Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T06:56:51.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atlatl Spurs from California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Francis A. Riddell  and
Donald F. McGeein
Francis A. Riddell
Affiliation:
Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California
Donald F. McGeein
Affiliation:
Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Atlatl engaging spurs are recorded from most regions of California and are placed provisionally into three types. Type I, “Snake head,” is composed primarily of specimens made of stone and has Central California Early horizon, Martis complex, and Early-Transitional Lovelock affinities. Type II, “Acorn,” is composed primarily of bone or antler specimens with Central California Middle horizon affinities. Type III may be a variant of Type I and has, as yet, undefined cultural and temporal affinities.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 474 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennyhoff, J. A. and Heizer, R. F. 1958 Cross-Dating Great Basin Sites by Californian Shell Beads. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 42. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Clemmer, J. S. 1962 Archeological Notes on a Chumash House Floor at Morro Bay. (Mimeographed and distributed by the Central California Archeological Foundation, Sacramento, for the Pacific Gas and Electric Company.)Google Scholar
Curtis, F. 1963 Arroyo Sequit (LAn-52). State Division of Beaches and Parks Archeological Report, No. 9. Sacramento.Google Scholar
Davis, J. T. and Treganza, A. E. 1959 The Patterson Mound: A Comparative Analysis of the Archaeology of Site Ala-328. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 47, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gifford, E. W. and Schenck, W. E. 1926 Archaeology of the Southern San Joaquin Valley, California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 23, No. 1. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gonsalves, W. C. 1955 Winslow Cave, A Mortuary Site in Calaveras County, California. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 29. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. C. 1910 The Ellis Landing Shellmound. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 7, No. 5. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Olsen, W. H. and Riddeix, F. A. 1963 The Archeology of the Western Pacific Railroad Relocation. State Division of Beaches and Parks Archeological Report, No. 7. Sacramento.Google Scholar
Olsen, W. H. and Wilson, N. L. 1964 The Salvage Archeology of the Bear Creek Site (SJo-112). Sacramento Anthropological Society Paper, No. 1. Sacramento.Google Scholar
Payen, L. A. and Johnson, J. J. 1965 Current Cave Research in the Central Sierra Nevada Mountains: A Progress Report. In “Symposium on Central California Archeology: Problems, Programs, and Interdisciplinary Approaches.” Sacramento Anthropological Society Paper, No. 3. Sacramento.Google Scholar
Riddell, F. A. 1960 The Archaeology of the Karlo Site (Las-7), California. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 53. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. J. and others 1956 The Little Sycamore Shellmound, Ventura County. Archaeological Research Associates, Contributions to California Archaeology, No. 2. Los Angeles.Google Scholar