Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T04:20:25.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeological Evidence for the use of Atlatl Weights in the Northwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

B. Robert Butler  and
Douglas Osborne
B. Robert Butler
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Douglas Osborne
Affiliation:
Wetherill Mesa Archeological Project, Mesa Verde National Park, Colo.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wilson Duff's tentative identification of several lower Fraser River artifacts as atlatl weights led the authors to examine 104 whole and fragmentary probable weights from the Northwest. They classify them on the basis of lashing grooves, notches, holes, or scars into three main types, each of which has variants. The weights are found in the lower Columbia and lower Fraser river valleys with a concentration in the Dalles-Deschutes region and range in time from the late Middle to the early Late periods of the Dalles Reservoir sequence, about 500 B.C. to A.D. 1400. Metallurgical analysis of a hollow copper bead found with two weights indicates that it is prehistoric and suggests connections to the east. The weights are often found paired in burials. Although ethnographic comparisons are disappointing, archaeological comparisons reveal possible relationships between the Northwest and California, the Great Basin and the Southwest, especially during Basketmaker II, and the eastern Woodlands. The possibility that the Northwest atlatl weights may be derived from eastern forms reinforces the previously presented idea that the Northwest participated in certain continent-wide developments.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , October 1959 , pp. 215 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, B. R. 1957a The Art of the Lower Columbia Valley. Archaeology, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 158–65. Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Butler, B. R. 1957b Dalles Reservoir Prehistory: a Preliminary Analysis. Washington Archaeologist, Vol. 1, No. 8. Seattle.Google Scholar
Butler, B. R. 1958 Archaeological Investigations on the Washington Shore of The Dalles Reservoir, 1955–1957. MS submitted to National Park Service in partial fulfilment of National Park Service - University of Washington contract for archaeological studies in the Reservoir.Google Scholar
Caldwell, W. W. 1956 The Archaeology of Wakemap, a Stratified Site near the Dalles of the Columbia. MS, doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R. and Griffin, J. B. 1958 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates II. Science, Vol. 127, No. 3306, pp. 1098–1105. Washington.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cressman, L. S. 1942 Archaeological Researches in the Northern Great Basin. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 538. Washington.Google Scholar
Cressman, L. S. 1956 Klamath Prehistory. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., Vol. 46, Part 4. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Duff, Wilson 1956 Prehistoric Stone Sculpture of the Fraser River and Gulf of Georgia. Anthropology in British Columbia, No. 5. Victoria.Google Scholar
Guernsey, S. J. 1931 Explorations in Northeastern Arizona. Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 12, No. 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Guernsey, S. J. and Kidder, A. V. 1921 Basket-Maker Caves of Northeastern Arizona. Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 8, No. 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hedden, Mark 1956 The Mountain Sheep of Petroglyph Island. MS, on file in the Washington State Museum, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Elsasser, A. B. 1953 Some Archaeological Sites and Cultures of the Central Sierra Nevada. Reports of the University of California Archaeological Survey, No. 21. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kidder, A. V. and Guernsey, S. J. 1919 Archeological Explorations in Northeastern Arizona. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 65. Washington.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. J. 1957 Report on the Composition of Indian Copper Beads Found at the McNary Dam, Oregon. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 166, pp. 227–31. Washington.Google Scholar
Niblack, A. P. 1890 The Coast Indians of Southern Alaska and Northern British Columbia. U.S. National Museum Report, 1887–88. Washington.Google Scholar
Osborne, Douglas 1958 Western American Prehistory — An Hypothesis. American Antiquity, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 47–52. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Osborne, Douglas, Caldwell, W. W., and Crabtree, R. H. 1956 Problems of Northwest Coast-Interior Relationships as Seen from Seattle. American Antiquity, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 117–28. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins, P. A. (editor) 1935 The Discovery of the Oregon. Trail: Robert Stuart's Narratives. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Seaman, N. G. 1946 Indian Relics of the Pacific Northwest. Bindford and Morts, Portland.Google Scholar
Spaulding, K. A. (editor) 1953 On the Oregon Trail: Robert Stuart's Journey and Discovery. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Strong, Emory 1958 Evidence of the Atlatl in the Pacific Northwest. Screenings, Vol. 7, No. 4. Oregon Archaeological Society, Portland.Google Scholar
Strong, W. D., Schenck, W. E., and Steward, J. H. 1930 Archaeology of the Dalles-Deschutes Region. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 29, No. 1. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. C. and W. W., Caldwell 1954 A Carved Atlatl from the Northwest Coast. American Antiquity, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 279–80. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, W. S. and DeJarnette, D. L. 1942 An Archeological Survey of Pickwick Basin in the Adjacent Portions of the States of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 129. Washington.Google Scholar