1. See, e.g., Denby David, “Gods and Victims,” The New Yorker, October 5, 2009; Duvdevani Shmulik, “Nefesh yehudi bokhiya,” Ynet, December 11, 2009, www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3818268,00.html; Puig Claudia, “A Serious Man Is a Seriously Good Departure for Coens,” USA Today, October 4, 2009; Scott A. O., “Calls to God: Always a Busy Signal,” New York Times, October 2, 2009.
2. Lausberg Heinrich, Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study (Leiden: Brill, 1998), secs. 1194, 1244.
4. Coen Ethan and Coen Joel, A Serious Man (London: Faber and Faber, 2009), 17.
6. Scott, “Calls to God.”
7. Roger Ebert, review of A Serious Man, Chicago Sun-Times, October 7, 2009.
8. See, e.g., Denby, “Gods and Victims”; Duvdevani, “Nefesh”; Ebert, “Review”; Todd McCarthy, review of A Serious Man, Variety, October 1, 2009; Ra'aya Morag, “Le-mi ikhpat ma kara le-goy,” Ha-arets, December 3, 2009; Elya Leibowitz, “Kri'a nosefet be-sirtam shel ha-ahim kohen yehudi tov,” Ha-arets, March 7, 2010; Joe Morgenstern, review of A Serious Man, The Wall Street Journal, October 2, 2009; Persall Steve, “Coen brothers’ A Serious Man Has Troubles of Job without Uplift,” St. Petersburg Times, November 1, 2009; Puig, “Good Departure”; Scott, “Calls to God,” 2009. Richard Corliss is among only a handful of American reviewers who pay greater attention to the role of quantum physics in the film, but even he touches on it only briefly; see Corliss Richard, “A Serious Man: The Coen Brothers’ Jewish Question,” Time, September 12, 2009. The critical discussion of the film in Israel, conversely, has put into relief to a much greater extent the role of quantum mechanics in the film. See, e.g., Yair Rave, review of A Serious Man, Pnay plus, December 9, 2009; Schnitzer Meir, “Yehudi lo maghikh yehudi,” Ma'ariv, December 11, 2009. See also the Wikipedia sites of the movie in English (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Serious_Man) and in Hebrew (http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%99%D7%94%D7%95%D7%93%D7%99_%D7%98%D7%95%D7%91).
9. For an account of the debate that focuses on the rhetoric of the different versions of quantum theory in its emergence, see Beller Mara, Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999). For a popular and concise account of the debate, see Greene Brian, The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality (New York: Vintage Books, 2005), 77–123; 177–216.
10. Schrödinger Erwin, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik,” Naturwissenschaften 23 (1935): 807–812, 812–28, 844–49. English translation appeared as “The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics,” in Quantum Theory and Measurement, ed. Wheeler J. A. and Zurek W. H. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983), 152–67. See also Einstein Albert, Podolsky Boris, and Rosen Nathan, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete,” Physical Review 47 (1935): 777–80.
11. Heisenberg Werner, “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,” Zeitschrift für Physik 43 (1927):172–98. English translation appeared as “The Physical Content of Quantum Kinematics and Mechanics,” in Wheeler and Zurek, Quantum Theory, 62–86.
13. Heisenberg, “anschaulichen Inhalt,” 172. Beller translates the opening sentence differently: “We believe that we intuitively understand physical theory when we can think qualitatively about individual experimental consequences and at the same time we know that the application of the theory never contains internal contradictions” (Beller, Quantum Dialogue, 69).
14. Beller, Quantum Dialogue, 114.
15. Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, “Quantum-Mechanical Description,” 777.
16. For a discussion of the EPR article and an analysis of the logic of the thought experiment it proposes, see Fine Arthur, “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009), ed. Zalta Edward N. , http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/qt-epr/.
17. See Fine Arthur, The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), chap. 5.
18. Psi-function: the mathematical expression of the possible states of a given system.
19. Schrödinger, “Present Situation,” 157.
20. Quoted in Fine, The Shaky Game, 78.
21. See, e.g., Corliss, “Jewish Question.”
22. I cannot help here but think of Monty Python's famous skit: “This is a dead parrot.”
23. On this point, my reading is akin to Rave's reading of the film (Rave, “Review”).