Skip to main content
×
Home

Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideology

  • ELIAS NAUMANN (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

It is a perennial issue in the public and the scientific debate whether increased pressures to reform due to the financial crisis or population ageing erode welfare state support. Surprisingly, our knowledge of how individuals change their attitudes in hard times is still limited – both theoretically and empirically. We rely on newly available data from a survey experiment in a representative German online survey and exogenously manipulate the perceived pressure to reform (due to an ageing society). We show that people indeed change their reform preferences when faced with an ageing society: the strong opposition to increasing the retirement age decreases. Further analyses reveal that not all groups within society react to increased reform pressures in the same way: political knowledge but also political partisanship do moderate the strength and the direction of the attitude change.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Elias Naumann, SFB 884 ‘The Political Economy of Reforms’, University of Mannheim, L 13 17, 68161 Mannheim, Germany E-mail: elias.naumann@uni-mannheim.de
References
Hide All
Alt J. 1979. The Politics of Economic Decline. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Althaus S. L. 1998. Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review, 92, 3, 545–58.
Blekesaune M. 2007. Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. European Sociological Review, 23, 3, 393403.
Blinder A. S. and Krueger A. B. 2004. What does the public know about economic policy, and how does it know it? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 35, 1, 327–97.
Blom A., Gathmann C. and Krieger U. 2014. Setting up an online panel representative of the general population: the German Internet Panel. Field Methods. Published online on March 26, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1525822X15574494.
Boeri T., Borsch-Supan A. and Tabellini G. 2001. Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens. Economic Policy, 16, 32, 950.
Boeri T. and Tabellini G. 2012. Does information increase political support for pension reform? Public Choice, 150, 1/2, 327–62.
Boudiny K. 2013. Active ageing: from empty rhetoric to effective policy tool. Ageing & Society, 33, 6, 1077–98.
Brooks C. and Manza J. 2006. Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies. American Sociological Review, 71, 3, 474–94.
Burstein P. 2003. The impact of public opinion on public policy: a review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 1, 2940.
Castles F. G. 2008. What welfare states do: a disaggregated expenditure approach. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 1, 4562.
Chong D. and Druckman J. N. 2007. Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101, 4, 637–55.
Chong D. and Druckman J. N. 2010. Dynamic public opinion: communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104, 4, 663–80.
Dallinger U. 2010. Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences? Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 4, 333–49.
Delli Carpini M. and Keeter S. 1993. Measuring political knowledge: putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 4, 1179–206.
Delli Carpini M. and Keeter S. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Druckman J. N., Fein J. and Leeper T. J. 2012. A source of bias in public opinion stability. American Political Science Review, 106, 2, 430–54.
Druckman J. N. and Nelson K. R. 2003. Framing and deliberation: how citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 4, 729–45.
Druckman J. N., Peterson E. and Slothuus R. 2013. How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107, 1, 5779.
Ebbinghaus B. 2011. The Varieties of Pension Governance: Pension Privatization in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Erikson R. S., Mackuen M. B. and Stimson J. A. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fernandez J. J. and Jaime-Castillo A. M. 2013. Positive or negative policy feedbacks? Explaining popular attitudes towards pragmatic pension policy reforms. European Sociological Review, 29, 4, 803–15.
Gaines B. J., Kuklinski J. H. and Quirk P. J. 2007. The logic of the survey experiment reexamined. Political Analysis, 15, 1, 120.
Giger N. 2011. The Risk of Social Policy? The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment and Social Policy Performance in OECD Countries. Routledge, London.
Goul Andersen J., Pettersen P., Svallfors S. and Uusitalo H. 1999. The legitimacy of the nordic welfare states: trends, variations and cleavages. In Kautto M., Heikkila M., Hvinden B., Marklund S. and Ploug N. (eds), Nordic Social Policy: Changing Welfare States. Routledge, London, 235–61.
Häusermann S. 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hinrichs K. 2005. New century – new paradigm. Pension reforms in Germany. In Bonoli G. and Shinkawa T. (eds), Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, UK, 4773.
