Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:35:53.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

British Guiana Archaeology: A Return to the Original Interpretations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Clifford Evans
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Betty J. Meggers
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Abstract

The reinterpretation of the Mabaruma phase, British Guiana, by Lathrap does not introduce new evidence that requires abandonment of the original estimate of about A.D. 500 for its introduction from the Orinoco delta.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cruxent, J. M. and Rouse, Irving 1958 An Archeological Chronology of Venezuela, Vol. 1. Social Science Monographs, Pan American Union, No. 6. Washington.Google Scholar
Evans, Clifford and Meggers, Betty J. 1960 Archeological Investigations in British Guiana. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 177. Washington.Google Scholar
Lathrap, Donald W. 1963 Possible Affiliations of the Machalilla Complex of Coastal Ecuador. American Antiquity, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 239–41. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Lathrap, Donald W. 1964 An Alternative Seriation of the Mabaruma Phase, Northwestern British Guiana. American Antiquity, Vol. 29, No. 3, PP. 353–9. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Rouse, Irving and Cruxent, Jose M. 1963 Venezuelan Archaeology. Yale Caribbean Series, 6. New Haven.Google Scholar