Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Do increasing reform pressures change welfare state attitudes? An experimental study on population ageing, pension reform preferences, political knowledge and ideology

  • ELIAS NAUMANN (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

It is a perennial issue in the public and the scientific debate whether increased pressures to reform due to the financial crisis or population ageing erode welfare state support. Surprisingly, our knowledge of how individuals change their attitudes in hard times is still limited – both theoretically and empirically. We rely on newly available data from a survey experiment in a representative German online survey and exogenously manipulate the perceived pressure to reform (due to an ageing society). We show that people indeed change their reform preferences when faced with an ageing society: the strong opposition to increasing the retirement age decreases. Further analyses reveal that not all groups within society react to increased reform pressures in the same way: political knowledge but also political partisanship do moderate the strength and the direction of the attitude change.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Elias Naumann, SFB 884 ‘The Political Economy of Reforms’, University of Mannheim, L 13 17, 68161 Mannheim, Germany E-mail: elias.naumann@uni-mannheim.de
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. L. Althaus 1998. Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review, 92, 3, 545–58.

M. Blekesaune 2007. Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. European Sociological Review, 23, 3, 393403.

T. Boeri , A. Borsch-Supan and G. Tabellini 2001. Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens. Economic Policy, 16, 32, 950.

T. Boeri and G. Tabellini 2012. Does information increase political support for pension reform? Public Choice, 150, 1/2, 327–62.

K. Boudiny 2013. Active ageing: from empty rhetoric to effective policy tool. Ageing & Society, 33, 6, 1077–98.

C. Brooks and J. Manza 2006. Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies. American Sociological Review, 71, 3, 474–94.

P. Burstein 2003. The impact of public opinion on public policy: a review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 1, 2940.

F. G. Castles 2008. What welfare states do: a disaggregated expenditure approach. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 1, 4562.

D. Chong and J. N. Druckman 2010. Dynamic public opinion: communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104, 4, 663–80.

U. Dallinger 2010. Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences? Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 4, 333–49.

M. Delli Carpini and S. Keeter 1993. Measuring political knowledge: putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 4, 1179–206.

J. N. Druckman , J. Fein and T. J. Leeper 2012. A source of bias in public opinion stability. American Political Science Review, 106, 2, 430–54.

J. N. Druckman and K. R. Nelson 2003. Framing and deliberation: how citizens’ conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 4, 729–45.

J. N. Druckman , E. Peterson and R. Slothuus 2013. How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107, 1, 5779.

B. Ebbinghaus 2011. The Varieties of Pension Governance: Pension Privatization in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

J. J. Fernandez and A. M. Jaime-Castillo 2013. Positive or negative policy feedbacks? Explaining popular attitudes towards pragmatic pension policy reforms. European Sociological Review, 29, 4, 803–15.

S. Häusermann 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

D. Hofäcker 2014. In line or at odds with active ageing policies? Exploring patterns of retirement preferences in Europe. Ageing & Society, 35, 7, 15291556.

E. Huber and J. D. Stephens 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

A. M. Jaime-Castillo 2013. Public opinion and the reform of the pension system in Europe: the influence of solidarity principles. Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 4, 390405.

M. Jeene and W. van Oorschot 2014. The dynamics of welfare opinions in changing economic, institutional and political contexts: an empirical analysis of Dutch deservingness opinions, 1975–2006. Social Indicators Research, 115, 2, 731749.

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky 1979. Prospect theory – analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 2, 263–91.

C. D. Kam 2005. Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior, 27, 2, 163–82.

D. R. Kinder and D. R. Kiewiet 1981. Sociotropic politics: the American case. British Journal of Political Science, 11, 2, 129–61.

J. A. Krosnick 1990. Lessons learned – a review and integration of our findings. Social Cognition, 8, 1, 154–8.

R. R. Lau and D. P. Redlawsk 2001. Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 4, 951–71.

T. J. Leeper and R. Slothuus 2014. Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Advances in Political Psychology, 35, 1, 129–55.

M. Lodge and C. Taber 2000. Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In A. Lupia , M. McCubbins and S. Popkin (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, New York, 183213.

B. I. Page and R. Y. Shapiro 1983. Effects of public-opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77, 1, 175–90.

P. Pierson 1996. The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48, 2, 143.

P. Pierson 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

K. Prinzen 2014. Intergenerational ambivalence: new perspectives on intergenerational relationships in the German welfare state. Ageing & Society, 34, 3, 428–51.

J. Raven , P. Achterberg , R. van der Veen and M. Yerkes 2011. An institutional embeddedness of welfare opinions? The link between public opinion and social policy in the Netherlands 1970–2004. Journal of Social Policy, 40, 2, 118.

D. P. Redlawsk 2002. Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making, Journal of Politics, 64, 4, 1021–44.

V. Schmidt 2010. Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2, 1, 125.

T. Shivo and H. Uusitalo 1995. Economic crises and support for welfare in Finland 1975–1993. Acta Sociologica, 38, 3, 251–62.

S. N. Soroka and C. Wlezien 2009. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

S. Svallfors 2010. Policy feedback, generational replacement, and attitudes to state intervention: Eastern and Western Germany, 1990–2006. European Political Science Review, 2, 1, 119–35.

P. Taylor-Gooby 2001. Sustaining state welfare in hard times: who will foot the bill? Journal of European Social Policy, 11, 2, 133–47.

W. van Oorschot , T. Reeskens and B. Meuleman 2012. Popular perceptions of welfare state consequences: a multilevel, cross-national analysis of 25 European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 2, 181–97.

J. R. Zaller 1990. Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response. Social Cognition, 8, 1, 125–53.

J. R. Zaller 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 100 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 451 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.