Hofäcker D. 2014. In line or at odds with active ageing policies? Exploring patterns of retirement preferences in Europe. Ageing & Society, 35, 7, 15291556.
Huber E. and Stephens J. D. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Jaime-Castillo A. M. 2013. Public opinion and the reform of the pension system in Europe: the influence of solidarity principles. Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 4, 390405.
Jeene M. and van Oorschot W. 2014. The dynamics of welfare opinions in changing economic, institutional and political contexts: an empirical analysis of Dutch deservingness opinions, 1975–2006. Social Indicators Research, 115, 2, 731749.
Kahneman D. and Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory – analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 2, 263–91.
Kam C. D. 2005. Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior, 27, 2, 163–82.
Kinder D. R. and Kiewiet D. R. 1981. Sociotropic politics: the American case. British Journal of Political Science, 11, 2, 129–61.
Krosnick J. A. 1990. Lessons learned – a review and integration of our findings. Social Cognition, 8, 1, 154–8.
Kumlin S. 2007. The welfare state: values, policy preferences, and performance evaluations. In Dalton R. and Klingenmann H.-D. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 362–83.
Larsen C. A. 2006. The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
Lau R. R. and Redlawsk D. P. 2001. Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 4, 951–71.
Leeper T. J. and Slothuus R. 2014. Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Advances in Political Psychology, 35, 1, 129–55.
Lodge M. and Taber C. 2000. Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In Lupia A., McCubbins M. and Popkin S. (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, New York, 183213.
Long J. S. and Freese J. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. Stata Press, College Station, Texas.
Luskin R. C., Fishkin J. S. and Jowell R. 2002. Considered opinions: deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 3, 455–87.
Mettler S. and Soss J. 2004. The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 20, 1, 5573.
Mutz D. C. 2011. Population-based Survey Experiments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Naumann E. 2014. Raising the retirement age: retrenchment, feedback and attitudes. In Kumlin S. and Stadelmann-Steffen I. (eds), How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 223–43.
Page B. I. and Shapiro R. Y. 1983. Effects of public-opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77, 1, 175–90.
Pierson P. 1996. The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48, 2, 143.
Pierson P. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Prinzen K. 2014. Intergenerational ambivalence: new perspectives on intergenerational relationships in the German welfare state. Ageing & Society, 34, 3, 428–51.
Raven J., Achterberg P., van der Veen R. and Yerkes M. 2011. An institutional embeddedness of welfare opinions? The link between public opinion and social policy in the Netherlands 1970–2004. Journal of Social Policy, 40, 2, 118.
Redlawsk D. P. 2002. Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making, Journal of Politics, 64, 4, 1021–44.
Schmidt V. 2010. Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2, 1, 125.
Shivo T. and Uusitalo H. 1995. Economic crises and support for welfare in Finland 1975–1993. Acta Sociologica, 38, 3, 251–62.
Soroka S. N. and Wlezien C. 2009. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Svallfors S. 2010. Policy feedback, generational replacement, and attitudes to state intervention: Eastern and Western Germany, 1990–2006. European Political Science Review, 2, 1, 119–35.
Taylor-Gooby P. 2001. Sustaining state welfare in hard times: who will foot the bill? Journal of European Social Policy, 11, 2, 133–47.
van Dalen H. and Henkens K. 2005. The double standard in attitudes toward retirement – the case of the Netherlands. The Geneva Papers, 30, 4, 693710.
van Oorschot W. and Meuleman B. 2014. Popular deservingness of the unemployed. Effects of policy context, economic conditions and cultural climate. In Kumlin S. and Stadelmann-Steffen I. (eds), How Welfare States Shape the Democratic Public. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 244–68.
van Oorschot W., Reeskens T. and Meuleman B. 2012. Popular perceptions of welfare state consequences: a multilevel, cross-national analysis of 25 European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 2, 181–97.
World Health Organization 2002. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Zaller J. R. 1990. Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response. Social Cognition, 8, 1, 125–53.
Zaller J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 22
Total number of PDF views: 127 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 559 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.