. J., Akiyama, H. and Antonucci, T. C. 2007. Cohort differences in social relations among the elderly. In Wahl, H.-W., Tesch-Roemer, C. and Hoff, A. (eds), New Dynamics in Old Age: Individual, Environmental and Societal Perspectives. Baywood, Amityville, New York, 4363.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. M. and Carstensen, L. L. 1996. The process of successful aging. Ageing & Society, 16, 4, 397422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bath, P. and Deeg, D. J. H. 2005. Social engagement and health outcomes among older people: introduction to a special section. European Journal of Aging, 2, 1, 2430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bekkers, R. 2005. Participation in voluntary associations: relations with resources, personality and political values. Political Psychology, 26, 3, 439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkers, R. 2007. Intergenerational transmission of volunteering. Acta Sociologica, 50, 1, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkers, R. and Ruiter, S. 2009. Generatieverschillen in maatschappelijke waarden en vrijwillige inzet [Generational differences in societal values and volunteering]. In Dekker, P. and Hart, J. de (eds), Vrijwilligerswerk in meervoud [Voluntary Work: A Diversity of Forms]. Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, 178–86.Google Scholar
Broese van Groenou, M. I. and Deeg, D. J. H. 2006. Changes in social participation. In Boer, A. de (ed.), Report on the Elderly 2006. Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, 215–37.Google Scholar
Bukov, A., Maas, I. and Lampert, T. 2002. Social participation in very old age: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings from BASE (Berlin Aging Study). Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 57, 6, P510–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, L. H. 2003. Factors affecting volunteerism among older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22, 2, 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, N. G. and Chou, R. J.-A. 2010. Time and money volunteering among older adults: the relationship between past and current volunteering and correlates of change and stability. Ageing & Society, 30, 3, 405–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, P. G., Ivani-Chalian, C. and Robinson, M. 2004. Religious attitudes among British older people: stability and change in a 20 year longitudinal study. Ageing & Society, 24, 2, 167–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimmins, E. 2004. Trends in the health of the elderly. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 7998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deeg, D. J. H., van Tilburg, T. G., Smit, J. H. and de Leeuw, E. D. 2002. Attrition in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam: the effect of differential inclusion in side studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 4, 319–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einolf, C. J. 2009. Will the boomers volunteer during retirement? Comparing the baby boom, silent and long civic cohorts. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 2, 191–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, G. H. 1974. Children of the Great Depression. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H. and Ziele, J. Z. (eds)2009. The Craft of Life Course Research. Guilford, New York.Google Scholar
Erlinghagen, M. and Hank, K. 2006. The participation of older Europeans in volunteer work. Ageing & Society, 26, 4, 567–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J., Clayton, S., Sickler, J. and Taylor, A. 2009. Belonging at the zoo: retired volunteers, conservation activism and collective identity. Ageing & Society, 29, 3, 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gesthuizen, M. 2006. How socially committed are the Dutch low-educated? Historical trends, life-course changes and two explanations for educational differences. European Sociological Review, 22, 1, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, K. A. 1999. Volunteering among the long civic generation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 4, 378415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, A. 2009. The social capital of older people. Ageing & Society, 29, 1, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmijn, M. and Broese van Groenou, M. I. 2005. Differential effects of divorce on social integration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 4, 455–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaskie, B., Imhof, S., Cavanaugh, J. and Culp, K. 2008. Civic engagement as a retirement role for aging Americans. The Gerontologist, 48, 3, 368–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klumb, P. L. and Baltes, M. M. 1999. Time use of old and very old Berliners: productive and consumptive activities as functions of resources. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 54B, 5, S271–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knulst, W. and van Eijck, K. 2006. Old soldiers never die: explaining the disproportionate aging of volunteers in The Netherlands between 1985 and 2000. Acta Sociologica, 49, 2, 185200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komp, K., van Tilburg, T. G. and Broese van Groenou, M. 2009. The influence of the welfare state on the number of young old persons. Ageing & Society, 29, 4, 609–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalive d'Epinay, C. J., Maystre, C. and Bickel, J. F. 2001. Aging and cohort changes in sports and physical training from the golden decades onward: a cohort study in Switzerland. Society and Leisure 24, 2, 453–81.Google Scholar
Mendes de Leon, C. F. 2005. Social engagement and successful aging. European Journal of Aging, 2, 1, 6466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohjalainen, P. 1991. Social participation and life-style: a longitudinal and cohort study. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 6, 1, 109–17.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roes, T. (ed.)2008. Facts and Figures in The Netherlands. Social and Cultural Planning Office, The Hague.Google Scholar
Rotolo, T. and Wilson, J. 2004. Whatever happened to the long civic generation? Explaining cohort differences in volunteerism. Social Forces, 82, 3, 1091–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, J. W. and Kahn, R. L. 1997. Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37, 4, 433–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiter, S. and de Graaf, N. D. 2006. National context, religiosity and volunteering: results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review, 71, 2, 191210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomassini, C., Glaser, K., Wolf, D. A., Broese van Groenou, M. I. and Grundy, E. 2004. Living arrangements among older people: an overview of trends in Europe and the USA. Population Trends, 115, 1, 2434.Google Scholar
Van Tilburg, T. G. 1998. Losing and gaining in old age: changes in personal network size and social support in a four year longitudinal study. Journal of Gerontology, 53B, 6, S313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbrugge, L. M., Gruber-Baldini, A. L. and Fozard, J. L. 1996. Age differences and age changes in activities: Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journal of Gerontology, 51B, 1, S30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, M., Pluym, S. F., van der Horst, M. H. L., Poppelaars, J. L., Seidell, J. C. and Deeg, D. J. H. 2005. Leefstijl van 55–64-jarige Nederlanders in 2002/2003 minder gezond dan in 1992/1993 [Was the life style of Dutch 55–64-year-olds in 2002/03 less healthy than in 1992/1993?]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 149, 52, 2973–8.Google Scholar
Warburton, J. and McDonald, C. 2009. The challenges of the new institutional environment: an Australian case study of older volunteers in the contemporary non-profit sector. Ageing & Society, 29, 5, 823–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warburton, J., Terry, D. I., Rosenman, L. S. and Shapiro, M. 2001. Differences between older volunteers and non volunteers. Research on Aging, 23, 5, 586605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. J. and Coleman, P. G. 2010. Strong beliefs and coping in old age: a case-based comparison of atheism and religious faith. Ageing & Society, 30, 2, 337–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. 2000. Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, August, 215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. and Musick, M. 1997. Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, October, 694713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Formal and informal social participation of the ‘young-old’ in The Netherlands in 1992 and 2002
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Formal and informal social participation of the ‘young-old’ in The Netherlands in 1992 and 2002
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Formal and informal social participation of the ‘young-old’ in The Netherlands in 1992 and 2002
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *