Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T00:56:21.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comment on Eugene L. Sterud's “Changing Aims in Americanist Archaeology: A Citation Analysis of American Antiquity–1946-1975”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Roger L. D. Cribb*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Southampton S09 5NH, England

Abstract

It is argued that the citation analysis of changing aims in archaeology by Sterud (1978) may not reflect the only or the most significant developments over the period studied. There is still considerable disagreement on the aims of archaeology, and there remains a tendency for archaeologists to split into competing schools. The interactions of these schools provide much of the impetus to growth and change in the discipline and are themselves potentially susceptible to citation analysis.

Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Chaney, R. P. 1972 Scientific inquiry and models of socio-cultural data patterning: an epilogue. In Models in Archaeology, edited by Clarke, D. L., pp 9911031. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G. 1958 Retrospect. Antiquity 32:6974.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1970 The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sterud, E. L. 1973 A paradigmatic view of prehistory. In The explanation of culture change, edited by Renfrew, A. C., pp. 318. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Sterud, E. L. 1978 Changing aims of Americanist archaeology: a citation analysis of American Antiquity—1946-1975. American Antiquity 43:294302.Google Scholar